WHAT PHILOSOPHY BOOK ACTUALLY RADICALLY CHANGE YOUR MIND?

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Philosophy doesn’t people’s minds, people change their minds then select a philosophy to support it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Brutally truth and real

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Everything is aesthetics and intuition.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Then how is the Bible 3000 years of people changing their minds and being like ye the bible be right and then staying that way

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Double digit IQ in action folks

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >3 millennia of wrongness

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >My audience is Satan empowered golems
            >I only need to optics my way to consensus
            >The Internet isn't for reason it's for collection and agreement
            The post

            I'm not saying he's dumb for "believing" the bible, I'm saying he's dumb for thinking longevity is a measure of validity. Plenty of incredibly stupid ideas have persisted for just as long or longer.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >My audience is Satan empowered golems
          >I only need to optics my way to consensus
          >The Internet isn't for reason it's for collection and agreement
          The post

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Everything is aesthetics and intuition.

      And? Doesn't make it any less correct. The logic helps affirm or disaffirm your intuition.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Beast and Man by Mary Midgley

    Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought by George Lakoff

    The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology by Dan Zahavi

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >George Lakoff
      I may have taken the Evola pill a little too hard but Lakoff’s wiki page comes across as liberal pseudo hogwash.
      > Lakoff argues that the differences in opinions between liberals and conservatives follow from the fact that they subscribe with different strength to two different central metaphors about the relationship of the state to its citizens. Both, he claims, see governance through metaphors of the family. Conservatives would subscribe more strongly and more often to a model that he calls the "strict father model" and has a family structured around a strong, dominant "father" (government), and assumes that the "children" (citizens) need to be disciplined to be made into responsible "adults" (morality, self-financing). Once the "children" are "adults", though, the "father" should not interfere with their lives: the government should stay out of the business of those in society who have proved their responsibility. In contrast, Lakoff argues that liberals place more support in a model of the family, which he calls the "nurturant parent model", based on "nurturant values", where both "mothers" and "fathers" work to keep the essentially good "children" away from "corrupting influences" (pollution, social injustice, poverty, etc.).

      >Erm you see conservatives and liberals are like your daddy and mommy.
      What is this tripe? An attempt at dualism to further legitimize the liberal regime we find ourselves engulfed by?

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Goddess' revelation to Parmenides/the youth. Along with the rest of the Eleatic fragments. Once you take them seriously and refuse to accept hand wavings and convenient interpretations from inferior philosophers, it's over. A total Eleatic victory that essentially overthrows all the conclusions of the last 2500 years of western theology and metaphysics.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I picked up Count Arthur de Gobineau's book about the races as an edgy but non-racist teen. Three years and 25 re-reads later I became a full blown nazi but without any of that incellish sauce, the pure, the sane nazism. I don't even want to save the white race anymore. I just want to embrace the fully white character. I also want to destroy Western civilization, cause chaos and disorder everywhere until the very last vestiges of the former rulers vanished, and then building it all up again in a better form like the white man that I am. Everything I gained back, after years of soulless postmodernism brainwash, in spirit and in inspiration, I owe to the Count.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Tfw proverbs btfos millennia of philosophy from millennia in the last

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Radically

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I was so glad when he ended himself. Truly a satanic being.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Revolt Of The Masses but I’m a stubborn 42 year old guy so not much else

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Beyond Good and Evil

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    None.
    Closest thing was either Siddhartha because it felt like a coming of age story that I could relate to or The Stranger because Meursault was
    >literally me

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    François-René de Chateaubriand

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it’s nice to see someone else on the board has read him, let alone was influenced by him. he was the beginning of my ascent to monarchism

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Critique of Pure Reason

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *