Still yet to be topped?

i cannot think of a single marxist cultural theorist that is noteable enough to beat him in terms of popularity, notablity and in terms of his theories just being good shit
>b-buh what about [X theorist who published 3 essays 3 years ago] and added only 1 extra idea then went into the void
doesnt count or matter

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Zizek

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      does he count if he was a literal admitted influence onto fisher?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yes because he hasn't killed himself and utilizes a transcendental materialist method to level his critiques, when it comes to his analysis of language he deconstructs some very key concepts which if we look at the consequences allows for a more essential understanding of our present situation and the laws that govern it. Fisher is good for what he critiques but doesn't use a metapolitical hammer like zizek does, considering the categories they each focus on. Fisher is much more particular, and doesn't necessarily espouse pragmatic solutions to contemporary issues, merely unveils the issue as it is. Zizek is arguably more praxis oriented and has significantly more memetic viral capacity if that makes sense.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          such as what?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            A continual engagement with the question, an interrogation of the 'real' like a psychoanalyst working with a patient from which a program should emerge. Not to act in a wasteful way like a reactive protest movement but to perhaps ride the tiger within existing structures and organically the opportune situation will arrive. Ultimately he seems to be in favor of the gramsci solution, a cultural marxism if you will. Ive considered that within this praxis there's another opportunity for counterrevolutionary hijacking of a reactionary nature, utilizing a Traditionalist framework.

            I meant to reply to you...

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          A continual engagement with the question, an interrogation of the 'real' like a psychoanalyst working with a patient from which a program should emerge. Not to act in a wasteful way like a reactive protest movement but to perhaps ride the tiger within existing structures and organically the opportune situation will arrive. Ultimately he seems to be in favor of the gramsci solution, a cultural marxism if you will. Ive considered that within this praxis there's another opportunity for counterrevolutionary hijacking of a reactionary nature, utilizing a Traditionalist framework.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            got any recs for grammsci that are secondary lit? i dont think ill get like 60% of his application of his ideas to his day and age since im neither italian or living in the 1920s

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Doesn't he basically rehash Lacan? Who in turn basically rehashed Freud?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You wouldn’t phrase it in a question that way if you weren’t just posting bait. Add some nuance. Don’t let the medium control you. Oh wait, you don’t actually know anything but memes.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >rehashed
        Are you using words you don’t understand for writers you have you never read?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What makes Zizek a marxist? I have never seen him voice a marxist point of view, his political opinions always seem to align with at best a tepid social democratic tradition, in foreign policy he often just echoes NATO/US State Department propaganda and honestly that's why he's invited everywhere I suspect. He's a "compatible" fake marxist amusing people with jokes and cultural tangents bht politically he's absolutely harmless. He's basically a jester.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I really like him, but he lacks metaphysics/spirituality, which should be the central point in criticizing neoliberal world order.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      any peeps you recommend in terms of critizing modern neolib world in spirtualistic terms? like im not very spiritual myself admittatly so his lack of that never bothered me, but on the other hand heideggers critiques of modernity espicially how it transformed spirituality are the most resonant and interesting parts of his critique to me
      also i find writers like Harun Yahya interesting for their critiques of neolib society and culture even if it was like a side thing for him and that he was also crazy

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >any peeps you recommend in terms of critizing modern neolib world in spirtualistic terms?
        You must be new here. Traditionalists Guenon and Evola are posted here daily, critiquing neoliberalism (or modernity) from a spiritual point of view is their central idea. If you're a beginner start with Guenons first book where he explains his main terms and purpose with his work. Then read The Crisis of Modernity and move on to Evola's magmus opus, Revolt against the modern world.

        If you want a critique from a Christian perspective you can read Nihlism by Seraphim Rose who was inspired by Guenon.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I'd say René Guenon is probably the most essential for an exposition on problems in the neoliberal world from the metaphysical perspective as well as an elaborate and cohesive elucidation on what that necessarily entails. He takes an extraordinarily thorough approach on the differences between the modern concepts of progress and science, reason and philosophy, religion , faith, "intuition", all of which would fall under the category of general knowledge, and the more essential metaphysical Knowledge which would fall under the realm of the universal.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          To elaborate further I would spend significantly more time with the works of René Guenon, Aristotle, Nietzsche, and Paramendias before moving on to Evola. You will find it necessary to become aquatinted with several authors to be capable of consistency, however you will find such a task more than rewarding for your own interests. You shall figure it out as you go, you'll find types like Mark Fisher and Zizek and the like useful as welk for criticism of modernity within the general determination

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Because metaphysics has worked very well in he places it's practiced? Metaphysical religions like those in india can't even keep up with the overwhelming materialistic tradition of the west. Indians are jumping over themselves to move to the west and abandon their traditions. What does that say about your naive idealistic solution?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Different anon. The power to create is an awesome power. Are we mearly cogs in waiting to be brides maids to the singularity. What is the countervailing force to perfect this terrible image.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Why does there need to be a countervailing force? Why does the image need to be perfect?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            A general sense. My spidie sense tells me that the neoliberal materialistic order is a run away train with no conductor. Lack of vision. A world is being created by narrow interests and these wise men see the word through excel block B3, yes men, technocrats and an indifferent privilege they cast aside. I'm am not read to stop being a human craft by God's "terrible" evolution. They doodle and call it art. God fricks and creates the tides of history. Brup. I am full of what they offer as substance. I want to starve and taste food again.
            /schizo rant over
            I'd have to reach back in my memory to the turn of the century. Nanotechnology, AI and the Sinngularity was being covered by WIRED magazine. I wish I could find this article, I hated it so much it was exquisite. It incapuslated the believe that man can be rendered down to homosexual economicus, concerned only with the price of heirloom tomatoes, and organic eggs. The article was describing the process of the Singularity, Ai becomes advanced enough that it turns the very fabric of the universe through nanotechnology in to it self, as it expands and devours matter it turns that matter into its creation, imprinting on it an 'image' of itself until the last quantum of the universes is devoured and inturn devours itself to become anew cycle of the universe cannibalizing itself. A sort of imperfect internal reoccurrence a nihilistic rebirth of chronous eating it children. Devouring sentience, a paradise to turn it into a paved parking lot.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Bawop wop wop.
            And this is there image, their vision. It reeks of arrogance. This is the hallowed siren song of utopian futurism. I call vaporware. Their god sucks. My God fricks. How could these narrow interests who's life is mediated through layers of abstraction and sycophants and technolcratic yes men think to turn the complexity of a mangrove and turn it - through thier clever ingenuity - a burger. Not even a very good one. And now they want to charge me double. This is thier imperfect vision. A lawn of kentucky blue grass is more interesting and worthy of contemplating. The stock goes up, the stock goes down, the stock goes up, the stock goes down.
            Change is invetable, I understand this forward march of progress. Their vision is lack luster. And with out the twin energies of the masculine and the feminine the rational and the intuitive there vision will be rudderless or without direction. Miserable and imperfect. This is the countervailing force that is need to thier lopsided and theirfore imperfect image.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is that John Balance?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      file name, comrade

      I'd say René Guenon is probably the most essential for an exposition on problems in the neoliberal world from the metaphysical perspective as well as an elaborate and cohesive elucidation on what that necessarily entails. He takes an extraordinarily thorough approach on the differences between the modern concepts of progress and science, reason and philosophy, religion , faith, "intuition", all of which would fall under the category of general knowledge, and the more essential metaphysical Knowledge which would fall under the realm of the universal.

      >any peeps you recommend in terms of critizing modern neolib world in spirtualistic terms?
      You must be new here. Traditionalists Guenon and Evola are posted here daily, critiquing neoliberalism (or modernity) from a spiritual point of view is their central idea. If you're a beginner start with Guenons first book where he explains his main terms and purpose with his work. Then read The Crisis of Modernity and move on to Evola's magmus opus, Revolt against the modern world.

      If you want a critique from a Christian perspective you can read Nihlism by Seraphim Rose who was inspired by Guenon.

      thanks

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      John was a gay but straight, this guy was straight but a gay

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Looked at this guy's Wikipedia, some suicide case who was molested by a doctor while in a psychiatric hospital for depression...why listen to this blockhead

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >suicide case who was molested by a doctor while in a psychiatric hospital for depression

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        "I was sexually abused by a doctor when I was in my early twenties. It was just after I had been released from psychiatric hospital after my first nervous breakdown and put it into his care for clinical depression. To spare my own embarrassment, I won’t go into the details of it, but suffice it to say, I was one of many young males that this doctor ab/used."

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Not only that but his philosophy consists of narcissism and gaslighting

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why should anyone listen to judgmental ignorant moron like you?

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nick Land alternatively didn't kill himself and took a reactionary approach over zizeks crypto conservative angle and fishers blackpilled nihilism. Land also incorporates occult methods and has infinitely more memetic viral capacity and probably likes Bitcoin (good)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Chad David Graeber showing multiple historical anthropological examples to prove none of this has to be this way.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Read it, folks. It's truly epochal.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >new history

          Oof.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It truly is a new history. You have no idea how far archeology has progressed in the last 60 years

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      while fisher is depressing, hes not like bauldrillard where he goes "real prolaterian ethos has falled, billions must stream", he does overtly state that there is a way out of this and that not only as marx described, our economy and social structer will bury itself but that a method of resisting capitalist realism is devolopiong alternative spaces for the masses on either the interent or irl that actually allow conversations that arent manufactered by capital to take place
      im not saying its a perfect solution but he does still offer one as opposed to land and a few POMO writers

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    He’s a cult leader

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Land mogs fisher

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      fisher
      >writes deeply personal books that describe culutral and social trends not only from a detached dialectical view, but from a deeply personal point of view that describes the real effect such changes have had on him and many others
      lUND
      >still alive and has written jack shit for the past 5 years
      >has abandoned any progressive economic, cultural, political or social goals
      >his own fans get into civil wars over whether hes fallen off or has become more based
      >entire early writtings were just shitting out bizzare and self contradictory words by twisting deluze in ways it was never meant
      >"BRO, WHY DONT WE BE RATS IN A NEW PLAGUE"

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        alive and has written jack shit for the past 5 years
        wrong
        >>has abandoned any progressive economic, cultural, political or social goals
        good
        >>his own fans get into civil wars over whether hes fallen off or has become more based
        doesnt matter
        early writtings were just shitting out bizzare and self contradictory words by twisting deluze in ways it was never meant
        no it wasnt

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >t. LUND himself

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What's the point of being progressive? Serious question

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Capitalist realism is nonsense. Yes, neoliberal ideologues and modern goycattle can't imagine a world beyond capitalism but most thinkers absolutely can.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      such as?

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nobody should wait too long to get topped

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      do you mean topped as in homosexual sex

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        he means his wife wears a twelve-inch strap-on dildo

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Well, he's popular because he wrote pop phil books.
    As far as I can see, he is not much cared about in academia and his ideas don't have much use in practical politics.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If there is one thing I am sure of it is that marxists get topped

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's how mutan's fight.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      he means his wife wears a twelve-inch strap-on dildo

      I don't know why people are sitting around yearning to be topped. It's actually kind of sad.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I cannot think of a single marcist cultural theorist who is worthy of the light of day

Comments are closed.