UK TO IMPLEMENT UNLIMITED FINES FOR CREATING DEEPFAKE PORN

you VILL pay every every penny you earn for the rest of your life for that AI porn you made

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Based. Frick cookers and degenerates.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      so if ai art isn't art because it stole from artists and its actually theirs does that mean the original artists are the ones that will be fined for deepfake porn because they're the ones that really own it?

      So deepfakes are bad but importing millions of rapist jeets like sunak is ok? Glad the priorities are in order

      You approve of them making pictures of a cute little girls a crime and than You cry about it when they make pictures of prostitutes that are most likely actual prostitutes pretty much same crime...
      go lick a boot ,
      lick a israeli boot ,
      it is the only thing You are good at ,
      maybe shit-skin Muslim Black person boot too ,
      LICK IT !

      here's the official press release:
      https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-cracks-down-on-deepfakes-creation

      >The new law will mean that if someone creates a sexually explicit deepfake, even if they have no intent to share it but purely want to cause alarm, humiliation or distress to the victim, they will be committing a criminal offence.

      imo this is unclear re: creating such an image but not 'wanting to cause alarm etc' or sharing it. so if i just make deepfakes and on my computer, never shared with anyone, and my computer becomes evidence as part of some other thing, is there a criminal offence? some of the papers are not reporting it this way and suggesting that the act of producing the image itself is an offence.

      >It will also strengthen existing offences, as if a person both creates this kind of image and then shares it, the CPS could charge them with two offences, potentially leading to their sentence being increased.

      as expected this just expands the existing revenge porn laws.

      interesting note at the end:

      >This offence will apply to images of adults. This is because the law already covers this behaviour where the image is of a child (under the age of 18).

      if you were making ai cp this doesn't change anything, you were already fricked.

      >As part of the Criminal Justice Bill, which continues its passage through Parliament, the government is also creating a range of new criminal offences to punish those who take or record intimate images without consent - or install equipment to enable someone to do so.
      this offence will be amended in to the current bill. as far as i can see the text of the proposed amendment is not available.

      based. send all AI losers to prison forever and steal all their money

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >t. inkcel

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Dumb phone poster

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      so the UK is banning gays and trannies now? based.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      eyyy, frick you too, wiener sucker

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >cookers
      I fricking HATE cooking

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Frick cookers
      Damn, and British “food” was already on its last legs.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Good fricking stuff. About time

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >cookers
      This
      Ill never forgive IQfy for shitting on my omelettes

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    so if ai art isn't art because it stole from artists and its actually theirs does that mean the original artists are the ones that will be fined for deepfake porn because they're the ones that really own it?

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    So deepfakes are bad but importing millions of rapist jeets like sunak is ok? Glad the priorities are in order

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >importing

      Sunak was born in Southampton, UK. He is not an immigrant.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        and his family are not immigrants maybe?
        a pig born in a stable isn't a horse

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          a human born in the uk and a human born in france is still a human

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They have people over in the UK?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            no idea, I don't visit shitholes

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            your point is? do you know what an analogy is?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            a faulty analogy leads to a faulty conclusion

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >can't understand a simple analogy therefore unfit to make any conclusion
            FTFY

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I accept your concession.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            he made concession that you are inept indeed. now show your hands

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Sunak isn't an immigrant. His parents are subject of British empire and citizens proper and their entire generational family line up are citizens of the empire proper for hundreds of years.

      I think you got him confused. He's actually advocating for removing the illegal immigrants

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        just how gullible are you? he has presided over years of record-breaking levels of immigration - both legal and illegal - and deportation rates remain at a small fraction of what they were in the blair years.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        just how gullible are you? he has presided over years of record-breaking levels of immigration - both legal and illegal - and deportation rates remain at a small fraction of what they were in the blair years.

        The modern elected conservative is about finding ways to funnel money to his friends in exchange for future favours. As far as the collapse of the country and the abandonment of traditional conservative positions, lol. You will get vague lip service at best and no efforts that cost political capital. That's already been allocated to domestic corruption or achievement international deals.

        https://i.imgur.com/8tZSBgn.jpeg

        you VILL pay every every penny you earn for the rest of your life for that AI porn you made

        Like I bet this is going to come hand in glove with a new enforcement mechanism and framework farmed out to either favoured NGO or private contractors. Sites where people post images will be mandated to pay either the public regulator or these firms for the privilege of operating in compliance with the law. Total coincidence when future board members will be ex-Tories.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          correct, this is yet another way for c**ts to make money through government contracts

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >importing

        Sunak was born in Southampton, UK. He is not an immigrant.

        >Muh he isn't an immigrant
        holy cope

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >He's actually advocating for removing the illegal immigrants
        And you believe him?
        My Eastern European friend said their university has mandatory LGBT propaganda course.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          > their university
          The government has very little power over the unis bro.
          Students are always fricking left wing gays who all think they are the next Stalin. Till they hit 30. Then the real world hits.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Is he a rapist? Or are you so low IQ you can't get basic facts in order?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >is pah-jeet a rapist?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >a literal collage of daily mail headlines
          Are you having an aneurysm, /misc/troon?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >THE DAILY MAIL???

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >COWHHHHH GOD THE DAILY MAIYEUWLLHH

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >COWHHHHH GOD THE DAILY MAIYEUWLLHH

            Every bird upon my word
            Is singing treble – I’m a rebel
            Every hen it’s said is laying hand grenades
            Over there sir, I declare Sir
            And every wiener in the farmyard
            Stock crows in triumph for the Gael
            And it wouldn’t be surprising
            If there’d be another rising
            Said the man from the Daily Mail

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >troony can't read
            Many such cases

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Good thing only buttholes live on Paki/India island.

      Yes. They must be imported. How can you otherwise convince Brits they need to be paid slave wages? UK is mimicking US but instead of attracting intelligent people, foreign capital and businesses they attract low IQ muslim apes. It's a country of villains as its main earning model is fraudulent financial services.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        LOL IF SUNAK WAS MUSLIM YOUR FRICKING OUTPOST NEXT TO THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN SEA WOULD'VE BEEN NUKED

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >US
        >attracting intelligent people, foreign capital and businesses
        ?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Top researchers, businesses, capital and so on it comes from around the globe to the US. They offer much more money than European or east Asian countries. The country is lifted up immensely by its ability to attract people to hold up its economic growth. No other country on earth has the pull factor US has.

  4. 1 month ago
    кaни

    You approve of them making pictures of a cute little girls a crime and than You cry about it when they make pictures of prostitutes that are most likely actual prostitutes pretty much same crime...
    go lick a boot ,
    lick a israeli boot ,
    it is the only thing You are good at ,
    maybe shit-skin Muslim Black person boot too ,
    LICK IT !

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >lick a israeli boot ,
      >it is the only thing You are good at ,
      >maybe shit-skin Muslim Black person boot too ,
      tis the yuropoorean way of life anon!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm not a bootlicker, but there's something about Russian cum...

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          it's funny because кaни is a russian (or serbian? can't recall) padophile

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Russia is based, unlike the West and especially Anglo shitholes.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Based on AIDS and male on male rape. have a nice day, garbage.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            oink

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            When do you deploy? Soon, I hope.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >le israelites = le bad
      >watching porn all day = le good
      mutually exclusive

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    here's the official press release:
    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-cracks-down-on-deepfakes-creation

    >The new law will mean that if someone creates a sexually explicit deepfake, even if they have no intent to share it but purely want to cause alarm, humiliation or distress to the victim, they will be committing a criminal offence.

    imo this is unclear re: creating such an image but not 'wanting to cause alarm etc' or sharing it. so if i just make deepfakes and on my computer, never shared with anyone, and my computer becomes evidence as part of some other thing, is there a criminal offence? some of the papers are not reporting it this way and suggesting that the act of producing the image itself is an offence.

    >It will also strengthen existing offences, as if a person both creates this kind of image and then shares it, the CPS could charge them with two offences, potentially leading to their sentence being increased.

    as expected this just expands the existing revenge porn laws.

    interesting note at the end:

    >This offence will apply to images of adults. This is because the law already covers this behaviour where the image is of a child (under the age of 18).

    if you were making ai cp this doesn't change anything, you were already fricked.

    >As part of the Criminal Justice Bill, which continues its passage through Parliament, the government is also creating a range of new criminal offences to punish those who take or record intimate images without consent - or install equipment to enable someone to do so.
    this offence will be amended in to the current bill. as far as i can see the text of the proposed amendment is not available.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The first paragraph makes it clear that the issue is with the images themselves. If you create any "alarm, humiliation or distress" will simply be assumed and you'll be a slave for the rest of your life.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        i think proving intent is probably going to be easy in most cases because tb h the only people who ever get prosecuted under laws like this are braindead morons who are actually out to do these things, but i don't think production itself is an offence here.

        again, most people are morons and will use a telegram bot or a website and in that case i think there might be a prima facie case of sharing

        regardless, i don't think this law actually changes very much in practical terms

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          also i will say that mods should probably make nudify threads a bannable offence. i don't know why they've let them up in /b/ and /r/ for as long as they have because it's clear doing things like this was always against the law, but maybe now that we're seeing actual legislation they'll start removing the threads.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            what the hell are you talking about?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            this is /r/ right now lol

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >it's clear doing things like this was always against the law
            what are you on about?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            creating pornographic imagery of someone without their consent is a criminal offense, usually under obscenity or voyeurism laws

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            is there a federal law i'm not aware of?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            bruh artists have been drawing nude females forever now what are you on about

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Only if it's published and distributed in a targeted manner to defame, offend, or insult the subject. If you take an already legally publicly available photo and alter it in a transformative way then you're the only one who has any rights to it.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >you don’t understand officer, that 9 year old that i took a picture of in the park and digitally altered to take 9 BBCs in a gangrape is a transformative work!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/8/24094633/deepfake-ai-explicit-images-florida-teenagers-arrested

            is there a federal law i'm not aware of?

            no federal offense yet in burgerland, but i think they have a bill doing the rounds now. again, most states probably have laws on the books that already cover scenarios like this.

            don't be an idiot. if you're doing this stuff, keep it to yourself.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            in other words, it's legal

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >They were charged with third-degree felonies under a 2022 Florida law that criminalizes the dissemination of deepfake sexually explicit images without the victim’s consent.
            literally not
            states rights and all that
            but hey man, you wanna risk going to jail keep doing what you're doing

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            i don't like deepfakes so it doesn't concern me. i'm just pointing out that your claim that it's blatantly illegal is false, depending on where IQfy is hosted.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            rule 1
            >You will not upload, post, discuss, request, or link to anything that violates local or United States law.
            last i checked, florida was in the united states and a federal offence is inevitable
            it's not worth having those threads on this site anyway, they're mostly just people advertising their telegram bots
            the potential legal liability should be enough to start banning those threads
            or y'know it's just a honeypot lol

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            how does a state crime lead to a federal offense?
            I'm glad IQfy is just as fricking moronic a 15 years ago.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >You will not upload, post, discuss, request, or link to anything that violates local or United States law.
            Then anyone who discusses abortion must be banned because abortion contradicts certain state laws. That's not how these rules work.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            1 trillion dollars fine to IQfy

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >it's clear doing things like this was always against the law,
            what law?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Taking upskirt shots and posting them is against the law. generating a nonconsensual lewd photo that is intended to look real is effectively the same

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >even if they have no intent to share it but purely want to cause alarm, humiliation or distress to the victim,
      what if i purely just want to coom?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Then look at videos of someone who consented to be filmed? You rape artists on this site post repulsive shit like this and cry on IQfy about getting no pussy.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Brits are already cucked beyond belief, it's like pissing in the ocean at this point

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    haha things get worse

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Seems very reasonable. I don't want people making fake porn of me or my family.
    Some questions come to mind, mostly about what counts as explicit and about how realistic the image has to be to count as a deepfake. But in general this seems to be a good move.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      As usual, bootlickers lack imagination
      >make some quality AI porn for you and your web bruvs, just being a good mate
      >output happens to resemble some OnlyFans model you've never heard of
      >she flails about and screams like a football player whose ear got touched
      >burden is on you to prove you weren't targeting her, which is how it has to be, otherwise every guy would be going "oh this image looks my ex-boss? I don't really think so" and the law would be toothless

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >output happens to resemble some OnlyFans model
        AI porn disrupts the "ethical porn" economy. White women were supposed to have career opportunities in "sex work entrepreneurship," aka being onlyfans prostitutes for brown men. israelites like Steven Pinker have been pushing "ethical" porn explicitly to get white birthrates down ostensibly because of climate change.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You're projecting

          Browns don't have money to pay for porn

          It's Whites who pay for porn

          have a nice day fricking Chink

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    So like, what if it's an image of an imaginary person who mearly looks like someone else?

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    So basically all you have to do is to just post the image from outside of UK?

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    UK yet again proving itself to be more authoritarian than russians

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That’s the main selling point.
      You move there as a billionaire then sue the peasants if they make a funny of you.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the country is falling apart and the government spend their time infighting, filling their pockets, and on stupid legislation like this

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      it is a law for women voters. the government are in an election year so they are creating policy that will appeal to voters. the threat of someone making porn of you if you are a women is almost zero but you are told it is a possibility. so criminalising the possibility is meant to show tories are the party of women.
      sending such an image is already illegal under the Malicious Communications Act. so many new laws are just increasingly specific interpretations of existing laws.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Once it's outlawed, they'll mandate on-device scanning for it. Creating a new category of illegal bit patterns is very useful.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it's not just coomers, moron-kun
    people have gone to jail on UK for posting song lyrics with Black person
    the UK is a total shithole

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    YFW YOU DON'T LIVE IN BRITBONGISTAN

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How will they enforce it?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      by wasting resources that should be used to address violent crimes and thefts, of course.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Good. Too many people are watching porn instead of working and contributing to the economy.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >vile degenerates
    >he's not talking about homosexuals and trannies
    >you would go to jail for calling a homosexual a vile degenerate in bongland

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Coomers are the most oppressed minority in the year 2024

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        First they came for the gamers.
        And I did not speak out. for I was not a gamer.
        Then they came for the coomers,
        And I did not speak out, for I was not a coomer.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It's the other way round. First were coomers then anime enjoyers, then gamers and lastly (You)

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    so let me get this straight

    OK
    >open ai
    >HRT
    >cutting balls off men
    >brown immigrants
    >Russia invading Ukraine

    NOT OK
    >deep fakes
    >TRT
    >shaming cutting off balls
    >no immigrants
    >affordable housing

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      you forgot high speed rail

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        China's such a bunch of morons. They're using their high speed rail programs to actually build high speed rail. Who even does that?
        In the UK for example the rail expansion programmes are explicitly designed to funnel money to those who are properly connected. That's why they're funded so lavishly by government compared to China and for many fewer miles of track and why the projects take longer. It's all by design.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >chemically castrates himself
      >rants about cutting off balls

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >vile degenerates
      >he's not talking about homosexuals and trannies
      >you would go to jail for calling a homosexual a vile degenerate in bongland

      lol what a fricking shithole
      groomer gangs are a-ok tho

      First the conservacucks came for the trannies but I wasnt a troony
      Then they came for the coomers and I was a coomer

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Define brown immigrants because if it doesn't apply to israelites and asiatics then you're an incel

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Matt Tye used to be fun. Pre 2017 or whenever his 1st daughter was born was KINO

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    how an indian introduce law in the uk ? idgi

    • 1 month ago
      кaни

      puppet is surely in charge right? as if Anglo did not sell out to israelite about century ago

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    yes

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You can extend this to every single anglo country.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      As long as it fricks over aitards I support it.

      You can extend this to every single anglo country.

      This is a good thing, anglos and third worlders deserve each others.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Oh no! A law will stop people from generating them!

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Getting your picture deepfaked is part and parcel of posting your face on the internet.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    lol what a fricking shithole
    groomer gangs are a-ok tho

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Women basically get everything they want. They can even destroy the world the way they want and punish men for trivial things while they destroy western civilization

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the funny thing is that most women would unironically be okay with Sharia law

      • 1 month ago
        кaни

        shit-skin alert
        WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          don't believe me?
          >most women are perfectly ok with putting themselves in harems, as long as it's a very high value male
          >women yearn to be "put in their place", every single blue-haired progressive has an absolute chud of a boyfriend
          >most women would be perfectly OK with not having to work a single day in their life

          • 1 month ago
            кaни

            get out of Your room and meet some actual woman You subhuman

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        i belive this. I think women are just seeing how far they can go until the males snap and "act like men" again and put them into their place. Its basic women psychology. They do that instincively, like children, they dont think about the future. And now we see it in mass scale with feminism etc, smash the patriachy etc.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >porn
      >trivial thing

      The great coomer defender of western civilization. Degeneracy bad, but don't you dare tread on my e-girl special folder.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        where did he mention porn D:

        are you projecting anon? also anti porn here but this is just weird to bring up when he didn't even mention it o_0

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          what's the context of this thread you gay moron

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I didn't read the original post, my bad actually. Sorry anon, you're right.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Feminism is the only good thing happening from 200 years of democracy.
      Feminism is good because it destroys the grotesque male narrative that men are the stronger sex. The truth is that women sit at the top of the sex market. Women are sex capitalists. It's women who organize the competition . It's men who compete for women and not women who compete for men. So they are right to be very strict about the rules. And since they are the queens, and 99% of men just live to provide for them, they have the luxury of rebuking any male quest they want and imposing on men various duties.
      The even bigger picture is that Men never really managed to tame the female sexual cravings. Women cannot be contained in coats of conventions, the female sexual libido is too strong and too violent for this. A women is pure sexual energy. When she discovers this, when she peels off the phony social layers, she merges with her true whorish self and she will never ever be the same.
      This is why all societies are flawed inherently. And it doesn't help that all men are eager to please women sexually and non-sexually. democracy is even worse.

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    SIR
    I
    R

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    how do they know it's a deepfake? the burden of proof is on the person making empirically unfalsifiable claims

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    seems like a massive grey area what about for personal use?

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    he's got an expiration date that is rapidly approaching and he's desperate to make it seem like he's capable of doing literally anything

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Just pick up a pencil loser, I draw nsfw and whatever I want of whoever whenever I want and no one can do a fricking thing. You're ai will always have limitations, my flesh and mind does not...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I fully expect this to be a stepping stone towards making all porn of famous people illegal.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Literally soon enough the art of making fun of famous people that people like will be illegal

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Good?

        And where is the problem here? Why in the frick would it be okay to make porn of anyone who doesn't want it?

        Boomers trying to regulate something they have no control whatsoever over is always funny to see. As If this would change a thing, the AI gigacoomers are from China and Japan.

        Who cares, the law still allows to punish c00mers in UK who spread that shit.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          post breasts then kys roastie

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >implying someone can't make AI porn of you getting railed by 2 Black folk

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >the law still allows to punish c00mers in UK who spread that shit.
          Anon, the UK AI coomer scene is insignificant if compared to the others.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Obviously but bong politicians can only deal with local problems.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why not just let it exist? People will be more critical of what's generated and what isn't, which will basically make generated porn as inconsequential as a rumor. But by criminalizing it, you don't let people get accustomed to the technology, meaning they can easier be influenced by generated porn because they don't really encounter it that often.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't live in the loicense commonwealth tho

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Someone make porn of Sunak

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Boomers trying to regulate something they have no control whatsoever over is always funny to see. As If this would change a thing, the AI gigacoomers are from China and Japan.

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I sure hope no one deepfakes mr. Sunak gobbling on a giant black wiener

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I use Mullvad VPN. Good luck, UK

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not British (thank God) but I'd like to cordially invite this brown gerbil to go frick himself and - if possible - learn to poo in loo.

    Laws don't really matter anymore since tech has advanced beyond the reach of states, so it really doesn't matter what browns or boomers or whoever the frick wants. It's a free for all. Welcome to the birth of real freedom.

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Troonack is just a puppet

  38. 1 month ago
    lowercase sage

    Degenerate here. How much do I pay for my sweaty Dorf?

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >an elected government official uses a private company owned messaging platform to communicate with the public matters of laws in an official manner using the words "vile degenerates"

    The lack of decorum and sense of appropriate presentation in the modern world is giving me feelings of revulsion so deep and fundamental that I have trouble putting it into words.

    The fact that government institutions use private websites for public communication alone is enough to make me gag.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      miki-sama miki-sama oshioki kibonnu

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        love that she actually made and sold her own shirts with this on it

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How is it different than giving interviews to private channels as was done since ever? The shit is probably published on the government website too.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        At least at some point, there were journalists asking questions that were possibly researched beforehand. The answers weren't required to be shorter than 200 characters, and you had an alternative, public channel, that was just as reachable as the private channel. Well, okay maybe that doesn't apply to the US.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's a lot more honest this way. There's no illusion of wanting the betterment of your country or your citizens. They can go full-on emotional hoopla to grab the attention and support of the lowest common denominator. And it works!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >>an elected government official uses a private company owned messaging platform to communicate with the public matters of laws
      There's nothing wrong with this moron. The same could be said as using Iphone/Android earthquake alerts or some moronic shit, it's a communication channel.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        it's pretty different because social media decides what you see
        there are ways to overexpose and underexpose information in a way that targets individuals
        that's control that regular cable will never have

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Remember when NERV got rate limited on Twitter/X?
      Kek.
      I don’t think you can save the normoids from themselves at this rate.

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This will be immediately used to target wrongthink because that is the true objective here. They will be permitted to make AI memes, but not you!

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    if i was in the uk right now i would make some but i am not and this is a direct effect of moronic shit like this. in countries of eastern europe, africa and middle east you are starting to see a standart of living comparable to the uk and almost no laws in comparison. An anon from Mozambique on /misc/ argued that it is not a bad place and basically won. Yes, in 2024 Mozambique is an ok alternative to the UK. I can also name Bahrain, Bulgaria, Romania, Mali, Namibia and Kazakhstan as all quite better places to live than the UK

  43. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >AAAAAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE I UPLOADED AN IMAGE TO THE INTERNET AND THE INTERNET USED IT THESE HECKIN' BIGOT MISOGYNIST CREEP CHUDS SAVE ME GOVERNMENT I'M GOING INSANE AAAAAAIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
    why are women like this

  44. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    yes, you should be punished for creating fake porn of real people

  45. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You first.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      kill
      yourself
      you
      moronic
      underage
      mentally
      ill
      schizo
      reddit
      newbie

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You first 🙂

  46. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    coomers in crisis management rn frfr

  47. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You have to have gays but if you do weird things with your computer you're a bad person.

  48. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    yfw you get served with a 3 gorillion bongbux fine for making pr0n of your favorite female politician

  49. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nice, frick AI Black folk
    >but it's not-
    It's close enough

  50. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    OY SIR, DO YOU HAVE A LOINCENCE FOR THAT THOUGHT?

  51. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >I NEED TO CUM I NEED TO CUM I NEED TO MAKE FAKE NUDE IMAGES OF OTHER PEOPLE SO I CAN CUM TO THEM WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT BECAUSE IM A PORN ADDICTED INCEL NOOOOOOOOO THE GOVERNMENT CANT TAKE AWAY MY RIGHT TO CUM TO PEOPLE WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Correct. The moral panic spouted by Black personcattle won't change my mind.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >If you ejaculate you're an addict and mentally deficient.
      Imagine letting the glavset roosters on /misc/ psychologically castrate you. Imagine the complete demoralization.

  52. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I love Russia, I love the axis of resistance, I hate all dystopian Anglo nations.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You love the wiener, pidoras.

  53. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    But mass child rape by foreigners is part and parcel? Some odd priorities m8

  54. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    just have sex?

  55. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The UK is an authoritative shithole based on 1984 so this wasn't unexpected.
    >unlimited fine
    Now that is interesting - are they saying there isn't an upper limit to the fine amount? If so that's kinda fricked as far worse crimes probably have a statutory limit on the fine amount.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      In the UK, female murderers get 1 year prison sentences, evil deepfakers can count on millions of $ fines and a permanent entry in the sex offender registry.

      >Mich. Teen Who Killed Sleeping Dad by Dousing Him with Lye Released from Jail After Fewer than 2 Years
      >Megan Joyce Imirowicz, 19, was found guilty of dousing her father with chemical drain cleaner, resulting in his death months later

  56. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    When will Saxons learn to hate again?

  57. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How the frick would they even know?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They will ignore the 11 year old white girls getting raped and devote all their resource tracking you down

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You are meant to post joking replies to threads like these, not factual ones.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They have the might of NSA surveillance to back them up.
      What? What do you mean they could use this power to track dangerous criminals harming real people? Slag off, exposing racists and coomers is more important.

  58. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    UK is a shithole with no future

  59. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >if someone creates a sexually explicit deepfake, even if they have no intent to share it but purely want to cause alarm, humiliation or distress to the victim, they will be committing a criminal offence.
    Cool, so just don't put your AI gen porn on the Internet and you won't get fined. I don't want to see it either.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What's fun about this is that it's legal in other English speaking countries so if you don't like someone in the UK you can email them ai porn then report them to the police.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That wouldn't work either because it's "creation" of sexually explicit deepfake. So that's another technical loophole if you get caught with AI porn.
        >No officer, I didn't make it, some disgusting criminal sent me this.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          What does "creation" mean? You're not generating it personally, you're requesting a computer (often a remote one) generate it. All you have to do is put that in the email subject; "Your generated image is ready, see attached."

  60. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I completely agree with the sentiment, but fricking hell there are bigger issues in the UK than this.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I completely agree with the sentiment
      You're an useful idiot.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You're an ESL.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not an argument.

  61. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AI as a whole should be banned for all eternity. Silica Animus should never be allowed to exist.

  62. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Europeans shouldn't be allowed to touch technology

  63. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >importing

    Sunak was born in Southampton, UK. He is not an immigrant.

    Sunak isn't an immigrant. His parents are subject of British empire and citizens proper and their entire generational family line up are citizens of the empire proper for hundreds of years.

    I think you got him confused. He's actually advocating for removing the illegal immigrants

    Is he a rapist? Or are you so low IQ you can't get basic facts in order?

    Holy british cope

  64. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That tweet isn't real. You have a loicense for these fakeries, luv?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *