The BLACK people of the world await your answer.

The BLACK people of the world await your answer.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    here is the answer

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >they were european
      >clusters with literal bedouins
      what do they mean by this?

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    IT.
    DEY.
    CULCHA.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There is a higher chance of an Aryan pharaoh than a black one. A billion to 1. Kangz posers are still in bondage of the slave trade.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Christians broke the noses off old statues to own pagans

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Christians
      Imagine being mind broken by Christians
      Statues are the representation of oneself in the afterlife. You break the nose, they can't breathe.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >You break the nose, they can't breathe
        Just because you're too stupid to k ow how breathing works doesn't mean ancients were as dumb as you. Noseless people can breathe just fine

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >The BLACK people of the world await your answer.
    Natural wear, a protuberance like the nose is one of the most likely parts to fall off. There's no need for a conspiracy theory because the so called caucasoid nose shape is a black nose shape.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No those on the top have caucasoid genes

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Original aryan caucasians with Black gene.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          simply the result of the rape of Bantus by Natufian ape…

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          No they're Black+caucasian rape babies

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The blacks aint ready for the biggest black pill of all

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They have Nubia,I guess

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Except that Nilotes are actually more related to Eurasians than to West Africans and not through any additional admixture

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/SO3zxCI.jpg

        The blacks aint ready for the biggest black pill of all

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Picrel is First Dynasty statues. In other words, the people who founded ancient Egypt and made it great looked like this. Thank you for playing.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      no its not. thats a 3rd or 4th dynasty official and his wife

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Like a Mexican doorman? Looks like one.

      In reality, a black man like this Nubian is more likely.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        His skin may be dark brown, but he is still on average 60% west Eurasian. They’re rape babies

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          One drop rule, mayo.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That only applies for white Euros. Your best “people” are rape babies of bumfrick Araps

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            moron

            Not at all, they barely had east african genes let alone sub saharan, even the original nubians looked much less Black than those on the pic you posted.

            We don't have any ancient Nubian samples. They likely had similar admixture to modern ones

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They looked like this btw

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27356-8
            They were literally 40%+ Dinka like. They would have looked like Eritreans

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >christian period
            That's not ancient egypt

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You mean ancient nubia? Ancient egyptians obviously didn't have much sub saharan dna but the ancient Nubians certainly did.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yes the guy i posted is literally nubians btw

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://anthromadness.blogspot.com/2015/06/sudanese-arabs-beni-ameri-beja-and.html?m=1
            Modern nubians are very diverse genetically

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Not at all, they barely had east african genes let alone sub saharan, even the original nubians looked much less Black than those on the pic you posted.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Dude on the right looks like a femboy I work with.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Too much cocaine

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    israelites/muslims went around smashing the noses of european statues too. it's the simplest way to disfigure something made of stone - break the most fragile part.
    next

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Egyptians got progressively darker over time. originally they had no SAA

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I can bet with nearly 100% certainty that the Egyptians of the Old Kingdom period were much darker than the Egyptians of today despite the addition of small amounts of SAA DNA because of the existence of air conditioning and sun screen. MENA people can tan pretty dark.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Cope. They still had no SAA admixture.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why blacks always think they were Egyptians? And yet they called Arabs in Egypt "invaders". They never heard of Coptics?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Its usually only african americans that delude themselves about egypt. They are rootless unlike other africans who can trace their ancestry

      The reason why blacks suddenly became vaguely relevant was because R1b-V88 Tarzan bleached the gorillas of Lake Megachad,- causing the Bantu expansion.
      Seriously... it's right there in the genetics and archaeological timeline.

      Lmao no

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Umm we are better because we can trace our ancestry three generations back when we were all tribesmen drtinking shit water for thousands of years or as slaves to Arabs!
        Both of yall are embarrassing

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          And your ancestors were peasants breaking their backs for their landlords. What's your point? Most people's ancestors were not living glorious lives. The fact of the matter is that Africans like most people have lineages they can look back on unlike most people in the Americas.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah but most people around the world ccan safely claim that single villages from their c**ts contributed more to civilization than the entirety of Sub Saharan Africa, and that's just a fact. A bumfrick Korean walled village would be touted as the epitome of African architecture if found in Zimbabwe

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >contributed more to civilization
            You have to be delusional if you think this. Maybe merchants and artisans did (which Africans had plenty of) but fricking peasants and in some cases literal serfs contributed jackshit to wider civilization. I bet Timbuktu did more than whatever shithole your ancestors lived in.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            if Timbuktu had never existed how would my life be worse
            (in USA)

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Timbuktu's relevance was mainly restricted to Africa. Very few towns and cities achieve global importance

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Concession
            Accepted

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Southern England did less than the entirety of black “civilization” because some moronic troon said so
            Yikes, you have no accomplishments and the only way you can even begin to cope is by pointing at your betters and claiming that your entire bloodline doing nothing is okay because a single individual of a innovative group did nothing personally

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Where did I say southern England did less you disingenious moron? Your own ancestors like most didn't do anything in their shitty villages while the men who did do stuff are unrelated to you. Is that what you want to brag about?

            Concession
            Accepted

            Denied.

            >Timbuktu
            You mean the Arab trading post?

            Timbuktu was always mainly inhabited by Malians

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >bet Timbuktu did more than whatever shithole your ancestors lived in.
            I know you’re basically esl tier due to being a nog but atleast keep your own words in check lmao

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Wtf are you talking about idiot?

            If not only Timbuktu but the entirety of Mali had never existed the rest of the world would be almost exactly the same
            If Southern England had never existed...

            If your and many others villages never existed nothing would change.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yes they DEFINITELY would lol
            Mali on the other hand would have been better off uninhabited, then civilization could have spread there. It could be like Australia instead of the trash it is now.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes they DEFINITELY would lol
            Ah yes, bumfrickville's disappearance would totally change the course of history
            >better off uninhabited, then civilization could have spread there.
            Your village would have been better uninhabited and later should have been populated with actual nobility to make it grow instead of cowshit eating peasants

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >bumfrickville
            London being gone would completely change everything, nothing would be untouched

            >should have been populated with actual nobility
            not possible, everyone can't be rich. Unless you believe they can. I have heard that a big problem in the Third World is that once anybody excels the whole village expects them to fork over some of what they earned, so it would make sense that you have that kind of thinking.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >London being gone
            London isn't a random village You from London?
            >I have heard that a big problem in the Third World
            " I heard". /misc/ isn't a source

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Is Timbuktu a random village?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            He won't answer. He's a disingenuous poster who only wants to argue out of boredom.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >can’t even read at a third grade level
            My point exactly, you’re too dumb to even have a real conversation and expect others to drop their points as you do when they’re inconvenient

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No really, what is your point? Because your incoherent rambling and babble can't be understood by anyone.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You’re literally moronic anon, you shouldn’t be on the internet, let alone on here but makes sense in a way. You’d be laughed off even a lefty hugbox like reddit for your moronation

            https://i.imgur.com/remxUac.jpg

            The cope is pretending that you can share accomplishments with people just because they happened to share skin color. Even more egregious when it comes to the nobility that historically looked down upon yours due to a difference in class. The fool with nothing on his own to show for will naturally latch on to other better men's lineages because he has been tricked by invented post modern concepts like "nationalism" and "racial pride".

            So blacks can claim Timbuktu or the sudan pyramids when questioned about 99% of Africa being a literal wasteland, but I as a bong can’t claim someone who grew up within miles of myself? You’re moronic aswell lmao

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            *more incoherent babble*

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You can’t keep track of your own points and i do not fault your Black brain for that.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            you never had any points to begin with. you've been reduced to crying about muh Black folk lol

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >So blacks can claim Timbuktu or the sudan pyramids
            Malians/West Africans can for the former, yes but they can't claim the latter because its an entirely different civilization/culture.

            Only Americans do this sort of shit when it comes to muh black accomplishments because they believe blacks or whites are a monolith. Europe let alone Africa are extremely diverse and it makes zero sense for people from one region to claim something from another because they share little in common.

            Innovation arises from cultures. Individuals all depend on the vast societal infrastructure supporting them. Every member in some way contributes to, and inherits, this.

            Yes but the vast majority of innovations are concentrated in a few key areas and among certain groups of people.

            racial pride is an extension of tribal pride is an extension of family pride is an extension of pride in self

            national pride is a stupid and moronic concept unless your nation is an ethno state as all should be.

            Lolol no. Racial pride is a recent aberration pushed by individuals who seek to force a sense of unity among everyone while ignoring the significant economic, cultural and geographic differences between peoples.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes but the vast majority of innovations are concentrated in a few key areas and among certain groups of people.
            notably not including Mali in even the slightest sense

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Within the world? Sure but in Africa Mali was quite important. No every region/country can claim to be important beyond their region.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Mali was important to Mali
            All Malians did was ensure civilized man had less land to inhabit. The world would be better if they had never existed.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Nope. Malians ensured trade in the Sahara was going strong thus they benefitted everyone in the region including even North Africa. This is basic history in Africa

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They sold slaves, if that’s your greatest feat, i feel very bad for the nogs. All those poor tens of millions sent to be castrated by Arabs just so you can do frick all with the money.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Malians ensured trade in the Sahara was going strong
            What did that accomplish?
            How is this different from saying "Malians ensured their stacks of mud didn't fall down"

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So i as an English man can’t claim my own towns accomplishments but a nog can? Do you even see how moronic you are?

            you never had any points to begin with. you've been reduced to crying about muh Black folk lol

            You’ve flipflopped from African blacks are superior than American ones because they can trace their ancestry to homies being able to claim what meagre achievements your entire people have made but huwite people cant do the same?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >So i as an English man can’t claim my own towns accomplishments
            Sure you can but don't have some unwarranted sense of superiority because you literally had nothing to do with said accomplishment.

            https://i.imgur.com/1TX14eC.png

            They sold slaves, if that’s your greatest feat, i feel very bad for the nogs. All those poor tens of millions sent to be castrated by Arabs just so you can do frick all with the money.

            You know nothing about the history of the trans sahara trade if you think slaves were the only thing being traded.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            My ancestors did by being tradesmen and encouraging the economic growth of the region to produce great advancements for the sake of mankind. I do not believe i’m better than this nog, I know I am

            >from African blacks are superior than American ones
            god you are moronic. I never so much as said this. All I said was the african americans were more prone to hotepism because they forgotten their roots and don't have any old culture themselves unlike native africans.

            You did, anyone can go back to the top of the thread and your moronic smut

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >My ancestors did by being tradesmen
            Cool, as were plenty of blacks. Can't say the same about all your fellow Englishmen however who were stuck as irrelevant farmers.
            >to produce great advancements for the sake of mankind.
            They were not personally responsible for it. At best they were just a minor cog in a machine.

            He won't answer. He's a disingenuous poster who only wants to argue out of boredom.

            Why would anyone answer it? Its a dumb rhetorical question

            >Malians ensured trade in the Sahara was going strong
            What did that accomplish?
            How is this different from saying "Malians ensured their stacks of mud didn't fall down"

            >What did that accomplish?
            Do you really need to ask how trade stimulating the economies of local polities is important? What next do we need to ask what the spice trade or silk road did?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Cn’t you see how moronic your logic is? Why shouldn’t a farmer a few more miles away not be counted as part of the system that made my c**t great. But nogs who did far less than a single village in the UK should not be seen as inferior?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >not be counted as part of the system
            Because they are just farmers? Lmao their only responsibility was feeding the people who actually did shit. No different from wage slaves waging to make money for the people that matter.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So nogs can gloat about being part of an international community because they were sold like cattle? But a farmer living a peaceful life can’t? moronic

            >You did,
            stop lying already you homosexual. accept you fricked up and take the L already

            You tards just keep replying since you have no jobs and when the civilized man gets bored and goes about their day, you claim it as a dub

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >So nogs can gloat
            Are these "nogs" here with us right now? I don't give a frick what moronic black americans have to say about being apart of the community or whatever
            >But a farmer living a peaceful life can’t?
            Of course farmers are a apart of a system but there are just farmers aka unimportant in terms of innovation compared to merchants, soliders, clergymen, nobility ect
            >I asked how my life would be any different if it never existed
            Wait, where? You mean this?

            if Timbuktu had never existed how would my life be worse
            (in USA)

            that was a different discussion with a different guy.
            >would unquestionably be better and more productive if Malians had never existed
            How do you morons even come to these conclusions. Mali's location and potential was never important enough to ever change the global economy. Morocco didn't so why would Mali? Egypt was the only place in Africa that immense impact on the global trade hence why it was invaded and conquered to many times.
            >had been settled by, say, Portuguese
            The Portuguese already settled in parts of Africa and hardly anything changed.
            >They genuinely would have done better if instead of trading
            Beyond moronic. Trading was the lively hood of these people. They live in a fricking desert. What were they supposed to do?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Nice word vomit to add absolutely nothing. Your mind just can’t keep up with the most basics of takes and you’re malding so much that i feel bad for you

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Translation: I have no argument

            >Mali's location and potential was never important enough to ever change the global economy
            but Arizona's location is lol
            Malian never amounted to anything because Malian trash inhabits it. Put Malian trash anywhere and it turns to a landfill. Put civilized men anywhere and it turns to a civilization.

            VGH... if only pure aryans like myself inhabited mali. we could magically turn shitty desert into a global power. lol whatever you say Nigel

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >we could magically turn shitty desert into a global power
            Yes. Arizona's GDP is 20 times higher than Mali's. Not an exaggeration.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >we could magically turn shitty desert into a global power
            Yes. Arizona's GDP is 20 times higher than Mali's. Not an exaggeration.

            And that's despite having 1/3 of Mali's population btw

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            And also only recently being populated in historical terms. And hence it doesnt have the massive generational wealth Mali should have according to nog arguments

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Mali's location and potential was never important enough to ever change the global economy
            but Arizona's location is lol
            Malian never amounted to anything because Malian trash inhabits it. Put Malian trash anywhere and it turns to a landfill. Put civilized men anywhere and it turns to a civilization.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >You tards just keep replying since you have no jobs and when the civilized man gets bored and goes about their day, you claim it as a dub
            you have now officially went full schizo babble. I feel sorry

            Translation: I have no argument
            [...]
            VGH... if only pure aryans like myself inhabited mali. we could magically turn shitty desert into a global power. lol whatever you say Nigel

            >no u
            Peak nog banter. And Mali aint a desert you moronic gay, it’s a temperate zone. You’re acting as if Mali is the Sahara Berbers who also did more than Mali despite living in sand huts

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >And Mali aint a desert
            I refuse to believe anyone could be this moronic.

            >we could magically turn shitty desert into a global power
            Yes. Arizona's GDP is 20 times higher than Mali's. Not an exaggeration.

            [...]
            And that's despite having 1/3 of Mali's population btw

            Arizona has nothing to do with anything you morons

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            And where does 90% of the people live in that c**t? Just because you have desert doesnt make you a desert nation, you absolute midwit

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Just because you have desert doesnt make you a desert nation,
            That doesn't fricking matter fool because the vast majority of the country is still desert. And its irrelevant anyways since historically, Malian civilization was concentrated in that desert.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No it wasn’t, it was just a single small city that served as a hub for selling slaves. If your entire civilization relies on that alone, you’re not a civilization

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That "small city" was still one of the most important in the region and facilitated trade and culture throughout Africa lmao.
            >If your entire civilization relies on that alone,
            They had other towns too but I guess city states can't be civilizations?

            https://i.imgur.com/BwyS5cL.png

            Mali could be making as much of a contribution as Arizona. It has more people to do so and much longer time. But its inhabitants mean it isn't.

            Nope and and its completely nonsensical to compare Mali to Arizona. Might as well compare Jordan to Arizona as well because 'hurr both have deserts'

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So this important city could not generate wealth for the Malian people? If it’s as important as you cope, why are they so poor with nothing to show for it today? And why does Arizona not factor into this? Arizona is isolated and yet is far more richer than Mali which had access to markets for thousands of additional years?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >could not generate wealth for the Malian people?
            Mali's woes today have nothing to do with Timbuktu, a city that stopped being important by the 18th century. We should be talking about history, not modern times.
            >Arizona is isolated
            Lmao it isn't this is why the comparison is dumb to begin with. Arizona is apart of the U.S. and got to enjoy the wealth and prosperity that America has given it. Mali is the one isolated. Arizona would be a lot more poor and desolate if it wasn't a U.S. state.

            >Nope and and its completely nonsensical to compare Mali to Arizona
            lol you people always try to take it back to geography then whine that, no, civilized man is doing perfectly well in a fraction of the time where people like Malians completely failed.

            You tell me what specifically makes Mali so bad that can support a population three times Arizona's but be twenty times less economically productive

            >what specifically makes Mali so bad
            Corruption, terrorism and ethnic strife.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            How can there be ethnic strife when 100 of their people have the same religion and race? Why isnt this a problem in 56% white America but a problem for Mali?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Religion and race isn't the problem but ideological and cultural differences. Its like asking why Russians and Ukrainians are fighting each other despite being the same race and religion.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Because Russia invaded Ukraine, anything else is a cope

            So you say, an American living in a country in which
            1. people with the same color,
            2. speaking the same language,
            3. with (more or less) the same (not so similar, I know) Western European ancestry,
            can be INCREDIBLY hostile to one another, to the point of sectarian violence - do you want me to look up how many race riots (not involving blacks) happened in the eastern seaboard alone in the XIX century between established settlers and new arrivals, e.g. Italians/Irish?

            Tiny riots that leave only a handful dead in a c**t with 330 million people isnt the own you think it is, chud

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            And they invaded Ukraine because of ideology

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Tiny riots that leave only a handful dead in a c**t with 330 million people isnt the own you think it is, chud
            You're being disingenuous, and moving the goalposts.

            Firstly, the US had 7 million people at the start of the 19th century, and less than 80 million by the end of the century - do not attempt to minimize these conflicts by using today's numbers.
            Secondly, notice how my point was not at all about the size or fatality of the riots - it was to falsify your thesis that ethnic strife cannot exist among similar peoples - see your post in

            How can there be ethnic strife when 100 of their people have the same religion and race? Why isnt this a problem in 56% white America but a problem for Mali?

            :
            >How can there be ethnic strife when 100 of their people have the same religion and race? Why isnt this a problem in 56% white America

            To conclude - you are wrong. There can be ethnic strife, whether between closely related, similar peoples, or whether between radically dissimilar peoples.
            Such ethnic strife is one element - not the only one, and not the most important one - among many that explain the current state of West Africa.

            Stop trying to reduce the history of any nation, and its current development (or lack thereof) to inane fanfic-tier headcanon - if it can fit in an imageboard's reply box, it's almost certainly wrong.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Go ahead and try to use any figures to cope your moronic take

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What part of
            >ethnic strife is one element - not the only one, and not the most important one - among many that explain the current state of West Africa.
            is moronic?

            Please explain how a complex problem cannot have a complex set of interrelated, mutually affecting causes.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So you say, an American living in a country in which
            1. people with the same color,
            2. speaking the same language,
            3. with (more or less) the same (not so similar, I know) Western European ancestry,
            can be INCREDIBLY hostile to one another, to the point of sectarian violence - do you want me to look up how many race riots (not involving blacks) happened in the eastern seaboard alone in the XIX century between established settlers and new arrivals, e.g. Italians/Irish?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Corruption, terrorism and ethnic strife
            I.E. Malians are a people with an abysmal culture as I've been sayin'

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Nope and and its completely nonsensical to compare Mali to Arizona
            lol you people always try to take it back to geography then whine that, no, civilized man is doing perfectly well in a fraction of the time where people like Malians completely failed.

            You tell me what specifically makes Mali so bad that can support a population three times Arizona's but be twenty times less economically productive

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Mali could be making as much of a contribution as Arizona. It has more people to do so and much longer time. But its inhabitants mean it isn't.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >You tards just keep replying since you have no jobs and when the civilized man gets bored and goes about their day, you claim it as a dub
            you have now officially went full schizo babble. I feel sorry

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Do you really need to ask how trade stimulating the economies of local polities is important?
            Yeah
            Ungagrunga giving fish to Oogabooga in exchange for flint on some isolated island doesn't mean anything for the wider world

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >doesn't mean anything for the wider world
            You need to go back and reread the comment chain again because the discussion was never about Mali having global importance. It was about it having importance for West Africa/North Africa.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >the discussion was never about Mali having global importance
            yeah it was
            I asked how my life would be any different if it never existed
            The global economy would unquestionably be better and more productive if Malians had never existed and the uninhabited land had been settled by, say, Portuguese, making their very existence a detriment to the world's commerce. They genuinely would have done better if instead of trading they had followed Mansa Musa into the ocean

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >So nogs can gloat
            Are these "nogs" here with us right now? I don't give a frick what moronic black americans have to say about being apart of the community or whatever
            >But a farmer living a peaceful life can’t?
            Of course farmers are a apart of a system but there are just farmers aka unimportant in terms of innovation compared to merchants, soliders, clergymen, nobility ect
            >I asked how my life would be any different if it never existed
            Wait, where? You mean this? [...] that was a different discussion with a different guy.
            >would unquestionably be better and more productive if Malians had never existed
            How do you morons even come to these conclusions. Mali's location and potential was never important enough to ever change the global economy. Morocco didn't so why would Mali? Egypt was the only place in Africa that immense impact on the global trade hence why it was invaded and conquered to many times.
            >had been settled by, say, Portuguese
            The Portuguese already settled in parts of Africa and hardly anything changed.
            >They genuinely would have done better if instead of trading
            Beyond moronic. Trading was the lively hood of these people. They live in a fricking desert. What were they supposed to do?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >You did,
            stop lying already you homosexual. accept you fricked up and take the L already

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >from African blacks are superior than American ones
            god you are moronic. I never so much as said this. All I said was the african americans were more prone to hotepism because they forgotten their roots and don't have any old culture themselves unlike native africans.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            If not only Timbuktu but the entirety of Mali had never existed the rest of the world would be almost exactly the same
            If Southern England had never existed...

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The cope is pretending that you can share accomplishments with people just because they happened to share skin color. Even more egregious when it comes to the nobility that historically looked down upon yours due to a difference in class. The fool with nothing on his own to show for will naturally latch on to other better men's lineages because he has been tricked by invented post modern concepts like "nationalism" and "racial pride".

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Innovation arises from cultures. Individuals all depend on the vast societal infrastructure supporting them. Every member in some way contributes to, and inherits, this.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            racial pride is an extension of tribal pride is an extension of family pride is an extension of pride in self

            national pride is a stupid and moronic concept unless your nation is an ethno state as all should be.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Timbuktu
            You mean the Arab trading post?

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The reason why blacks suddenly became vaguely relevant was because R1b-V88 Tarzan bleached the gorillas of Lake Megachad,- causing the Bantu expansion.
    Seriously... it's right there in the genetics and archaeological timeline.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like black people only know about one of the most overhyped ancient cultures in the world. I guess with enough Hollywood movies it could be Wakanda

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      homie looks ANGLO

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Germanics are at the very same level than subsaharans, same inferiority complexes about their historical irrelevance

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Big MED noses were too heavy

Comments are closed.