What do you think of the Pre Adamite Theory?

The theory is that White people came from Adam and Eve and people outside of the garden were not white people and that these groups evolved separately from whites. Also related is Anglo Israelism. Anglo Israelism means either the British or more broadly the Europeans descend from the Israelites.

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >the idea that humans evolved in Africa and that Eurasians split from Africans 70,000 years ago is so repulsive to some people that they're going back to the Pre-Adamite theory

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    mostly correct. Angels fell and fricked humans to create the white race(s). That process involved multiple crosses and back crosses in order to develop a breeding population to get us started here on earth. At that point we were probably 99% angel soul trapped in flesh, but now I think having that level of purity is rare outside some isolated pockets which are currently the targets for mass race mixing to destroy us.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >This allegory written by people who didn't even know who black people were is proof whites and blacks are unrelated blah blah
      Racists should just be atheists. No religion is compatible with racism

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >No religion is compatible with racism
        You are extremely ignorant if you never heard of Judaism before. Also, communion exists in order to provide those not born with a soul a way in which to acquire one by consuming the flesh and blood of the angelic race. Although I do not think it works with juice and crackers.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Christian identity is truly a schizo cult.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The rise of schizo posting on IQfy is a mixture of:
      >More ESL
      >More boomers
      >More christians
      it conspires together for hyper numerology nutjobs.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It’s wrong. The majority of man’s genome may have emerged from Africa or something, but the races were created by interspecies breeding. Blacks exist because they mixed with a super archaic hominid, mystery species, which comprises between 2 to 20% of their genome, depending on who it is. Meanwhile, Europeans and Asians mixed with Neanderthals, etc.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Blacks exist because they mixed with a super archaic hominid,

      It wasn't super archaic, don't believe that self-hating Iranian israeli man Robert Sepehr. The mean estimate of divergence of this species was about 625,000 years ago, which was close to the divergence of homosexual sapiens, Neanderthals, and Denisovans, and the actual amount is much closer to 6.6-7% (with some of the admixture not actually being from a different species, but a very genetically divergent population of homosexual sapiens).

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You might know a bit more about it than me and you have good points, but my points still stand. You’ve only tried to minimize the significance of it, and maybe properly so. However, that’s still 6.6-7% of their genome derived from a hominid species not found in other humans. That, and the presence of other hominid species in other humans, is what created the broad races: African, caucasoid, mongoloid, etc. Asians for instance, have the most Neanderthal dna.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >However, that’s still 6.6-7% of their genome derived from a hominid species not found in other humans

          >The signals of introgression in the West African populations that we have analyzed raise questions regarding the identity of the archaic hominin and its interactions with the modern human populations in Africa. Analysis of the CSFS in the Luhya from Webuye, Kenya (LWK) also reveals signals of archaic introgression, although our interpretation is complicated by recent admixture in the LWK that involves populations related to western Africans and eastern African hunter-gatherers (section S8) (20). Non-African populations (Han Chinese in Beijing and Utah residents with northern and western European ancestry) also show analogous patterns in the CSFS, suggesting that a component of archaic ancestry was shared before the split of African and non-African populations.

          https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015685/

          It's found in non-Africans, but to likely lesser degrees, and you should know that only West Africans and Bantus have this ancestry in Africa itself. Their closest relatives (Nilotics, Sudanics, etc) as well as other groups like the Khoisan, Horners, Omotics, Sandawe, and Hadza do not have this ancestry.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This make Nation of Islam and Hoteps sound sane and reasonable.

    White wewuzzing is officially more pathetic and annoying than black wewuzzing at this point. Even turanists aren't that moronic.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Seems like a cope to avoid having to consider yourself kin, even if many thousands of years distant, to nonwhites.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      why do non-whites think they are entitled to being related to whites?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They are not entitled. It's just reality.
        One you cannot cope with.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          well they're both related to chimps but I don't see anyone saying we have to accept chimps in our communities.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What do you mean 'entitled' to, they are.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Even the theory of Yakub selectively breeding new races is more plausible than this

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If that's the case, Genesis could be a story of the people of haplogroup IJ ancestors.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *