why are still using git?

why are still using git?

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    because it makes troons seethe

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >git is shit
    >use my shittier homerolled wrapper around tar.gz instead!
    No I'll use git (linux torvolds)

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i have no idea who this eceleb is and I really don't care about his opinion but this guy needs to do something different about his health. I have no idea what's wrong with him medically but look at that dude's face holy shit. Lay off the one ring and get out of moria, jfc

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >youngest looking 20 year old swiss

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    try fossil

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    whats wrong with it?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      can't add empty folders

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        git is fine. branches are cool, but to be honest i could probably live with svn just fine aswell.

        this is genuinely annoying THOUGH

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Because barely any services support the superior Mercurial.

          Branch handling in Git is shit. Sure, let me just discard my entire local repo just to see what change was made on that other branch.

          You can.

          Just add a .gitignore file in it

          If you want the folder to remain empty, add a * to the .gitignore file, and add an exception to the .gitignore file itself.

          Well, it's no longer empty then, is it?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Mercurial
            I understand that it never got mainstream because linux used git but it's so much nicer

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You can.

        Just add a .gitignore file in it

        If you want the folder to remain empty, add a * to the .gitignore file, and add an exception to the .gitignore file itself.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          thats disgusting and moronic

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            just like empty folders then

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            and as expected you're not interested in solutions, you just want to cry about something

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You're overcomplicating it. Add an empty file named .gitkeep. That's the de facto convention for empty folders.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            that doesnt prevent shitters from commiting files into it with a git -a .

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            If that's even a consideration then you have much bigger problems and your codebase will be crap anyway.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not giving your shitty clickbait video free watch time.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it just werks

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because it's good! It needs to live

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    SVN is better

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because it makes the depression projector in the picrel depressed, and I like reflecting the depressing that people project on to me, back to them 10 fold.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Because it makes the depression projector in the picrel depressed, and I like reflecting the depressing that people project on to me, back to them 10 fold.
      This is why git is based but you're giving everything to Microsoft now. Best make your own version control.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        git != GitHub moron

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >can't add empty folders
    non-issue that only newfriends whine about, been like this for many many years

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      its a nuisance for when you want to have a guaranteed output folder of some kind. as a result i have to always add something like

      output/:
      mkdir $@

      output/binary: | output/
      # make sure we depend on the `output/` dir so it gets made first...

      in my Makefiles.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    works on my machine

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Soon silicon valley devs will shill Facebook's Sapling relentlessly. Watch out for the muh scalability talking point.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why is Git bad? How about you tell me instead of expecting me to listen to some homosexuals podcast to get an explanation.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Because it doesn’t have a “download this executable” link front and center

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Git is good.

    Much better than SVN turtoise crap.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >some literally who getting filtered by git
    Next you're going to tell me you listen to Jo Blo

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Make way, the superior version control system coming through...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      A perfectly working system until you have to work on the same file as the next guy.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Behold, the future:
    https://github.com/martinvonz/jj

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      very nice, impressive

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        huh, that doesn't sound bad actually

        looks nice
        >Compatible with Git
        extremely big, if true

        Ive been testing it on personal projects currently.
        What Im doing right now is a somewhat non-canocial workflow
        git init .
        jj init --git-repo=.

        Then describe what Im working on a bigger scale
        jj desc -m "[...]"
        and every other step
        jj split -i

        It works essentially like running git commit --amend very frequently, and when you feel like you got a commit's worth (semantically), git reset --soft HEAD~ && git add -p && [...] && git commit

        The canonical way tracks closer to normal git usage, and the primary benefits are that merge conflicts are just a normal object and that the end-user is more exposed to the operation log, the jj equivalent of reflog, and with it fool-proof reverts and similar. Things like improved performance for huge monorepos will have to prove themselves, but I think theres quite some value in a clean slate, such as getting rid off --staged/--cached which are the same but not always etc.

        Theres also Sapling from meta, not officially but "some guys at $place" - same as jujutsu not being an official google product (yet), but you can tell that it's made to bridge their existing internal systems (piper/phabricator) with what outsiders are using/familiar with (git{hub,lab})

        Because barely any services support the superior Mercurial.

        Branch handling in Git is shit. Sure, let me just discard my entire local repo just to see what change was made on that other branch.

        [...]
        Well, it's no longer empty then, is it?

        >Sure, let me just discard my entire local repo just to see what change was made on that other branch
        git stash && git switch $branch
        I just never use checkout

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >git stash && git switch $branch
          In Mercurial I can just immediately see what's going on on other branches, their changes get pulled when I do a pull as well. I only need to switch to branches if I want to commit on them.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      huh, that doesn't sound bad actually

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      looks nice
      >Compatible with Git
      extremely big, if true

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      looks cool but I'll pass. git works good enough for my needs. don't need 5% more productivitiy when I already know a tool that just werks

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        For now, I feel the same. I just play around with stuff
        Long term I see some potential in a new tool that supports pre-commits/CI pipelines natively, it could save time not in committing but in dealing with the systems build around it.
        My only complaint so far is the language it's written in

        It would be nice if git wasn't just tailored for FOSS commie shit and had enterprise features so I do not have to suffer using Perforce again.

        >FOSS
        >commie
        have a nice day my cattle

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >another anime reference
      destroy it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >written in rust
        into the trash it goes.

        I'll write a server implementation in Go and name it kaisen just to dab on em

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >written in rust
      into the trash it goes.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If you only you knew...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >tfw you have to write code without google's internal tools

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >tfw can't breed

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >mfw after post nut clarity shame of closing all the tabs of the things i decided to watch

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >seethe about git
    >but not about the internal model, just being too moronic to learn the commands
    >recommend some janky crap like Visual SourceSafe just because it has a GUI
    >instead of something like darcs or pijul that can actually claim to be better than git
    The absolute state of nu-IQfy morons.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      it's a tool
      who cares about its internal model?
      I only care if it makes my life easier or not

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >GIT is awful! It needs to die!

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It would be nice if git wasn't just tailored for FOSS commie shit and had enterprise features so I do not have to suffer using Perforce again.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    he looks like some bat or gargoyle meme i cant remember

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    > 500 000 repos
    i mean, if you have 500 000 projects, what the frick do you expect?

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How come I can hear what this guy sounds like (not good btw) based on how he looks?

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm an oldgay that migrated a big multinational corp from CVS to svn, thankfully I retired just as the new zoomie hires were screeching they couldn't possibly learn subversion and couldn't function without GitHub

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What's bad about git is it's terminology/syntax. It makes it hard for people to develop a good mental model of what's actually happening. What it achieves is great, it's a hugely useful piece of software but the UX sucks balls.

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This video is the epitome of no substance. It's clear this guy just wanted to sound cool with his "unpopular opinion" and couldn't back it up at all, lmao. Even funnier that a IQfy troglodyte would find the video and be like "yup, I agree."

    Touch grass.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Youtube has gone to shit on every topic
    Programmer YouTube which was always going to be one of the better subgenres just because it's a high-iq hobby merely experienced delayed enshittification
    None of these people actually hate the languages they claim to hate
    None of their stupid opinions are real and are there to justify a stupid video with their FUBAR face on them
    If they have a moronic opinion and you click on it to hear just how moronic it is they win, that was engagement
    Stop watching it
    Stop paying attention to it
    STOP making threads for them

    The most popular languages and technologies are definitionally at least fine and probably see massive adoption because they work more than everything else. Popular thing BAD is a title they choose to upset and intrigue the maximum number of people

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >watching videos about programming
      absolute dullard territory

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >AND MY AXE!

Comments are closed.