The thing about the big bang that I'll never understand is how did something come from nothing?

The thing about the big bang that I'll never understand is how did something come from nothing? It makes more sense for something to have always existed that to come from absolute nothingness.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    GOOD point

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The big bang theory only proposes that the universe was very small and then suddenly expanded to become very large. It does not make any assumptions about where the universe came from
    >The Big Bang is a physical theory that describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

    They just take the current universe and the cosmic microwave background and the idea that the universe is currently expanding (because it seems to be expanding). Then they work backwards mathematically and it appears as though at some point the universe was extremely small and extremely hot and extremely dense. That's pretty much the extent of the theory

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Then the question comes, how did the small universe come to be? Was there a mini bang?

      https://i.imgur.com/sp5btKQ.jpg

      The thing about the big bang that I'll never understand is how did something come from nothing? It makes more sense for something to have always existed that to come from absolute nothingness.

      Also I love Christopher Walken in everything he does.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >how did the small universe come to be?
        No one knows. /thread

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Are there any theories?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Theories on exactly how a universe can come to be depends on the type of universe.
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse#Types

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What about OUR universe? From the beginning.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well my science teachers done told me wrong, they told me that was the very beginning of everything and everyone.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wrong. The Big Bang was posited by a Catholic priest and hypothesizes that all matter and universal laws were created during the first few seconds of a massive singularity. It is not "well you see the universe was small then expanded, but otherwise had no beginning".

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Didn't Darwin come up with the bangs and the evolving?

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Also, I believe it's proven that a particle, and its antimatter counterpart can "spawn", by "borrowing" energy from the future. Provided they annihilate each other right after creation.
    Admittedly, that would require laws of physics to already exists so ignore this post.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Question, since time is a human perception and is highly subjective... Does that mean that everything is happening all at once and in a sense were all immortal if there is no time?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >since time is a human perception
        Wrong. Time is a physical dimension of reality that exists independent of us and anything else alive.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I thought time was only a perception according to quantum physics and thus everything is happening in one blip.

          Some lady physicist explained it as a man on a train waving to his friend outside and the lady outside waving back, and two lights on the train going off on the front and the back, while one will perceive them as both flashing at the same time, the other will see one flashing first and then the other. Neither of them are right and neither of them are wrong due to discrepancies in space, time, and light. And therefore time as we know it is mainly a human construct.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >>>/x/

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If it bodies energy from the future, then the total energy would fluctuate in time. If you're talking about the time-energy uncertainty, then the "future" would be some 10^-20 seconds away from when it borrowed it

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Oh, you mean the one thing that nobody understands? That's what you don't understand? How original

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >something to have always existed
    Something always existing seems just as absurd as something coming from nothing.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Its actually the same thing, if it always existed that means it didn't come from anything which effectively means it came from nothing.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The intuition of ape brains did not evolve to understand the ultimate nature of the universe at plank scales, but to hunt and collect food while collaborating with other apes. Is simple as that.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We're pretty good at dividing and conquering problems into simpler ones though.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The thing about the big bang that I'll never understand is how did something come from nothing?
    That doesn't happen at any point in cosmic inflation cosmology, so what are you talking about, idiot?
    >It makes more sense for something to have always existed that to come from absolute nothingness.
    No it doesn't.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I often wonder if there have been more than one Big Bangs or little Bangs or whatever, where universes are created and destroyed and if advanced species existed long before us and if its just an endless cycle of creation and destruction. What an odd existence we live.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The universe will always perplex me, especially quantum mechanics. Phew, it's enough to make your mind explode.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The thing about the big bang that I'll never understand is how did something come from nothing?
    That is not big bang theory, big bang postulates everything came from a mysterious singularity approaching infinite energy whose specific original information was lost in the explosion as its energy was splattered across the universe.

    >It makes more sense for something to have always existed that to come from absolute nothingness.
    Nothing is something, its the smallest possible amount of anything and everything, so even in that case, nothing would be the thing that always existed.
    In that case, what you mean to ask is how did nothing proceed to yield everything else such that 0% became 100% and math provides hints such as 0^0=1 and 0!=1. If nothing is absolute, then nothing is bound only by nothing and without any boundaries or limitations, everything is possible and if nothing is compounded infinitely it must eventually result in 100% of the possibilities.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That sounds religious.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *