The iPad Pro M4 base models actually has 12GB of RAM instead of 8GB but they disabled the extra 4GB.

The iPad Pro M4 base models actually has 12GB of RAM instead of 8GB but they disabled the extra 4GB.
Explain iCucks, why is this OK?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    if you sauter that to the existing traces I will sue.

    t. Tim, also leave a tip for my high quality product

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >sauter

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >smoldering iron

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >flucks

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Sauter

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >why is this OK?

    It's the most powerful device that will run Procreate as there is no Android version.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why a glorified Netflix and youtube machine needs to be the post powerful tablet on earth and costs $999?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Because they can? What do you want them to do? Make the M5 slower than the M4 so shitty Intel and AMD could catch up?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I would like them to just admit the tablet is a personal computer and let it run macOS.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Apple will never, if you want MacOS, get a Mac.
            The fact that they're holding this hard onto 8GB RAM goes to show that they will never lower the price of their products or let one cannibalize another.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah I know, what's a computer and all that.
            Just because they won't do something doesn't mean it wouldn't be better if they did.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'll procreate with your mom.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's an iPad. Its a toy for morons.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There's no 4GB LPDDR5X chips so Apple had to use 6GB modules, but of course they had to disable the extra memory as a big frick you for being poor.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Explain this

      https://de.aliexpress.com/item/1005006067622619.html

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      why even reply if you don't know the answer,
      that's nonsensible;
      >apple had no more inexpensive chips so they use more expensive chips and disabled some of it.
      Its ok to say "I don't know"

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There's plenty of reasons

    >More RAM can reduce battery life.
    >More RAM may not work good with the binned M4
    >A 12GB configuration may be less stable
    >12GB may cause excess wear on the SSD
    >12GB may have environmental impacts that are vital to Apple

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >applegay believes that

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I’d believe that they have chip binning where it’s assumed that some fraction of RAM chips will be bad and they can just disable them and ship the rest of the package
      The rest of this answer looks like garbage though

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Binning is done at Samsung and Micron, a differently binned chip will have a different model number.
        Also there are no 4GB chips that run at LPDDR5X 7500 required for the M4 iPad's 120GB/s memory bandwidth, only 6GB, 8GB and other higher ones.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >>More RAM can reduce battery life.
      The extra RAM is still there. You can't shut down just a part of a LPDDR module.
      >>More RAM may not work good with the binned M4
      Skill issue.
      >>A 12GB configuration may be less stable
      Skill issue.
      >>12GB may cause excess wear on the SSD
      You mean less wear, right? Smaller RAM = more SSD usage for swap.
      >>12GB may have environmental impacts that are vital to Apple
      So let me get this straight. The manufacturer created the bigger modules thus increasing the environmental footprint vs. creating smaller modules. Apple is not using the extra capacity, and somehow this is more environmentally friendly? It's literally wasted resources which generated tons of CO2, all for nothing.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Why bother replying? It's obvious that you don't know how computers work.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >no arguments
          I accept your concession.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >There's plenty of reasons
      how much is tim cuck paying israelite?
      >>More RAM can reduce battery life.
      AHAHAHAHAHA
      >>More RAM may not work good with the binned M4
      AHAHHAAHAHAH
      >>A 12GB configuration may be less stable
      LOL I HAD 12GB RAM FOR A DECADE U STUPID israelite
      >>12GB may cause excess wear on the SSD
      AHAHAHAHAH
      >>12GB may have environmental impacts that are vital to Apple
      AHAHAHHAAH

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >no arguments
        I accept your concession

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Black person
          i
          g
          g
          e
          r

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      All of those are not good reasons.
      >More RAM can reduce battery life.
      Both chips are there and being used, the power usage is the same.
      >More RAM may not work good with the binned M4
      There's no way a chip can be damaged so that it can only address 2/3 of each attached memory module
      >A 12GB configuration may be less stable
      Are you joking?
      >12GB may cause excess wear on the SSD
      No. If anything having more RAM will cause less wear on the SSD because the OS will cache more data to reduce reads.
      >12GB may have environmental impacts that are vital to Apple
      Buying two sets of inventory, I guess.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD EVENING SAR HOW IS MUMBAI NIGHT?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      hahahahaha

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Eh. The only reason I could see is that the upcoming iOS 18 update reserves those extra 4 gigs for some AI tasks.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >>More RAM can reduce battery life.
      no. miniscule difference.
      >>More RAM may not work good with the binned M4
      this has some merit, not much
      >>A 12GB configuration may be less stable
      same as above
      >>12GB may cause excess wear on the SSD
      what? it should decrease it significantly
      >>12GB may have environmental impacts that are vital to Apple
      is this bait?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why can't Apple just make a device with 12 gb of ram without those flaws?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      baited everyone award

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >More RAM can reduce battery life.
      Can a single RAM chip only be partially powered? Is that actually possible?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      a good macgay will say
      >frick you poorgay that is why

      a bad one will say

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Apple fan vs. Apple shareholder

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't see what's the problem, they only advertised it as 8GB and you're getting 8GB.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What excuses? They're selling an 8GB iPad with 8GB.

      >what's the problem?
      >i don't see the problem here
      >what excuses?
      >what's the issue here exactly?
      Go back

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Okay, but what IS the problem? This isn't NV selling 4GB vRAM cards with 3,5GB vRAM at usable speed.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Point out the issue. Apple sold it as an 8GB device, and they're giving you that 8GB.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Okay, but what IS the problem? This isn't NV selling 4GB vRAM cards with 3,5GB vRAM at usable speed.

          I think that in general, folks here prefer the "costs," associated with something to be related to the physical, tangible value of the thing. introducing deliberate abstractions of this concept is basically the starting point of marketing and the disgusting hypercapitalist hellhole we live in.

          don't get me wrong, you're better dead than red. I just think we should do a better job containing the israelites' greed is all.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >associated with something to be related to the physical, tangible value of the thing
            Seems pretty hard even going with stuff that you can measure objectively as much as a lot tech.

            Take mobile chips, they tend to be the same cost as desktop ones despite being slower … but if you prefer the portability, the value of a slower but cooler component that consumes less increases ten-fold.

            Car industry has been doing this for almost two decades by now but cargays took it without complaining much like the good boys they are

            >car with 2.0L engine and 150hp for $30k
            >car with the mechanical 100% identical 2.0L engine but engine management software tuned differently so the engine has 210hp
            >sells the car as sport version for $37k

            Wouldn't there be more strain on everything with the engine set to more HP though?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Technically yes but the engine gets tested at the top spec so it will work for the lifetime they have designed it for.
            Basically if you buy the top spec engine car you will get a "normal" lifetime out of it but if you buy the cheaper lower powered model where only the software is different chances are it will run a bit longer since it will be not as stressed. They might cheap out on some other parts too though so maybe then your engine will run forever but your transmission might have some cheaper parts on it that could make it grenade. Everything is finely tuned for maximum profit since even 1 cent difference per part adds up hugely in such a huge scale when you build millions of cars.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Seems pretty hard even going with stuff that you can measure objectively as much as a lot tech.
            >Take mobile chips, they tend to be the same cost as desktop ones despite being slower … but if you prefer the portability, the value of a slower but cooler component that consumes less increases ten-fold

            just stop. you are comparing apples to bowling balls. I am going to address the automotive example because that is probably easier to explain
            't there be more strain on everything with the engine set to more HP though?

            the perceived "performance," of an engine through the lens of the driver can be related to power output. you can achieve a higher power output, amongst other techniques, by increasing the compression ratio of the engine and/or increasing the charge air pressure. this does cause increased wear on the components but thats not the point. the point is, a modern car's powertrain is engineered to withstand the output of the highest trim's configuration. the manufacturer then artificially limits the power output via software and sells multiple trims (for marketing, maximize profit). but the only reason car b makes less than car a in terms of power is some boolean operator in the power.cfg file is set to 0 instead of 1. (not really but thats sort of how it works).

            real life is like who's line is it anyway? everythings made up and the points don't matter.

            It might be engined for the "normal" wear and tear compared to the toned down version there would be still less of it, which might lead to less mainetance needed and preferable for people who don't get an erection over higher HP.

            You focus too much on "software cucks it" which is kinda understandable since it's annoying that you technically get less than you could have but also seems a bit too simplistic.

            Also obviously not arguing against companies pulling this shit not for mainetance benefits of the enduser but to push them to the more expensive version.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I mean yeah, but that is just the end-user rationalizing being cucked by software, "daddy wouldn't let me play with ALL of the power, maybe its for the best my tonka toy will last longer this way."

            if it were some companies goal to create a product that was as durable as possible, with the lowest possible cost-of-ownership, you would see them make drastically different decisions than they do now when it comes to design and engineering. that is the point.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The 2.0L block is engineered for 210HP and watered down to 150HP in the base model instead of 'overclocking' an engine block that was engineered for 150HP

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Do you have an example of a shitbox engine that was available from the dealer with a 40% power increase option that only required software changes?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            not sure if the numbers add up exactly but look at the USA model Audi A3. There are two trims of the A3 and an S3, all with the same engine. Actually this engine is used through out the VAG lineup, including on the Porsche Macan. Drastically different pricepoints for different models, all with the same powertrain.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >the VAG lineup
            giggity

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://australiancar.reviews/vw-mk-7-golf-r-cjxc-cjxb-engine-ea888-gen-3/
            According to what I can find there are significant internal differences and various trims use different turbochargers, it's a lot more than a different tune.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yes, all VAG products (with the exception of some Porsche/Lamborghini/Ducati/Bentley models) are assembled from a global parts bin so you can find examples of engines with the same displacement, but various other mechanical differences easily. They also artificially create "tiers," for cars to exist in like I had mentioned. Take a look at this:

            https://procarmanuals.com/self-study-program-645-audi-2-0l-tfsi-engines-ea888-series/

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Seems pretty hard even going with stuff that you can measure objectively as much as a lot tech.
            >Take mobile chips, they tend to be the same cost as desktop ones despite being slower … but if you prefer the portability, the value of a slower but cooler component that consumes less increases ten-fold

            just stop. you are comparing apples to bowling balls. I am going to address the automotive example because that is probably easier to explain
            't there be more strain on everything with the engine set to more HP though?

            the perceived "performance," of an engine through the lens of the driver can be related to power output. you can achieve a higher power output, amongst other techniques, by increasing the compression ratio of the engine and/or increasing the charge air pressure. this does cause increased wear on the components but thats not the point. the point is, a modern car's powertrain is engineered to withstand the output of the highest trim's configuration. the manufacturer then artificially limits the power output via software and sells multiple trims (for marketing, maximize profit). but the only reason car b makes less than car a in terms of power is some boolean operator in the power.cfg file is set to 0 instead of 1. (not really but thats sort of how it works).

            real life is like who's line is it anyway? everythings made up and the points don't matter.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Funny how itoddlers will come up with excuses. In reality it just means they will sell a 12gb Pro Max version later on.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What excuses? They're selling an 8GB iPad with 8GB.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    iTODDLERS BTFO!!!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      iTODDLERS BTFO

      beelzebub

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't the PS3 Cell processor has two unused CPU cores as well?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      no, it had 8 spes, but 1 was disabled because of the yields

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The PS3 cell was only a shadow of what the originally had planned.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The PS3 cell was only a shadow of what the originally was marketed.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The PS3 cell was only a shadow of what the originally had planned.

          PS3 cell proccor of shadow when looked[ at what plans were marketed

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      PS3 Cell processor in retail units have 1 conventional processor PPE and 8 sub processors satellites SPEs. Sony produced Cell with 9 SPEs in case one failed manufacturing process for yields. Modding a retail PS3 to activate the hidden unused 1 SPE does nothing last I heard.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        prolly just binning, this isn't a new concept

        they're made with 8 spe's but to increase yields the ps3 only uses 7 of them. the cell was hard to make

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Binning RAM doesn't make too much sense, isn't it pretty simple in structure?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            well it doesn't make too much sense on these chips since the ram is separate dies, meaning they can just put know-good ram dies on their packages
            binning is usually just for the dies themselves, like say they make a 4GiB chip and it's not perfect, they could rebadge it as 2GiB or something instead

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            maybe is not binning the ram but the memory controller?

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    These conspiracy theories are crazy.

    The 256GB and 512GB iPads Pros have 8GB RAM. The 1TB and 2TB iPads Pros has 16GB RAM. These are the facts.

    Even if Apple did disable 4GB for whatever reason, it would be only about driving a positive user experience decision.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Wanna bet they'll release iPad Pro Plus in a year with 12GB as base? Early adopters will have a very positive experience knowing their devices physically have 12GB as well, but it's been disabled.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Wanna bet they'll release iPad Pro Plus in a year with 12GB as base?
        That would be a ridiculous bet, as Apple has never once done something like that – that is an Nvidia move, not an Apple move.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Even if Apple did disable 4GB for whatever reason, it would be only about driving a positive user experience decision.

      That's right.
      Too much ram just makes you unhappy.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >would be only about driving a positive user experience decision.
      What the FRICK did he mean by this

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They are not disabled, but used for things behind the scene, like next gen telemetry.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That theory doesn't make sense since the 1TB and 2TBs have 16GBs of physical RAM and exposes all of it to the user.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >why is this OK?
    It drives more purchases of 16 GB models, which have a higher profit margin, better compensating Apple for R&D. If we stop funding R&D, we won't get the most premium products in the future. As part of the Think Different(tm) family, we invest together in our shared future. Thank you Tim Cook.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Completely different thing.
    What Apple is doing is putting in a full 7950X3D and telling you it's actually a 7600 that you cannot unlock.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >What Apple is doing is putting in a full 7950X3D and telling you it's actually a 7600 that you cannot unlock.
      While you paid the full price for the 7950X3D but they will ask for $400 to get the fullcpu. Also, you have to pay $600 for just 16GB of extra RAM

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the M3 is way more powerful than the 7950x

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >M3
        4 performance cores
        >M4
        3 performance cores

        >7950x
        16 (performance) cores

        Yeah I'm sure your tablet CPU can match the performance of a premium desktop chip. What else did Tim Apple promise you?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          moron alert

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >moar cores
          lmao, we're doing this shit again?
          Single core performance has the biggest impact on 99% of tasks. Only Youtubers care about multi-core because video editing is one of the few tasks that can take advantage of more cores.
          Also don't kid yourself, you don't run a datacenter that requires milions of cores.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Now fully disable every other core except one and see how modern your computer is.
            >NNNOOOOO THAT DOESN'T COUNT IT'S NOT FAIR, LOOK HOW FAST THIS ONE SINGLE WEBPAGE LOADED, I SWEAR THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE COMPARED TO THE COMPETITOR

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You're just getting desperate at this point, and you have the nerve to accuse others of being pajeets?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >I got BTFO and have no arguments but it's you who is getting desperate!
            I mean it's not your fault that you are brown, it's Apple's fault for thinking they can outsource their shilling to pajeets and get away with it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare/apple-m3-vs-amd-ryzen-9-7950x
        It's the other way around, iToddler.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    probably gonna be the same exact hardware in their new laptops without any changes and they need a means to differentiate them.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The M4 Macbook Air and Pros will come with 8GB RAM base.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's cheaper for their robot assemblyline to make one product with no variation than 10 variants with different hardware.
    Automakers are doing the same thing where all models have heated seats, reverse cameras, etc, but all are disabled in the BIOS without the key.
    4GB ram costs nothing for a chipmaker. Just ship 1TB and charge to flip flags in the bios to enable it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That's it. To get the pro with a matte screen you have to get a 1tb ssd for some reason.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >can afford to make product with thing
      >disable it and charge extra because frick you that's why
      100% israeli

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    that's called binning. in the mid 2000s to early 2010s, binning methods weren't as extensive so they err'd on the side of cautioned and binned silicon that, at times, had fully functional cores.

    this isn't the case anymore; binning is quite extensive now and they have much tighter requirements as to what qualifies as a certain SKU. if they don't meet those requirements or have faulty cores, they blow internal fuses in the CPU to physically disable them by cutting them off from the rest of the functional die, so the die will report now as a different part.

    tl;dr: this isn't the 90's anymore, dumbass.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      binning is a psyop and an excuse to segment products

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        and this thread is a psyop to weed out morons like you.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Others speculate it may be reserved for iPadOS 18, which is rumoured to bring forth a heap of AI-driven features.

    Fricking Apple giving me more RAM than advertised!

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Apple is 100% going to charge a monthly subscription to increase devices performance. This then eliminates the need make different models. It honestly wouldn’t shock me if this was to happen. Would tie nicely into the rumours that Apple are going to have a rent-a-iPhone service. Society is to poor to afford their own things.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    iTODDLERS BTFO

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ay lmaaaao
    Humiliations of applecucks are unlimited!

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Car industry has been doing this for almost two decades by now but cargays took it without complaining much like the good boys they are

    >car with 2.0L engine and 150hp for $30k
    >car with the mechanical 100% identical 2.0L engine but engine management software tuned differently so the engine has 210hp
    >sells the car as sport version for $37k

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i remember days of vw with blue i, chrome i and red i, if i would have had the money i would have gotten the blue

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      yes but most of money in car industry comes from servicing said vehicle.
      and it's almost never just more power. more expensive car comes with extra and or special features. which make more money for the service. basically rich pay more for similiar features. like what apple is doing.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        most dealership profit comes from the service department. the manufacturer makes like 100% margin when they sell the car to the dealer, their profit comes from the sale of cars.
        t. car business for 10 yrs

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          dealerships are forced to buy parts and other miscellaneous stuff directly from manufacturer

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yes, I have seen the financial statements. the manufacturers do not make a ton on service/parts. for customer pay, dealer makes lotsa profit on service/parts. for warranty - dealer still gets paid. if I were to guess, service/parts is a wash for the factory if you net it out. a new silverado sells for like twice what it cost the factory to build. keep in mind, the dealer pays like $2000 less than MSRP on paper (true inventory cost has been obfuscated through program money/holdback etc.)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      except that in cars the cheaper model is often cheaper because it will save on warranty repairs and other issues due to lower engine load. Plus the more powerful version hardly ever is exactly the same engine. It often uses different air filters and intakes, sometimes different exhausts, and most times different oil types, oil filters (with larger capacity for slightly better heat dissipation and lower chance of dry-runs), different cooling, often different brakes etc. I don't know of a single car that has a 'sport' model that uses the exact same power train and accessories/peripherals and only a different tune. It may be the same engine, but many accessories and peripherals are different. A better analogy would be as follows:
      >car with 3.0L 280hp 6 cylinder engine sells for $45k
      >manufacturer makes same car with mechanically identical 3.0L 6cyl engine but with 2 cyl disabled (becoming a 2.0L 4cyl engine) and different management and tuning so the engine only has 180hp
      >sells the gimped version for 37k, when a hypothetical regular 2.0L 4cyl variant should cost only 30k and offer the same performance
      >consumer pays extra for 2 cylinders he will never use and 'sport model' consumer pays even more for hardware that is already present in the cheaper gimped model
      >both consumers get scammed paying extra for shit that's already built into the vehicle

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >https://procarmanuals.com/self-study-program-645-audi-2-0l-tfsi-engines-ea888-series/

        >The engine modifications for both performance classes are identical with respect to the engine mechanicals, where a number of friction-reducing measures have been implemented. There are differences as regards charge cycles and the combustion process.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    humiliation ritual

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is this the new Nvidia
    >3.5gb
    scandal?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's more like the RX480

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >laptop as a service, LAAS
    The big question is, can you hack it? I see profit turning 8 GB macs to 12 GB

    ANSWER NAO PLS

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >AyyMD finally matches M2 energy efficiency
    >M4 BTFO's with 50% better efficiency 2 months later

    There's no replacement for having billions to buy nodes from TSMC.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >AyyMD finally matches M2 energy efficiency
      X

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    we now have RTX4050 tier passively cooled APUs that can address up to 192GB of RAM.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >AyyMD finally matches M2 energy efficiency
      >M4 BTFO's with 50% better efficiency 2 months later

      There's no replacement for having billions to buy nodes from TSMC.

      do the needful street shitter

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Seems to have improved with M3.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Frick, forgot to include laptop 4070 at 3571.41, with TDP going all the way to 115W while M3 Max needs about 110W for the entire fricking laptop.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >$5000 currybook can't even keep up with a $300 GPU
          LOL
          LMAO EVEN

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >$3500 for 64GB of VRAM
            Now get me a similar x80shit laptop around that 4060 or whatever nvshittia has with similar battery life, screen and trackpad

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Now get me a similar x80shit laptop around that 4060 or whatever nvshittia has with similar battery life, screen and trackpad
            now get a toilet street shitter

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            your currybook cant even last 60 minutes under load iJeet
            and that's with 10% the performance

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            what does a totally different laptop (M1max) vs a 14in 1080p 200nit shitheap in an (unspecified) cpu bound scenario have to do with GPU performance of the M3/4 vs 4060 mobile linjeet?

            >Now get me a similar x80shit laptop around that 4060 or whatever nvshittia has with similar battery life, screen and trackpad
            now get a toilet street shitter

            I-I'll jusst buy a moble cpu part and play gaymz on that

            never change poorhomosexuals.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Our eyes can't see more than 1080p anyway!1

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's OK you cannot do math, dumb pajeet.
        2477 * 1h of battery life = 2477 / 989 = 2.5 / $
        1508 * 8h of battery life = 12064 / 3500 = 3.44 / $

        keep staying dumb and poor

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Rent free

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I don't think
      very fitting

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    8gb are made available to the cpu for the os and apps, while the others 4gb are used for something else

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    because those cores are broken? why throw away the chip when half of it works when you can sell a model with less cores enabled, moron?
    they are selling a tablet with a functional 12gb inside it and just disabling 4gb of that 12gb for no real reason, it is damn different.

    Do you have an example of a shitbox engine that was available from the dealer with a 40% power increase option that only required software changes?

    e450 (i think?) and e63 amg same engine different tune
    m345i and m3 same engine different tune
    obviously they have mechanical differences on the rest of the car as well

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >twitter screencap thread
    POST THE FRICKING LINK Black person

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Literally in the image, you blind frick

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >CPU powerful enough to obliterate most laptops and all other tablets on the market
    >they won't let you run Mac OS on it
    frick apple

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They got binned defective memory for cheap!

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    poor rats, they should use Black folk or applegays for experiments and let the rattos be free

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >they should use Black folk or applegays for experiments
      they ARE. why do you think they try so hard to use them in their ads and why do you think the only ones buying apple (using iPay credit) are them

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is so fricked, they're literally cucking you out of 4GB extra RAM.

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    iToddlers blown the frick out.

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Pay your memory loicense fee, homosexual

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    zoomers discover binning

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Aren’t these things just massively overpowered at this point, since they can only run iPadOS? I read that even an M1 is overpowered except for a few demanding tasks.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      iPadOS as software for almost anything you'd want to do aside of c00ding and transcoding. And the extra RAM would actually be not half as bad for training LoRAs but I guess people who care about that would go for 16gb and 10 cores anyway.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      europe is forcing apple to open up ipados so it will get fixed eventually

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *