Wait, so you mean to tell me that the new QD-OLED monitors suffer MORE burn-on than older models?

Wait, so you mean to tell me that the new QD-OLED monitors suffer MORE burn-on than older models? I thought that the lower power consumption made it more difficult to burn-in? How can people buy such obviously flawed technology.

IPS is best for productivity (clearest text, no burn-in, best viewing angles)
MiniLED is good if you want some reasonably deep blacks, but you also don't want disposable garbage.
OLED is only suitable for watching videos and playing games, but there better not be any static elements in those videos and games.

When will manufacturers use non-OLED for flagship phones? My One Plus 8 has severe burn in. This technology isn't suitable for anything beyond watching videos/playing games.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    While OLED is prone to burn-in the rate at which it happens is determined by power consumption and modern OLED is more energy efficient than older OLED.

    Phone OLED = less than 1 AMP/5W
    TV OLED = More than 10 AMPs/50W

    How many watts do you think picrel is using during video playback?

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because it still takes an extremely long time to burn-in an OLED panel, especially if you're not an idiot who abuses the panel.

    Of course for a stupid person like you, it is probably not a good idea to own an OLED.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >it still takes an extremely long time
      You're going to rape it to death in half a year if you're a normal person with a job that requires using a computer. It only takes "an extremely long time" in some hyper-casual use case like having a TV you use for 1h once every 2 days or some shit.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        do you refuse to have more than one display on principle like some kind of homosexual. just get a cheap ips for productivity wtf

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        burn-in is exponentially related by the brightness youre running the display at. all my smartphones that are over 4 years old have 0 burn-in

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They're killing these things in less than a year>

      >it still takes an extremely long time
      You're going to rape it to death in half a year if you're a normal person with a job that requires using a computer. It only takes "an extremely long time" in some hyper-casual use case like having a TV you use for 1h once every 2 days or some shit.

      Quads of truth

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >displaying images on a display device is abuse
      The absolute cope

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >samsung OLED panels are shit
    no fricking way

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      barf

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bring CRT back

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Working on it, if I become a billionaire I will buy one of the old factories and start producing new TVs at a loss, I promise.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    For me it's VA

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Wait, so you mean to tell me that the new QD-OLED monitors suffer MORE burn-on than older models? I thought that the lower power consumption made it more difficult to burn-in? How can people buy such obviously flawed technology.
    Why TF would you think that?
    >When will manufacturers use non-OLED for flagship phones? My One Plus 8 has severe burn in. This technology isn't suitable for anything beyond watching videos/playing games.
    Never again.
    Why would they use a worse screen when OLED doesnt really burn in on phones and is superior in every way?

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Every year OLED looks a little better and they have to make the conventional LCD screens a little better to be an acceptable choice for the mainstream consumer. In essence, waitchads and poorgays stay winning.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Rtings testing methodology was flawed. These frickers turned off all compensation measures and were running CNN at 16:9 100% brightness for 8 hours a day. But of course they're now hailed as the only non-corporate voice in the tech journalism world so they're treated as the voice of god by soys.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      too be fair, if you're going to rate a device's longetivity, you need to punish it as hard as possible for your test.

      if you ever look at a pack of LED lights, the "lifespan" is assuming that the light is on for 3 hours a day, rather than 24. it's disingenuous.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      why they didn't run them for 24h/day? then you would get burnin hours more quickly

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        because that's how a lot of morons actually use their tvs

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        because that's how a lot of morons actually use their tvs

        They run them between 15.5 to 20 hours a day, so not a realistic usage, just as much as they can do and still allow compensation cycles to run.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          that's a realistic usage for some people believe it or not

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          is everyone so moronic that they can't count hours instead of days??
          who cares if running it 20h/day is typical usage or not, just give me lifetime in hours

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You can see the results here: https://www.rtings.com/tv/tests/longevity-burn-in-test-updates-and-results
            Most of the screens have run for 7200 hours. It's funny to see that a lot of Mini LEDs struggle with uniformity way more than OLEDs, but you get burn-in with the latter. Realistically either is disposable garbage for what they charge for them.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            7200 hours is just 2.5 years for 8h/day usage
            do they have burnin pictures for 3600 hours?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous
          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            so this has a noticeable burn in at 6 months, which I guess is just 1800hours? https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/b2-oled#test_16344
            total crap

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            you wont get similar burn in when watching content with any variety

            >All 100 TVs are displaying the exact same content: a live stream of the U.S. version of CNN, untouched, with all commercials and breaks intact.
            Also they run them at max brightness

            LG has mla panels which are more efficient so less burn in but currently the cheapest ones launch in gaming monitors.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            This. Any moron knows you are not allowed to watch tv on your tv

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            and as we all know, watching tv means autistically needing to leave it on at max brightness on the same channel 24/7

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            yeah honestly the price performance is squarely in the oleds favor with current <1k € prices for 55"

            The cost per hour watched before you might wana replace one is really small, and gets smaller each gen with more performant tvs that cost less

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            TV should last 10+ years

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            tvs should also have good contrast

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            6 months is about 3600 hours. They started the testing in November 2022

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The point of the test is to show the worst case scenario. The assumption is that if you run these TVs with normal usage patterns the burn-in will be less than what RTings shows. Also now they've adjusted the schedule so all the compensation cycles run correctly.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >lust provoking image...

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      see

      barf

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    apple was right all alone, miniled is the future

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >you also don't want disposable garbage
    The hell I don't. I'm going to burn that shit up and then send it down the river. Then buy another.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.rtings.com/tv/tests/longevity-burn-in-test-updates-and-results

    hmm

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    OLED is a good choice for a monitor if you want something that's less disruptive to circadian rythm.

    if you only use it during daytime ips is clearly the better choice, if you mostly use it for media and games at night oled.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      4k OLED tvs at 55" cost <1k € now and have 8mil dimming zones
      people buy them because of hugely superior image quality, thats it

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        for tvs i'd recommend OLED to almost anyone, except public displays and such

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >OLED is only suitable for watching videos and playing games, but there better not be any static elements in those videos and games.

    I've had an OLED for 2 years playing games with static elements and there's no burn in yet. LG C1.

    Yes, I test with solid white backgrounds. The burn in shit is way overblown now.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, LG is great. The only things that burn in are the solid news ticker tapes.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I watch the news on it maybe 15 minutes every other day. Not even.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's WOLED tho, QD-OLED is supposed to be worse for burn-in, but better image

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It is impossible to embrace the immensity.
    IPS 4life, bro

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    im doing it
    wish me luck

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >burn in isn't important
    >unless you use ultrawide QD-OLED monitors
    OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >only needs 700 hours for permanent burn in to happen
    >can easily burn in within 6 months
    >only use it for gaming and NOTHING ELSE

    jfc what a shit technology

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      yeah but it's the best we have until microled is affordable in like a decade

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        miniled is affordable today

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          and i'ts not as good as oled but still pretty good

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's only bothersome if you compare both side to side in a pitch dark room.
            MiniLED is good while waiting for microLED.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    QD-OLED uses blue OLED as a light source, and blue OLED is the single biggest culprit in the short lifespan of OLED, typically about less the lifespan of red and green OLED.
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-43408-7

    LG's WOLED is much better than QD-OLED.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Are they purposely choosing the most fragile shit to develop

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      yeah but worse color gamut, lower brightness and more banding

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lg also uses blue oled to generate the white light

      QD oled has much, much better brightness and color volume than woleds and the s95b was by far the cheapest good tv to buy. LG had to rush out mla panels out but couldnt put them in the cheap tvs so qd oled was the price perf king, now LG is pushing panels out for less money and it depends on how low samsung is willing to go on what tv is the best.

      s90c is prob the best tv to buy right now but it prob costs more than some lg cheaper tvs

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >max brightness of 40%
    >refresh rate to 144hz (175 max)
    >15% brightness when using it for office use or light games like tf2
    >turn it off when i take a break so it can cool/refresh cycle
    i think it will last a long time this way, and i still get to enjoy really good brightness (anything about 40 is excessive to me) and refresh rates.
    buying excessively specced hardware and then under-running it is my tactic of choice for longevity

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      when i get an oled i am going to play games and watch movies on max brightness b/c what's the point of having one otherwise

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        anything about 40% strains my eyes
        but i'm sitting fairly close to it, it's a computer monitor not a tv

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          i'm also getting a monitor and i plan to sit about 2 feet from it for optimal ppd. pretty sure my eyes will be fine.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            my desk is only so long...

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            mine is about 20 inches deep with a keyboard tray that goes out 8 more inches and my face usually a few inches further back than that so i'm good

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            thank you for telling me

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            you're welcome.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >max brightness of 40%
      >15% brightness when using it for office use or light games like tf2
      >i still get to enjoy really good brightness
      what did he meant by this?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      > office
      > oled
      moron

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    So OLED is shit burn in garbage. Yep that figures...gotta release shit customers need to replace for future sales.

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I thought that the lower power consumption made it more difficult to burn-in?
    Where morons like these emerge?

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Want a new monitor
    >want a 4K Oled (60hz$
    >read these threads
    Guess not

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why are people still debating over this? Its OLED or nothing. Everything else is simply inferior. Its also not an expensive market anymore. I currently have a portable oled as my secondary monitor, and a glossy IPS as my main.

Comments are closed.