Why are they like that?

Why are they like that?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    WW2 is the exact opposite story. Everyone acts like Britain did absolutely nothing and hands all the credit to either the USSR or US depending on their politics. The damage Britain did to the Luftwaffe, the actions of the British navy, their actions in the Pacific and Africa, all of it just gets completely ignored. I'm not arguing that Britain carried the war effort, but it deserves a hell of alot more credit than it gets.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I want a decent account of the British-German air war in 1941(before US entrance) but it's hard to find anything not steeped in propaganda.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Tasty cope.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they did nothing in any of those wars

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You do realise that WW2 resulted in Britain losing it's overseas empire and handing over most of its overseas military bases to US? That US also controlled both UK and US armied under one command during WW2? That they send twice as much lendlease to UK as they had to USSR. Whereas for USSR that was maybe 5-10% of total supplies and equipment, for UK it was essentially majority of their equipment?

      Sure, Britain did some damage, but that was essentially under oversight and supervision of US.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No it didn’t
        Rest of your post is based on a false premise in the opener so kys

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Canada, Australia, New Zealand grants full autonomy then freedom or outirght freedom like in India's case.

          Then gets outright buck broken by US over their overseas military bases

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destroyers-for-bases_deal

          Yeah, I'm thinking Britain got worse deal than Germany after WW2. Also lost status of great power, as only USA and USSR were on the level of such.

          It's quite ironic. One last time Britain tried to meddle in Europe's politics and it led to the greatest loss of land and power known to date.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      American economy and tens of millions of soviet soldiers would beat germany anyway. Honestly IDK what hitler was thinking about when he started it all.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Prussia deserves credit for saving the day at Waterloo, but Britain also gets full credit for setting it up and holding the position.

    France absolutely would not have won WW1 without Britain.

    And Britain was the only member of the Allies to be continuously at war with Germany for the entirety of WW2, and to stay in the fight even when London was being bombed repeatedly. They won the single greatest aerial battle in European history. They certainly deserve winning credit more than China or France.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Prussia deserves credit for saving the day at Waterloo, but Britain also gets full credit for setting it up and holding the position.
      Most of the forces opposing Napoleon at Waterloo were prussians

      >France absolutely would not have won WW1 without Britain.
      Weird cope. The idea is to determine who were the top contenders of WW1 (france/germany) and therefore the main winner

      >And Britain was the only member of the Allies to be continuously at war with Germany
      Meaning : fleeing then hiding on their island and entertaining hitler with his peace proposal offers until big daddy USA enters the war

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Most of the forces opposing Napoleon at Waterloo were prussians
        And they only arrived after the British had been fighting for several hours against the French while outnumbered more than 2:1, weathering bombardment and several charges on their position.

        > The idea is to determine who were the top contenders of WW1 (france/germany) and therefore the main winner
        France lost more men against Germany but if losing soldiers is your idea of being a top contender in a war then nobody beats China at any war.

        >Meaning : fleeing then hiding on their island
        You mean their homeland? That was being threatened with constant attack? Why wouldn't they defend their own country after France rolled over for the Nazis? What were they supposed to do, stay stranded in Europe while the Luftwaffe bombed London into the ground?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >after France rolled over for the Nazis?
          You mean after France and Britain rolled over, and France saved the fleeing british cowards after their blunders?
          Clearly you are not arguing in good faith

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You mean after France and Britain rolled over, and France saved the fleeing british cowards after their blunders?
            homie France got rekt in WWII in 6 weeks, the frick were the Brits going to do?

            >Prussia deserves credit for saving the day at Waterloo, but Britain also gets full credit for setting it up and holding the position.
            Most of the forces opposing Napoleon at Waterloo were prussians

            >France absolutely would not have won WW1 without Britain.
            Weird cope. The idea is to determine who were the top contenders of WW1 (france/germany) and therefore the main winner

            >And Britain was the only member of the Allies to be continuously at war with Germany
            Meaning : fleeing then hiding on their island and entertaining hitler with his peace proposal offers until big daddy USA enters the war

            >Most of the forces opposing Napoleon at Waterloo were prussians
            Britain had to hold the line on more favorable ground for hours on fighting. That was the plan you absolute dingus, the Brits knew the Prussians were a lot closer than Napoleon expected.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >homie France got rekt in WWII in 6 weeks, the frick were the Brits going to do?
            Well, it could have been different if instead of running away like cowards without firing once at the Germs ; the Brits actually stood their ground. Don't you think? But I have to admit, it takes some nerves to flee then to ask the people figthing tooth and nail to avoid total collapse of their homeland to actually cover your safe evacuation then to call those same people who actually saved your ass cowards

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >France lost more men against Germany but if losing soldiers is your idea of being a top contender in a war then nobody beats China at any war.
          France won all the decisive battles of WW1 leading to the final victory (1st and 2nd battle of the Marne and Verdun). Not even mentionning the French troops of Franchey D'Esperet collapsing the southern front in the Balkans and obtaining the reddition of Bulgaria that led immediately to the separate armistices with the Ottoman and the Austrio-hungarian empire. The brits, now are essentialy remembered for getting their arses kicked at la Somme and Galipoli.

          Brits should not romanticized their contribution in WW1, at the end of the day on the western front, they were only covering twice as much ground as the Belgians lmao

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Brits should not romanticized their contribution in WW1, at the end of the day on the western front, they were only covering twice as much ground as the Belgians lmao
            Woo lad, you've clearly never read any German books about WWI.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >what were the French Army Mutinies
            France would have collapsed into a communist state again like in 1871 without allies moron

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >>what were the French Army Mutinies
            No idea why anglos are keep pushing the meme of le mass mutiny in France

            >In 1967, research by Guy Pedroncini found 2,878 sentences of hard labour and 629 death sentences but only 49 of these were carried out

            49 executions over more than 7 millions men mobilized, certainly the french army was on the verge of collapsing lmao

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >All the decisive battles
            You should be banned for a post of such low quality

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I want to meet the person who thinks France won ww1 though.
            Like bruh actually do some research first lol

            Nice rebuttal homosexuals

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Bongs always bringing the bare minimum, gotta respect that in some ways

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Bongs fought the french outnumbered throughout the day until the prussian arrival you disingenuous israelite homosexual
        Let me guess, some buck tooth bong raped your prostitute grandmother like his government raped your third world shithole?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Bongs fought the french outnumbered throughout the day until the prussian arrival
          See

          https://i.imgur.com/FjEefgS.jpg

          Lmao the butthurt is real
          >50k > 31k

          Ratio without Blucher's troops was actually close to 1:1

          Britbongs be like
          >arrrgghh this is too unfair we literally can't win against those bloody frenchies if we are not outnumbering them 2 to 1. I guess we will just have to wait for real men to arrive to save the day

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Weird cope. The idea is to determine who were the top contenders of WW1 (france/germany) and therefore the main winner
        The Germans themselves regarded Britain as being their main foe in the west and often downplayed France in their own propaganda, such as pic related, or maps of the British empire as an octopus holding France as if it were a British colony. Many Germans even blamed Britain for starting the war (somehow)
        There's a reason everyone knows Gott strafe England but can't recall any equilievent phrase for France
        And if we go by main winner that definitely isn't France or even Britain but America

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You guys really have zero knowledge of WW1; this is absolutely baffling. After the professional army within the BEF got wrecked in early 1915, the Brits had to rely on hastily enlisted volunteers (later on conscription). Britain was not equipped to properly train, equip, or lead these civilians, especially compared to the conscript armies of the continental forces. The Germans viewed British troops with disdain; to quote Wilhelm II himself, 'The contemptible little army of General French.' There was equally no trust from the French command in the capacity of the Brits to withstand a significant assault. That's why, despite having roughly the same number of mobilized men, in early 1917 French troops were covering 800km of the western front line, while the Brits were assigned to only 100km of the front.

          That being said, among German elites, there was this bizarre disillusionment of Britain acting like a puppet master and manipulating continental powers into fighting Germany. It's an odd idea, since France alone, without any British involvement, had all the reasons to wage war against Germany to reclaim its lost territories. This opinion is reflected in von Falkenhayn's journal, but even he wrote that the British troops on the continent were a 'bottom-side show,' and that France was 'England's best sword.'

          As a matter of fact, every significant battle lost by the Germans on the western front was against French troops. Pretending that France was not the top dog of WW1 within the Entente, as much as Germany was within the Alliance, is either silly or disingenuous.

          Inb4
          No one is pretending that France could have won WW1alone

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Most of the forces opposing Napoleon at Waterloo were prussians
        Literal bullshit. Most were germans, because the British regiments were mostly from Hanover which was British. But prussians wre a minority. You are a fricking moron, off yourself.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Lmao the butthurt is real
          >50k > 31k

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Wellington's army: 68k
            illiterate moron, many such cases

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So, men from the Netherlands, the duchies of Brunswick, Nassau and Hannover were all de facto brits because they were figthing under Wellington.

            Then I guess France single handedly won WW1 since allied troops were all under supreme allied commander Foch

            Holy kek

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      absolutely would not have won WW1 without Britain.
      there would not have been a ww1 without britain

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Germany was spoiling for a fight against Russia and was going to start it sooner or later because they saw Russia as an existential threat to themselves. And that meant war with France was inevitable, due to the alliance between Russia and France. Hence why Germany invaded France first, before turning to Russia.

        For France's part, they had a grudge to settle against Germany from earlier wars, and were more than ready to meet them, but were leery of picking a fight against both Germany and Austria-Hungary at the same time. Luckily for them, Austria-Hungary ultimately forced the issue by invading Serbia.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Never understood why some right wingers blame everything bad that happened in the 20th century on the Brits. They seem like the least guilty of all parties involved.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Could be people who larp as nazis. They tend to hate anglos.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this
      britain deserves most of the credit for the 1st 2, and respectable credit for the 3rd

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is not how multi party wars work.this image even cheats by having USSr and USA share a spot if it's supposed to be choosing a single winner.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Britisher cope

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Too bad that nobody claims Britain won WW1 alone

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I want to meet the person who thinks France won ww1 though.
      Like bruh actually do some research first lol

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    WWII wouldn't be won without Britain.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who fricking cares. Brits and krauts are mostly ugly autists and psychoapths who kill kids, France did almost everything thats good, it is the heart of europe and by extension of the world, they re chosen by God to spread civilization. Cope and seethe.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    USSR was toast in WW2 without the bongs, let alone the US support
    Why on earth would you pick Waterloo, actual brain-dead homosexual OP

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The real realization is that Waterloo was a useless battle which would have changed nothing.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yep. France was absolutely wrecked after a decade of constant war. Napoleon inherited a crashed economy and virtually no manpower. One of the major reasons why Prussia crushed France in 1870 was because of the huge demographic difference largely thanks to Napoleons endless wars.

      Had Wellington lost the battle that day, there was another 100k army of Austrians and Russians on their way.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ultimately all these wars were won by major powers working together, but currently all of them are collapsing, and the only legacy of their great cooperative achievements before long will be autists arguing online about which one deserves more credit.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *