Who the Frick Ever Thought This was a Good Argument?

>There have been hundreds of different understandings of how diseases spread throughout human history
>The others are silly made up nonsense
>But not yours
>Yours is real.
/
>There have been dozens of different understandings of the laws of physics throughout history
>The others are silly made up nonsense
>But not yours
>Yours is real.
You can do this with literally anything from ethics to medicine to fricking BEE KEEPING.
The Idea that a thesis is proven incorrect by the numerous examples of opposing thesis it disregards despite others having believed in them just as fervently is fricking absurd.
And it SHOULDN'T have to be pointed out it is absurd.
Any fricking dipshit with a 4 year degree who was made to read the socratic dialogues should have thought of this retort and disregarded the point without it having to be laid out to them.
So why the frick is this pic still so fricking often as if its a coherent point???
Its literally atheists telling on themselves for being morons who cant think conceptually.

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's funny because it makes you seethe.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      So basically the same justification as bible thumping christians who say "i'll pray for you" because they know the condescension will get on other peoples nerves?
      Got it.
      I mean if you just want to accept your the same brand of moron as the average normie theist i'm all here for it,
      I just always thought you guys were supposed to be superior or something

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I've never posted or said the thing you're crying about, I'm just saying that it's funny because it makes you seethe.
        Anyway, I could even see an argument as to how it can be read in a more nuanced way, but you're seething too hard right now and I wouldn't enjoy having that talk with someone who is upset.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          people being morons annoy me like they annoy most intelligent people.
          i make no apologies for that
          morons are bad for civilization
          they cause the problems that get people killed and make life shitty

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >people being morons annoy me like they annoy most intelligent people.
            you're not as intelligent as you think you are
            >i make no apologies for that
            You should
            >morons are bad for civilization
            So have a nice day
            >they cause the problems that get people killed and make life shitty
            Then have a nice day and remove the problem from society.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        best part of trad catholism has been (up until recentlly) how near low profile it's been. Pre-vatican 2 trad Catholicism is border line underground.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    These are not analogous.
    Pathogenicity and physics have been verified by concrete observations and tests.
    Theism is a branch of animism, claims of the supernatural and superstitious believes, which have never been observed nor tested.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You being a woman has also never been observed or tested, yet you still believe you are one. Explain.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I literally can't stop thinking about trannies

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          whether you want to call /misc/ocks obsessed or not, the fact of the matter is the logic used by dishonests theists of
          >"why do you even CARE bro???"
          is the exact same as atheists who now defend the incoherent position of gender ideology.
          If Gender is a meaningless social construct then
          >"Trans women ARE women"
          CANNOT be a factual statement.
          Its purely a matter of opinion, and a matter of opinion where further there CAN BE no fact.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I don't understand why you guys keep talking about trannies
            Secular atheist medical and biological organizations have banned transitioning for kids and have made official statements that sex is real and binary and can't be changed.
            Why do you keep bringing this stuff up

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            why did you have to say troony 3 times in this thread!!! you summoned radiochan!!!!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Well probably because its brought up so often by atheists
            I can link you to any of the largest atheist youtube channels; all of them without exception have made videos advocating the trans understanding of gender.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I literally can't stop thinking about trannies

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >mindlessly repeats himself without adressing the retort
            why do you chose to be an animal instead of a man anon?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Inflammation theory

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >telling on themselves for being morons who cant think conceptually
      pottery

      /thread

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Pathogenicity and physics have been verified by concrete observations and tests.
      And at one point they were not
      When germ theory for instance was purely speculative was it then on the same level as theism?
      What about when germ theory had the sort of circumstantial evidence theists offer for things like the power of prayer by pointing to examples where the application of germ theory led to health success??
      Was it on the same level as theism then???

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It was testable unlike theism

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          In what way??
          Prior to the invention of the microscope (IE now when we can literally se viruses invading health cells) how do you know you washing your hands caused you not spread disease anymore then you know a christian praying DIDN'T prevent him from spreading disease???
          In either case all we have is acts which were taken and results we can record.
          We cant isolate for all unknown factors as (especially in the middle ages but really at all times) we are limmited in the instruments we have to rule out other possibilites.
          So i ask again:

          What about when germ theory had the sort of circumstantial evidence theists offer for things like the power of prayer by pointing to examples where the application of germ theory led to health success??
          Was it on the same level as theism then???

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Dude the germ theory doesn't depend on microscopes, famously Semmelweis didn't use one
            There were studies into the effects of prayers on several things, all turned up no effect
            Generally you don't need to know the mechanism to recognize an effect, the mechanism is investigated once the effect is reported

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yet atheists seek to use the argument to disprove something as if it is as concrete as pathogenics and physics. The reasoning works both ways. It is either completely void or completely valid. You do not get to pick and choose.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        There are no teapot behind Mars and there are no "gods in the sky but not really it's another dimension uh... somewhere, wormhole but undetectable and uh... not in this plane of existence, you see uh... our invisible soul self goes there after death but we can't see it happen."

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          No, he’s absolutely right. Not to mention that Viruses also are not omnibenevolent omnipotent beings that think that their revelation are the only means, or at least by far the best means, to save men from eternal damnation, yet they choose to ignore humanity and wait 200k years to reveal themselves first only to israelites, then wait some additional thousands of years for Jesus, then wait for Christians to develop ocean going ships for Christians to spread it to the New World or the Pacific, with Christianity arriving along with germs (ironic, lol).

          The fact that you think this analogy can work for any popular monotheistic religion, espeically Christianity and Islam, says lot about how abysmally stupid you are. This analogy can only have some value if you think that God is NOT omnipotent and omnibenevolent, so not the God of Abraham as seen by Christians and Muslims.

          unintelligible word salads, not even responding to what I said. I am atheist by the way.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No, he’s absolutely right. Not to mention that Viruses also are not omnibenevolent omnipotent beings that think that their revelation are the only means, or at least by far the best means, to save men from eternal damnation, yet they choose to ignore humanity and wait 200k years to reveal themselves first only to israelites, then wait some additional thousands of years for Jesus, then wait for Christians to develop ocean going ships for Christians to spread it to the New World or the Pacific, with Christianity arriving along with germs (ironic, lol).

        The fact that you think this analogy can work for any popular monotheistic religion, espeically Christianity and Islam, says lot about how abysmally stupid you are. This analogy can only have some value if you think that God is NOT omnipotent and omnibenevolent, so not the God of Abraham as seen by Christians and Muslims.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        you didn't even try to make a point here did you? It's void, the feelings are arbitrary and void. That's the whole argument.

        https://i.imgur.com/RSJfPCK.png

        And in the year 1500 people hadn't seen plenty of bacteria or viruses.
        At that point was germ theory on the same level as belief in a God?
        [...]
        Not in all points of history.
        Germ theory was accepted long before we had the technical equipment to se bacteria or viruses.
        Should we not have accepted it until microscopes were invented?
        [...]
        Define proof
        [...]
        >Dude the germ theory doesn't depend on microscopes, famously Semmelweis didn't use one
        Yes, thats my point.
        >There were studies into the effects of prayers on several things, all turned up no effect
        do you ammend this statement or would you rather me demonstrate it is false?
        >Generally you don't need to know the mechanism to recognize an effect, the mechanism is investigated once the effect is reported
        And yet people do theorize as to the mechanism in order to achieve the effect prior to when they can observe it directly
        I expect you support humans doing that
        Again if you did not it would mean not believing in germ theory for centuries after we did.

        This is some apex level moron
        >it was my point that germ theory doesn't depend on the microscope
        a theory is a mechanism that best explains phenomena regardless of whether or not this mechanism is observed, it has explanatory power and may be observed in the future. Religion doesn't function on systems of explanatory power it's an internal feeling and believe and no one religion explains the world better than another.
        "accepting" a theory merely entails that one accept it's explanatory power, the theory itself can be incorrect and when proven so can be rejected. People accepted germ theory because it best explained physical phenomena and were confirmed when they observed them, religion doesn't function as such.
        >there were studies prayer did nothing
        yes please, please demonstrate to me how prayer does things. Show me it doing something.
        >and yet people do theorize
        Yes they do, theories explain things about the world. Belief in this case means 'i believe this is likely to be true because it explains phenomena" belief is justified here (belief not knowledge). In the case of religion one has an unjustified belief. It does not explain and in fact often fails to explain phenomena about the world.
        you are really stupid and should stop talking.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      /thread
      Trailer trash and Christ LARPers may seethe

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >which have never been observed
      You forgot to add "in a scientific setting." While you may not believe such claims, people have said they've had religious experiences.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    All 3000 gods have the same amount of evidence for their existence, not true of your analogies.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You being a woman has the same amount of evidence as any of those 3000 gods, and yet you still believe you are one.

      >You can do this with literally anything from ethics to medicine to fricking BEE KEEPING.
      Well no op, those things utilize evidence and change with new evidence. It's scientific.
      When you have a bunch of thesis with no evidence it's perfectly reasonable to make his argument.
      Now is it a good argument for atheism like gervais probably intended?
      No
      It's a good argument against rigid dogmatic religions like Christianity. People who follow their own religions faithfully and denounce all others as bullshit ARE morons. People who are interested in religion should branch out and study many as well as philosophies that apply to cosmology and ethics.

      And yet atheists like you fanatically adhere to the religion of gay and troony and black worship. Atheists kneel in prayer to their almighty gods.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >And yet atheists like you fanatically adhere to the religion of gay and troony and black worship. Atheists kneel in prayer to their almighty gods.
        I'm not an atheist

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Correct, you worship gays instead.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/Tsi10TA.jpeg

            >Are you able to make a single argument against atheism which isn't just seething about gays
            I think the reason homosexuality is linked to atheism is the lack of diversity. Homosexuals are the most undiverse type of person. They literally want to breed with themselves. They are the embodiment of an Ouroboros. This is why they oppose theists.

            Op how does it feel to be dumber than Ricky Gervais? Lmao

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Are you able to make a single argument against atheism which isn't just seething about gays?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Are you able to make a single argument against atheism which isn't just seething about gays
          I think the reason homosexuality is linked to atheism is the lack of diversity. Homosexuals are the most undiverse type of person. They literally want to breed with themselves. They are the embodiment of an Ouroboros. This is why they oppose theists.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Nta but people on IQfy saying shit like that always make me laugh because I've almost certainly fricked more women than them.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >think the reason homosexuality is linked to atheism
            It's not. The vast majority of atheists are heterosexual just like the general population
            You not liking gays does not imply God is real

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >homosexual
            have you seen this movie on the gays yet?:

            https://rumble.com/v4uomzo

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Kek, based. Atheist gays will seethe but it's true.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            wtf is that pic? Is that from a Disney movie or some shit?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yes. The villian is a straight white man who solves everyone's problems, and then, one day, he reads a book about homosexuality, and becomes so full of pride, that he has to be defeated by a diverse group of people. In the end, he is banished to a magic mirror for his vanity of loving himself (because he is homosexual, and that's what homosexuality is).

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What movie is this?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            "Wish".
            It basically tries to redefine the egregore of "Walt Disney" as pic related. It fails at this, and is forgotten.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Ooo yeah. I stopped caring about disney around the time they started making fully 3D movies. I think I lost interest in Pixar after Wall-E

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Golem.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >black worship

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You are dodging the argument. You have no answer.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Not really. There are various historical and modern claims of miraculous events, it just isn't good enough for people to accept. Still, this means some religions have more evidence than others.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >You can do this with literally anything from ethics to medicine to fricking BEE KEEPING.
    Well no op, those things utilize evidence and change with new evidence. It's scientific.
    When you have a bunch of thesis with no evidence it's perfectly reasonable to make his argument.
    Now is it a good argument for atheism like gervais probably intended?
    No
    It's a good argument against rigid dogmatic religions like Christianity. People who follow their own religions faithfully and denounce all others as bullshit ARE morons. People who are interested in religion should branch out and study many as well as philosophies that apply to cosmology and ethics.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >complains about bad arguments
    >ignores what people are saying and instead has a melty about troons
    Blessed are the poor in IQ, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >he thinks there are only 3,000 gods.
    >he's proud to claim that he doesn't have a god.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    None of these religious homosexuals even care about morality. Most of you adhere to Abrahamic religions because of misogyny.
    If Christ (the man who befriended prostitutes and spoke out against honor killings) was alive today you would all string him up.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >socratic dialogues
    I've started reading the republic, and I'm blown away at how clearly it explains the parables of the new testament. I'm confused as to why it's not part of the bible.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Probably because the dialogues were written almost 400 years before Jesus started with his preaching gig.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Probably because the dialogues were written almost 400 years before Jesus started with his preaching gig.
        OK, well then make it part of the old testament then, or make it a middle testament, or make it a preface or something. Seems like a missed opportunity.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >religion isnt real lol there's no evidence for god hahaha get btfo theists
    >there's no evidence either that men can become women or vice versa
    >atheist MELTDOWN
    Holy shit the SEETHING ITT proves it right. Atheist cucks can dish it out but they can't take it, just like their wives with Tyrone.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Have you ever fricked a woman?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, your mom jajajajaja.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >he's never fricked a woman
          >calls others homosexuals
          Lmao.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm Christian, I don't fornicate. I'm planning to get married next year so your crying is moot. Also how does it feel having a bawd for a mom? Imagine coming out of the same STD-filled pussy that dozens of random wieners have been in. Couldn't be me since I come from a Christian family. Seethe atheist cuck.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Sorry bro, I don't consider unironic virgin to be straight men. You're a eunuch.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Taking dicks up your ass is way more cringe and less manly than having self-restraint, you useless atheist homosexual.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Good thing I've never done that, eunuch. Not surprising that a eunuch tries to call heterosexual men homosexuals because he's insecure about the fact that he's not really one of them.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why do atheist morons like you promote homosexuality so heavily then? homosexual. You got fricked in your ass, homosexual.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            obsessed

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's funny how you need to make up things about me because you can't cope with being not just a lesser man, but rather a eunuch, eunuch.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What a moronic argument. Imagine trying to virginity shame Christians. Any degenerate moron can go frick a prostitute whenever he wants. It takes strength not to give into your temptations. Not that an STD-riddled atheist homosexual would know anything about that.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Very admirable that you've chosen to be a eunuch, eunuch.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Is your argument I should spend fifty bucks and frick your bawd mother? I like how you didn't even deny that your mom is a prostitute, atheist cuck.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why should I spend energy denying baseless accusations, eunuch? I never told you to spend money on prostitutes, but it's quite sad that losing your virginity in other ways isn't realistic for you. Thankfully, your religion encourages you to be a eunuch.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Stop crying that your mother is a prostitute, atheist cuck. It's normal for your kind.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Sad attempt, eunuch. We both know it didn't work.
            On the other hand, it seems like you're quite upset about not being a real heterosexual man.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            How many wieners has your mother taken before your dad (and after), anon? Why does this question make you cry so hard?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            How does it make me cry? I didn't even address it lol.
            You on the other hand had a really sad moment when you were confronted with your eunuchhood.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Jesus Christ died a virgin. Generations of masculine men committed themselves to celibacy for the Catholic Church. The insults of moronic degenerate atheist fleas like you are completely irrelevant to Christians.
            On the other hand, your mother being a prostitute has always been a shame throughout history. Too bad for you, atheist homosexual.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's not supposed to be an insult to you. Your religion literally says that being a eunuch is good! I'm just saying that you're not a real heterosexual man but rather a eunuch.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Historically the opinions of atheist homosexuals has been wholly irrelevant while Christianity conquered the entire world. And your mother is a prostitute, which all religions and cultures agree is bad, kek.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why are you calling me a homosexual? You're a eunuch while I'm a heterosexual man.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You have a prostitute mother, and you're an atheist, so it makes you a homosexual automatically.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Anon why are you so obsessed with homosexuals and prostitutes

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why would anything like that make me a homosexual? I've never fricked any man and, unlike you, I have fricked several women, eunuch. Only one of us is a heterosexual man, and it isn't you.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Atheist homosexuals can't be men. Masculinity is defined by obedience to Christ. You're a homosexual, anon. And your mother is a prostitute, which you no longer deny.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous
          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You don't think that "man" means "adult human male", eunuch? So Christianity is a religion which claims that "adult human males" are not men, and eunuchs are heterosexual while adult human males who frick women are homosexuals?
            That's fascinating.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            A real man obeys Christ and has sex only with his virgin wife in the confines of marriage.
            A pozzed atheist homosexual fornicates with diseased used up bawds and lets other men frick him in the ass.
            The latter is not a real man. And the latter is you, moron!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >he unironically doesn't think that man = adult human male
            lmao
            You will never find a tradwife. You will continue being a eunuch while I continue fricking women. Keep seething, eunuch.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Real men don't slurp up other men's sloppy seconds. Real men frick virgin tradwives. You will never be a real man, atheist homosexual.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            keep saying this yaoi shit about men slurping another mans cum out of a woman. Hothothothothothot

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Implying I give a frick what a halfman thinks
            lol

            Actually one of the women I've fricked was a virgin. Speaking of, you'll never get to experience that, eunuch.

            It feels good that throughout history atheists have been killed and burned alive by Christian men and there was NOTHING they could do about it. And it feels good we will return to those times as soon as society gets tired of leftists, rapefugees and atheists again.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            > And it feels good we will return to those times as soon as society gets tired of leftists, rapefugees and atheists again.

            TWO MORE WEEKS BROS, TRUST THE PLAN. DO NOT HAVE SEX.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >openly wishes for the death of his foes instead of loving his enemies
            Guess who's not inheriting the kingdom of heaven lol

            Here it is. You hope that soon society will be radically restructured and you'll be provided with a complementary tradwife, because if that doesn't happen, you'll remain a eunuch. Every time, lol.

            Why were atheists such weak pussies they couldn't stop themselves from getting killed by Christchads? Explain atheist wienersuckers.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Soviet Union kills thousands of Christians
            >Christians burn thousands of other Christians
            lol

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Cope.

            I have 7.8 inch Latino dick homosexual. I can guarantee you that it's bigger than your tiny atheist dick. You're not a man and your mother would suck it moron.

            You'll never get to use it lmao.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            My dick is bigger than yours b***h. Sit down dicklet.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I've never measured mine, so idk. It's funny to listen to a Christian virgin eunuch brag about the size of his fick though.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Dicklets aren't men. Sit down now b***h.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You've literally never touched pussy in your life, eunuch. Your dick will never see any use.
            Btw do you think Jesus would approve of you bragging about the size of your dick?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Didn't read your whining, dicklet. Sit. Down.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Suck my butthole and maybe I will

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Nope, you read what I wrote and the fact that you'll never get laid hurt your feelings.
            I really like how I got you to abandon Christian values and turned you into a generic incel who brags about the size of his useless dick.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Didn't read. Stop. Crying. Dicklet.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yep, another case of hurt feelings. Would you still respect Jesus if you found out that his dick isn't up to your standards, eunuch? Is men's dicks all that you think about?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >blah blah blah
            Impotent dicklet rage detected.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not the one who just admitted that the yardstick he uses to measure his fellow men are their dicks, eunuch. You're fruitier than I thought.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yep, more seething dicklet rage.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            How can you even follow Jesus if you don't know his dick size? Imagine if Jesus comes back to Earth and tells you that he has a small dick lmao. You'd probably start looking for a religion worshipping someone with a bigger dick.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >more insecure dicklet blabbering
            Kek.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What should I be insecure about? Unlike you, I frick women and don't think about men's dicks. You on the other hand will never frick a women but consider other men's dicks to be of utmost importance.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yawn. More dicklet crying. Must suck having a small pecker.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I don't even know what I'd do with a longer dick tbh. I already have to be careful about hitting the cervix, so in most positions it would just mean that I would have to be even more careful.
            Of course that's not an issue for you because you'll never get laid and mainly care about penises because you like the big ones.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Didn't read. You're not a man, you're a dicklet. Be quiet now boy.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Thank you for demonstrating Christian values to me, eunuch. I always knew you guys only ever cared about big dicks.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why is the dicklet still talking? Sit down.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not a dicklet, but I'm talking because I find it hilarious when "Christians" on IQfy let the mask slip and reveal that what they really care about isn't Jesus, but rather shit like the size of men's dicks.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            he got under your skin and you argued with him for 2 hours over dick size lmao
            you're a dicklet

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >openly wishes for the death of his foes instead of loving his enemies
            Guess who's not inheriting the kingdom of heaven lol

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Here it is. You hope that soon society will be radically restructured and you'll be provided with a complementary tradwife, because if that doesn't happen, you'll remain a eunuch. Every time, lol.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I have 7.8 inch Latino dick homosexual. I can guarantee you that it's bigger than your tiny atheist dick. You're not a man and your mother would suck it moron.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >colonized mexican
            LMAO

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Every single time.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Christard crusader is an insecure latrino rapebaby
            Lol, not surprised.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Implying I give a frick what a halfman thinks
            lol

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Actually one of the women I've fricked was a virgin. Speaking of, you'll never get to experience that, eunuch.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Jesus wants you to never have sex and never touch your penis. He wants you to respect god fearing POC and women while you do your christian works.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Masculinity is defined by obedience to Christ
            Wtf, Mother Teresa was an alpha male all along.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Anon do you support circumcision because it makes boys dicks numb?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I talked to this one girl and she said because she's a virgin men are scared to have sex with her

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Anon chan have u ever kissed another boy? :3 this conversation is kind of turning me on. I love making priest yaoi where the kawaii uke priest accidentally summons a big bara (but still sexy) incubus demon!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Meds.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            IM NOT TAKING MY ANTI YAOI MEDS!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why are you so obsess with men fricking other men. I'm a fujoshi and even I don't think about gays that much

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >plan on getting married next year
            Lmao to who? You got one of those islamic arranged marriages with your cousin going on for you?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >I don't fornicate
            lmao

            Sorry bro, I don't consider unironic virgin to be straight men. You're a eunuch.

            this

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Go suck all the cum out from all the men that have been in your mom's infected pussy, you atheist homosexual.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You sound upset

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >i spend all my time sending obscenities to atheists in IQfy
            >im going to heaven btw

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Unironically yes. And you're going to hell for being an atheist homosexual lol. Sucks to suck. Seethe.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Imagine if your church community knew what you post here
            >implying

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They know that he posts stuff like this because they can look at him and smell him

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      But it's secular atheist medical and biological organizations which are banning transitioning for minors and saying that there are 2 semester based on gamete.
      your strawman doesn't even work.
      Are you able to make any argument that isn't just seething about trannies?

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Guys it's time to stop bullying OP
    Let him be

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      literally just got back to the thread like 5 minutes ago
      I okay fren

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is the Christian stuff just a reaction against modernity?

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Awful thread

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is anyone else ITT shipping the athiest eunich and the homosexual christian?

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This was a good thread and then the seething atheist spergs showed up and ruined it. Really sucks. Goes to show you why the Catholic Church used to burn these vermin alive. And now that we stopped, they are destroying Western Civilization.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'm not athiest. I have faith in the lord to bring forth cute priests and sexy demons!

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >I come to the board sandwiched between a hardcore porn board and a board devoted to handsome men to rant about homosexuals

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Holy shit, the christcuck is having a mental breakdown.

  17. 1 month ago
    Radiochan

    ok fine why should we believe in your god then

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    have been hundreds of different understandings of how diseases spread throughout human history
    >>The others are silly made up nonsense
    >>But not yours
    is real.

    This is currently the most moronic thread on the board

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >There have been hundreds of different understandings of how diseases spread throughout human history
      none of them were understandings. they were baseless claims, just like religions.
      >The others are silly made up nonsense
      all of them were silly made-up nonsense. we figured out finally what's going on. when and how is this going to happen with religion, do you expect some experimental proof of the specific Southern Baptist god of the 1893 convocation, as augmented by pastor Jim?

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    16613628
    >unironically using "no u"

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    all athiests are ga---ACK

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >internet dick measuring contest turns into a literal dick measuring contest

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'm not measuring my dick, I've literally never even measured it so I don't know how long it is, lol. It's the Christian who has big dicks on his mind 24/7.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    My dick is 85cm and I'm not even fully erect
    yet

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Could God create a dick for himself so long that even he couldn't measure it?

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The difference is there are no proof for any gods but you think yours is real and the others are fake.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Well Physics are something that is provable or testable, while belief in God will always be just a matter of belief. Its not something that you can scientifically prove like with physics.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    in every one of those allegedly parallel cases there actually was a way to decide. not so in the case of fairy tales for adults.

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >There have been dozens of different understandings of the laws of physics throughout history
    the dozens of different understandings of laws and physics are not all based on an equal ammount of convincing evidence.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Seen plenty of bacteria. Yet to see any men sitting on clouds.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      And in the year 1500 people hadn't seen plenty of bacteria or viruses.
      At that point was germ theory on the same level as belief in a God?

      in every one of those allegedly parallel cases there actually was a way to decide. not so in the case of fairy tales for adults.

      Not in all points of history.
      Germ theory was accepted long before we had the technical equipment to se bacteria or viruses.
      Should we not have accepted it until microscopes were invented?

      The difference is there are no proof for any gods but you think yours is real and the others are fake.

      Define proof

      Dude the germ theory doesn't depend on microscopes, famously Semmelweis didn't use one
      There were studies into the effects of prayers on several things, all turned up no effect
      Generally you don't need to know the mechanism to recognize an effect, the mechanism is investigated once the effect is reported

      >Dude the germ theory doesn't depend on microscopes, famously Semmelweis didn't use one
      Yes, thats my point.
      >There were studies into the effects of prayers on several things, all turned up no effect
      do you ammend this statement or would you rather me demonstrate it is false?
      >Generally you don't need to know the mechanism to recognize an effect, the mechanism is investigated once the effect is reported
      And yet people do theorize as to the mechanism in order to achieve the effect prior to when they can observe it directly
      I expect you support humans doing that
      Again if you did not it would mean not believing in germ theory for centuries after we did.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah this was moronic.
    >uhhhh there has been communism, chiefdoms, fascism, slave societies, monarchism, military dictatorships in history...
    >but liberal democracy is true?? right...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Another moronic analogy. Abstract political concepts are not omnipotent omnibenelovent Gods ignoring most of humanity for hundreds of thousands of years, they have no will or power to maniphest themselves intentionally

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because an omnipotent beneolent God would probably make himself known to more people than a sect of israelites, instead of ignoring 99% of humanity for most of human history on the planet; diseases have no desire or ability to “save” humanity and to reveal their true nature. Yet another moronic half-assed Christard “rebuttal”. Christards like you think that saying the first thing that comes into your mind without thinking about it is a big gotcha, ignoring the big logical leaps in your shitty ass analogy, Christards think that coming up like any shitty excuse is a good argument, that’s why you think that theologians/apologists are some kind of geniuses for coming up with tautological arguments and other fallacies ridden excuses.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Because an omnipotent beneolent God would probably make himself known to more people than a sect of israelites, instead of ignoring 99% of humanity for most of human history on the planet; diseases have no desire or ability to “save” humanity and to reveal their true nature.
      The frick does this have to do with the epistemologically untenable position that a thesis having a large number of competing thesis renders it moot??
      I'mt not saying the argument you just laid out isn't a good argument against God; I'm saying the one i talked about in the OP is a bad one.
      > Yet another moronic half-assed Christard “rebuttal”. Christards like you think that saying the first thing that comes into your mind without thinking about it is a big gotcha
      Mother fricker you literally saw post and proceeded to launch on a rant that has NOTHING the frick to do with anything I said in the slightest.
      Ricky Gervais made a shitty argument for atheism.
      Its an argument that can be demonstrated to by shitty virtue of the position it is predicated on being formally unsound.
      That doesn't speak to atheism being wrong.
      That doesn't speak to atheists writ large being stupid (aside from their prediliction to repeat his unsound argument)
      It does speak a bit to your own incapacity to conceptually think but ONLY because you had this pointed out to you and proceeded to write a paragraph long post seething about it like a caveman rather then engage with any aspect of the critique made of his logic.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Room temperature IQ gay btfo lmao

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >The frick does this have to do with the epistemologically untenable position that a thesis having a large number of competing thesis renders it moot??
        It renders the argument for an omnibenevolent omnipresent God moot, learn to read, moron, also nice selfie
        >Ricky Gervais made a shitty argument for atheism.
        He made a decent and reasonable argument against the main religions in today's world. My "rant" has everything to do with why your moronic analogy exposes you as a colossal idiot to anyone who thinks about it for more than 5 seconds and doesn't have a room temeprature IQ

        Room temperature IQ gay btfo lmao

        moron

        >That doesn't speak to atheism being wrong.
        That doesn't speak to atheists writ large being stupid (aside from their prediliction to repeat his unsound argument)
        What even are these shitty strawmen arguments, chimp?
        >It does speak a bit to your own incapacity to conceptually think but ONLY because you had this pointed out to you and proceeded to write a paragraph long post seething about it like a caveman rather then engage with any aspect of the critique made of his logic.
        I did, learn to read, everything in my post addresses why your moronic anaology is purely moronic.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >The frick does this have to do with the epistemologically untenable position that a thesis having a large number of competing thesis renders it moot??
        You fricking moronic clown. The problem is NOT that there are many thesis, religions are NOT thesis, they're revelations, in the case of Christianity and Islam they're supposed to be revelations from an omnibenevolent and omnipotent God. That's what makes the idea that god IGNORED 99% of humanity for most of human existence on the planet moronic. Because if Christ's salvation, or knowing the israeli prophets like Moses, was so important for humanity's salvation, it would make absolutely sense for God NOT to reveal himself to most of humanity and let the New World inhabitants be pagans for 1500 years or more (in the case of places like Patagonia that remained non Christian even until the 19th century.

        The fact that you can't get why the logic in your shitty moronic analogy is fricking non existent is astounding.

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >The israeli wind god is the correct god and all those 1000s of other gods were all wrong

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Someone that can't reason (an atheist/disbeliever/wrongdoer).

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >diseases
    Diseases are real though, you can see when someone has chickenpox, etc. But there is no such evidence for religion.

    >understandings of the laws of physics
    The difference between physics and religion is that physics develops and revises itself. Religion doesn't. Why aren't priests conducting research into the history of Jesus and church to try and verify whether miracles were real? Instead they just accept on FAITH that miracles were real, and they don't doubt the reality of miracles. Which is stupid.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      God's grace is not a thesis! Gervais' statement is perfectly valid, regardless of the sarcastic intent.

      >The frick does this have to do with the epistemologically untenable position that a thesis having a large number of competing thesis renders it moot??
      It renders the argument for an omnibenevolent omnipresent God moot, learn to read, moron, also nice selfie
      >Ricky Gervais made a shitty argument for atheism.
      He made a decent and reasonable argument against the main religions in today's world. My "rant" has everything to do with why your moronic analogy exposes you as a colossal idiot to anyone who thinks about it for more than 5 seconds and doesn't have a room temeprature IQ

      [...]
      moron

      >That doesn't speak to atheism being wrong.
      That doesn't speak to atheists writ large being stupid (aside from their prediliction to repeat his unsound argument)
      What even are these shitty strawmen arguments, chimp?
      >It does speak a bit to your own incapacity to conceptually think but ONLY because you had this pointed out to you and proceeded to write a paragraph long post seething about it like a caveman rather then engage with any aspect of the critique made of his logic.
      I did, learn to read, everything in my post addresses why your moronic anaology is purely moronic.

      >The frick does this have to do with the epistemologically untenable position that a thesis having a large number of competing thesis renders it moot??
      You fricking moronic clown. The problem is NOT that there are many thesis, religions are NOT thesis, they're revelations, in the case of Christianity and Islam they're supposed to be revelations from an omnibenevolent and omnipotent God. That's what makes the idea that god IGNORED 99% of humanity for most of human existence on the planet moronic. Because if Christ's salvation, or knowing the israeli prophets like Moses, was so important for humanity's salvation, it would make absolutely sense for God NOT to reveal himself to most of humanity and let the New World inhabitants be pagans for 1500 years or more (in the case of places like Patagonia that remained non Christian even until the 19th century.

      The fact that you can't get why the logic in your shitty moronic analogy is fricking non existent is astounding.

      >There have been dozens of different understandings of the laws of physics throughout history
      >The others are silly made up nonsense
      >But not yours
      >Yours is real.
      The correct one came via the scientific method, not unverifiable divine revelations

      >There have been hundreds of different understandings of how diseases spread throughout human history
      >The others are silly made up nonsense
      >But not yours
      >Yours is real.
      Yes. Because again of scientific observation, medicine is not a religion but a science and its conclusions are reached through trial and error, scientific research, etc.
      >You can do this with literally anything from ethics to medicine
      Not really. With ethics it's more of a popular opinion thing than an exact science.
      > to fricking BEE KEEPING.
      Sure you can do it with bee keeping, because bees can be studies, observed etc empirically pretty easily. If bees impollinate x flower they make x honey.
      >The Idea that a thesis ...
      Non sequitur and false analogy. Gravity doesn't want to be discovered. Bees don' care about humans keeping them. Diseases don't want to get cured. The Abrahamitic God DOES want humans to worship him and follow his rules. The fact that he allowed thousands of religions to prosper for thousands of years, some like the Egyptian religion, for at least 1000 years more than Christianity itself, contradicts the existence of a God that really cares about humanity knowing about him. This analogy can only work somewhat with Pagan religion where worshiping Hermes, Mercury or Thot didn't change anything. It DOESN'T work if you worship a God who hates you for worshiping another deity and not believing in him. So unless you're some tribal animist or a someone LARPing as a pagan, Ricky gervais' quote makes perfect sense, it shows the idiocy of a religion where a God that wants only monotheists to exist somehow lets animism and pagan religions prosper and thrive undisturbed for 99% of human existence on Earth.

      you didn't even try to make a point here did you? It's void, the feelings are arbitrary and void. That's the whole argument.
      [...]
      This is some apex level moron
      >it was my point that germ theory doesn't depend on the microscope
      a theory is a mechanism that best explains phenomena regardless of whether or not this mechanism is observed, it has explanatory power and may be observed in the future. Religion doesn't function on systems of explanatory power it's an internal feeling and believe and no one religion explains the world better than another.
      "accepting" a theory merely entails that one accept it's explanatory power, the theory itself can be incorrect and when proven so can be rejected. People accepted germ theory because it best explained physical phenomena and were confirmed when they observed them, religion doesn't function as such.
      >there were studies prayer did nothing
      yes please, please demonstrate to me how prayer does things. Show me it doing something.
      >and yet people do theorize
      Yes they do, theories explain things about the world. Belief in this case means 'i believe this is likely to be true because it explains phenomena" belief is justified here (belief not knowledge). In the case of religion one has an unjustified belief. It does not explain and in fact often fails to explain phenomena about the world.
      you are really stupid and should stop talking.

      >All these thought out enlightened things that Ricky Gervais DID NOT fricking say
      Wait, wait,
      You're telling me that when you GIVE AN ARGUMENT for a belief you can justify that belief irregardless of the moronic non-argument someone else gave which failed to justify that belief??
      Stop the fricking presses!
      Somebody call the president!!
      Get NASA on the line!!!
      what a fricking amazing profound discover we have just witnessed hear today!
      Only one fricking problem though:
      >Rickey
      >Gervais
      >Didn't
      >Make
      >Any.
      >of
      >These.
      >Arguments.
      He didn't say SHIT about the scientific method
      He didn't say DICK abou epistimilogical standards
      He just smugly fricking said
      >"Wow, seems like alot of people disagree on religion huh" :>)
      As if it was a fricking argument and a bunch of dip shit college studen atheist shit heads have since then acted like its some profound god damn statement.
      You can add on WHATEVER THE FRICK YOUR homosexual ASS WANTS to ammend Gervaises moronic blanket comment,
      But it will remain inconsistent regardless of what you say.
      And you fricking moronS
      Will keep reposting it
      over
      and over
      and fricking over
      because fricking help yourself.
      You are mindless god damn animals who believe whatever the TV tells you to, and the fact that the pic in the OP will UNIRONICALLY be posted by atheists time and time and time again will demonstrate over and over there is NOTHING fricking superior about ANY of your fricking reasonings.
      Your the same unthinking fricking cattle you b***h about christians being.
      And you will prove it over and over and over again by putting forward incoherent logic that any middle schooler who read socrates will be able to se through.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Religion is a belief, you have no reason to think it other than you feel it, yet thousands of other people have different feelings and believe different things. That's what he's saying, that's it. homosexual.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Religion is a belief, you have no reason to think it other than you feel it,
          ahahahahahhaahahhahahahahahahahahahAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
          YOU FRICKING moron!
          Name something you have a reason OTHER THEN
          >"you feel it"
          to believe.
          You are a being whose entire existence is defined by senses you cannot verify accept by other senses you cannot verify (if you fail to comprehend the truth of this statement FRICKING THINK ABOUT IT YOU moronic Black person BEFORE YOU FRICKING RESPOND)
          And all of it as such,
          everything you experience,
          you take on faith.
          Like all atheist """arguments""" you are pointing to a universal fact of reality (IE that there is no evidence of anything) and using it to discredit ONE specific claim arbitrarily ("there is no evidence of God!" :0)
          THERE.
          IS.
          NO.
          EVIDENCE.
          OF.
          ANYTHING.
          You fricking dipshit!
          lmao
          You could be living in ""the matrix""
          You could be a deluded shizophrenic
          You could be an isolated consciousness projecting every feeling he has into a manufactured reality!
          There is no way to know if any of that is true or untrue yet you accept the existence of reality yet deny the existence of God despite both being on equal footing IE: censory input.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You're moronic if you don't understand the implication of Gervais' argument, Not that I care about defending him, not a fan of him, but the fact that he didn't spell out the implications of his argument to your moronic ass does not mean that they aren't there.

        Nice moronic meltodown, by the way, really enterteinaing. Guess I should've expected the Gervais spammer to act like an angry chimpanzee.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          What fricking “””implications””” dip shit??
          When you have to write 3 paragraphs of caviots and additional arguments those aren’t fricking “implications”
          They’re a more coherent position tacked on to a moronic one
          You can claim Gervais quote was a joke not a serious argument and that’s fine (and also correct)
          But it then should NEVER be used as a fricking argument when it clearly is not
          If the statement doesn’t stand on its own then it isn’t a sound syllogism

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >If the statement doesn’t stand on its own then it isn’t a sound syllogism
            It stands out on its own perfectly moron, nice selfie btw. I've already explained why at length, the fact that you're too moronic to get it is another matter.

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    God's grace is not a thesis! Gervais' statement is perfectly valid, regardless of the sarcastic intent.

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yall still in here talking about wieners and dicks?

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I would punch this guy on the face if he told me something like this, the I would say something edgy like
    >There have been humans passing their genes for 6 million years until now. But not yours, yours end today.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Chimp like behaviour from the Christard, nothing new.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Is that how butthurt you get when people point out that you're wrong?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No, it's how butthurt I get when someone tries to offend me with smug sarcasm.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          But you have no answer to his argument. You have no argument that Christ is more real that Allah. Every argument you can come up with works no less for Allah. You was outplayed by Mohammad.
          >Atheists wrong because desert book says so!
          >Mohammad: my desert book says you all wrong
          How do you counter that? You can't.

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Calm down with the antisemitism, ricky

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >There have been dozens of different understandings of the laws of physics throughout history
    >The others are silly made up nonsense
    >But not yours
    >Yours is real.
    The correct one came via the scientific method, not unverifiable divine revelations

    >There have been hundreds of different understandings of how diseases spread throughout human history
    >The others are silly made up nonsense
    >But not yours
    >Yours is real.
    Yes. Because again of scientific observation, medicine is not a religion but a science and its conclusions are reached through trial and error, scientific research, etc.
    >You can do this with literally anything from ethics to medicine
    Not really. With ethics it's more of a popular opinion thing than an exact science.
    > to fricking BEE KEEPING.
    Sure you can do it with bee keeping, because bees can be studies, observed etc empirically pretty easily. If bees impollinate x flower they make x honey.
    >The Idea that a thesis ...
    Non sequitur and false analogy. Gravity doesn't want to be discovered. Bees don' care about humans keeping them. Diseases don't want to get cured. The Abrahamitic God DOES want humans to worship him and follow his rules. The fact that he allowed thousands of religions to prosper for thousands of years, some like the Egyptian religion, for at least 1000 years more than Christianity itself, contradicts the existence of a God that really cares about humanity knowing about him. This analogy can only work somewhat with Pagan religion where worshiping Hermes, Mercury or Thot didn't change anything. It DOESN'T work if you worship a God who hates you for worshiping another deity and not believing in him. So unless you're some tribal animist or a someone LARPing as a pagan, Ricky gervais' quote makes perfect sense, it shows the idiocy of a religion where a God that wants only monotheists to exist somehow lets animism and pagan religions prosper and thrive undisturbed for 99% of human existence on Earth.

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    read the theologians by borges

    https://people.duke.edu/~garci/garcitextos/bilingues/BORGES-JL/CUENTOS/TEOLOGOS.HTM

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Gervais is a comedian not an epistemologist. No one should have to take him seriously.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *