Why has America historically granted its imperial possessions and satrapies so much autonomy?

Why has America historically granted its imperial possessions and satrapies so much autonomy? Is it the Mongol business model?

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Criticize Israel or israelites and the mask comes off

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      cool it.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Im bot sure if they really have much autonomy. Look up what the US did during the Suez Crisis

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's happening with Saudis and qatar etc did they give up on the dollar?

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They don't always need to show their hand, but they will when they have to. For example during covid when Saudi Arabia was refusing to cut oil production and the US oil industry was on the verge of collapse (this would have been the victory of victories for Saudi Arabia), Trump threatened to withdraw his air defences and MBS quickly got in line. This is just one small but fairly recent example

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah. Another big one that nobody talks about is the rugpull of the British and French currencies in the Suez Crisis. And that was only punishment for ALMOST not obeying the US. Had Britain and France actively disobeyed, there may have been “USSR putting down the Hungarian revolt” level of reprisal.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Radiochan

    Because it's American led, not American controlled.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Frick off

      • 4 weeks ago
        Radiochan

        Sorry America isn't the super imperial power you want to think it is, hon.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I said frick off because you're a namegay.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They're a tripgay you newbie, quite being a dumbgay.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Tripgays are also namegays.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No you can literally post with just a trip.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yet the troon posts with a name, they're a namegay that became a tripgay because other people kept using their hecking username

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think the Mongols or Romans had this many bases.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Meme painting
    Egypt is neither pro america or pro east
    Mutts actually deny it any effective weapons because >israel QME

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Egypt isn't allowed to have an opinion, the last time they tried to have one the CIA staged a coup and killed Morsi

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because it's easier to control the world when you have competent henchmen who have control of their quadrants? Do you think it would be more efficient to just outright suck the resources from them? Who will have your back then?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well, the US does suck the resources out of them, just in an indirect way by making itself the centre of the global financial and trade system plus the petrodollar.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I was thinking the other day (I’m Canadian) about what might occur if, say, Canada decided it wanted to quit NATO, NORAD, PJBD, and instead become security-allies with China.

    Surely the United States couldn’t just allow this to happen? Maybe they would not resort to war outright, attacking Canada to ‘preserve the union’ (the international outrage would be without precedent), but how could they watch this drift occur? They would have to turn on the heat: big time. All pressure the US could bring on the Canada short of outright war would be brought to bear, squeezing, squeezing, squeezing (like with Cuba). But the day comes, and Canada eventually becomes China’s ally: they are lost for good. The only way the USA can ‘force them to be free’ is to invade and initiate a Brother War. After all, Canada and the USA are so closely linked by history, culture, and geography that it is unthinkable that any outside power (China), who does not understand this special relationship, would interfere and rend it asunder. It cannot happen. Canada MUST be invaded and incorporated into the USA so that it will be protected from China. It’s for Canada’s own good, they don’t know any better (being bombarded by Chinese propaganda), and the USA has to do what is necessary, even if the world (who doesn’t understand this relationship either) reacts with censure and outrage.

    And just like that I understood Putin’s position in Ukraine.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Radiochan

      Canada is already a Chinese possession.
      A Canadian invasion would sunder NATO.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Vancouver isn't all of Canada. Justin is too much of a homosexual to really turn his back on the US

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I was thinking the other day (I’m Canadian) about what might occur if, say, Canada decided it wanted to quit NATO, NORAD, PJBD, and instead become security-allies with China.
      There would be no way for the U.S. to stop this, though in today's world at least I imagine such a move would be very politically painful for the people pushing for it because lots of Canadians would become scared about the direction the country is going in, and it would wake a lot of people up. They are very pro globalist so they don't like leaving important organizations like that for no reason.

      I would imagine that if all that really happened, you'd see China trying harder to economically dominate Canada (it already is doing so), kind of like how it attempts to economically punish and coerce nations like Australia who are more in the crosshairs right now. That's what I imagine would happen. I don't think the Chinese elite would treat Canada as an equal partner even if that's what they wanted or were expecting for, it would be more of a "we're controlling you, so do what we say" kind of thing than what people are probably used to. That's just my guess as to that hypothetical situation.

      >And just like that I understood Putin’s position in Ukraine.
      Was there an equivalent of the Holodomor, Communist rule, and USSR in the last century between the US and Canada?

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Australians pretend this is bullshit, but they literally removed a PM who threatened their military bases uears ago, and we follow along even more now. Yes yes, thank you ameridaddy, pls send guns, and we'll keep teaching your soliders how to be frickin tough c**ts(because we have to be we have sweet frick all to keep us going why the frick else do you think we're like this jesus fricking christ). Anyway, thanks for the submarines, really appreciate how you went and told France to eat an arrangement of dicks and gave us their subs.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    After WWII, the business interests which were formerly aligned under various states such as Germany, Italy, Britain were entirely destroyed so they realigned themselves and their governments under the American government and its military. Truman gave an address within his first year as president on how America would be at the forefront of the world from now on.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The US runs it's empire for security, not profit. They have no need to extract wealth from their provinces or puppets.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >They have no need to extract wealth from their provinces or puppets.
      The whole tech supply chain and tech mineral spergery says otherwise

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Worked for Rome

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *