The word negrophilia is derived from the French ngrophilie that means "love of the Negro".

The word Blackphilia is derived from the French négrophilie that means "love of the Black". It was a term that avant-garde artists used among themselves to describe their fetishization of Black culture. Its origins were concurrent with art movements such as surrealism and Dadaism in the late 19th century. Sources of inspiration were inanimate African art objects (l'art nègre) such as masks and wooden carvings that found their way into Paris's flea markets and galleries alike as a result of colonial looting of Africa, and which inspired artworks such as Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon,[3] as well as live performances by Black people, many of whom were ex-soldiers remaining in European cities after World War I, who had no choice but to entertain as a source of income. Equally of interest to avant-garde creators were live arts such as dance, music and theatrical performances by Black artists, as evidenced by the popularity of comic artist Chocolat and the musical review Les Heureux Nègres (1902).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackphilia

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    one century later

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this triggers the chud

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It should trigger anyone with a functional neocortex

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          a crowd of people walking is supposed to trigger me?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I’m a little bit curious if you are able to empathize at all with the understanding that there exist some White people who think it’s in their and their families best interest if their countries and capitals stay White. I mean can that feeling resonate with you at all, even if you don’t agree with it? For example, maybe some Nigerian wouldn’t want Abuja to be 40% non-Black and this has nothing to do with Black supremacy.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't have empathy for whitoids so I cannot feel anything. Maybe you shouldn't have colonized the world if you didn't want the world to come to you? Tough luck.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Admits being a psychopath driven by anti-white hatred
            So you are definitely a fifth column who shouldn't be in any White countries. And your argument boils down to "YEAH KILL 'EM" so you really don't have anything insightful to discuss.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Do you define the USA as a white country? Why shouldn't I be here? You stole nearly half of this country from my country. You genocided the Native Americans and now you squat on their land. You made your bed, now lie in it whitoid.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Radiochan

      shouldn't have had an african colonial empire lol

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >shouldn't have had an african colonial empire lol
        Based.

        Black folks in France are just the consequence of the French colonial "past". I can sympathise with a Lithuanian or Latvian complaining about non-European immigration in their countries, but nations like France and Britain deserve to get BLACKED harder than an average college freshwomen in America.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I wasn’t pleased with King Charles’ tokenism at the coronation, but it did give me hope to see Kate Middleton was smirking disdainfully at them while princess Charlotte and prince George look completely disgusted.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        More like shouldn't have had left-wing immigration policies since the 60s
        North Africa colonized Spain for seven centuries (Al Andalus), yet North Africa isn't currently full of Spaniards as a result.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Radiochan

          this is a pretty tortured justification
          the modern european colonial empires and the states that colonized them have a much higher standard of living than the ex colonial states
          also we live in the 21st century

          • 4 weeks ago
            Cult of Passion

            >we live in the 21st century
            Some of us live in the year 39th millenium, I reckon.
            [spits tobacco, leaves a trail down my chin and left unwiped]
            N'only war and such.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Iberians already had a real civilization before being colonized, so they don't really care about North Africa.
          Meanwhile, French colonization of West Africa, although it lasted 10 times less long than Al Andalus, gave the local Black folks everything they now have.
          Gave them a written language, built their cities, introduced them to modern technology and concepts...etc
          It's no wonder they see France as some kind of motherland and flock to it by millions if given the possibility.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The Mosques of Bamako were literally funded and built by the Saudis, the French had nothing to do with it

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You're talking about one particular mosque built a decade after these photos were taken.
            Those on the pics (pictures taken in the 1961) were built during French colonial rule, with French funds.
            The French built tons of mosque in Mali (including the famous mud mosque)

          • 4 weeks ago
            Cult of Passion

            What a western centric perspective.

            In all my travels I have been suprised by people believing in foreign sourced psy-ops. Its kind of rare-ish but exists everywhere.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Neo-Garveyite

            The image macro is dishonest because it's well known that Bamako was only a small village before the French made it the capital of French Sudan. The region had several large metropolises like Segu, Djenne, Timbuktu, and Gao

            You're talking about one particular mosque built a decade after these photos were taken.
            Those on the pics (pictures taken in the 1961) were built during French colonial rule, with French funds.
            The French built tons of mosque in Mali (including the famous mud mosque)

            >The French built tons of mosque in Mali (including the famous mud mosque)
            If you're talking about the Great Mosque of Djenne, while the reconstruction of the original mosque was initiated by the French colonial authorities, native labor guilds did the planning and construction

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The region had several large metropolises like Segu, Djenne, Timbuktu, and Gao

            And here's the how the most impressive of them, Timbuktu, looked when white people arrived in the late 1890s.
            This was the most impressive "city" of an entire continent.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            To me thats fairly impressive.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If you're a racist who holds Black folks to sub-human standards, yeah I guess

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't, earthwork and clay construction are hardly exclusive to blacks

          • 4 weeks ago
            Cult of Passion

            >earthwork
            >earth

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            There's villages in the southwest that looked nicer than that.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            hairess apes sticked sticks in the ground, put mud on it to dry in sun and then some plants as the roof, as it was enaugh to protect them from sun and rain, even tho they had plenty of wood and stone
            meanhile egiptians despite living in desert with a big river imported rocks to build they buildings, even arabs were doing decnt up to 2 stages high buildings, also in the desert, or drilled a rock to build houses in it
            because actual people think about the future and have ambitiom, unlike apes

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What the actual frick is that spelling? Did you even proofread before posting?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Most Egyptian buildings were made from mudbricks and reeds
            Only temples and such were made from stone

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ugh....the large metropolis of Segu...

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Finally found a scenery shot of Segu
            There are very few photos as there was really nothing of interest there (unlike in Timbuktu and Djenne).
            It was largely just another typical straw huts village, but larger and with a few mud structures (such as ) there and there
            Nothing as "impressive" as Timbuktu, Djenne or Kano though.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It was for a while, Andalusian diaspora were a big deal in the region (Spain kicking them out helped), and directed a lot of barbary pirate raids, also provided many of the soldiers for Morocco's conquest of Timbuktu
          But they assimilated eventually

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        African colonial empire sans le négre is fully achievable.

        https://i.imgur.com/2Nc5mg0.jpg

        The word Blackphilia is derived from the French négrophilie that means "love of the Black". It was a term that avant-garde artists used among themselves to describe their fetishization of Black culture. Its origins were concurrent with art movements such as surrealism and Dadaism in the late 19th century. Sources of inspiration were inanimate African art objects (l'art nègre) such as masks and wooden carvings that found their way into Paris's flea markets and galleries alike as a result of colonial looting of Africa, and which inspired artworks such as Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon,[3] as well as live performances by Black people, many of whom were ex-soldiers remaining in European cities after World War I, who had no choice but to entertain as a source of income. Equally of interest to avant-garde creators were live arts such as dance, music and theatrical performances by Black artists, as evidenced by the popularity of comic artist Chocolat and the musical review Les Heureux Nègres (1902).
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackphilia

        The women in that painting were Black?
        I never fricking noticed. Thought they were some non-descript shade of brown.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        so it's punishment for something no one alive today has anything to do with? why should any white support it then?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          *French
          drop your huwide raze larp to rope in everybody with pale skin to defend you frog

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >not answering the question
            >resorting to ad hominum
            many such cases among browns. the french are the worst of western europe thanks to their revolution but that doesn't mean i want them ethnically cleansed.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's punishment for having uplifted Black folks out of prehistory
          Do you see people from North Sentinel Islands migrate to Europe?
          If whitey had left Black folks in their primal neolithic state, none of this would have happened

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            sorry for actually having faith in people, it worked out for us so we assumed it would it would work for the lesser men as well. frankly if colonization never ended it may have if we executed the violent criminals throughout the generations but communists love to ruin everything.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/Gni61xC.jpg

            Iberians already had a real civilization before being colonized, so they don't really care about North Africa.
            Meanwhile, French colonization of West Africa, although it lasted 10 times less long than Al Andalus, gave the local Black folks everything they now have.
            Gave them a written language, built their cities, introduced them to modern technology and concepts...etc
            It's no wonder they see France as some kind of motherland and flock to it by millions if given the possibility.

            These images are always framed dishonestly. South Africa was extremely underopoulated before Europeans arrived, less population=less urbanization. If European colonists could be given credit for anything, its that, raising the population of Africa, but you can hardly blame a location in the middle of nowhere with barely any people for not having massive cities. Cheyenne, Wyoming isn't exactly a metropolis either.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >South Africa

            These are pics of West Africa tho

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            By "South Africa" I just meant Sub Saharan Africa, not the RSA

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            By "South Africa" I just meant Sub Saharan Africa, not the RSA

            According to the "Congo genocide" theory, the Congo had over 20 millions inhabitants when Leopold took over in 1885
            Yet, there wasn't a single city in the entire area, only primitive villages.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You'd have to be moronic to think the place had that many people. Even if we assume they were concentrated on the coast. Just read literally anything about the fricking place.

            [...]
            These images are always framed dishonestly. South Africa was extremely underopoulated before Europeans arrived, less population=less urbanization. If European colonists could be given credit for anything, its that, raising the population of Africa, but you can hardly blame a location in the middle of nowhere with barely any people for not having massive cities. Cheyenne, Wyoming isn't exactly a metropolis either.

            All these pictures are from the sahel, doe.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The estimated killed range from 1 million to 13 million, which is a significant range, And total estimated population was anywhere from 10 to 15 million, again, a massive range, which considering the sheer size of the Congo Free State, was over 1 million square miles, thats at most 15 people per square mile, for context, the population density of New York is over 30,000 people per square mile

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >for context, the population density of New York is over 30,000 people per square mile

            And "for context", what are the population density of Russia, Canada and Australia?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Anon, the vast, VAST majority of the land in Russia, Canada, and Australia is underdeveloped

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, but there are still cities in some areas
            I'm pointing out that throwing the population density of the entire place is dumb and meaningless to explain why there isn't a single city in the whole place

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Fair enough, but for its total land size it was no doubt largely underpopulated, which contributed towards its lack of urbanization. There were no population centers

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, because the area is fricking massive?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >If whitey had left Black folks in their primal neolithic state

            Since when are people in the Iron Age Neolithic?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nice own
            Being stuck 3,000 years behind the rest of the world is much better than being stuck 8,000 years behind I guess...
            You sure showed us

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Let's be honest with ourselves anon. The daily life of a turnip farmer in Denmark was no more advanced than the daily life of a yam farmer in modern day Togo.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes it was. Maybe if you brought up a russian serf, maybe.
            A Danish farmer in the 1800s had to navigate drastically different social structures, has never seen a slave. Had draft animals, cultivated grain and not tubers. Lived in an organized state and not in a chiefdom 5 villages wide.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Radiochan

          It's not punishment; it's a natural consequence of what happened.

          African colonial empire sans le négre is fully achievable.
          [...]
          The women in that painting were Black?
          I never fricking noticed. Thought they were some non-descript shade of brown.

          No it's not.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes it is, it's called don't let them in. Don't take modernity as it is for granted, we took a very specific path to get here. Colonialism could have lasted for quite a while had the early 20th century taken another turn.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Radiochan

            Sorry, those places used to be French, they're coming to the metropole anyway. There have been Black folks in France proper since the 1700s.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            We are talking on different frequencies I see.
            We are discussing whether it's possible to not get flooded by mass immigration if you had a colonial empire. And the answer is squarely, yes. Unless you are assuming some irrational scenario were senegambians just materialize in Paris.
            >There have been Black folks in France proper since the 1700s.
            Probably earlier than that, what about it?
            What are you trying to prove?

            The estimated killed range from 1 million to 13 million, which is a significant range, And total estimated population was anywhere from 10 to 15 million, again, a massive range, which considering the sheer size of the Congo Free State, was over 1 million square miles, thats at most 15 people per square mile, for context, the population density of New York is over 30,000 people per square mile

            I highly doubt the congo free-state could possibly kill as many people that efficiently. Regardless, the inner congo barely had fricking states and was under constant warfare/slave raids, I don't see how they could possibly sustain a population of tens of millions.
            Like, I guess the Kongo Kingdom maybe could sustain a little of that, but by the time of the congo free-state, it was confined to angola.
            There's also the problem

            Fair enough, but for its total land size it was no doubt largely underpopulated, which contributed towards its lack of urbanization. There were no population centers

            points out, that basically all cities in the place were founded by europeans.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Radiochan

            No, it's not. This is the natural consequence of having a globe spanning colonial empire.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Explain Sweden.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sweden tried copying the immigration model of colonial powers and former colonial powers like Britain, France, and the USA, because it was largely successful for them throughout the 20th century.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >it was largely successful for them throughout the 20th century

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Moron
            Brown immigration in these countries started at the end of the 20th century, and is the main reason why these place went to shit
            France and Britain were successful BEFORE (or rather UNTIL) brown immigration.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Radiochan

            Sweden has a deep national scar over not doing more in the Holocaust and not taking in more israelites was used to browbeat them into taking in all the Somalis. Also, the Swede does not seem able to comprehend that there are people who thinks differently than he does.
            But we're talking about France, not Sweden. The two are not very comparable except in as much as both are European countries.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Explain Sweden.
            Um...
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Swedish_Gold_Coast

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'd like you to explain why that is.
            You can always just not admit them into your country, you know. This isn't some abstract process of history that is envitable. It was fully preventable and is fully reversible. Les millard de négres is not some deterministic consequence of colonialism, how could you even come to such a conclusion.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Radiochan

            i already did; if you can't admit them in your country don't bother conquering other countries. It is most definitely a deterministic consequence of colonialism if you conquer the brown nations. They're going to make their way back to the metropole.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >i already did; if you can't admit them in your country don't bother conquering other countries.
            You didn't do shit. This isn't an explanation, this is a justification. And a shitty one at that.
            >It is most definitely a deterministic consequence of colonialism if you conquer the brown nations.
            Why?
            >They're going to make their way back to the metropole.
            Explain why

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Explain why
            to have easier access to the government thats ruling over you, they're let in because the alternative is rebellion and the host country losing its valuable colonies.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >to have easier access to the government thats ruling over you,
            Now, say the colonial government tells you to frick off and just doesn't let you buy passanger ship tickets to the capital. How are the senegambians going to get to paris? Teleportation?
            > they're let in because the alternative is rebellion and the host country losing its valuable colonies.
            In what fantasy world do you live in? This literally never happened. Most mass migration happened long after decolonization.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            anon, do you honestly believe France truly decolonized? They still claim soverignty over most of their foreign land holdings

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, francafrique is not a colony, and french overseas territories are not colonies in any discernible sense. Regardless
            >hey're let in because the alternative is rebellion and the host country losing its valuable colonies.
            is a non sequitour.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >They still claim soverignty over most of their foreign land holdings

            They dont hold anuthing in Africa except a tiny island near Mauritius
            >"b-but they have military bases in some countries"
            These countries are free to tell them to leave, as Mali and Niger recently showed
            Same can't be said of Japan and Germany with US military bases

          • 4 weeks ago
            Cult of Passion

            >host country losing its valuable colonies.
            And colonies have semi-direct ties to the top, saar. Showing where the cultures overlap, symbiosis, a child,...creation itself.

            Meta-avatars for meta-creations.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Radiochan

            >Explain why
            to have easier access to the government thats ruling over you, they're let in because the alternative is rebellion and the host country losing its valuable colonies.

            this

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Your framing is false and you concession is accepted.

            >to have easier access to the government thats ruling over you,
            Now, say the colonial government tells you to frick off and just doesn't let you buy passanger ship tickets to the capital. How are the senegambians going to get to paris? Teleportation?
            > they're let in because the alternative is rebellion and the host country losing its valuable colonies.
            In what fantasy world do you live in? This literally never happened. Most mass migration happened long after decolonization.

            P.S: Decolonization as we know it wasn't really an inevitability until ww2. Or perhaps ww1.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >There have been Black folks in France proper since the 1700s.

            Yeah there were a few dozens mixed races dudes brought from the caribbean
            Totally comparable to the current situation...

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You are comparing postcards (i can see the stamps on them, moron) to actual non-staged photos. There were homeless people "then" too, there were drunks, prostitutes and piles of trash on the streets

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sweden didn't have an empire in Africa and they're getting negrified and arabized too. It has nothing to do with colonialism.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why are Black Africans the face of migration when it's Middle Eastern and North Africans who migrate the most? Is this just Nafri propaganda?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Why are Black Africans the face of migration when it's Middle Eastern and North Africans who migrate the most?
        Because they're the most recognizable ones. A lot of native Frenchmen could pass for Middle Easterners lmao

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >"Conversano"
          >Native Frenchman

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversano

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      extremely hot

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's a march for that guy that got squished to death by cops in 2016

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Nancy Cunard
    Like a true bongs and anarchist coal

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    100% Rothschild psyops.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    America is literally a Blackphile

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The word Blackphilia is derived from the French négrophilie
    is the rest of your wall of text as moronic as this first part?

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Describes so many current day media zeitgeists

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *