What would happen if we cloned the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)?

What would happen if we cloned the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)?

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Even if they arent really buried there
    It changes nothing, islamically speaking

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      The graves are fake?

      Lol, it's cute how you think your alchemy and magic can replicate the work of God.

      >"O company of jinn and men, if ye have power to penetrate (all) regions of the heavens and the earth, then penetrate (them)! Ye will never penetrate them save with (Our) sanction"

      This has nothing to do with the question

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Allah hasn't gifted you with wisdom. He has his reasons.
        If you try, you'll find great wisdom in the Quran. It's literally got the answers to your questions, and more.
        I helped you out with a verse, but I can only open the door for you. A faithful servant must walk through himself. Salam, brotherm.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why are you posting like this? You are certainly either a christian or an atheist

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >“O you who believe! Ask not about things which, if made plain to you, may cause you trouble”

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            ok bro.

            saudi new rich rascals already destroyed the tombs. whatevers there is a placeholder to keep face.

            I thought the Green Dome was one thing they didn't destroy.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            they dont have to destroy it. they only have to snort the ground powder of the prophets bones

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the graves are fake?
        Every "relic" in Saudi Arabia is fake, and this is the very reason why the saudis have been destroying them for decades. They know if historians could get their hands on them they'd see it's all fake. It is mathematically impossible that islam started in Mecca.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      saudi new rich rascals already destroyed the tombs. whatevers there is a placeholder to keep face.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        They weren't rich when they destroyed it

        >WhenSaud bin Abdul-Aziztook Medina in 1805, his followers, theWahhabis, demolished nearly every tomb dome in Medina based on their belief that the veneration of tombs and places claimed to possess supernatural powers is an offense againsttawhid.[6]The tomb was stripped of its gold and israeliteel ornaments, but the dome was preserved either because of an unsuccessful attempt to demolish its hardened structure, or because some time agoIbn Abd al-Wahhabwrote that he did not wish to see the dome destroyed despite his aversion to people praying at the tomb.[7]Similar events took place in 1925 when theSaudi militiasretook—and this time managed to keep—the city.[8][9][10]Most of the famous Muslim scholars of the Wahhabi Sect support the decision made by Saudi authorities not to allow veneration of the tomb as it was built much later after the death of Muhammad and considered it as an "innovation".[11]

        Doesn't look like they destroyed it completely though

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >destroying the tomb of one of your fricking deities
          What a strange religion.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Wahhabis actually are the logical ones here, from a Muslim POV. Venerating Muhammad is idolatry since you're supposed to only worship God himself, so it's only logical that destroying Muhammad's tomb shouldn't matter at all since only venerating God is what matters here.
            But from a strictly historian's view, they're absolutely fricking vandals and I hate it

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >logical
            It relies on a 50iq interpretation of shirk. They don't think Muhammad is on the same level as Allah, they think he was closer to Allah than they and are trying to learn from and emulate him to get closer to Allah themselves.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Couldn't you use this to justify worshiping, or "venerating" or whatever Arabic meme word is used to describe what Muslims are supposed to do to Muhammad, Aphrodite or Shiva or whoever?

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            No, Aphrodite and Shiva were worshipped for themselves, not to get closer to Allah. They are also described as 'gods', which would be partners for Allah, which would be shirk. They also don't exist.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >No, Aphrodite and Shiva were worshipped for themselves, not to get closer to Allah
            Sure, but my point is: what if I'm worshiping them to get closer to Allah?

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            That doesn't make any sense. Muhammad spoke with Allah and was chosen to transmit his final revelation. What to Aphrodite or Shiva have to do with Allah?

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            They're also prior Prophets. Or maybe they're angels, I dunno. They're in some sort of similar state to Muhammad where they too were created by Allah before he made time and space and such, and as such are also coeternal minor deities like Muhammad. Perhaps they're minorer than him.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          it would have been commendable if you added the missing spaces. wikipedia removes line breaks upon copying and then you have moronation like 'againsttawhid' and 'militiasretook'.

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lol, it's cute how you think your alchemy and magic can replicate the work of God.

    >"O company of jinn and men, if ye have power to penetrate (all) regions of the heavens and the earth, then penetrate (them)! Ye will never penetrate them save with (Our) sanction"

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    It would just be like any other intelligent person

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why 'intelligent'?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *