What am I in for?

What am I in for?

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >license

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's free for personal use.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nothing is free in life.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          True. Even if I meet a nice cashier who decides to let me have a free item, there was the cost of getting there at that time to receive the "freebie".

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Excluding the cost of getting there, you cant find another direct cost? Cost of freebie from a cashier is a personal gratitude, an obligation to thank back, a moral debt, relational debt, social debt, etc.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          GNU+Linux is

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        lol, "Free for personal use".

        Nothing is free in life.

        someone's parents raised them with common sense.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You have to make an account though?
        Otherwise I don't understand how RH could stop Rocky/Alma from yoinking their patches.
        RH is legally required to provide you with sources under the GPL if they distribute it to you.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty much different defaults than Fedora's and limited packages, you can't mount ntfs unless you install ntfs-3g, need to login to your account to enable repos for updates, also enable EPEL repo to access more packages and flatpak to have anything from flathub.
      That's it, you will receive updates that will be mostly patches and kernel backports.

      Nothing is free in life.

      lol, "Free for personal use".
      [...]
      someone's parents raised them with common sense.

      Shut up, you're using Linux, you're using a kernel mostly contributed to by Red Hat anyway. Linux is a free corpokernel. Go play smart ass somewhere else. Also, everything has a license.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        lmao, frick redhat they destroyed linux with systemd

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >muuhhh license
      KYS

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Debian but worse and with less packages

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just a stable, boring Linux system that will probably last you longer than your hardware.

      I personally don't find fewer packages to be a problem and I don't even use Flatpak. I do like the longer support cycle.

      You have to make an account though?
      Otherwise I don't understand how RH could stop Rocky/Alma from yoinking their patches.
      RH is legally required to provide you with sources under the GPL if they distribute it to you.

      Yes, what is your point?

      red hat is really only slightly better than canonical
      They certainly have contributed more to linux userspace but at the end of the data they are there to sell a product and that includes your data

      >red hat is really only slightly better than canonical
      Is "Corporation X being more gooder than Corporation Y" really the only thing that concerns you when comparing distros?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >longer support cycle
        I’ll take Debian’s ability (and perfect track record) of being able to upgrade across major release versions in-place over longer support cycles any day

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Fair enough. The way I see it, by the time you want to upgrade RHEL you'll probably want to upgrade the hardware entirely or just do a fresh install anyway.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    prostate cancer

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's done. I like it quite a bit so far. It definitely lives up to its "rock-solid" reputation. Did have to enable a few repos but that wasn't too bad.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >guh nome

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Works on my machine

        What version of Gnome does RedHat use? It looks like Gnome 2 but in GTK 3

        40 at the moment, though I'm running the GNOME classic mode. Even the standard mode appears to be modified (menus are a bit different, settings are easier to access, I'm guessing a bunch of extensions are in use) compared to what you'd get on Debian or something.
        Also I didn't even have to add a desktop icon extension for the classic mode lol. I think that says a lot if the normal non-RHEL GNOME (funded by RedHat) doesn't have those built-in.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >GNOME classic mode.
          Is this available in Gnome 3?
          I use MATE, I never knew of a classic mode in gnome.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, you just select it on the login screen (gdm)

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why would I use this over Mate?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know what the differences are because I don't use either, but you might prefer it to regular GNOME if you're in a situation where you're not allowed to use EPEL packages or you just want your DE to be maintained by Red Hat rather than EPEL.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            "gnome classic" is gnome 3 with extensions to make it look similar to mate, but is very different to mate
            you're right about epel

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What version of Gnome does RedHat use? It looks like Gnome 2 but in GTK 3

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      gee bill, TWO taskbars?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      god damn gnome looks so dogshit

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Dogshit isn't a metric.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >gnome
      >~~*enterprise*~~
      lel
      No thanks.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's going on in here?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        wtf is he okay?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          what's the usecase for being okay?

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the wagie experience. you just work anon

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fedora but worse.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >What am I in for?
    no packages

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It won't be as terrible as windows 8.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    out-of-date software. use fedora for workstation/desktop, hell, you can even use it for servers, but centos is probably better for that. and centos stream is fairly stable btw. it runs behind fedora so it isn't a true rolling release

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Old packages

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      for legacy applications, you think clients are in the edge of development and deployment?

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unironically a terrible experience, unless you're only using it as a server OS, although ubongo is honestly much better than anything else whatsoever.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wasn't RedHat infamious for EPEL sync issues?

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Poo in the Loo

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      redhat is an anti-White anti-Christian organization with a streetshitter CEO who is controlled by israelites

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >1.3k RPMs
    you will spin very fast indeed.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    red hat is really only slightly better than canonical
    They certainly have contributed more to linux userspace but at the end of the data they are there to sell a product and that includes your data

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://rumble.com/v40ybk1-james-okeefe-reveals-documented-racial-discrimination-at-ibm.html

    LMAO

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/making-open-source-more-inclusive-eradicating-problematic-language

      It's a gayOS.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >that article
        lmao, absolute judeo-cuck homosexuals

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    red hat GLOWS so hard

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If people are stupid enough to fall for these fed bait threads in 2024, so be it. Darwin awards and all. It'll be less morons using Linux.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What are you even implying, schizo? That people who use RHEL won't want to use Linux anymore because... you don't like it?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If people are stupid enough to fall for these fed bait threads in 2024, so be it. Darwin awards and all. It'll be less morons using Linux.

      Redhat is used extensively throughout the US "intelligence" community infrastructure. Redhat is a pseudo-governmental origination.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >tips red fedora

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    realizing you made a mistake and later installing the free version
    https://rockylinux.org/

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      alma is better

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        how so? what's the difference?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        kys redhat shill

        how so? what's the difference?

        alma got cucked and is now based on centos stream lmao

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          There's no point in both Alma and Rocky being straight up bug-for-bugs. Rocky is fully committed to that idea, so it makes sense for Alma to try and change direction if it wants to continue to exist.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          thanks bro,
          rocky > alma

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A very stable linux.
    Might be a bit lacking in packages

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >What am I in for?
    Boring OS that mostly does its job.

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >gayOS
    Sure, just like Debian.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Windows wasn't gay until they forced the pride flag on users in their "Widgets".

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's only a thing on Goyslop Edition. LTSC does not have this problem.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't know if they did it this year, I just disabled widgets in group policy.

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i laughed hard, because instead of Arch (which is the best) you are installing Redhat.

    laughed so hard i spilled my drink on my programmer socks and now i need to change them, but the laugh was worth it

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      people like you interest me - you don't attribute something's worth to it's actual qualities, you attribute it to whatever the perceived stereotype of its primary userbase is, as some sort of blanket understanding of what's good and bad. try being less of an npc

      t. alpine user

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I agree; it is "common knowledge" that Red Hat is "le bad" and that using Red Hat's distro will get you laughed at, anonymously, over the Internet. I feel like this puts off a fair number of people, for no good reason.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it's better to go all in and get 10 years of support rather than use a frankenstein mess like debian, ubuntu
          it's either alpine (all out) or rocky (all in) for me

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *