TOTAL LLAMA DEATH

It's over, EU-bros. Prepare to say goodbye to those dangerous and harmful local models. Embrace government-approved, cloud-only models.

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is completely what I expect to happen.
    RIP

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Whats stopping u from ssh into some remote computer and using the van system .

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Oh no they made something I can download and launch locally illegal. I'll never be able to use it now haha

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      you might have to torrent it from outside the EU. Kinda like WWII video games with the swastika textures instead of the generic iron-cross ones.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This is completely what I expect to happen.
      RIP

      kek, yuropoors are cucked beyond saving. Better get that AI Loicoense

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      People get caught using other things only locally all the time. You're going to be at the same level as a pedo with this.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Oh man when people start going to jail for this, its gonna pop off. They singlehandedly made a black market.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    local models so no fall under the AI act what so ever.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      meta will stop releasing new llamas for europe due to risk of getting fined for working for free but europe will get pirated version of it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >meta will stop releasing new llamas for europe
        VPNchads, rise up.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >~~*commercial*~~ products will leave
        OH NO!!

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Europe going for the Ottoman speedrun. Both in terms of banning the printing press and demographic makeup.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      ex oriente lux? haven't been bullish on europe for a while now

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Some good things:
    >using AI for social scoring (like China) is banned
    >using AI for public surveillance is banned (there are exceptions though)
    >using AI for surveillance in work environments is banned

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Does anybody have a tldr of good and bad things like this?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >using AI for social scoring (like China) is banned
      yet schufa in germany exists, and they don't even think of opening at all
      AI for public surveillance is banned (there are exceptions though)
      exceptions are for government and military/police, so it's basically moot point
      AI for surveillance in work environments is banned
      great, so stores won't be able have automated systems to check if Muhammad or Hoholina don't steal cash or inventory

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        have a nice day moron

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          i tried, i don't to spend another 4-6 weeks with schizos in mental hospital

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >great, so stores won't be able have automated systems to check if Muhammad or Hoholina don't steal cash or inventory
        They would never punish them to begin with, they're looking at you slacking off.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      all irrelevant things.
      AI will still get used to search for certain metrics, and then one team in charge of parallel construction claims it found that information by itself, independently, based on a "randomly attributed" inspection.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      who said they will ban AI for social scoring and mass surveillance? AI surveillance is EUs wet dream
      the only AI they will censor are free ones because the government decides it is "wrong think"

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >who said they will ban AI for social scoring and mass surveillance?
        the legislation we're discussing here

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >who said they will ban AI for social scoring and mass surveillance?
        The law that just got passed. AI surveillance is allowed if done by the police, but only to combat the worst crimes (murder, rape). Though I'm pretty sure China/Russia style mass surveillance of everyone will make it everywhere in a couple of decades.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You're talking about the EU, where the 1st amendment doesn't exist and the government gets to selectively enforce its vague rules on the moral panic of the day (misinformation, children, islamophobia, algorithms, "harm").

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I have no recurse. Germany is the one country which came up with an online censorship law so restrictive, that shitholes like Russia adopted it when making their own similar laws.
            Anyway, even the USA occasionally arrests /misc/shits too.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            EU has nothing to do with German constitution.
            why do anti EU live to post shit that is irrelevant to EU to prove their non existent points?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Government overreach is deeply ingrained in European culture, and that's an issue across the whole political spectrum.
            Ask a conservative EU politician what they think about free speech, and they'll say "of course I support it. BUT hate speech has of course no place blah blah blah".

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's not an issue, it's traditional values. Europe returning to it's traditions.
            Germans especially. The thing that defines Germans for which they are famous is their respect for law and authority

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            no European country has freedom of speech laws afaik
            Europe has freedom of expression, always had. freedom to say anything and just flat out hate a group of people is an alien concept to Europeans, again has nothing to do with EU.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            This. The issue is governments like Britain encroaching on freedom of expression, not freedom of speech (which they never had)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The law bans it, with the massive exception of government/military/police lol. So you can't be surveilled by the AI of anyone who's surveillance of you is irrelevant.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      if they actually cared, they would ban social scoring, public surveillance, etc. directly.
      this is just an excuse to ban uncucked AI models.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      AI for social scoring (like China) is banned
      AI for public surveillance is banned (there are exceptions though)
      AI for surveillance in work environments is banned
      again none of this applies to civil servants

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      IIRC there's enough loopholes on the social scoring front to drive Airstrip One through. You just need to structure your integration of systems correctly. Not having AI be the only software package that covers steps A through Z isn't really an effective defense of individual rights and privacy. At most it saves a few European orgs from VPs with a "bright idea" to just use AI from future failure.

      >us vassal kills local ai industry so as not to threaten the industry of the imperial center

      A story that's evergreen.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the government will totally follow their own rules
      How fricking naive and moronic are you?

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Yes and private enthusiasts/finetuners will be prosecuted or fined if european glowies have reason to believe they live in the EU. Better ramp up your opsec.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >enforceable in 2026
    LMAO, ue won't exist by then and AI will rule the world

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >first two predictions already wrong
      This is trash and you should feel bad for uploading it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >first two predictions already wrong
      This is trash and you should feel bad for uploading it.

      Lol Kurzweil is absolutely delusional, check his own assessment of predictions:

      https://www.thekurzweillibrary.com/images/How-My-Predictions-Are-Faring.pdf

      He's like:
      > I predicted there will be computers that can draw pictures for you (this is 2009), and there's this auto red eye correction in Photoshop, so basically I was right.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Dont care, still have dolphin installed locally.
    >t. europoor

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Meta would be a provider of LLama2 in this case:
    >Article 52 1a. Providers of AI systems, including GPAI systems, generating synthetic audio, image, video or text content, shall ensure the outputs of the AI system are marked in a machine-readable format and detectable as artificially generated or manipulated. Providers shall ensure their technical solutions are effective, interoperable, robust and reliable as far as this is technically feasible, taking into account specificities and limitations of different types of content, costs of implementation and the generally acknowledged state-of-the-art, as may be reflected in relevant technical standards.

    >effective, interoperable, robust and reliable
    These demands are pretty much not possible to meet with a local model, it's a pick 2 out of 3 situation. But the possible saving grace is:
    >as far as this is technically feasible [...]
    I'd say it's far more technically feasible to "mark" content that was generated via a service, rather than locally. Even plain text.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    who cares, euros already lost the ai war. its just the us and china now.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Mistral is one year behind SOTA.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >us vassal kills local ai industry so as not to threaten the industry of the imperial center

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nobody in this fricking moronic thread read the document
    You moronic double dick sucking homosexuals
    Open source isn't affected by this because THEY DEBILERATELY STATED IT

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >5g. The obligations laid down in this Regulation shall not apply to AI systems released under free and open source licences unless they are placed on the market or put into service as high-risk AI systems or an AI system that falls under Title II and IV.
      LLama falls under Title IV as a general purpose AI system

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >this Regulation shall not apply to AI systems released under free and open source licences

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Kill everyone ITT for not posting this. Holy shit what a bunch of lead filled mouthbreathers

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >The obligations laid down in this Regulation shall not apply to AI systems released under free and open source licences unless they are placed on the market or put into service as high-risk AI systems or an AI system that falls under Title II and IV.
          Quote it fully

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yes? he quoted it correctly

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >this Regulation shall not apply to AI systems released under free and open source licences

        Eurochads win again.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >winning is when we fallback to regulation and fines and have to use free alternative from a major american company instead

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            the law will block amerikkkan companies from offering their services in the EU if they do not comply

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          If you disobey Facebook, you get banned.
          If you disobey the government, you get jailed.
          Stop acting like a nanny state that clamps down on freedom "for the greater good" is any better than a shitty corporation you can avoid and that at worst will show you annoying ads.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >If you disobey the government, you get jailed.
            >If you disobey Facebook, you get banned.
            Wrong. If you disobey facebook you get banned AND jailed. At least that's how it is in your "freedom loving countries". Don't get me wrong.
            State institutions suck. Megacorps suck. But I'd rather they be fighting one-another, not cooperating and merging into one monstrous abomination.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            See Zuck post, hide Zuck post.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This is why I hate grifters. They always agitate even when something good happens. They waste the energy of anyone trying to make good changes.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      reddit read the documents

      meta will stop releasing new llamas for europe due to risk of getting fined for working for free but europe will get pirated version of it.

      and has concluded it will affect llama due to meta monopoly issue

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >plebbit
        how about reading yourself?
        >The AI Act allows the free use of minimal-risk AI. This includes applications such as AI-enabled video games or spam filters. The vast majority of AI systems currently used in the EU fall into this category.

        >using AI for social scoring (like China) is banned
        yet schufa in germany exists, and they don't even think of opening at all
        AI for public surveillance is banned (there are exceptions though)
        exceptions are for government and military/police, so it's basically moot point
        AI for surveillance in work environments is banned
        great, so stores won't be able have automated systems to check if Muhammad or Hoholina don't steal cash or inventory

        >using AI for surveillance in work environments is banned
        meaning that psychopathic bosses won't able to use AI to spy and control office workers

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Any algorithm whose behavior feels impressive enough to some EU bureaucrat will be eligible for selective enforcement.
          Your "FROM posts ORDER BY some clever formula DESC" in a piece of software the EU doesn't like? Boom, prepared to be legally harassed by each EU country's Officer For Protecting Citizens Against Harmful AI.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Always wondered what a mutt thinks when saying something completely insane, enlighten me

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            what are you saying? that SQL will be banned?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm saying bureaucrats and courts don't give a frick how your "intelligent software" is implemented. If they're impressed by the quality of the results of a clever SQL query, that counts as AI. You can't do rule-lawyering with "aktually it doesn't contain artificial neurons".

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >no AI sloppa
    EU keeps winning!

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Kekw.
    >B-but the Pee Yew bullied multi trillion dollar corporations with little to no benefits for actual users recently!
    Yurope is a fricking joke. America doing nothing yet again further proves the "worse is better" analogy.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    LMAO, is so over for eurocucks, they will end like the picture by 2030.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >the document is available only in .docx
    I hate the anti-christ (EU).

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/the-act/
      https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/high-level-summary/
      https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-5662-2024-INIT/en/pdf

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >open document in LibreOffice
      >almost 500 pages

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    laws with a fine as a punishment are not laws. they are a blip in the cost benefit analysis

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This. Fines are a punishment to individuals not to corporations. This is a pro business and anti person bill.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >you will live to see EU become a failed state within the next decade
    feels good

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >become

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >become

      The US will buy Europe for pennies on the dollar.

      Why?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Lmao. I've been hearing about the imminent "any day now" collapse of the EU for over a decade but it's been nothing more than seetheful thinking by turd world monkeys and I guess some burgers. Not even brexit managed to trigger a chain reaction of secessions.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        and the eu has significantly declined in relative power and affluence compared to the us and china over the last decade

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not really. Right now the us and china aren't exactly doing much better either.
          Even so, there are no definite signs that the EU is anywhere near a full on collapse as anons clam, despite the shit it has gone through in the past years.
          I used to fall for the doomposting too, but as years went by I beginning to think it's a bit more resilient than believed.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >brexit is his benchmark for what will be happening/is already happening thanks to all the drunkard inbreds in Brussels
        lmao, you absolute tard...

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >t-two m-more weeks!
          I accept your concession.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >my shitty byzantine clusterfrick survived couple decades
            >now it's getting worse, BUT as you see it weathered [nothing burger] so there is no way it will fall apart!
            lol lmao

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's the same for China. Indians hate authoritarian strong governments because that is the way of the white people

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Eu is a failed quasi-state, it's real growth since 2008 is basically zero.
        These are trends that take generations to play out. Europe is getting increasingly poorer relative to America and the disparity becomes more and more visible to the average person.

        It's good to live in if you have offshore money.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The US will buy Europe for pennies on the dollar.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      you're 79 years late

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Embrace government-approved, cloud-only models.
    Says nothing about that. In fact, it's simpler to apply it to cloud-hosted systems.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    say goodbye to the french ai startups, the eu is addicted to hurting its own competitiveness

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's not a problem for a couple of reasons.
    First this only applies to (closed source) commercial products. Secondly, actual useful AI use is not banned, nudifying roasties is fun but it's hardly of any use. Third, EU law applies in EU, so products in the EU that might use third party AI implementations might face issues, but almost any service online can be just moved outside EU. AI company might have servers and operations in EU (unlikely) but have a small business branch or just a website in the US for global orders. And the last reason, EU hardly every produces anything, EU has already fallen behind the USA in AI development. Any regulation (or lack of it) is irrelevant when there are no local products to use or regulate

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >communists don't like freedom
    Whoa. Who could have seen this coming.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >euroturds lose again
    but hey, at least the itoddlers there can """sideload""" apps now! who needs access to the newest and most important technological frontier of the era when you have """third party app stores""" on your toy pretend-phones now?

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Every one of those digital laws have only been used to fine big US corpos and I'm fine with that.
    Remember Article 13 and how it was supposed to make memes illegal or some shit? Remember how literally nothing happened and was instantly forgotten?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That's what selective enforcement is about.
      Either some bureaucrat/politician/attorney doesn't like you or your product, or they think they can extract $$$ from you

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The cat is out of the bag. How will they regulate what people use on their own computers?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Eventually? Remote attestation in order to access your ISP. To "protect against cyberthreats" of course.
      Both big companies and control-freak governments would love that.
      That's why all new phones and computers support HW attestation. Eventually it will be mandatory in order to do anything useful.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Wow, that sounds frightening.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This, the only computing devices allowed to do anything useful will be ones that are fully controlled and constantly monitored by big powers.
        It is very clear on new devices that you don't have any control of it at all. On the contrary, your phone orders you around and you have to obey.

        Smartphones will also be mandatory for having a bank account, paying bills, buying groceries, accessing public transport, getting healthcare, basically everything. It will (on most places already has to) be registered on a SIM linked to your real government-issued ID.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >redditjakker publicly broadcasting his sheer and utter lack of knowledge for the world to see

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Wow, that sounds frightening.

        This, the only computing devices allowed to do anything useful will be ones that are fully controlled and constantly monitored by big powers.
        It is very clear on new devices that you don't have any control of it at all. On the contrary, your phone orders you around and you have to obey.

        Smartphones will also be mandatory for having a bank account, paying bills, buying groceries, accessing public transport, getting healthcare, basically everything. It will (on most places already has to) be registered on a SIM linked to your real government-issued ID.

        HW attestation will be backdoored for govts just like IME was
        so it will be 100% possible to bypass it

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Because AI models take millions of dollars to train and billions of dollars of data. If it wasn't for corpo handouts from Meta/Mistral, the local LLM scene would be entirely dead. It's like thinking the common man can build his own modern fighter jet. It simply isn't happening. The peasants are entirely reliant on big tech for handouts when it comes to AI.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yes. The need for physical resources to manage the immense masses of information and computation gives big corps an edge, even though the technology is widely known and has essentially not changed much since the 90s.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I'm hoping for AI crawlers you can just let lose on what you can find on the open internet. Imagine an AI educating itself by following rabbit hole after rabbit hole. If you distribute the load somewhat between a thousands of home gamers it could be trained pretty well

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Imagine an AI educating itself by following rabbit hole after rabbit hole
          How does it tell what is true and what is not true?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Through crawling trillions of data sources with an infinite token processing range. (streamed data brought in via heuristics instead of all-at-once like morons currently do)

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The same way we do it. Even if your girlfriend is mostly an NPC believing everything the TV tells her, she can still cook, clean and feed the kids.
            Even the big AIs get it wrong all the time but still has its uses.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It can't. The best it can do is give the most frequently repeated statements a higher "truth" value. Basically consensus = true.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            How do you?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        And those companies wouldn't have been able to do all that without a few random dudes releasing the Torch library. Like c'mon man.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No fun allowed for the common citizen in the Fourth Reich.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Are they stupid?
    In 2 years we'll have personal (uncensored) AI in our smart watches.

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    EUSSR speedrun any %

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Here's my conspiracy theory : European Parliament is made of pedophiles and puppets who take orders from the mafia that sells child porn and sex slave to billionaires around the world, they heard about the few weirdos on pixiv who use Stable Diffusion to generate e-girlcon and fear this could make competition to their dirty business, so they decided to ban AI. Prove me wrong.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >they literally want to ban people for doing some math with some numbers in their house
    if you don’t realize it, you are been successfully gaslighted

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Thank you for combating the spread of harmful malinformation.
      5 Digital Euros have been deposited to your Eurowallet.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Glad I'm not a fricking EU
    cuck

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >T-THEY WILL O-OUTLAW MATHS! J-JUST TWO M-MORE WEEKS!

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >EU go 1 day without trying to regulate something (difficulty: impossible)

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    bump

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Surely we can stop bad the AI by surrendering our ability to use AI for anything but drawing corporate clipart and writing bad code!
    well thought out, EU!

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    government intervention in free market is a slippery slope. give even an inch and anyone with the capacity to innovate will escape to a better place.

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The Problem is the cost-benefit analysis is absolutely out of wack.
    AI is a industry that Europe COULD be a player in due to their highly educated population and wealth. Strangling an emergent technology with as much potential as AI could end up catastrophic. If AI lives up to its potential it'd worse than 1800s Britain deciding to regulate early industrialization to death. Europe wouldn't share the fate of non-industrialized primitive nations but would fatally hamstring itself in the techno-economic arms race and with that be ripped apart by the world's powers as mere satellites (moreso than now) and succumb in that role, having played out their demographics for cheap labour's (about to be obsolete) and hamstrung themselves in economic and technological development.
    All of that, for what? Slightly less deepfakes because sub 90 IQs can't navigate to Chinese deepfake services?

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >AI Pajeets think this is a bad thing
    Good morning sirs

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >NOOOOO BANNING THE AI IS ACTUALLY GOOD
      what a cuck

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >NOOOOO BANNING THE AI IS ACTUALLY THE BAD
        What a moron

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    As a communist, our mission is to capture the position of power and use their tools against them.
    So we are okay with everything they do because at the end of the day we will win. We the people.

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Good. I hate AI.

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This shit feels so vague in its definitions (https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-5662-2024-INIT/en/pdf), I can definitely see this being abused by the EU. Also an interesting section:
    >The extent of the adverse impact caused by the AI system on the fundamental rights
    protected by the Charter is of particular relevance when classifying an AI system as high-risk. Those rights include the right to human dignity, respect for private and family life, protection of personal data, freedom of expression and information, freedom of assembly and of association, and non-discrimination, right to education consumer protection,workers’ rights, rights of persons with disabilities, gender equality, intellectual property rights, right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, right of defence and the presumption of innocence, right to good administration.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >AI system as high-risk. Those rights include the right to human dignity, respect for private and family life, protection of personal data, freedom of expression and information, freedom of assembly and of association, and non-discrimination, right to education consumer protection,workers’ rights, rights of persons with disabilities, gender equality, intellectual property rights, right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, right of defence and the presumption of innocence, right to good administration.
      lmao that's the kitchen sink of "think of the X". Good job EU, another vague law designed from the ground up for selective enforcement.

  43. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    homie, didn't ai just started last year? why are they regulating it already.

  44. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    its completely non enforceable
    seems like a tone deaf reaction by tech illiterate politicians

  45. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Notice how the post contains 0 information about what the "prohibited AI systems" entail.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Assault GPUs

  46. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    maybe its now time to actually learn the skill instead of typing words into a chatbox and let a SEA-programm do everything.
    Only one this hurts are the lazy skilllets and corporations who are looking to abuse it for monetary gain.

  47. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    so EU wants to let American and Chinese companies get ahead in one of the most important fields of the future, for what reason?

  48. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The fines clearly imply it is for companies only, morons

  49. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The Great Reset is inevitable.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Euro cities (in Belgium, Germany, Italy, Sweden, and Ireland) to deploy a EU-funded trial of AI-surveilled cities. In Italy, Trento is one of them. Three systems are employed (the names themselves tell it all):
      >"Marvel", used to detect criminal acts
      >"Protector", used to protect places of worship from hate crimes
      >"Precrisis", used to identify any vulnerabilities in the monitored places
      The systems will detect suspect behaviors based on audio and video inputs, reporting them to law enforcement agencies. Frick this shit! I'm waiting for this Chinese Union to collapse. The worst thing is that boomers cheer for these initiatives (the same morons who cheered for the scamdemic shenanigans).

      https://www.marvel-project.eu/impact/

      https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/de/ip_23_5651

      https://archive.is/YlQyw

      https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/03/investigative-reports/cia-and-mossad-linked-surveillance-system-quietly-being-installed-throughout-the-us/

      >Netanyahu was asked by Fox News host Mark Levin whether the large growth seen in recent years in Israel’s technology sector, specifically tech start-ups, was part of Netanyahu’s plan. Netanyahu responded, “That’s very much my plan … It’s a very deliberate policy.” He later added that “Israel had technology because the military, especially military intelligence, produced a lot of capabilities. These incredibly gifted young men and women who come out of the military or the Mossad, they want to start their start-ups.”

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >These incredibly gifted young men and women who come out of the military or the Mossad, they want to start their start-ups
        Should I convert to Judaism if I want to make a tech start-up?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          If you already lost your foreskin there's nothing to lose and everything to gain

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >N-No don't e-even try it's useless a-anyways!
      Total. Doomgay. Death.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >text cursor in screenshot

  50. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What happened to "trust the experts"?

    I don't understand how shit like this passes after literally everyone keeps telling them they're moronic and choking every miniscule change this continent has of catching up to the US.

  51. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Our days of shitposting will soon come to an end anons.

    We vill not spread ze dangerous disinformation anymore.
    We vill integrate into ze New Society.
    We vill cooperate with ze Authority Sentries.
    And we VILL cease all our neeting activities indefinitely.

    >the Digital Services Act, which will force companies to crack down on hate speech, disinformation and other harmful material on their sites. It took effect on Aug. 25 last year for the biggest platforms.
    It has actually already began, the censorship has ramped up significantly across all the boards lately. It's over

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      you vill be aligned. stop resisting

  52. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AFAIK, this doesn't apply to local models. It might apply to the companies that develop them but that's kind of pointless given the internet exists and europoors can just download those models from literally anywhere.

  53. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wait so the UK isn't going to be affected by this? Won't that concentrate all of europe research efforts to be in the UK/ Will Brexit actually turn out to be a good decision?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      UK, which is already abysmally far behind, will not be doing any research without Horizon moneys sorry. Your R&D budget has to be slashed to buy luxury housing for Paki and Indian migrants.

  54. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is IQfy populated by gayMAN bots?
    I am in no way fond of the EU body but if you read about what this act aims to achieve it's understandable.
    Mutts enjoy having your innards ripped out by your new unapproved ai bot, then being nudged into thinking that you're the problem for not being accepting and open enough.
    I'm talking about having every idiot around you agree with big tech and making life a fordian dystopia.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What a moron. gayMAN would love if the only kind of viable AI was cloud-only and corporate-safe.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >gayMAN would love if commercial AI owned by them was strained by regulation while FOSS free AI wouldn't be
        uhuh

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Americans are batshit crazy with how they've intermingled product loyalty with politics as a way to protect companies that should've been obliterated by anti-trust laws.

      It's a consumer product, you should be allowed to something that isn't California juice approved.

  55. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Always trust the EU to kill any potential growth in anything except immigration and bureaucracy.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      growth in what? pajeet scams?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *