Time exists necessarily

Time exists necessarily

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >necessarily
    necessarily for what?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing can be determined to exist without time since existence is a concept of personal agents and time is necessary for personal experience.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Incorrect, proven wrong by Dio Brando's stand Za Warudo

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >time is necessary for personal experience
        Nope. Time is an illusion where you experience life in slow-motion instead of all at once.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        So? Personal experience doesn't even exist necessarily.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        no it's not

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Okay, explain how that works then. Describe how one experiences something without time to do it in.

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    God is a literal moron who thinks he can somehow reframe not wanting to be abused by him/not wanting to exist as me being evil or wronging him somehow like if I post about how he's evil for forcing me to exist so that he can dominate and abuse me through other people in this moronic hell world and how he's evil for raping my mind and terrorizing, abusing, threatening, harassing etc me for my thoughts and gangstalking me and terrorizing, harassing, abusing, threatening etc me for everything I do he will just have his minions start saying "he thinks he's the boss!! He thinks he's the boss!!!" "you're not the boss!!!" etc as if saying that is somehow a justification for the evil shit he does or as if it's somehow a reasonable way to spin his evilness back on me, it isn't, it just makes him sound like a complete moron because that's what he is, a complete moron and everything he says and does is moronic and can't be justified and he knows it so he just says moronic evil shit instead that makes him more evil and stupid

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Spaz out more, freak

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Okay, what does this have to do with the thread topic? Your rambling makes no mention of time.

  3. 4 months ago
    Dirk

    Time is contingent. It has a beginning by nature.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Time and space are eternal and exist independent of the cosmos which at one point spilled from the egg. Measurement of time is relative to when the egg hatched.

      • 4 months ago
        Dirk

        Esoteric dribble

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Except it's the motif that science has come to use for how the Big Bang could have been.
          Jastrow came anyway. "I would like to say at the start that I am a complete agnostic on religious matters," he told the crowd of 800, as he stood before them in a black suit, with dark tie, short-cropped hair and a facial expression which suggested fervent detachment. The lean, bouncy man in his 50s looked the part of a bright young cleric.

          The problem, as Jastrow sees it, is the strong evidence that the universe is "open." That means it started at one point, at one time, and that all the pieces from the original bang will continue to race apart from one another forever.

          The universe will eventually dissipate all its energy and die a cold, lonely death, in fragments.

          Scientists had expected, and hoped, that the universe would stop expanding. They hoped it would finally be shown to have settled into a "steady state," or to be permanently oscillating between exploding and collapsing back again.
          https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1978/02/16/lifting-the-curtain-on-the-cosmic-egg-and-the-big-bang/3e7448c5-101c-490f-a843-0df7c557c4bc/

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Says who?

      • 4 months ago
        Dirk

        Math

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          ... No.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Having a beginning does not entail being contingent.

      • 4 months ago
        Dirk

        Yes it does

        ... No.

        Actual infinites are impossible

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Yes it does
          It doesn't by definition.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Actual infinites are impossible
          How many moments in time are there between one second ago and right now?

          • 4 months ago
            Dirk

            That's not the concept

            ?si=zI9VhJ-wRsts_D7o

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            What is the difference between something having no beginning and it having bypassed an actual infinity? I care not whether we call these temporal or logical moments?

          • 4 months ago
            Dirk

            >bypassed an actual infinity
            I'm not sure what you mean by that

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            If it has no beginning, we can't even imagine at what point it didn't exist. This would involve an infinite regress of ideas that would logically have no end.

          • 4 months ago
            Dirk

            I'm still not following. The point I'm making is that infinite regress is absurd. Time began, a self existent being caused it.

            > Actual infinites are impossible
            Then say “Aristotelian metaphysics” disproves it, not “math”, since actual infinities are perfectly logically consistent in their mathematical formulation.

            Fair

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Logical moments are nonsense and a cope. Its intuitive that time has always existed and therefore that actual infinities are real. Duns Scotus' moving of the goalposts is just the typical semantic moronation that is characteristic of continental philosophy. If there is no infinite regress then God is not actually eternal. Simple as.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >That's not the concept
            It is. Stop being a dumb frick weasel.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Actual infinites are impossible
          So even though God didn't come into existence, he is not infinite? He had a beginning?

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          > Actual infinites are impossible
          Then say “Aristotelian metaphysics” disproves it, not “math”, since actual infinities are perfectly logically consistent in their mathematical formulation.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Its contingent on God's existence and nothing else.

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Time and space are the same thing. What we describe as "time" is just a property of space that states no particle can occupy the same relative space at any particular instance. The reason time moves in a linear arrow is because entropy is more likely to increase in one direction, and so life naturally evolved to percieve time in the overall direction of entropy.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well, ideas at least exist without space but ideas can't exist without time.

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Existence exists necessarely

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Time is an illusion.

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    What is time? Change. Of what? Positions of physical things. Now ask: would time exist if nothing was moving? No.
    I might be wrong, but that was just my reasoning.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      So? Personal experience doesn't even exist necessarily.

      Well to be fair, this is just supposed to make classical theists seethe. I mean yeah, this is a potentially entirely different debate that could be had but I believe in God.

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Time actually exists subjectively
    What now, anon?

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not necessarily

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *