Whats the difference between decolonization and genocide?

What’s the difference between decolonization and genocide?

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    one precedes the other

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    It all comes down to what you mean by decolonization.

    Decolonization can be good, it can also be a euphemism for ethnic cleansing.

    The devil is in the details.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Decolonization can be good
      for who? post examples

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Serbians, Bulgars, etc. liberating themselves from the yoke of Ottoman oppression.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >for who?
        For anyone who's ever been colonized moron.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        America. Death to the Hessians and Red Coats.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Do you really think Britain would be better off babysitting billions of pajeets? Why are rightoids like this?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Let’s say a group of people invade your country and force you to live as their subjects, then a stronger country helps your people resist them so you send them back where they came from at gunpoint

      Is it really genocide to get rid of a foreign colonial power?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        The occupying power and civilians who immigrated from that occupying power are not the same.

        If the civilians stole land or property that is different, they should have to return it.

        I'm also ok with the farmland restitutions of South Africa, as white South Africans have a huge wealth and land disparity as a result of apartheid that is harmful to the country.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          I have no faith that South Africa will succeed once all the whites lose land ownership. The indigenous people there have a poor track record for management and administration. I could be wrong, but I doubt I'll be wrong.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          That worked so well for rhodesia

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          'Land' on its own is worthless. It only becomes valuable when it is developed/cultivated. Rhodesia already tried this approach (land expropriation), and it actually made the country poorer, because the new land owners were too lazy and stupid to cultivate with the same efficiency as the previous owners.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Being sanctioned made Zimbabwe poorer not land expropriation.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Algeria had a literacy rate of 15% and death age of something like 52 before they kicked out the French.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >The occupying power and civilians who immigrated from that occupying power are not the same.

          How? They said “Free Stolen Land? Cool!”

          Settlers are legitimate military targets

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >The occupying power and civilians who immigrated from that occupying power are not the same.
          this is a great point. like in cyprus, palestine, it's the reason they long past the point where any fair solution is possible

        • 4 months ago
          Radiochan

          The occupying power and civilians who immigrated from that occupying power are not the same.
          Yet they benefitted from what that occupying power did

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Genocide is what the newspapers say when the group which isn’t in power fights back.

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing if you ask your average third world moron

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *