why do iran_n and chg frequently get lumped together?

why do iran_n and chg frequently get lumped together?

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I’m a CHGGER. My wife is a EEGER. Our son is an EEFER.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the general drift is obvious.
    although, as we already know, even in the North Caucasus there is literally an admixture of iranjeet.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      do iran n and chg descend from the same populaton and when did they split? or they just happened to have similar admix while being unrelated?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        similar admixture while unrelated.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        probably a common ancestor.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fathers of the yamnaya

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      South Indians have high iran_n admixture.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        do they?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes. Look at Syriac Christians and Nair.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't know how Pajeets managed to frick this up so bad. All Brahmins Aryanmogg the Dalits of NW India who are 40% of the population. As a European I hail the Sintashta genius of Ramanujan.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Are they Aryan?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          India is not Asia.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        damn i bet he slays all the punani

        its better to be a 7 in a land of 3's than to be an 8 in a land of 10's

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dalit quit this cope. CHG only contributed the maternal component to yamnaya. As always browns only purpose to give their women to the altar of BWC

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        thoughts on ane ilya?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Oh it weren't me. I think all of these cavemen are totally irrelevant for anything, yet in the latest cavemen model I know (the one composed of ANE, WHG, and Caucasus_UP), ANE looks like the worst of them and literally peaks in literal jeets. Like, if you want some le epic cavemen to wewuz, just choose WHG as they were richer in R (EHG was more Q and even I than R in reality), actually had lived in Europe, and contributed to no one but Europeans.

          https://i.imgur.com/LtG1KtT.jpeg

          why do iran_n and chg frequently get lumped together?

          Because for most pops they can be used interchangeably. But this is kinda the reason why races are claimed to be obsolete, any line drawn between such close pops will be entirely arbitrary and the degree of closeness itself too.
          There are 3 main pre-Neolithic clusters in West Eurasia, European hunter-gatherer e.g. SHG, Eastern proto-farmer e.g. CHG, and Western proto-farmer e.g. AHG. But as it was already said, it's unclear which one of the two polar pops of each cluster is the purest, e.g. Natufian or Anatolian and Iranian or Caucasian.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >WHG as they were richer in R
            >EHG was more Q and even I than R in reality
            Why are Russians so bad at genetics? It's really uncanny at this point how they manage to get everything wrong like an inverse weather vane. If a Russian says something you can be almost certain the exact opposite is correct
            Letting their ancestors out of the Judeo-Bolshevik kolkhozes was a mistake
            If you slice open and cut up a Russian brain and a woman's brain you will find they are physiologically quite similar and I do believe this explains their inherent in ability to understand evidence and reason with it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Might be because Russians are the most ANE-rich population in the world after Indians. You should submit to your ANE masters, farmbug hijra.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Basically it went something like this
    >prior to the LGM Caucasus(Dzudzuana/Kotias_UP) is West Eurasian and J with very minor Basal Eurasian while Iran is more Basal Eurasian-rich
    >ANE men with R2 cuckold the hairy black-skinned Brahui midgets of Iran during the LGM(give or take) to the great pleasure of the Brahui women
    >Dzudzuana males respond by cuckolding the ANE/Basal Eurasian mongrels in Iran to form ancestral CHG at the tail end of the LGM and the mix settles most of the Caucasus
    >ancestral CHG and Iran_HG drift apart for ten millenia becoming physically unrecognizable from each other with CHG being white-skinned and blue-eyed while Iran_N look like Somalians with hirsutism

    Target: IRN_HotuIIIb_Meso:I1293
    Distance: 22.4689% / 0.22468857
    60.2 Georgia_Kotias_UP
    29.8 RUS_AfontovaGora3
    8.2 IND_Great_Andamanese_100BP
    1.8 Ethiopia_4500BP

    Target: Georgia_Kotias_Mesolithic:NEO281
    Distance: 15.6182% / 0.15618237
    84.0 IRN_HotuIIIb_Meso
    16.0 Georgia_Kotias_UP

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kotias UP btw is pretty much halfway between Gravettians and Anatolian HGs although that's probably not the actual mix since things get fuzzy with Paleolithics. It still ties pretty strongly into the I and J brotherhood of the original blue eyed men.

      Target: Georgia_Kotias_UP:NEO283
      Distance: 5.1178% / 0.05117824
      42.2 Czech_Vestonice16
      41.0 TUR_Pinarbasi_HG
      13.2 Czechia_Bohemia_UP_HG
      2.2 Ethiopia_4500BP
      1.4 RUS_AfontovaGora3

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i thought iran_n had developed light skin genes like anf did
      also i thought dzudzuana was mostly basal

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Iran Aurignacian cuckolded ANE and Iran_N has ANE mtDNA from their ANE moms.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, ANE was super cucked, but Dzudzuana was cucked worse. Dzudzuana only contributed mtDNA to Iran_N.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Cope, Ganj Dareh was R2. Iran UP had L, H and maybe, just maybe T. All a bunch of loser Jeet and Somali lineages in the modern age.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The other Neolithic sites had G and J.
          >Iran UP had L, H and maybe, just maybe T.
          Do you have any proof of this, moron?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Those haploshits are associated with Iran_N ancestry and they have no basal branches elsewhere

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            H and T are not associated with Iran_N ancestry.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            H is definitely is. EEF had their own divergent branch sure but it was quite rare and consistent with minor contamination of their gene pool by Iran_N ancestry mediated through Mesopotamia. The rest of H is pretty much just Iran_N.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes the Iran_N cucked EEF to death. Iran_N males replaced EEF haplogroups with their own G and J. H could be Natufian and is first found in the Levant.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            H is divided into two primary branches which are more distantly related than I and J. The one found in Levant is probably H2 the same branch as Anatolians. H1 the Jeet and Iranian one almost certainly originated from Iran. It had a presence in Shahr-i Sokhta, Gonur and Swat Valley. You have to be a literal moron to think it came from somewhere else than Iran.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            H is Natufian.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not wasting any more time on a microcephalic Paki

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Cope.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what is the distance of chg and iran n on G25?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      0.19 or about the same as Swede and Lebanese

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm moronic and can't use vahduo, can you do a run and show me?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        is g25 even good for distances of components that old? Btw I've always though chg was iran n + 10% ANE

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          CHG is closer to modern Europeans in F-stats than it is to Iranians so in theory the difference could be even bigger, so big that CHG is closer to a Swede than an Iranian.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i wonder how accurate is conflating natufid or negrito mutts with iran N, compare the facial structure on the iranian with the pamiri

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nice sample of 1 person for each group, moron

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You can notice it ewith each person on the videos tho.
            They have much better facial structure than iranian jeeties, and onge jeeties

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous
          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous
          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous
          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ?si=EuEmmLUM0SyzEUZQ

            Or check these ones

            Notice how they are leagues above the average porkjeetranian

            Maybe is the sintasha dna not the iran n though

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Kalash

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it looks like a cleaner version of iran N; the lattter in contrast appears abo-Black admixed

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            that's just the extra basal no?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *