What book is he reading?

What book is he reading?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Moon Magic

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Moon-Magic-Complete-Harnessing-Mystical/dp/1507205015/ref=asc_df_1507205015/?tag=googshopuk-21&linkCode=df0&hvadid=310805494719&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=8252242824938566021&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=t&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=1006557&hvtargid=pla-448494847576&psc=1&mcid=ac0f522a5d263e0486faef2be093dfe5&th=1&psc=1
    it looks really fricking shit.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This homie actually made a referral link lmaoo unbelievable.
      Don't click on that shit!

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Im gay and I hate these types.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You'll perish hell

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Gays usually hate most other gays, so yeah.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        because being gays is about wanting to frick yorself

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Might be the most pathetic excuse for an ass I've ever seen
      Also that's a man

      He's ugly. He should be killed for daring to have the confidence to post his gross face and body online

      I think he's cute

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Super cute.
        Face
        Hair
        Body
        Look
        Pose
        Even his little ass is super cute

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hate in what way? You still want to frick them, you liar. Non homosexual homos want to dominate twink asses.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >them

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Might be the most pathetic excuse for an ass I've ever seen
    Also that's a man

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It looks like it'd still have an acceptable jiggle to it in that position though

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >It looks like it'd still have an acceptable jiggle to it in that position though
        People who see a man's hairy, stinking ass and think "yeah imma get me summa dat" will never fail to amaze and repulse me.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's what we call a twink, sir.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >also thats a man

      no shit, really?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Based flat ass hater. No man, let alone woman should have such a deflated bottom. It's super easy to get thick glutes even by squatting mediocre weight (135-185) with some semblance of effort.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    [...]

    [...]

    https://boards.IQfy/wsr

    [...]

    [...]

    GO GO GO GO GO GO GO
    ITS NOT THAT HARD JUST FRICK OFF AND LEARN TO USE BOARDS PROPERLY

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He's ugly. He should be killed for daring to have the confidence to post his gross face and body online

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    "Revolt against the Modern World" by Julius Evola

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i always wondered what would happen if you were to connect two clamps with an electric current to a septum piercing.
    Not being sadistic, just genuinely curious.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It would be extremely painful

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You are a big guy

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If connected to a car battery, it would just make the piercing really hot, probably to the point of melting. If connected to a wall, the person would get shocked, probably worse than if they touched a wire with their hand.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nah, they're conductive enough it'd just pass a ton of current and get hot in either case. They'd probably end up with some nasty burns around the piercing site but nothing that severe.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you put one clamp on the piercing one on an electrode up the ass

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Your book.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this supposed to be lewd? he looks like an auschwitz survivor

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's the point. He's a bottom. He's the weak one getting dominated

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why is he posing with that? If I was a cute twink posing for a thirst trap I would pretend to read hegel or maybe the commie manifesto if I wanted to be edgy, not some gay new age astrology book

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It would be hotter if he was reading far-right literature

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It would be hotter if he was reading far-right literature

      Yeah, someone please shop him with one of our meme books so I can save the pic in the "funny" folder 😉

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It would be hotter if he was reading far-right literature

      [...]
      Yeah, someone please shop him with one of our meme books so I can save the pic in the "funny" folder 😉

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Mooning us
    Book on moons

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    whats his twitter

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Reverse image search Black person. It's 2024

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like an annoying fruitcake b***h.
    I wish he was mine.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i love dumb idiot flamers
      unless they're fat or old, then i hate them

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Based jannies leaving the thread up

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >IQfy
      >jannies

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    im not gay but i kinda wanna hit it just to see what id be like

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >what id be like

      it's so awesome you'll think you'd died and gone to heaven

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >im not gay but
      I have bad news for you

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        im not gay

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Cute. I'd make sweet love to him for hours on end

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Awww, I want a bf like that

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You all have horrible taste in men

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      For real IQfy would be puking

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Any literature recs on resisting the temptation of gay sex with cute twinks like op pic?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Brideshead Revisited

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      David Blaize by E. F. Benson

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Death in Venice

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Thats a child not a twink

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I want to kiss him and feel how soft his skin is.

    🙁

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bro thats so gay
      thats just a normal guy
      im way cuter than that

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      homie thats disgusting

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what compels him to do this is it the worms in his gut

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anna Karenina

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Whats your Russian bf reading?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What do the wall notes say?

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >This thread is still up
    Proof that IQfy is gay as frick

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's what happens when you start with the greeks

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The socks really do it for me

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It's homosexual because they appreciate some twinkletoe gay.
    A real straight Man appreciates the masculine Form. Pale, marble-like and sweat-glistening skin taut over hard, defined abs. Broad shoulders and wide arms, strong legs, and a rock-solid gluteus maximus. Real men get inspiration from this, admire this, touch this. Real men transmit their masculine energy through each other's sensual but strong grip. homosexuals just don't understand true Straight Energy.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Pale
      Tanned*. Pale skin is feminine.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, it has to be pale.
        >t. yellow Straight Man

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this really just depends on the brainwashing that is going on in the current culture

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No, the ancient Greeks thought tanned skin was masculine and pale skin feminine.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous
          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Name a better femboy in literature, I'll wait

            Verification not required.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah he's a hairless fat infant. Kinda effeminate, bro.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      most homosexuals want to kill themselves or a male from their past or other males in general but they are too scared to come to the realization.
      the circuitry and set of behaviors for seducing, being seduced, fricking and the circuitry and set of behaviors for hunting, being hunted, and killing run parallel to each other.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So where did you come across that esoteric knowledge?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I spent years observing myself and others and did find some supplemental material eventually. I also spent a lot of time in close proximity with people that knew this and used it to manipulate people. I didn't know what was going on at the time though.
          For instance a woman sizing you up as a potential mate, or a male sizing you up to see if he can fight you will give you similar feeling impressions.
          Also achieving a kill is a huge aphrodisiac and will attract the opposite sex, it will also get people to rally behind you as well, support you with resources etc. In place of actually killing or sacrificing humans, you can scapegoat or cancel somebody or seriously injure somebody, it achieves a similar psychoactive effect and same behaviors follow.
          This is why ancient priests practiced animal sacrifice, to cure the build up of predatory energies and psychosis among the tribe. Look at pharmakós from Ancient Greece.
          This is why Catholics sacrifice Jesus and eat him at the mass, it nullifies the predatory energies and prevents some of it running into other humans, both as source and receptor, and also bonds the laity.
          There is also a very strange idea that emanates from the subconscious that you become or take on the power of what you eat, most moderns wont spent enough time in meditation to realize that though.
          Most moderns don't realize this stuff has a strange and nebulous effect and influence on their lives and generates a whole host of confusion, hypocrisy, and mental illness.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You seriously have it reversed. It’s the straight males who want war to kill off the other side’s mean and take their women. Gays are disgusted by war because the thought of another man dying needlessly, especially a beautiful one, sickens them. See all the gay WW1 poets for more info (e.g Wilfred Owen)

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >You seriously have it reversed
          I don't, in the case of the reversal its psychological naivety and immaturity. Competition comes with life. This life will naturally impart suffering.
          > Gays are disgusted by war because the thought of another man dying needlessly, especially a beautiful one, sickens them.
          I've met a variety of homosexuals and most of them do not think like this. I've literally seen one flip from this mindset to the more destructive one at the slightest hint of inconvenience.
          Have you ever seen a bottom male incessantly mock people? Hunters will mock and objectify their target prey to signal to the tribe that its a piece of meat to be killed and consumed. Reciprocity.
          They also have a bizarre way of admiring the male physique, as if it were a slab of meat, rather then the result of hard work and display of potential strength.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >psychological naivety and immaturity
            To add to this seduction and fricking is meant to bond males and females to produce and raise offspring. Male on male shit is just silly. If you really loved a homie you would help him get a nice b***h and mob up with him.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yet ironically a gay man can probably love another man more than a woman. I agree the purpose in life is to frick and die, but the world needs extras on the sidelines to make art and support others.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Male on male shit is just silly

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Pausanias is referring to Harmodius and Aristogeiton who were not well received in Athens by everyone. Pausanias also got BTFO'd by Socrates.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >who were not well received in Athens by everyone
            there were statues erected to them in Athens and Thucydides talks about how the Athenians have a positive opinion on them, so does Aeschines

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And even in Aristotle's Athenian Constitution he relates how Harmodius and Aristogeiton were polarizing in Athens. We have statues of giant dicks and monstrous abominations in the west paid for by rich pedophiles. That means little.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            not polarising on account of their homosexuality but, I assume, on account of the political division between democrats and oligarchs (and the oligarchs would fit your definition of "rich pedophiles" better)

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Polarizing doubly, because if you were not aware, homosexuality was illegal in Athens and was only "permissible" by ambiguity in the law (Pausanias says this):
            >Now here and in Lacedaemon the rules about love are perplexing,
            The ambiguity was likely a literal modern day "well if the balls don't touch..." or "a boy TECHNICALLY isn't a man..."
            All that needs to be said is from Pausanias:
            >From this point of view a man fairly argues that in Athens to love and to be loved is held to be a very honourable thing. But when parents forbid their sons to talk with their lovers, and place them under a tutor's care, who is appointed to see to these things,
            Because the common folks likely did not share the same tastes as the bourgeois Athenian elite. One of the speakers (I am too lazy to get the quote, I may do it later) even says that love between man and woman is of the plebs. This clearly contradicts Socrates' argument, showing that homosexuality was NOT thought of as totally normal, otherwise it would not be such a point of contention.

            All of this is NOT to say that there was NO homosexuality, but that it was extremely controversial and likely predominantly amongst the bourgeois elite, from which most (really all) of our texts descend. (Excepting, in a manner, Socrates)

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >homosexuality was illegal in Athens and was only "permissible" by ambiguity in the law (Pausanias says this):
            No, you are mischaracterising what Pausanias is saying. He says the customs in are perplexing because they praise lovers for winning beloveds and scorn beloveds for giving in too easily to lovers:
            >>Let one just reflect that it is said to be a finer thing to love openly than in secret; and particularly to love the noblest and best, even if they are uglier than others; and again, that everyone enthusiastically encourages the lover, and not as if he were doing anything shameful. . . . But on the other hand, when fathers set attendants in charge of the beloveds and prohibit them from conversing with their lovers, and the attendant has this as a standing order, and the beloved's contemporaries and comrades blame him if they see anything like this going on; and the elders, in turn, do not stand in the way of those who cast reproaches or abuse them on the grounds that they are speaking incorrectly—then, if one glances in this direction, one would believe that such a thing is customarily held to be most shameful. . . . So our law, in good and noble fashion, really wants to test these and to have the beloved gratify one group of lovers and escape from the others. On account of this it exhorts lovers to pursue and beloveds to flee, setting up a contest so that there may be a test as to which group the lover belongs and to which the beloved. (Plato, Symposium 182-4)
            This is very much the same as the Victorian sexual ethic that governed heterosexuality. There is also no evidence that there were laws against homosexuality in ancient Athens. Both Aeschines (pic related) and Plutarch say the opposite, that the lawgiver Solon gave pederasty a special status.
            >Because the common folks likely did not share the same tastes as the bourgeois Athenian elite.
            This may have been the case, but there does not seem to be evidence of widespread antipathy to homosexuality on the part of commoners. An interesting thing to note is that the juries for lawsuits were primarily overseen by working class men, on account of the payment you would get, and yet people were not shy about discussing their own homosexuality in them -- which you think they would avoid if homosexuality was seen as a damaging thing, or something that working class juries would take offence to.

            [...]
            Further evidence can be given by the highly euphemistic and indirect way they speak of relations between a man and man, but the very forthright manner in which they describe male-female relations.
            A. Georgiades has an excellent, well cited book describing the mythos surrounding sexuality in Greece. He doesn't take a /misc/gay stance (although he does declare his views) and instead examines the actual sexual climate of Ancient Greece and Athens, as well as debunking some of the myths that are common in even high level academia today.

            >A. Georgiades has an excellent, well cited book
            The guy is a far-right Greek nationalist. I read his book. It is deranged and rambling.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The guy is a far-right Greek nationalist. I read his book. It is deranged and rambling.
            If you characterize anyone that disagrees with you or the demonstrably incorrect myths of the academics then you are not open to reason at all. You can

            >This may have been the case, but there does not seem to be evidence of widespread antipathy to homosexuality,
            You can continue to play these pedantic games and say "it was accepted" "maybe it's the case" "no widespread" "not everyone" and others. You can also dismiss everything you disagree with as a false. Simply, if it were seen as normal, the social climate would not have given rise to the prohibition in Socratic, Platonic, and Aristotelian teachings. You also blatantly ignore the illegality of male-on-male homosexual relations, and the fact that male-male homosexual relations besides rape of slaves was the exclusive domain of pedophilia. (And let me guess, you are going to say "well... cultures have a different view of what's an acceptable age...")

            These kinds of arguments are pointless because you initiate them with a meme and a declaration that anything you disagree with is deranged rambling. You are pretending to argue in good faith but you have the sole purpose of being, in no uncertain terms, an utter pseud. I began reading the Greeks with the expectation that they were gays, I left realizing that this view only exists due to the desire to normalize various modern social practices. Yes, I have used ad hominems (in conjunction with a direct contradiction to your main point). This is because you do not intend to commit to anything other than rhetoric.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >If you characterize anyone that disagrees with you or the demonstrably incorrect myths of the academics then you are not open to reason at all. You can
            I am myself right-wing but the guy is a grifter and has an agenda to push.
            >You also blatantly ignore the illegality of male-on-male homosexual relations
            Where is the illegality?
            >and the fact that male-male homosexual relations besides rape of slaves was the exclusive domain of pedophilia
            It is true that there was an age gap, however it cannot have been pedophilic all the time, considering pic related is a depiction of Harmodius and Aristogeiton (and I cannot imagine small boys being part of an effective Theban fighting force)

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I am myself right-wing but the guy is a grifter and has an agenda to push.
            No, you're a pseud that regurgitates what you heard on youtube. You likely come from reddit, and your intent is to push homosexuality because you are a demented pervert. If you engage in this sort of pedantry: "not pedophilic... ALL THE TIME..." then nobody believes you are making believable arguments.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >No, you're a pseud that regurgitates what you heard on youtube.
            What? This sounds like projection. I don't watch YouTube. I am emphatically against YouTube. I only post primary sources when arguing.
            > If you engage in this sort of pedantry: "not pedophilic... ALL THE TIME..."
            Only because I believe it to be the truth. Does the statue look like pedophilia to you?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Your honor, it's not pedophilia because she's 18 now.
            >How many years ago did you start dating?
            >Six.
            >Guilty.
            LMAO

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What? Schizo?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >yes, yes, have sex with men and boys
            >have hedonistic pleasure, that's what life is
            >degeneracy is okay because... because Le Tradition!
            >(i'm right wing btw)

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Mindbroken.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You OK, bud? Tough time at school again?

            dumb fricks

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You OK, bud? Tough time at school again?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The problem isn't that he is far-right, the problem is that it took him 10 years to graduate and that he is a flip flopper. Go look at what he said about Israel then and what he says now. And he is about to vote yes on the new same sex marriage and adoption law.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Polarizing doubly, because if you were not aware, homosexuality was illegal in Athens and was only "permissible" by ambiguity in the law (Pausanias says this):
            >Now here and in Lacedaemon the rules about love are perplexing,
            The ambiguity was likely a literal modern day "well if the balls don't touch..." or "a boy TECHNICALLY isn't a man..."
            All that needs to be said is from Pausanias:
            >From this point of view a man fairly argues that in Athens to love and to be loved is held to be a very honourable thing. But when parents forbid their sons to talk with their lovers, and place them under a tutor's care, who is appointed to see to these things,
            Because the common folks likely did not share the same tastes as the bourgeois Athenian elite. One of the speakers (I am too lazy to get the quote, I may do it later) even says that love between man and woman is of the plebs. This clearly contradicts Socrates' argument, showing that homosexuality was NOT thought of as totally normal, otherwise it would not be such a point of contention.

            All of this is NOT to say that there was NO homosexuality, but that it was extremely controversial and likely predominantly amongst the bourgeois elite, from which most (really all) of our texts descend. (Excepting, in a manner, Socrates)

            Further evidence can be given by the highly euphemistic and indirect way they speak of relations between a man and man, but the very forthright manner in which they describe male-female relations.
            A. Georgiades has an excellent, well cited book describing the mythos surrounding sexuality in Greece. He doesn't take a /misc/gay stance (although he does declare his views) and instead examines the actual sexual climate of Ancient Greece and Athens, as well as debunking some of the myths that are common in even high level academia today.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous
  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    hidden

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you are against homosexuality, you are a leftist.

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    mods just banned my thread w/ webm related but left this thread up. says a lot about the mods.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      don't post a negress next time

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        she's not a negress, autistic and gay homie.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How can white women even compete

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        i used to be exclusively into white women, but being with them has turned me off completely.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          mods just banned my thread w/ webm related but left this thread up. says a lot about the mods.

          mixed race women are sexo

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        i used to be exclusively into white women, but being with them has turned me off completely.

        by not being 90 IQ Black folk for one
        ask yourself, do you really want to raise some Black person mutt with 90 IQ? because that's what you're gonna get if you race mix with one of these

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Im already 200 iq so it'll balance out and I'll have a genius son but without the supergenius autism

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          why are you artificially constricting the choice into a black-white binary? you know there are women other than negresses?

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    catcher in the rye

  34. 2 weeks ago
    sage

    Mods confirmed to be homosexuals because they wont remove this shit for days

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *