This person is an utter retard, and no one should take anything they say or write seriously.

This person is an utter moron, and no one should take anything they say or write seriously.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you can take the homosexual out of christianity
    but you can't take the christianity out of a homosexual.

    literally all this guy's arguments are moral arguments. lemme tell you why LGBTQ is good because muh heckin dad was a pastor. really dude?

    no reason to support gays if you're an amoral atheist. they are a harm to others. a harm to themselves. just get rid of them duh. simple equation. try explain how im wrong without resorting to feel feels or morals (you can't).

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      mass murder is unhealthy for the heart of a civilized society. however that doesn't mean we should promote sodomy either. just send them all to an alaskan labor camp and in a generation homosexuals go back to being 0.2% of the population.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There's no point. Modern homosexuality is a product of capitalism. Keep the system the same we end up with a non stop train to Alaska paid for with increased inflation and tax dollars. I'm not even a commie but it's 100 percent true.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Did the free market molest you as a kid?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            and how do you know that?

            I actually leave my safe space

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >explain
      Because I'm stronger than you.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't understand, why is it good to hate LGBTQ?
      if that's what you're alluding to, then you're not any more rational than he is.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I don't understand
        have fun with aids, molestation and social erosion.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          and how do you know that?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            history

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >aids
          fair point
          >molestation
          it could be that they have higher rates of committing sexual assault, however it isn't necessarily inherent to being a homosexual.
          >social erosion
          even if it's true, who cares

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't hate anyone and if anything, I pity them. It's simply the logical conclusion of atheism when it isn't shoe horned into a fake objective morality like secular humanism. Homosexuals lead unhappy lives driven by impulse which is more destructive than opiate addiction as relates to daily control and planning through disruptions induced by hypersexuality which can never be planned. Diseases are incurred through insertion of the penis into an anus, even mild ones such as UTIs will be incurred simply by fecal bacteria coming into contact. The receiver of this action suffers from acute damage and eventual prolapse of the rectum. They are a harm to others by means of disease communication, the negative emotions brought on by disgust which even can be triggered in the most accepting person by stench, and the potential to spread it by convincing someone they feel sexual toward to have sex with them. Individually they would have objectively been better off being heterosexuals and society would have been better off with the absence of homosexuals. The only officially atheist states either criminalized or discouraged homosexuality.

        Most people have a positivity bias which causes them to subjectively ignore their own vast and greater amount of bad experiences in favor of good ones. The bad outweighs the good for not just homosexuals but a great many. If it was a single gene and there was a test, clinically it would be viewed as something like trisomy 18 or downs syndrome or turner syndrome. Only a religious person or psychopath wouldn't abort these hypothetical persons who would suffer more harm by coming into existence than a healthy person.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      mass murder is unhealthy for the heart of a civilized society. however that doesn't mean we should promote sodomy either. just send them all to an alaskan labor camp and in a generation homosexuals go back to being 0.2% of the population.

      Ok buckos, (YOU) do it though.
      >should kill
      >should labor camp
      You do it, drag these people from their homes, beat them up, stab them, guard them.
      Run your opinions through your heads as to what they'd require, see if you could do it, instead of some abstract function that will somehow happen to your benefit. Limp wristed inhumane homosexual fricks

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Its not in my self interest to harm another person. The inability or refusal to do something doesn't invalidate the claim. Weak insult game too, you sound like Dillahunty. The broader point was that secular humanists are basically Christians.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I have no bone to pick with gays. I simply can recognize that homosexuality is disadvantageous from scientific materialist inferences. The bigger problem is humanist atheism which makes no sense. It's the religiosity and evangelism (LGBTQ acceptance and pro choice) that really make it irrational. Indeed, the people most insensed about posts like that, and to whom they are written to trigger, are midwit atheists incapable of eschewing religion entirely. Your mischaractorization of the posts and the insult at the end is fundamentally religious and no different than a pastor twisting the words of an oppenent representing and addressing from reductio ad absurdum arguments and proceeding to pathologize (ad hominem) amounting to saying you are wicked and going to hell. I don't hate gays. I hate the Dillahuntys of the world.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >The bigger problem is humanist atheism which makes no sense
          It's a response to Nazism. Nazism emphasized the right of (biologically) superior groups to expand and dominate/exterminate groups perceived as undesirable, unclean and the like. In contrast, humanist atheism, *drawing on the liberal and Christian traditions*, emphasizes concern for the least in society and firmly opposes maligning of groups along biological lines (race, sex, orientation) and support special right protecting these groups so that something like Nazism can never take root again.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    imagine not being pro-life

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Eugenics.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        hmmm but even then, u can have Eugenics without abortion

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    celebrity atheists are the most laughable human beings

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Here he is literally running away the second he encounters a substantial push-back against his constant straw-manning of the argument for christian ethics.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he ran away because he's dating a mtf troony and there's not actually any way to defend that outside of libshit bubbles

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this. he opened with christian conservatives being anti lgbt for some reason. how that relates to human flourishing i will never understand. andrew had every right to go there with his argument including them and dillahunty absolutely has no response to it. if you check out more of his videos he's an insufferable "e-celeb" atheist who always falls back to "well i'm not convinced" as if that means anything.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >"you're not criticizing secular humanism, you're criticizing what I personally believe!"
      Ummmmmm yes, you personally believe in secular humanism, therefore what you believe is being criticized. Is Matt genuinely moronic?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Andrew debating the entire room after Matt flees is hilarious because all his fans are just as moronic as he is.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the cope in the audience is palpable.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      didn't realize the first time that his boyfriend actually was there in the back when he walked out

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >call andrew a jackass
        >he tells you and your husband to have a nice day
        >clutch pearls
        fricking hilarious how the room erupted to defend dillahunty.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Literally said he wouldn't believe if someone parted the ocean in Jesus name
    For me it didn't even take the magic book of Protestantism and I became Ordodox

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's not completely fair.
    Here is my review of this individual.
    - Above average IQ and can effectively crush the average person in debate.
    - Strong vital force. Passion in his voice and mannerisms. Not an npc and likely has a soul. There's a reason his show has seen success.
    - Is trapped within a rigid ontology. And sadly, it's one that that prevents him being interested in seeing his position or exploring. The very idea of being interested in metaphysics or philosophy our of an authentic curiosity and not grounded in materialistic concerns seems absurd Dillahunty.
    - Hence his knowledge of philosophy lacks any depth, and real thinkers make him look like a fool in debate. Unfortunately, these debates are his least popular, for the very same reason Dillahunty is trapped in a limiting ontology (people aren't actually concerned with truth or the question of being).

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > Above average IQ and can effectively crush the average person in debate.

      No. Incorrect.

      >Strong vital force. Passion in his voice and mannerisms. Not an NPC and likely has a soul. There's a reason his show has seen success.

      This has nothing to do with intelligence.

      >Is trapped within a rigid ontology. And sadly, it's one that that prevents him being interested in seeing his position or exploring. The very idea of being interested in metaphysics or philosophy our of an authentic curiosity and not grounded in materialistic concerns seems absurd Dillahunty.

      True.

      >Hence his knowledge of philosophy lacks any depth, and real thinkers make him look like a fool in debate. Unfortunately, these debates are his least popular, for the very same reason Dillahunty is trapped in a limiting ontology (people aren't actually concerned with truth or the question of being).

      True.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *