What did?

What did IQfy think of it, if anything?

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    He's right democracy is a joke, it's just a dictatorship by way of propaganda.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      /thread

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        now get out

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      /thread

      dictatorships have a dictator morons

      what we have is an oligarchy.

      aristotle said it himself 2k years ago: democracy inevitably turns into oligarchy

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Functionally irrelevant

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    fine, educational read since i no longer care about political philosophy enough to read primary sources, he goes on gay little chud rants though that are underdeveloped and annoying. i assume that was done on purpose so people won't hate him like everyone hates moldbug now.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Worthless parasitic hands typed this worthless opinion

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        in the future kindly be charitable and directly reply to the points raised in my post. thanks! it takes a special effort from all of us to maintain the standards of decorum on this board 🙂

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think he’s a pseud for even thinking he had to point this out. Populism has always been a political principle for certain political actors. Nobody ever believed some mass of people could direct change. But this man, who is not even a Westerner by the way, is one of these people that always has to get the intellectual gotcha in and so he didn’t realize that and felt like he had to write this book. This guy and his whole circle of alt-right YouTubers are idiots in my opinion. Alt-right internet intellectualism is an unmitigated disaster.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Nobody ever believed some mass of people could direct change
      >im too smart to face the empirical facts and arguments in the book that solidly prove otherwise
      Proof IQfy is dogshit and does not read

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        How do you cite empirical facts to demonstrate what somebody does or does not believe. It can’t be done. What? Did he survey every person in the world with populist sympathies and take all of their replies as objectively honest? It’s so ironic that you think I can’t read, but you can’t grasp basic logic.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Surveys are representative. Statistics are sound. Subjective experience is not so interpersonally aberrant as to render my red incomprehensible to your red. You have the same schema in your perceptive organs. You use inches or meters. You speak English. You are on a computer. Parvini writes including statistical evidence of major political survey and decision outcomes. They map well onto each other. However public perception is proven wrong. Mass broadcast as well can be pooled in its platform objectives. The FCC determines much of what speech code enterprises and political parties can express. You posted an arrogant solipsism that falls flat.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            First of all, surveys are not representative. They’re indisputably not always representative. And all surveys have built in bias and confounding variables. Every statistician and “economist” knows this. But go ahead and cite where he conducts a survey that suggests all of these people really believed a populist mob could implement political change. Let’s see the evidence that proves inconclusively that this was popular sentiment. I’ll also wait to hear why if the goal was to disprove the effectiveness of popular sentiment, why he felt the need to disabuse the popular masses of that sentiment…

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Surveys and Polls are often conducted in order to influence the very public they purportedly represent. Most people will go with the flow and recite whatever they think is already popular, even if it is not actually popular. Eddy Bernays pointed this out, in opposition to Gallup and Roper's confidence in a rational public.

            https://www.jstor.org/stable/2745378

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Nobody ever believed some mass of people could direct change
      I'm going to tell some direct democracy good types I know that they don't exist.

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    A collection of notes very loosely tied with some attempt at showing applications of various things. When I've read it I remember seeing some minor mistakes on the author's part I also think he failed to give Schmitt proper depth.

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >society is... le hierarchical!
    >chuds: WOW!!!11
    read the power elite by mills and then dumhoff instead of chud-tier recycling of antiquated italian theorists

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Cliff Notes elite theory

    It's fine as a primer.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *