What is the evolutionary-historic reason why women aren't attracted to intelligence, surely intelligence helped the hunting group getting a juicy...

What is the evolutionary-historic reason why women aren't attracted to intelligence, surely intelligence helped the hunting group getting a juicy mammoth?

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    based misogyny thread. i'd frick her.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'd hit her from behind and pull her hair until she squeals

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Women are attracted to actual intelligence (how to succeed in life), not incelligence (eidetic memory of one's entire pepe folder and strategic knowledge of how Germany could've won WW2)

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      bump

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      true & this

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the only thing that girls want is money and lots of it homosexual which begs the question why are we here

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      spbp
      /Thread

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ?

        [...]

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      those correlate

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        To the extent they do that is what women are attracted to. The OP suggested intelligence would be useful for getting the mammoth, and to the degree that is true that is exactly what women want. They’re often turned on by men who do impressive things, sometimes even things that aren’t very financially valuable or whatever but are just generally impressive (like being a musician other people like). How are you going to identify “intelligence” or whatever other abstract quality you personally think is determinate of other kinds of substantial “success”? By identifying the success itself. Sometimes people know success when they see it, because maybe in their experience of things the thing they see another person doing seems difficult or skilled, but more often the thing that seems to identify success to people is the approval of many other people. So women often seem to be attracted to qualities in men that many other people are praising. But it’s all very fluid and complicated, women aren’t just by default attracted to something like a big game hunter, that can often be repelling because their social milieu shuns those people for killing animals frivolously. The way we assess what is valuable and what isn’t or what is impressive and what is shameful is very socially determined.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      But success in life doesn't have that strong a correlation with intelligence. Being born into the right situation at the right time or even mere dumb luck play into it a lot more than intelligence - there are incomparably more rich, upper-class dumbass kids than there are self-made billionaire geniuses.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >But success in life doesn't have that strong a correlation with intelligence.
        It does; "success in life" is broader than just being a billionaire. Obviously a below-average-intelligence guy who's born into a billionaire family has a much better chance of remaining a billionaire than a smart guy who's born poor; however, a smart guy who's born poor has a decent chance of clawing his way into the middle class, whereas a dumb guy who's born poor has almost no chance of that.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          In other words, the correlation is actually spectacularly weak in practice.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It's not weak. It may not be as strong as the correlation between one's socioeconomic status at birth and one's socioeconomic status as an adult, but there's a clear correlation between IQ and income.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The correlation is weak specifically because you yourself admitted that you have to tweak what defines the concept of "success in life" to get the fricking result you want you moron.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            No, most people would define "success in life" to include people like doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc., not just billionaires.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Even becoming a doctor, lawyer or engineer doesn't even require high IQ, they require a conscientious personality.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Facts.

          Don't get me wrong, it ain't trickin' if you got it. But if you HAD to get rich or make six figures for a girl to touch your penis, you aren't successful. You're a John. You're a trick.

          And you are insane if you think the hot 19-year-old "dating" an actuary with high functioning autism doesn't have a bum-ass boyfriend on the side who's been to prison 3x and lives with his mom selling dope between Madden matches online.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        cope

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Having a lot of money correlates more with your iq rather than your social status you were born into

        So cope

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Part of intelligence is the ability to WIN success as well as the ability to MAINTAIN and MANAGE success. You're a coping manchild autist who sees no value in accomplishment, so you have literally nothing, you have zero things in life as a result of your disposition and backwards and useless thinking.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Not valuing money and successes doesn't mean one is stupid, it just means he has a different value system. Many geniuses were poor and died poor. Many Black folk became rich by trade or just sheer act of will to save and invest.
          I would say that WILL is correlated with success much more than intelligence is.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Not valuing money and successes doesn't mean one is stupid, it just means he has a different value system. Many geniuses were poor and died poor. Many Black folk became rich by trade or just sheer act of will to save and invest.
          I would say that WILL is correlated with success much more than intelligence is.

          Let's get real for a second. LUCK is above all else. Do you think a billionaire has a billion times more IQ or WILL than a billion people combined? That is statistically impossible. The distribution of psychological characteristics alone cannot explain the distribution of success.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Oh sure luck too. Plenty of angles to prove that success == intelligence

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Being dumb can negate success and advantage quicker than anything else in this reality. You have no idea.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        IQ correlates very strongly with positive life outcomes.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Racist

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You’re not familiar with G-factor, are you?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        means your ancestors weren't dumb fricks and there are high chances you inherited some of that

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >incelligence

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      beautiful

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Correct

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      oh

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      OP: destroyed

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >not incelligence (eidetic memory of one's entire pepe folder and strategic knowledge of how Germany could've won WW2)

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >eidetic memory of one's entire pepe folder
      How do I achieve this?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This. Women want the kind of intelligence that affords them lots of money and an exciting material life (shoes, nice house, clothes, expensive vacations)

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        have a nice day materialist israelite bag

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Women don’t want a bitter and boring poor guy. They, at the very least, want a man to provide for them. Yes, even the most left wing feminist wants this.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Women have jobs. They are entitled to nothing.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, just try to brute force logic this into a woman’s head and see how that works out

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Women associate the ability to provide with your looks.
            If you are tall, muscular, handsome, you can provide her things.
            Not him.
            That's how this works.
            A big muscular male can intimidate other males away from the woman and assure her good genes for her kids. It could protect her from predators, since humans were prey for most history.
            Hell, its why males have deeper voices than women. So they can scare away other males.
            Handsome males usually have well developed bones in their face, jaw, cheeks and so on, which shows her his bone structure is well developed, its a visible trait to show proof of good bones and genes.
            And good bones in the face help absorb impact if you get hit.
            Your face can't absorb a stone being thrown at you tho, no matter the bone density.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wrong women frick impulsive scumbags who have no ambition disprortionately. A white guy is more likely to get laid if hes a drug using degenerate whos umemployed rather than a normal guy with a degree

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        If you waste your life in the rat race and get into insane debt you have dogshit iq

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Bruh I'm an impulsive scumbag and I can't get.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        > impulsive scumbags who have no ambition
        These women are impulsive bastards themselves, so there's no reason to be upset.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      fricking best post

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      its not that good a post guys, i think a raid is afoot

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Cope. 🙂

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          > 🙂
          Black person sneed discord mite

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Person makes post
        >I don't like it
        >Must be a big conspiracy instead of some butthole talking shit on the internet
        Brainworms

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why does it seem like every guy on welfare has b***hes? Maybe women are a lot more stupid and not great at picking anything besides what color to paint a room?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      best post

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The post that broke IQfy

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Incelbros! Not like that. D:

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >incelligence

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >incelligence

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      OH NO INCELSISTERS

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is the most effective IQfy trigger I have ever seen. Genius.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Shilling for taxes and the IRS on IQfy is almost as effective.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >not incelligence (eidetic memory of one's entire pepe folder and strategic knowledge of how Germany could've won WW2)
      this is true, its literally me
      Once a girl said something like how its weird and creepy that I knew Hitler's birthdate. I've learned to shut up since

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        "Creepy" is a literal slur

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah but I probably come across as one
          feelsbad tbh

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        His birthday is literally 420, even my normie friends know and joke about that.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Literally all the (you)s on that post are dick riding it though

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Shut the frick up you punk ass little troony before I rape you.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Came here to say this (using less homosexual language)
      The fact that you pissed off a lot of virgin autists literally proves this. Intelligence is success in life, not your knowledge of pop-history trivia.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > incelligence

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm gonna screenshot this post right here and save it into my "Best IQfy moments" folder, along with the rest of based posts I know by memory thanks to my "incelligence".

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Only on IQfy could a reddit-tier memepost like this get so much traction.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        cope.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Useless shit take with this many replies
      Dude get a better hobby than having your discord friends updoot you on IQfy.
      t. actual sex haver

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        cope and larp

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This. Put me in the screencap.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      shut.the.frick.up.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      real

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Women are attracted to actual intelligence (how to succeed in life),
      hm not really. The guy who opened a business and had success with it still has way less success than the leader of the local football team.
      It's not really success in life, but being in a situation were you are a team leader.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      /misc/ will never recover

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    women are attracted to familiarity in more aspects than what people want to admit. in particular they prefer men of a similar intelligence to their own

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    they are. You are just a poor midwit that women look down on.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They are attracted to the kind of intelligence that helps you dominate other people and get shit done, not to erudition.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They are attracted to intelligence. Incels who think otherwise are simply not as smart as they think they are. 😐

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Is this the ultimate redpill?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Her name is Iida Palosaari

        Itse asiassa islam ei edellytä naisten käyttävän hijabia, vaan kyseessä on enemmänkin kulttuurinen kuin uskonnollinen tapa.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >In fact, Islam does not require women to wear the hijab, it is more of a cultural than a religious custom.
          "Let them draw their veils over their chests"
          sorry libcuck

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >don't have your breasts out
            >hippity hoppity women are property
            Do muslims really?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            yes
            problem?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Somewhat related.

        The concept of “redpill” itself appears to me to be kind of a concept for midwits. The idea is that you subscribed to some “bluepill” that made sense in the past but turned out to be profoundly incorrect, and now you take a “redpill” with a different cliché that replaces the thought, and it must be completely correct. Does this make sense to someone who is thinking for themselves and learning about the world around them? To make the “pill” system work, you must replace thought with narrative, which is an anti-intellectual approach. The “redpill” appears to be a dubious concept, much like “wokeness”.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Grognak does not count using his brain, he uses his fingers... THE SAME FINGERS HE WILL USE TO TEAR APART YOUR SKULL
          It's not hard to understand why strength and stature were more selected than intelligence.
          Likewise in the modern era, a truly "intelligent" person would understand the correlation between physical strength and attractiveness, therefore they would grow themselves to be stronger. Intelligent people typically are sexually selected unless they're incredibly inept socially. However, a lack of social intelligence is exactly that, a lack of an aspect of intelligence.

          Is this the ultimate redpill?

          I've always thought that needing the concept of the red pill was a sign that you're not very intelligent. The old LULZ "blackpill" was to me so blatantly obvious that i never understood why there was so much hype once eggman made his videos. If you couldn't figure out that Hollywood lied to you and that life between men and women is inherently inequitable, you're moron who relies on others for most of their conceptualizations.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >It's not hard to understand why strength and stature were more selected than intelligence.
            Evolutionarily selecting for dexterity over strength and the intelligence to put that dexterity to work is what caused us to differentiate from chimps.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I think I found it, the lowest IQ post on IQfy

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >No money can buy it
            >While he's juicing

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The red pill is awakening to the reality of life following an epiphany that changes the perception about life. Like how the earth is flat, that the moon landing was fake, that nuclear weapons are fake and that the israelites really are the synagogue of Satan.
          The red pill is an outlook not a set of instructions, you dumb animal.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Ideas are food, and the truth is a bitter pill to swallow..

          Let that one digest for a moment. It's not half-baked, it just needs to sit..

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's just a bootleg version of Plato's cave allegory. Almost a carbon copy actually. But you wouldn't call that anti-intellectual because an old Greek said it and your favorite podcasters quote that old Greek. Right?

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Woman are attracted to power. Strength is the most obvious type. If you can turn your brains into power, they will be all over you

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >What is the evolutionary-historic reason why women aren't attracted to intelligence
    I've seen more than a few women who're attracted to that. It's just that memory alone isn't the fullness of it. Application is more heavily weighted in the comparison, so if you can sharply reach the correct conclusion about something, then demonstrate such mastery that you can achieve the desired result consistently without giving away the game, it's both mystifying and attractive.
    Also, I remember this one story about a Chinese guy who used to live a hermit lifestyle, making literary puzzles for his wife. The Mongols invaded and ruined that, but she did love him.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Her name is Iida Palosaari

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      nobody asked

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nobody asked you either. Now have a nice day! have a nice day! have a nice day! have a nice day! have a nice day! have a nice day!

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          pipe down incel

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Black person

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      may or may not be gender confused

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        gender confused how?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          they have strong masculine features. hard to tell if born with a Y chromosome, or not.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You gay as frick boi

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Women are biologically attracted to power and success, they want the best genes for their children.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They want the best resources.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >What is the evolutionary-historic reason why women aren't attracted to intelligence, surely intelligence helped the hunting group getting a juicy mammoth?

    Yes and no.

    Women overall prefer men who are slightly above average intelligence.

    Hyper-intelligent men tend to be socially moronic and thus a liability in any group dynamic.

    Stupid men are incompetent and can make suicidally poor choices.

    In a study of 4,000 women the results found this order from most attractive to least attractive:

    >Above average
    >Average
    >Highly intelligent
    >Below average

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Women overall prefer men who are slightly above average intelligence

      Men with lower intelligence have more children.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Not for the reasons you think. Men with lower intelligence are more likely to take risks that smarter men wouldn't take. Women generally prefer men who take risks regularly because it indicates ardor and boldness. And because risk-taking in a state of nature implies

        >What he's doing must have a massive payoff

        or

        >He is so capable that he is willing to gamble on this behavior

        While smarter men take risks as well, they tend to be much rarer and more calculated. Which stinks of cowardice or weakness to most women.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          > men with lower intelligence are more likely to take risks
          Is there any real evidence for this claim? It seems likely that men of lower intelligence will take stupider risks, but in general this trend is more a function of temperament than intelligence.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Stupid men don't recognize risky behaviors as risky. If some guy gets mud on your new shoes you aren't thinking about murdering him, or life in prison, or being killed. You're thinking "this fricker is gonna get fricked up".

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That's not an intelligence thing. That's just a cultural priority. If someone fricked your cat, you'd do the same.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            > Stupid men don't recognize risky behaviors as risky.
            Shouldn't everyone else realize that the dude is dumb, not brave?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            He's both, and that's an attractive trait. He's exactly what "Behind every great man" is meant to apply to.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            There’s no real difference for most women.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Another thing to remember is that what women consider USEFUL is not the same as what they consider ATTRACTIVE.

          The type of man a woman would rip off her clothes for in an empty broom closet and let take her raw from behind is not the same type of man a woman will marry. One is a feeder, one is a breeder. One is a dad, one is a cad. One has to ask for sex, one gets attacked while he's ignoring her.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Is this what incels actually believe?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I’ve been with eight women. I know what I’m doing.

            Female mate preferences change according to the menstrual cycle.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            > I’ve been with eight women. I know what I’m doing.
            Degenerates belong to reddit.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >when a virgin loser tries to shame a winner

            Kek. No girl will ever want you without a bribe.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Let's see how you talk when you burn in hell for your adulteries.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Not him but being with eight women certainly does not make you a "winner"
            I have been with 8 as well and I don't go around signing my posts with that information as though it makes my opinion more valid kek.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >change according to the menstrual cycle.

            *age

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That too.

            When women are ovulating, they prefer alpha males.

            When women aren't ovulating, they prefer beta males.

            As women age out of the alpha male demographic they settle for beta males long term.

            Now you know why women tend to go for betas when they are on birth control.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Like I said

          They're only attracted to dumb yet physically astute men, its also the reason global IQ is plummeting. They're actually detrimental to humanity

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      they are. chads with intelligence. who can leverage it to gain money and status.

      not autistic intelligence at learning useless information and lack of social skills.

      stupid but bold chad/tyrone men are also attractive to women.

      intelligent chad > stupid chad > intelligent nerd/autist > stupid nerd/autist

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        the "stupid" but bold type are above average in intelligence.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Anecdotally, one of my teenage best friends was 6'0, chiselled as frick, well beyond 130 IQ and hung. The only girls he could date were fat, short, hideous, or some combination of the three. He was way more confident than me, could charm a room without intending to. Effortlessly dominant and commanding. When attractive women showed him interest, he seemed puzzled and amused, thinking it was just friendliness. Eventually he came out as a troony, which was almost painful to watch, all that potential going down the drain.

      I wonder if my own IQ of 127 contributes. I'm a 6/10 at best, and only because I'm 6'1. Receding chin, balding, uneven facial hair. I'm no chad, but I've gotten laid more often than I probably should have given my girlish demeanour.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Social skills are intelligence
    You're just in denial of how dumb you really are

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    He's not wrong.

    Women prefer men who are cunning and wily. The Donald Trumps and Kanye Wests of the world. Not the Elon Musks and Bill Gates.

    Think of the dorky kid at university who offered to do her homework like a simp vs the guy who openly schmoozed with the professors, wormed his way into every social circle, had connections to all the dopemen, played varsity, led a frat, was on a first-name basis with the president of the uni, and threw the most lit parties.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Kanye West is in the top 2% intelligence wise (he took a real IQ test with a shrink)

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Women are attracted to wealth and status which IQ predicts better than any other factor. So they are attracted to intelligence just indirectly.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Women are attracted to intelligence, so long as it is applicable to real world applications and is tempered with masculinity. Carpentry/smithing/engineering/architecture design are really good examples. Not only do you have to work with your hands and be fairly strong, you have to have a good grasp on mathematics as well as art due to needing a steady hand.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I agree

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They're only attracted to dumb yet physically astute men, its also the reason global IQ is plummeting. They're actually detrimental to humanity

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >They're only attracted to dumb yet physically astute men, its also the reason global IQ is plummeting. They're actually detrimental to humanity
      I agree. Which is why women should not have been allowed to choose their own mates. Historically it was the father who did it. Women will choose dumb violent bad boys who abandon the family.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        > bad boys who abandon the family
        And that a bad thing because... You need daddy to rape you in the ass as a child?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        We have to go back

        > bad boys who abandon the family
        And that a bad thing because... You need daddy to rape you in the ass as a child?

        Dilate troony

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They are, but the current system is so pitted against Darwinism because it incentivizes short-term gain over long-term gain. The quicker the better, and while intelligence in the past would've been used quickly to build communities, plan harvests, or design combat training, it's now smothered by college degrees, the sludge of climbing corporate/academic/government, and money. So if a high IQ person did want to use their talents to get women, then they'd have to spend the better part of their youth to meet the qualifications of high-IQ status, while their more impulsive/low-achiever/average counterparts spend their youth chasing women and get first dibs instead.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >current system is so pitted against Darwinism
      It's not pitted against darwinism, it's darwinism selecting for low intelligence because low intelligence signals more money. Edward Dutton said in a recent book that the most fertile demographic in the UK are 80 IQ welfare moochers

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      > current system is so pitted against darwinism
      What a meaningless phrase. Darwinism works the way God intended it to work. If you can't adapt to changed circumstances, it's your own fault that genes don't propagate.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Darwinism currently is what led us to where we are now. with the Incel epidemic.

        I’ve been with eight women. I know what I’m doing.

        Female mate preferences change according to the menstrual cycle.

        Its amazing that because of npcs men have to literally justify their conquests to complete strangers. Like, frick off.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Few reasons probably. Highly intelligent individuals tend to be less physically imposing. They tend to be less spontaneous and able to engage in the lighthearted, pointless banter that is so important when getting women to like you. They tend to be deeply invested in topics that are just not interesting to the majority of people, which doesn't make for great chat. They may be more prone to self criticism or low self esteem.

    As some people have mentioned in this thread already, that's only one aspect of intelligence. The nerdy, autistic kind of intelligence. High emotional and social intelligence is what women love and if you're born with that and good looks you're sorted.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Highly intelligent individuals tend to be less physically imposing. They tend to be less spontaneous and able to engage in the lighthearted, pointless banter that is so important when getting women to like you. They tend to be deeply invested in topics that are just not interesting to the majority of people, which doesn't make for great chat. They may be more prone to self criticism or low self esteem.
      This entire description is wrong.
      An intelligent man understands the importance of physique in day-to-day action. If he desires approval from his peers, he'll learn how he can best manage his form.
      An intelligent man seeks out experience in many facets of life, and is able to pull from those to fill his conversations with vigor and intrigue.
      An intelligent man knows how to introduce his favorite topics, weaving them in as necessary to illustrate his message.
      An intelligent man uses his introspection to manage his excesses and direct his growth, using his outward demonstrations of applied knowledge to criticize the world around him.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I think what you're describing here is a mature, self - assured man. There are many men like this who are not particularly intelligent. I've met intelligent people whose lives are a mess and struggle socially.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >mature, self - assured man
          The difference is that I describe a man who directs himself that way consciously.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >if I redefine the word intelligence I'm right

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Theres no such thing as intelligence
    Someone is intelligent if they have the same opinions and politics as you. Thats all it means.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No female animal is attracted to intelligence in general. Physical supremacy is what attracts female animals in human cases its facial bone structure in chimp cases its physical strength

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      > that what incels tell themselves

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Has a handsome male not gotten effortless sex?

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >intelligence doesnt mean being good at aspergers shape tests akshually it means you have qualities i think are good

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >What is the evolutionary-historic reason why women aren't attracted to intelligence,

    Women are attract to power. Power comes from wealth and status.

    Intelligence, among other basic human attributes, MIGHT help you acquire wealth and status, but if you don't use your intelligence, even if you have an IQ of 200, you're worthless. Not just to women but to everybody.

    And if you haven't figured that by now, I can tell without a shadow of doubt you're clinically moronic.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why would a 200 IQ demigod care to impress and get liked by 90 iq midwits?
      >inb4 B-because it feels good to put penis in vegana

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Depends on the girl.
    Nobody knows things for sure.
    Some girls are already rich and powerful and want a Chad or Brad to frick them, or love them.
    Life is complicated.
    If youre tall, attractive and youre financially stable usually helps.
    But not always.

  25. 2 years ago
    ἐποχή

    The mother is earlier than the son. The feminine has priority, while masculine creativity only appears afterwards as a secondary phenomenon. Woman comes first, but man “becomes.” The prime datum is the earth, the basic maternal substance. Visible creation proceeds from her womb, and it is only then that the sexes are divided into two, only then does the masculine form come into being. Thus, male and female do not appear simultaneously; they are not of the same order.… The female is primary, the male is only what comes out of her. He is part of the visible but ever-changing created world; he exists only in perishable form. Woman exists from everlasting, self-subsistent, immutable; man, evolving, is subject to continual decay. In the realm of the physical, therefore, the masculine principle is of second rank, subordinate to the feminine.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They are, but the effect is modest. Studies examining it have only examined speed dating, and there appears to be a link between verbal IQ and attraction (as well as between verbal IQ and perceived IQ). This makes sense, as verbal IQ is the realm of knowledge that is most easily flexed in a conversation.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >if you talk like a moron you are moronic
      No shit.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Women are attracted to intelligence, it's just not the only thing they're attracted to. You need more than just one positive trait to attract women, it turns out. But just because you think you're smart yet women don't like you, doesn't mean they're not attracted to intelligence.

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I’m literally deformed and I do pretty good with women. Was born with a cleft lip and palate and have a crooked nose, scar on lip and face. Not good looking. I’ve done pretty good just trying to be a good talker and working hard

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Uhhhh, woman bros?

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >why women aren't attracted to intelligence
    This is extremely dependent on culture and time period
    Women are absolutely attracted to intelligence and related success in life, given a culture that glorifies those things as ideal for a man to have.
    Western culture isn't about that, it's usually money and appearance prioritized over most other things. Personality is always important everywhere, and being a good talker is universally desired by women for obvious reasons.

    In general women are not as innately driven as men are, which is why we project our own ideas onto them. Women will like whatever their society tells them to, and will follow the lead of their mothers, sisters, friends, teachers, etc

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Cope. Women prefer men who don't speak much.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I didn't say a talkative guy, although extroverted men are at a massive advantage compared to shy men

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Cope. Women prefer men who don't speak much.
          only if you look like chad.

          Cope. This has been studied with thousands of samples. No woman likes a chattery gay best friend type.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Nah. Extraversion is one of the best predictors.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Its almost as if women want to dominate conversations. No, you're going to listen to my whacked out ideas and you're gonna like it, b***h.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Do you even go outside?
            There are tons of extroverted guys who easily get women, and they're not gay in the slightest. They're just outgoing and very good looking. the perfect combo. Being quiet is fine if you're attractive but you can't be totally silent

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Cope. Women prefer men who don't speak much.
        only if you look like chad.

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because a baby having a head that is too big to come out a vegana safely is all but a death sentence to the mother historically. But there's more to it than that. Men and women are attracted to fundamentally different evolutionary paths. Men are attracted to cuteness, intelligence and (in the right places) body fat. These are traits that are associated with youth. Big heads (big brains), cuteness, body fat, they're all paedomorphic traits. Woman, on the other hand, like small brains, big muscles and big frames. These are traits we share with our ape ancestors. So, if left entirely to women, we would evolve into smaller-brained, apeish muscle men, and if left entirely to men, we would be big-brain but otherwise unviable paedomorphic ayy lmao looking creatures. So the two pulls of sexual selection keep us with large, but not too large, brains.

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Put a paperbag on that thing and i'd ravage those puppies

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    > Thinking women aren't attracted to intelligence.

    Much dumb, my guy.

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >IQfy - History & Humanities
    >Return Catalog Bottom
    >Update Auto
    >Post a Reply

    >View Announcement

    >...Anonymous
    >08/23/22(Tue)08:45:08 >No.13842593
    >139 KB
    >139 KB JPG
    >What is the evolutionary-historic reason why women aren't attracted to intelligence, surely intelligence helped the hunting group getting a juicy mammoth?

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Sexual selection is crazy and we still don't have a strong theory on how it works. Look at the birds outside and tell me that the males screaming their heads off while being brightly colored isn't both the most beautiful and most moronic thing you've seen. Natural selection keeps sexual selection in check through predation and other means, but remove some of that predation, as is the case in New Guinea, and you get male birds that look like this. Likewise, with humans facing less natural selective pressure, sexual selection is free to drive us toward increasingly bizarre and potentially detrimental physical forms and ways of courtship. Get ready for human males to become Chads of Paradise.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Although a bird in new Guinea is not concrete proof of such a statement, I do agree with you

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Women may not be attracted to intelligence, but they rarely marry a man who is less intelligent than them. And as they get older this becomes more and more important. A teenager might be okay with a dumbass hunk, but very few women older than that will consider one as a possible long-term mate. It's all part of making sure there is someone there to provide for them and/or any kids they may end up having. Most women probably are not aware of this consciously, but it definitely drives them subconsciously.

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Being intelligent makes you slightly more attractive - just not a lot, especially when compared to physical looks which predict 40 - 60% of the variance.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Only 3% of the variance?
      I thought it would be about 25% at least.

      What's that paper called?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Intelligence and mate choice: intelligent men are always appealing

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the valedictorian of our senior high school is a girl, so you're a moron.

  39. 2 years ago
    ig.eugenociderr

    most amazing breasts on the net worth nothing poetry

    answers fvey 1700- non weighting undistortion gene unwinding. these morons trying to load up on their sword driven into thrm. disgusting start yo finish

    imagine thinking physical and financial intelligence didnt exist

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    see

    Her name is Iida Palosaari

    and learn to read

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Many thanks anon!

      [...]
      kind of uncanny, looks like someone pasted a jap's head with bleach blonde hair onto a white woman's body
      in any event her parents must be very proud

      If had all the resources and time, I would have probably tried to breed the perfect waifu, but that in itself is a malignant, since even if you have the perfect body, her spirit is corrupted by you. In essence, part of your soul is with these "flock", and worst case is the evil part of you they take. That is why one day when we build AI, it is inevitable they would get part of our soul (just as the theoretical breeding of the perfect waifu, this time in electric form), and as a caution they could get the evil part of humanity.

      [...]
      >That is why half-Japanese, half-european is the best combo wombo like pic related.
      Your combo wombo produces porn stars who prostitute themselves out.

      Best to grab them first before the yakuza anon. Start saving money now future CEO anon.

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    kind of uncanny, looks like someone pasted a jap's head with bleach blonde hair onto a white woman's body
    in any event her parents must be very proud

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >That is why half-Japanese, half-european is the best combo wombo like pic related.
    Your combo wombo produces porn stars who prostitute themselves out.

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Everyone considers themselves intelligent but unlucky.

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    intelligence is expressed after initial attraction. You need to draw them in with your looks and they stay for your mind.

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Because intelligence that doesn’t produce results is worthless.

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You can't just throw everything into intellect, brother

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There are many kinds of intelligence. Women like men who have emotional intelligence, which means they can understand and deal with their own and other's emotions in an adult, mature way. They also like men who have social intelligence, which means men who have it easy interacting with people and are good chatters. They also like men who are creative, which also takes a lot of intelligence.

    You know, it's not just about memorizing loads of facts about an esoteric topic.

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Who is the girl

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    they're attracted to humour/charisma which is a proxy for intelligence
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289611000523
    same thing probably applies to wealth/status

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Counting beans is not intelligence to the ancient peoples

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I would argue they kind of are. They are super acctracted to successful people. Being successful generally means being above the pack. A engineer earning bank is smart. A great politican is smart. A amazing officer has to be smart. Success generally requires some intelligence.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    obvious raid is obvious

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *