Why are Google like this?

Why are Google like this?

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's not just google, many shitty and morally bankrupt "Tech" corporations are desperately trying to integrate "AI" into everything despite offering nothing that is actually useful. this is why ChatGPT has, and never will, make a profit. it's been said here many times that this meme is literally shitcoins v2.0 except nobody is making any money. remember reading about fricking Black folk saying:
    > wow! blockchain! we can use it for anything!
    and then nothing substantial came out of it? same shit with ai but far more computer illiterate simpletons that now think they're experts because they were able to use stable diffusion or write a python program that talks to chatgpt's api.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >anti chatgpt ramblings
      I bet you have never been obsessed about wikipedia, moron

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        shut the frick up, moron

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I've genuinely started avoiding any service or device with AI in its name now, but I'm a bit of tech luddite (or tech skeptic) even though I still using 1111 from time to time for myself.

      To hell with all this crap.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Its hard to avoid. I got a new washing machine a couple months ago and it has an "AI cycle". Its just a renamed sensor cycle and nothing to do with AI...but thanks to the hype marketing that shit is going to be everywhere

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >got a new washing machine a couple months ago and it has an "AI cycle".
          You're fricked anon, that washing machine is a spyware.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >its a cloud lightswitch! it's connected to the cloud!
      ok but what does that mean
      >it means its on the cloud!
      to what benefit
      >
      yeah.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There’s the part where the recent advances in ML have also given us some actually useful tools whose value anyone can see (machine translation, text to speech, image classification, all got massively better with ML). And unlike the blockchain, an LLM is easy to try out and seems impressive for the first 10 minutes (which is also why every other moron thinks they actually understand how they work when in reality nobody really does).

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ironically it's both the biggest haters and shillers of AI who have no idea what they're talking about, but can't shut up about it.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        All those things are definitely important and are largely glossed over, I think. I'm definitely, supremely tired of companies stuffing moronic chat bots into random shit that don't need it. Like that car company's chat bot that would spout of wild shit that made it obvious it was just directly connected to Chat GPT instead of some bespoke system for their company.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          profitability is entirely uncorrelated with share price

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            doesn't matter
            as long as people believe it then that's where they will go.
            if people knew better then they wouldn't pay for accountants and investors to do the work for them.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This. AI/ML was being implemented long before ChatGPT blew up. All the hype shit is of course going to turn out to just be hype, but AI/ML was and will continue to be implemented by companies that aren't sexy (like insurance) to do boring tasks that don't catch the public's attention.

        An AI chatbot that can direct you to the right customer service person faster than the typical menu system plus getting transferred multiple times. Will save companies millions, but no one's going to cream their pants about it like AI writing code. Well I guess upper management and shareholders might, but not average people.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ChatGPT-4o is able to transcribe my handwritten notebooks error free. I can automatically generate spreadsheets from scraped sites with accurate sentiment analysis data. I can have MVP software generated from a prompt in under a minute. All of these things are absolutely not something pre-transformer AI tools could do.

          Unfortunately Google got rid of the people who figured this out and they've gone full corpo mode so they're probably done innovating.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I uninstalled Notepad and Paint from my computer. Frick the AI scourge.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      "AI" is just a search engine with no search field and only show text in word-to-word style.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Capitalism

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      True, we need fascism.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yup. Globalism let all these Indians blacks and israelites in.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why are most us corporations like this? They don't want to be good, they want to be first to monopoly extortion shit behaviour.

    Even though the world generally doesn't tolerate it anyhow if they go as far as they fantasize and they have to back down nearly every time.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Google seems to have this pathological reaction to everything, and in fact it was founded on it.
      Google saw search was popular, and made search but great.
      Then Google saw mail was popular, and made mail but pretty good.
      Then Google saw MS Office was popular, and made MS Office but okay
      And so on, getting worse each time, and slowly the features on the existing products have gotten worse over time.

      It's a very fundamental problem with how software development interacts with modern corporate structures. In basically every modern corporation, the only to advance is to prove your competence by taking on a project which allows

      a) You to demonstrate your ability to operate independently and lead others, and
      b) Your boss to show that he can recognize good projects

      This causes a kind of mania when new technologies show up, because there's an incentive for each individual worker to try to take on new projects, and for each project manager to try to advance his career by showing that he's made a significant change to the business. This is made worse by the tendency of tech companies to try to present their new technologies in a format that is normie-friendly. As a result, each manager at each level of hierarchy in the business is likely to be aware of the same technologies, and the further they get from the individual-contributor level, the less they will identify its utility

      So basically, there's this chain where upper managers hear about AI, so they want to identify AI projects. No individual manager underneath him wants to be the only manager to not take advantage of AI, so they ask individual contributors to find uses for it. The most opportunistic ICs will simply make shit up and start running with it. The ones who don't see a good use for it, will risk looking incompetent because they didn't find a way to contribute, and will not advance their careers.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So in the end it's just "look at me, I'm actually good, please like me, I beg you."

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the entire work of Software is simple menial job, maintain data of Excel and Word and sometimes make backups.

        Technology itself doesn’t offer any actual benefit to any corporation. Corporations who automated menial jobs don’t get better or more productive. This explain why every corporation have giant HR departments and are happy in hire 1,000 humans every week.
        IQfy think, corporations are dumb because they not swap human labor for their machine equivalent, but companies really enjoy hire humans have humans working.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          More than just the staff that will be fired when their jobs are hired, and even if it is slightly more expensive to automate, the company will be able to fire the extraneous administrative roles needed or wanted to manage those staff - so long as automation doesn’t exceed the expenses of staff and its administration, it is worth it in the eyes of the company. Even if you were to account for loss in quality, so long as the lost profit in lost customers or sales don’t exceed the cost savings in automation, the company has ample reason to rid themselves of people.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Oops. Replace “hired” with “automated”

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because corps are driven by profits and growth. stagnation and status quo are death to their stock price and to their shareholders. it's as simple as that. it's the fallacy of infinite growth.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Do you think these "le infinite growth" parasitic investors in shareholders actually realize this? Probably not because as long as they get their golden parachute it doesn't matter. This is why I don't blame people who wishfully think "can't wait for the world to end", "can't wait for <insert sector or industry I don't like> collapse". People with power ruin everything they touch

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dodge v Ford Motor Co.

      Basically a judge ruled that Henry Ford (notorious anti-semite and pro-worker industrialist) couldn't do things like give his workers raises to reward them for their good work, or save money in the company's coffers as a hedge against economic downturn, he had to maximize profit for shareholders above all else.

      Thus the precedent was set that publicly traded companies should behave like greedy sociopaths.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Funny how ~~*they*~~ haven't applied that to ESG or DEI.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ESG and DEI policies are driven by stock rating policies from massive state pension/401k funds run by Larry Fink.
          He demands a company behave a certain way with the promise he'll buy that company's stock with his massive money stockpile gotten from certainly illegal government backroom deals
          if that company complies, the stock price catapults and the shareholders make money
          so fink gets to drive corporate behavior for no other reason than he has an enormous amount of other people's money to spend

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I still don't understand how ESG/DEI makes money. Everything ((they)) do is supposed to make money. What financial incentive is there to give out money to companies for shitting up their products when the public doesn't seem to give a frick about diversity except for a vocal minority? If Larry Fink or whoever is getting money from the government, surely he could find better ways to invest it than paying companies to put black people in their movies and video games.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I still don't understand how ESG/DEI makes money
            It doesn't. Instead, they get free money from Federal Reserve Member Banks (GS, JPM, CITI, et al), who in turn get below-inflation interest loans from the Federal Reserve. The money they make is willed into existence by the very people that like ESG and DEI. It's a thin veil that centrally-planned economies hide behind.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Everything ((they)) do is supposed to make money
            you are misinformed
            everything a public company does is supposed to increase share value
            fink can FORCE corporate behavior because shareholders can sue the company for not behaving in such a way that would increase their stock price from an inflammatory purchase by Black Rock etc

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's just pedantic. You increase share value by making more money. When you buy shares you're basically buying that proportion of the company's expected cash flow.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It doesn't make money, it's just to pump stock price. His goal isn't for his investment to make money, it's to control the culture.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Pozzed companies get the money from Black Rock, Black Rock gets the money from the people who print the money.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Could you please share more links about this Dodge VS Ford thing? Sounds like a good read.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          pic is all you need

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            it's all so tiresome

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Except that Ford was in the wrong in that situation, but it was the judges who abstracted that to being you have to put profits first.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I didn't know about this, but I've just read about it. I think the main issue at the time was that Ford flat out said he wasn't prioritising profits, it was also clear that the Dodge brothers were using dividends from their Ford holdings to invest in their own business and Ford was trying to prevent this by limiting dividends. It seems this case didn't really create any precedents, it simply demonstrated the existing principle that corporations should be run for the benefit of their shareholders.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because if they stop now, then they'll die. All of them need to barrel down the highway at the same equally moronicly fast speed because the second even one of them slows, then the winner is determined - and by God, it's anything but the guy who slowed down first.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They need more time to sell shares so they have to keep the music going. When the bubble pops they won't be anything to replace it, that's probably when they start WW3. It's a last act of desperation that just maybe they can deliver on their promises and save the world.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, the fed will just turn the money printers back on when that happens.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    hindu pajeets

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The equation is also wrong, symbolizing how AI produces bullshit answers that don't work and aren't useful.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it means AI = 0

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So he's saying AI has no value. At least he's being honest.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You laugh now.
        But AI will help solve fusion within 5-10 years.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          fusion-bros, just 20 more years!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >E = mc2 + AI
        mind = blown

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Frick me I can't stand Indian 'Wisdom'
        All they ever do is take something someone actually smart said, and slap some shit on it

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Agree?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        in years to come, people will view him the same as they saw Einstein

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        thanks you sreekanth saar

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >why are google
      >are
      you do realize OP is one of those pajeets?

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    leadership has the IBM/GE mindset

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's actually worse than Google+.
    Google+ was actually not bad, just lacked adoption.
    The issue is that Pajeet ruined the Search Engine, and now they are creating a trash AI.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This
      Google+ had a lot of good ideas, and its biggest flaw was in adoption. If Google had more patience, they could have had a cool thing. It just needed more time for people to discover and understand it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This
      Google+ had a lot of good ideas, and its biggest flaw was in adoption. If Google had more patience, they could have had a cool thing. It just needed more time for people to discover and understand it.

      Google+ had an army of fangirls reporting people who didn't use their real names. And yeah, frick that policy. I remember israelitetube warning their users about using real life info. Kek.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >myopia
    >panic
    >poorly motivated
    >decisions based on trends
    Hiring too much women.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The problem is that shareholders expect infinite growth, which is imposible in limited system.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I sincerely hope Google dies. It won't, but I can dream.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why is Google like this
    Because this was googles origin story. They were once that company that out competed the industry giant. Yahoo was huge. IBM was huge. Then Google came and conquered the market. Tech bros are obsessed with disruption because they fear being disrupted themselves. Its why they added that stupid Google AI suggestions because they heard enough people say chatGPT was more useful than Google search. I also think they fear that the web is getting too centralized. Google doesn't produce their own value they leech it off other sites. The less sites that exist the less valuable Google is. Reddit consuming the internet is a direct threat to them because if reddit gets better at indexing their own site what will Google have that actually makes them valuable? I think this is especially scary for google considering that if search fails they don't have anything even close to replacing that revenue.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Also Google was ahead of the game regarding AI and OpenAI was created in order to stop them from having a monopoly. In a way OpenAI was created to destroy google and it is working.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i sold like 60% of my tech stocks last week

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      enjoy your tax bill

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Not trading in an IRA.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Of course, start with and IRA, but eventually you will need to branch out into a taxable account too

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why are Google like this?
    indians are not creative people

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How do these people get away with running their previous employer through the mud?
    Is it just okay as long as its gayMAN or something?

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why are Google like this?
    Have you seen NVDA's share price? All companies are trying to assert dominance in AI as investors know there will eventually be a small number of winners. Aside from this, mature companies with large cash flows are wise to have a bunch of speculative projects going. If they need to cut costs to boost their share price in a downturn they need some projects they can cut. Further to that, if aren't telling investors that they are at least trying something in AI then it is a really bad look and they'll get sold off vs something like Microsoft that positions themselves as having a more coherent AI plan. If Google didn't have some AI it's like they're not even trying to compete and they definitely won't become a dominant player in the future so investors will hate it.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sounds like the perfect explanation for Microsoft Copilot. It has absolutely no reason to be there but it is.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Copilot is great though. One of the legitimate uses of AI.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Their exec are into the secrecy.
    AI will play a pivotal role in the enaction of the Great Reset. Mainly for the selection step : where the worth of every individual will be weighted to determine their right to live or die.
    Whichever organization will be the one providing the weighting service will have the opportunity to shift the parameter in favor of their own execs and family.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this but race instead of "execs and family". the influence of racial competition within tech is undeniable, except by old boomer honkies that just can't accept that the world works like that. Exhibit A is the current drama going on with Xbox: a bunch of white guys are getting railroaded by the Brahmin bureaucracy because they didn't fill their division with H1Bs. They even hired an incompetent black for division President! They could have hired an incompetent Indian and got with the program. That was a slap in the face.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >REAL CAPITALISM HAS NEVER BEEN TRIED OUT!!!
    you're literally spewing the same memephrase as communists
    cope less next time

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Man with two fake jobs telling other people how to do anything is a bit rich

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Enterprise don't really 'make' money. They just make it circulate.
    When Google pours money into AI, it's not disappearing. It goes into another enterprise account. Which will in turn, spend it elsewhere.
    Wanna know what put money out of circulation? Dividend.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The fact that DuckDuckGo had AI integration before Google and it works better than Google's despite being slightly dumber versions of ChatGPT 3.5 and Claude 3 is hilarious.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why are jeets so obsessed with tony stark?

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I love how people seem to believe H. Ford was a pro-worker industrialist who cared about his people, when in reality he was a ruthless capitalist that wanted to increase revenue even if it meant shitting on their employees.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      His opponents were literal israelites pushing for legislation that'd allow them to syphon Ford's money to compete directly AGAINST Ford
      Pick your poison

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >UX guy thinking his opinion matters at all
    lmao

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I guess because they know first hand what happens to companies that get left behind, Google rose because Yahoo failed to act, they snatched a massive market from them and through Android and Chrome snatched massive market shares from other areas too.
    I guess this caused them very anxious about any potential game changer that might arrive. You really don't want to be Yahoo of AI or internet explorer of AI. So you panic and try everything.

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Does this guys have frick you money or just a death wish?

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    FOMO, not just at Google

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Einstein's formula is E2 = (mc2)2 + (pc)2 for the general case including momentum. No idea about that »AI« nonsense tho.

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When the engineers and researchers stop being in charge and the advertisers take over, this is what happens.
    Look no further than Microsoft.

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is fake

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That vision is not catnip. It's happening. We're building the basilisk.

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >they are in panic because they want to invent something first
    >it's exactly like Google+, where google got fricked because they didn't invent something first
    Sounds like Google+ backs up this very idea that if you are not the first and late to the party, you get fricked.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yeah, as long as there isn't a clear winner in this race, each tech giant will try to cram its own shitty implementation into their user experience. in a strange way, it's better for them if the market is awash in crappy implementations because advances by smaller teams are not picked up by the public at large, giving the giants time to acquire or reverse engineer.

      i joined tech in the middle of the CNN craze. people thought that hierarchical models would lead the way to GAI in a few years then too, but what we ended up getting was modest improvements in object recognition and fancy filters.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >GAI
        lel

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Einstein plus implulse/momentum (common case)

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's because 10 years ago if you searched for "black people" on google images there'd occasionally be a picture of a monkey in the mix.

    And because every american sets aside 2 hours minimum to worship blacks every day this is just unacceptable.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *