Science now claims women stay fertile in perpetuity

The official arbiter of scientific misinformation (appointed by the government controlled by the official Party of Science), Nina Jankowicz, says that the government must crack down on misinformation like sending pictures of empty egg cartons to women. That is “meant to remind [women] that [their] fertility is waning.” And that is “gendered misinformation.”

So there you have it. Couldn’t be any more official. Science now believes women stay at the same level of fertility throughout their lives.

Science is moronic and clownishly evil. Smash science. Kill science.

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    People became too sheltered during quarantine and when they're finally let out of their pure and sanitized bubble, they're offended by the most mundane things.

    They also have Stockholm syndrome with social media and ideas about misinformation. Nothing on social media is real, everything is misinformation. Complaining about misinformation on it exposes that you're too dumb to find out where the real facts are. No one publishes their science, literature, reports, or legislation directly on things like Instagram or Snapchat, it's all 3rd party accounts posting clickbait science.

    • 1 month ago
      Cult of Passion

      >by the most mundane things
      Youre out of touch with reality, covid jaded you into the blue pill.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You can get offended but people react by calling the police and going after their children and jobs.

        Seething over a photo of an empty egg carton is too much. So is seething when you see a movie with a diverse cast.

        • 1 month ago
          Cult of Passion

          >he still doesnt understand that the Left's detachment from reality is a giant fake-out to fascilitate child sacrifice, wars and embezzlement
          Blue.

          Youre distracted by the thing they hold up (because youre BLUE (submissive to society).

          Thats just used to get you to suggest an alternative, now it was (You) who ensured the crimes, unwittingly.

          BLUE.

        • 1 month ago
          Cult of Passion

          >offended
          She isnt, youre duped by her.
          >Seething
          Youre reacting to her, she controls you while you thoought you were leading.

          In Psychology its called Psyche-Driving. Beep-beep, vroom-vroom.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Seething over a photo of an empty egg carton is too much
          Not really. Bullying causes psychological damage that can last years.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Unlike her fertile window

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Seething over a photo of an empty egg carton is too much.
          It's kind of low though. Trolling used to be funnier.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      "Misinformation" and "disinformation" are both define as "information that is true, but framed in an opposing narrative". It's just censorship, the fact these terms are allowed to be used in a democracy is abhorrent.

      I actually agree that a lot of anti-Western narratives are damaging to society, but then they should be making Western countries appealling places to defend again instead of dividing us by flooding our housing and labour markets with illegal migrants. We never needed these terms because people didn't fall for foreign agitprop and were willing to defend the social fabric of their societies. You win by restoring that fabric, not censoring views oppossed to the regime.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >but then they should be making Western countries appealling
        who do you mean "they"? those that frick up western society are the anti western, are you moronic?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >who do you mean "they"?
          ~~*they*~~

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous
      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >You win by restoring that fabric
        They can't unimport millions of browns.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you can do that fairly easily

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah all it takes is the total eradication of your current state, then the implementation of [your] state, then the same thing again once [your] state begins misbehaving as well.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >When your """intellectual""" takes are second order /misc/ barf
        If there is any failing in the West is the overabundance of these impressionable, doom-gloom idiots.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Science is moronic and clownishly evil. Smash science. Kill science.
      you are literally talking about a politician doing politics. she was appointed on political reasons, to do politics.

      "Misinformation" and "disinformation" are both define as "information that is true, but framed in an opposing narrative". It's just censorship, the fact these terms are allowed to be used in a democracy is abhorrent.

      I actually agree that a lot of anti-Western narratives are damaging to society, but then they should be making Western countries appealling places to defend again instead of dividing us by flooding our housing and labour markets with illegal migrants. We never needed these terms because people didn't fall for foreign agitprop and were willing to defend the social fabric of their societies. You win by restoring that fabric, not censoring views oppossed to the regime.

      /misc/ bots

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It’s official science, by the official science misinformation czar. You are trolling and gaslighting antidemocratically, presumably from an FSB office

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          notice how you're doing the politician's bidding by being a bootlicker and not saying anything bad about them, but rather about the scientists that politicians enslave.
          it's like going after some Apple engineer because Apple is making you buy extra dongles for the features you want. /misc/tards disgust me

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I don’t read posts by science deniers. Apologize to the Party of Science and you will be heard.

          • 1 month ago
            bodhi

            >scientists are enslaved by politicians
            I am playing the world's smallest violin for you LMAO. Imagine saying something this moronic and being dead serious. You are delusional and should seek professional help

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What has "science" done to oppose the politicians that you claim have enslaved them?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >you are literally talking about a politician doing politics. she was appointed on political reasons, to do politics.
        Your post is literally considered disinformation and you could be jailed if you actually had the balls to post that publicly (we all know you don't).

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If people have to live inside misinformation all their lives… and it has been an ongoing problem since most of history probably, what do you think about you?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >and it has been an ongoing problem since most of history probably
        nta, I'm torn on this. it was supposed to be a means to an end. "for the greater good", for an ultimate end to hardship.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, they saw all kinds of things being banned that before no one dared to ban, including speech. So now they think they can get their pet peeve banned too.

  2. 1 month ago
    Cult of Passion

    No you know why Im quite hostile to the US and intel agencies in general...theyre polluted with Satanic agents and utterly untrustworthy.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why is cuckolding such a popular fetish nowadays? It doesn’t make much sense from an evolutionary standpoint.
    Is it because of porn conditioning us to look at other people having sex instead of having sex ourselves ?

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Make a disingenuous argument
    >Get called on it
    >Further disingenuously misinterpret the response
    >Get mad
    >Tell IQfy how mad you are
    The life of a twitter warrior

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This is malinformation combined with active disinformation. That’s hate. Whereas I am a good and decent one.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Thank you for revealing your psychological motivation to us but it doesn't detract from the patheticness of what you're doing

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Cry harder cave monkey

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Most people do not know how brief the window of fertility really is. By 35, almost everyone has fertility problems, and a significant portion are literally sterile.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, by 35 you basically have to start paying fertility specialists and pray. I'm glad my adviser told me this or me and my wife would've waited too long to have kids.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm glad my adviser told me this or me and my wife would've waited too long to have kids.
        this is the problem, these things should be taught in school first hand, someone either your parents are moronic to even tell you something like this and you waste your breeding years doing some stupid shit like work or study for schlomoberg

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      True and real. Women after 25 are left overs. Sad but true.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Does that mean its OK if I frick ur mom?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I've read articles on "fertility".
      Just remember that its generally not defined, unlike something like population replacement rate.
      Sometimes you get but sometimes it also just means "number of babies per geographical sub group" or "chance of complication".

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      One of my wine aunts decided in her late 30s to have kids but ended up needing a bunch of IVF treatments just to squeeze one baby out. According to my sister, our aunt had two abortions in her 20s because "she wasn't ready yet".
      Now she's an activist for "IVF Rights" and currently supports the "Family Formation Act" which would make IVF treatments a government guaranteed right. If you're an investor, companies that profit off of IVF are probably a good place to put money as more and more women in middle age discover they can't get pregnant anymore.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The subfertility portion ? where Subfertility is defined as a reduced level of fertility as seen by a longer time for conception ? All the way up to 31 years ? Wouldnt that green line just be fertility ?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i always thought the window for males was larger than for females, especially if you took care of yourself but i've been getting conflicting messages about it. I was planning to start getting kids around late 20's, as many as my income will alow by that point, but if i'm likely to become infertile/have moronic kids by 35 then all bets are off.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Think about it for a second anon
        The female has the plumbing, and the eggs are made during birth of the women. The plumbing is rigged up and is operational by sometime in early puberty, where a ovary(egg) is spent for each mensturation. That has 2 consequences:
        1. Only about 500 eggs is spent before menopause kicks in
        2. The eggs age, and there is no selection mechanism to kick out less competitive eggs

        Meanwhile for Sperm, you instead have a mechanism to make sperm. And there is a selection via sperm health since its technically a race.
        The fittest % has a chance of winning the race, but overall reproductive health is still a factor.

        This DO make the window larger, but it needs to be reality checked: The point of test tube babies IS that you get to have a selection of the ovary. The sperm race might offset a little, but its still fricked.
        The process is also cumulative, meaning age of father vs age of mother. And since marrying a older man is more likely in most cultures, it is what it is.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Some of the people who ever lived were autistic, so you definitely can father children old.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >sending women images of empty egg cartons

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Soiyence will lie about anything, its trash

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The only conceivable purpose of claims like this is to keep women in the rat race, keep working, forget about family, tell them they have forever.
    But older mothers produce more children with Autism and other developmental issues.
    Any healthy society will need to breed in their early 20s but this is when people are supposed to attend college and get entry level jobs and work work work.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Oy vey you female goyims shouldn't have kids while you're young the way you evolved to for millions of years, wait until you're 50
      >*sinister laughing and hand rubbing noises*

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Polysci major says stupid shit
    Science is moronic!

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the women with dicks can even impregnate in their 90s, so this is correct

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      troonys don't live that long, homosexuals' life expectancy is over a quarter of a century shorter than everyone else's because they're all drug addicts and they have a high suicide rate

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        facilitating the death of troonys is the one upside of drug legalization

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Op. Why do you care? No one will frick you.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Honest question but do you prefer a girl with a strong masculine penis or a small feminine penis?

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why does this board refer to science as if it's one big autonomous hivemind brain?

    Actually, scratch that question. I already know the answer. The people here are moronic like on every other board.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Believe in Science, chud.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the people who do that aren't representative of the board, it's malicious people trying to burn down the dignified subculture and build a twitter mill in its place

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why does this anon refers to IQfy as if it's one big autonomous hivemind brain?

      Actually, scratch that question. I already know the answer. This anon is moronic.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *