So how will you adapt to the evolution of the english language?

So how will you adapt to the evolution of the english language?

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Content Warning: Sexual Assault.
    Okay timeline, so be for real is sexual assault roleplay okay if I'm female non-binary? My boyfriend or significant other or whatever is an non-binary white tw(??) so I know it is up to me to do it if we do do my non-consent roleplay because he is male so if we do male on female non-consent roleplay it might be "non-consent non-consent" that is for real sexual assault. Oh yeah to me he is my "he" because we do boyfriend and girlfriend roleplay, my two cents is it is okay because too long didn't read I'm neuro divergent. XD

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I believe
      >tw
      is transwoman. That's why they clarify the use of he later on in the post.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Never would have got that from context since the boyfriend was already established as non-binary.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        isn't it trigger warning?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What's the point of dating a mtf troony as a woman if you're just gonna be straight?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        because white cishet people are bad. don't ask me why they are bad, they just are.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This is like asking why the quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >I am a weak-minded low IQ individual, I need to be accepted or I'll die
        >right now the path to acceptance is being as weird as fricking possible
        >ok I'll be as weird as I can be
        that's literally all there is to it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The bigger questions what's the point of being an MtF who goes by he/him and has sex with a biological woman

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yer a wizard, 'Arry.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      tw is transwoman

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      tk mg, fr da nw lg be sr ht bs sr up. no og bc we be dw wt jc up tp wt is gd my ng.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'll never complain about weird ambiguous context-dependent spellings in ancient egyptian ever again. This is like thinking the traffic in my city was bad and then driving in LA for two weeks.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No, Egyptian is still worse.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      it is assyriologist George Smith reborn

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      When the publishing industry starts churning out novels written in this language you have a rich career as a Don Gifford type annotating them for later generations of scholars to understand like he did for Joyce.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How? And why?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Some knowledge should remain lost throughout time. Now we are cursed.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If that becomes the norm, I'm becoming a dinosaur and no one can stop me.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This is clearly a joke.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Way to state the obvious

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I can understand this. I might kill myself tonight.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    translation:
    cringe warning sexual assault okay timeline so be for real is sexual assault roleplay okay if im a female nonbinary? my boyfriend or significant other or whatever is a nonbinary whitey trigger warning so i know it is up to me to do it if we do do my non consensual roleplay because he is male so if we do a male on female non consent roleplay it might be non consent non consent for example real sexual assault. oh yeah to me he is my he because we do boyfriend on girlfriend roleplay, my 2 wieners are okay because my timeline doesnt read im not debonair, extreme discussion

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Impressive that someone managed to extract any sort of meaning from that. Or sad...

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    English will look like that in a thousand years, and there is nothing you can do to stop it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Of course I can't but I also don't need to as other people are hard at work guaranteeing that there won't be any spoken language in "a thousand years", never mind humans.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        midwit syntax
        sorry, had to be said

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Thank you for elaborating, that will help!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            When you say "there won't be and X, nevermind Y" you're supposed to put the bigger thing in X, and the smaller thing in Y.
            The proper way of saying it would have been:
            >there won't be any humans in a thousand years, nevermind spoken languages"
            Or even
            >there won't be any humans in a thousand years, let alone language"

            There you go. Now you can hide your midwitism more easily

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Thanks, now I can pretend to be English on the internet.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm Italian doe

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Thanks, now I can pretend to be Italian on the internet *twirls moustache*

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >not using a fortiori

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You just know that there's like an army of spiritual cuckold redditors out there ready to explain in a smug tone why this sort of lightning fast linguistic degeneration is absolutely okay and in fact is making English better than it was in Shakespeare's time.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I don't see you speaking shakespearian english homosexual

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Dost thou even speak the tongue of the queen?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        *thou be but a homosexual

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Why thinkest thou that?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >linguistic degeneration
      Speaking as someone with a degree in linguistics there is no such thing.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Linguistics has a limited scientific view of language. Aesthetics matters.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You can have a personal aesthetic sense, but that personal aesthetic sense is not really very relevant to what's useful for communication. To Chinese literati a couple hundred years ago, the whole concept of alphabets was unaesthetic, and English was just more barbarian chatter on par with Hunnish.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Multiple perspectives doesn't mean you can't say anything meaningful about aesthetics. Same for ethics. Why does subjectivity filter so many people?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Speaking as someone with normal T levels, I think a language that is losing clarity, subtlety and depth is actually degenerating and I also think you're very very gay.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          How do you measure the clarity, subtlety, and depth of a language? And aren't those largely a question of the writer anyway? A poor workman blames his tools.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yeah i agree now lets continue this discussion on historical linguistics in tok pisin or toki pona your choice

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Shut up you descriptivist Black person

        1337 5|°34|< //45 8453|) //00|3

        I<Y5

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You said that as if your degree in linguistics was meant to give credit to your opinion rather than tell us that you're indoctrinated. But even from a linguistic standpoint, isn't it orthodoxy that languages become simplified and dumbed down with time? Just think of modern Greek compared to Ancient Greek, or compare Latin to most Latin-derived languages even within the same literary register.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    oulipo ca. 2024

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Just read Orwell’s “why I write”He would’ve loved to see the evolution of English language.

  10. 1 month ago
    Jack Evans

    What a fricking moron. Either do it or don't. She's getting caught up in a bunch of bullshit and she just needs to stop and think about whether or not she actually wants it. It doesn't matter who is who in their roleplay session as long as it's enjoyable or desirable for both of them. Tripping on the shit she's tripping on is fricking stupid. Who gives a shit what other people think. I will admit that I can see where she's coming from being concerned about how others might view her boyfriend but the only real problem is if they both can't keep their mouths shut about what they do in the bedroom and she obviously can't. I feel bad for her boyfriend.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is not new, we had afrikaans, Black folkpeak as bastardized english and in the context of op post there was l33tspeak like language in times of dumbphones.
    I sadly forgot what was it called or maybe l33tspeak was indeed the name of that.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      1337 5|°34|< //45 8453|) //00|3

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        w00T! |_| r t3h r0xX0rZ!

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >So how will you adapt to the evolution of the english language?
    I won't. English is a dreadful language anyways, I'll drop it in favor of my mother tongue.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    language evolves. get over it chud.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Unironically very impressive how it can fit every "word" into exactly two characters every single time. If that is some sort of shitpost it's a pretty well-made one.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Plebe from all countries will speak degenerate globish and real intellectual / political elite will return to French.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ce

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Ce ce, boule? Care parte a frazei dumisale nu ai inteles?

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it is natural for the young to talk like morons, for they are surrounded by morons fr fr homie ngl yeeeeeeeeeeeeee

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Literary English won't change. It's had many opportunities to, but one of the strengths of English is the literary form continues through the centuries and we can still read stuff from 600 years ago.
    What can change is vocabulary, minor punctuation things, and pronunciation, but the fact that you can still read English written 600 years ago and understand it is significant. Again, we do not pronounce English the same as 600 years ago - the pronunciation is changed from decade to decade and we can't stop that. But we can still read and understand it because the form stayed the same instead of changing to match pronunciation.

    Semitic languages also have a literary old written form and a modern new written form, but they splintered so badly that the old form is basically like Old English for them. What's cool about English is that it stays mostly the same and no Nu-English has caught on, though if the US falls that could happen. There are plenty of unique pockets of large population "Nu-English" around the world, which sound moronic to native speakers but could take over given the right circsumstances.

    Icelandic:
    Has a language control board and has the best controlled non-development of language over time. They can read stuff from like 800 years ago relatively easily with only minor grammatical and pronunciation changes. They also forbid loanwords and create new words for literally everything.

    German:
    Has a language control society and changes it too little at a snail's pace so old German is readable because only minor stylistic changes, but also unreadable for different reasons. Germans know their modern language is different now, and keep trying to change it, but the language control people never get their votes through because of conservative afraid old people.

    English:
    No language control body, and it's not even the "official language" of the USA. English is kind of a child of the printing press and one of the reasons it has remained so reliable and prominent. Before that, languages changed so chaotically, but since then, every language has really stabilized.

    Japanese:
    Pretty much the same since the kana were invented so they can read stuff from like a thousand years ago.

    I'm curious about other languages I don't know as much about.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >They can read stuff from like 800 years ago relatively easily with only minor grammatical and pronunciation changes.
      Relatively minor grammatical changes, sure, but the pronunciation has changed quite a bit, it's just disguised by the conservative spelling. Kind of like English.
      >Pretty much the same since the kana were invented so they can read stuff from like a thousand years ago.
      Uh... not really? Even if you ignore kyuujitai, historical kana spelling, hentaigana, and kuzushiji (and the latter two are less likely to be applicable in a modern reprinting), thousand-year-old Japanese has a bunch of obsolete words and the verbs were conjugated significantly differently. (To the point that schoolchildren have to learn Middle Japanese conjugations by just chanting them repeatedly.)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        My impression with Icelandic is that it just sounds like an accent rather than a different language, like Crawford's reconstructed pronunciation.

        In terms of the kana, I was just thinking in terms of familiar letters. I did not know about the actual content was impenetrable, so that is interesting to learn about. Do you know any example for a verb change? I am curious what that looks like. Do you happen to know how far back the average japanese person can read? I am no scholar in these things, just stuff I've read about broadly over time, but if you can share anything I'd like to absorb it.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >In terms of the kana, I was just thinking in terms of familiar letters.
          Familiar letters doesn't mean much, Finnish is written in familiar letters.
          >I did not know about the actual content was impenetrable
          Well, not outright impenetrable, especially since they study Middle Japanese in school, but difficult.
          >Do you know any example for a verb change?
          If you google 古文活用 you should find plenty of information.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I’ve been thinking about this sort of thing lately. I recently attended an auditing conference where I learned that a common term, “segregation of duties” was being replace with the less problematic “separation of duties.” It seems the fact that racial segregation existed means any use of the word is suspect. I’m reminded of the controversy over a politician who used “homierdly” some years back.
    Why should the least literate people get to control language?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Why should the least literate people get to control language?
      Such inanities are the very soul of democracy

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I got into trouble in college when I used segregated as well, despite it being in a strictly non-racial manner (was discussing divisions of labour). We under a tyranny of morons, it's absurd.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nauseating

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like my bash history.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is it any coincidence that language is becoming more incomprehensibly unintelligible to even those who speak it at the same time/rate as us approaching an actual nuclear war and Armageddon. maybe the original Word is coming back. amen and best of luck Black folks

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      All I know is people are gonna die while the zogstein creatures stay in their bunkers

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        and then what? Reality turns into israeli Fallout? who the frick is writing this shit

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          there was this clickbait video I saw one boring day about the bunkers that billionaires have access to.
          Basically imagine an upside-down luxury hotel dug into the ground, with every comfort that exists and with enough supplies to last for a shitload of time.

          Such places exist and are there just for the billionaire zogsteins to run back to in the case they drop the bomb

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Are there languages too high IQ for a Black person to learn them?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No. Barring language-specific impairments, any human being will acquire the language they're exposed to as a child.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        > any human being will acquire the language they're exposed to as a child
        Why do nignogs still speak nignog English, after generations of living in an English speaking nation?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Because of segregation, then de jure and now de facto, plus language as a marker of identity. It's not as if one dialect is intrinsically better or worse than another.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            > Because of segregation
            > because of this
            > because of that
            What you say may or may not be true, but you have shown no proof to back it up.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Segregation was de jure until the mid-20th century and continues de facto in much of the country, is this not a condition under which you would expect linguistic differences to be perpetuated? It's not as if black children adopted by white families don't grow up sounding like their peers.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Numbers rule. Sure, a few Black individuals can learn perfect English if they grow up in a white environment. Torring them into Black person ghettos, the dialect would soon devolve into Black person English.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Language does not have much of anything to do with genetics. It's just a matter of a community speaking a certain language (because their ancestors were influenced by their native languages when learning English, and because they largely learned English from working alongside poor white indentured servants such as Irish, who spoke various dialects of English) and that dialect continuing to be passed down within a community.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            > Language does not have much of anything to do with genetics
            It is and all data points towards language being genetic.
            The leftoids making up all kinds of copes about how the data just coincidentally points towards language being genetic still haven't brought up any sort of proof about how the material conditions have changed the language of the nignogs and of the lower classes.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I just explained- their ancestors learned it imperfectly because they spoke very different languages natively and learned it as adults, and then because they were segregated they continued to pass down that version of English among themselves. Genetics is correlated to language insofar as people mostly learn the language of their parents.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You have no proofs to back that up though. Why can't you just simply admit that only someone who is ethnically British can learn perfect English? They are the only ones naturally pre-disposed for that language after all.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Because that's utter nonsense. I challenge you to find a difference in English test scores between, say, well-off well-educated English-Americans, Irish-Americans, and Polish-Americans.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That would be ueless, academic language is artificially constructed in such a way as to be comprehensible to most people within a certain contingent. All the turbomutts of those former empires - India, China, Arabia, Greece, Latin, Spain, England, Germany - speak artificially constructed languages created for mutts.
            Old Spanish was incomprehensible to even French - modern Spanish is spoken throughout the world. The reason for this is that you have to be an ethnic Spaniard to speak Old Spanish.
            This old phenomenon is still observable in small parts of the world - Swiss German, although very related to academic German, is incomprehensible to even Germans themselves.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So why is American English basically the same language as British English save for a few different spellings and phrasings when only a minority of the people who speak it are of English descent?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >You have no proofs to back that up though. Why can't you just simply admit that only someone who is ethnically British can learn perfect English? They are the only ones naturally pre-disposed for that language after all.

            This is a genuinely imbecilic statement.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That works the opposite way too
            zoomers adopted ebonics wholesale and now speaking the King's English is "talking like mf sephiroth or some shit"(this is le bad)

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    When do you think globalists will start to push for some sort of esperanto-esque globalese language to eradicate the last real source of culture? There will certainly come a time in the near future when speaking the language of your ancestors will be seen as a politically radical act.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      English is that language, changing or decimating languages across the world.

      And the dominant language can be enforced effectively by those in power. Loads of languages have died from foreign influence. You can't have a politically radical language because that would be the language of the poor and downtrodden who have no resources to rebel against their rich overlords who speak the enforced language.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        But English won't do, it has a history, a culture behind it, and is still capable of expressing complex thought in the right hands. The new global language needs to be something wholly artificial, almost beast-like in its simplicity, and without a past, because the erasure of the past is the exact reason why you would want a global language.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I get what you are saying, and it works well as a plot for a story. But in reality, nobody would adopt a constructed language. The only way it would work is if it was not identified as such, and was perceived as natural. But that would take a stupid amount of time to implement. Worlds are created not by the hand of a god, but by the nibbling of worms.

          The closest thing that happens is a shadow government seeding meme words and ideas in psyops, to get people to talk or think a certain way, but that has been happening since recorded history.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I guess the only way then is to find a prehistoric artificial language, let it be popoular enough among the elite to build up a fanbase of wealthy autistis who will teach their children to speak it, and finally wait for those native speakers to raise political influence and declare the conlang an obligatory global language.

            Soros would love it.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Take what I like
    Leave what I don’t

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Learn Chinese.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Last time I got blitzed on cocaine I was sort of typing like this to the first few people I messaged after everyone had gone to sleep and I was inexorably awake until sunrise.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >inexorably

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *