Why is intelligence not an attractive trait? Shouldn't it be an advantage, evolutionary speaking?

Why is intelligence not an attractive trait?
Shouldn't it be an advantage, evolutionary speaking?

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >mfw STEMcels havent replied

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it is, but women like chadtelligence not basedtelligence

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    High IQ definitely will get you laid. Higher intelligence is extremely important for a man because it impacts how good your game is.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Women like social intelligence. They don't like some loser who spouts nothing but equations or history factoids.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      High intelligence people aren't compelled to sperg out like that. That's a Hollywood meme.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Intelligence only contributes to the (positive as well as negative) halo effect. A tall attractive guy will be seen as even more attractive when he's intelligent ("OMG, he's hot AND smart"). An unattractive manlet will be seen as even more unattractive when he's intelligent ("ewww, he's ugly AND a nerd").

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Evolutionarily speaking, the conditions have changed way too fast in favor of intelligence, but not in a way that idiots get extinct. The traits that select buttholes are still ongoing and they compete hard with those that select for intelligence. These kind of stuff starts to have visible change after 10,000 years.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    intelligence is an attractive trait, whats repulsive is losers who have grandiose delusions of superior intelligence they develop as a coping mechanism. people who are legitimately intelligent can use their superior brains to get what they want. dumb nerds who wrong presume they're intelligent as a cope can't do that, they're too stupid to, their mental illness forces them to constantly brag about their fake smarts and incessantly spout out stupid memorized factoids like a total melvin.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What part of "intelligence can be detected but is not found attractive" didn't you understand?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Intelligence is attractive, what got actually detected was what we were taught to be intelligent traits, such as wordiness, and a large vocabulary used to compensate for the lack of abstraction, and studying, not thinking. In virtually all cultures, wordiness is a sign of stupidity, and the language may not even contain the words that let you speak like that

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You literally made this up you lying piece of shit STEMcel
          The study mainly used the International Cognitive Ability Resource (ICAR) to measure intelligence, and supplemented with vocabulary, reaction time and knowledge tests
          And the women detected the intelligemce of the men by watching them reading newspaper headlines aloud, performing a pantomime task and, trying to make the experimenter laugh
          Why do STEMcels feel the urge of making up facts to justify their arguments?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know what ICAR is, but I doubt it's different from other such tests. They all measure useless traits that have nothing to do with real life intellect. They are the cognitive floppy ears that have no real use, except that they decide your life.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I don't know what ICAR is, but I doubt it's different from other such tests
            See? You keep making stuff up. You didn't even bother to look it up. The ICAR includes stuff such as verbal reasosing, spatial reasoning, number series, etc

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >verbal reasosing,
            Usually bullshit like pic.
            >number series, etc
            Same.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            IQ tests use the same stuff
            Are you perhaps saying IQ is a meme?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Based

            https://i.imgur.com/Jcb5FEC.jpeg

            Natural selection is not the same as sexual selection.
            Take pic rel for example, and other bird species, being colorful is an explicit disadvantage in nature, but peahens find it attractive, so colorful peawieners are more likely to pass on their genes.

            Humans are prone to the same thing, and unless eugenics is enforced, sexual selection by women will lead to the degradation of our species since they don't select for intelligence, work ethic, etc. but instead physical attractiveness and violent, impulsive behavior.

            If it weren't for sexual selections whites may not even exist
            What advantages do light eyes, soft light hair and caucasian features have over that of native north americans or the (now extinct) patagonians such as the selknam?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >If it weren't for sexual selections whites might have had to select for intelligence rather than pretending to select for it
            Wow, compelling

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can be a genius at different skills but still be 100% socially deficient which will certainly set you back in relationships. Social intellegence is basically independent of other types of intellegence.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because intelligence requires that you need to talk with someone for days before you can safely assess their intelligence.
    Compare that to physical beauty which can be evaluated in seconds.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ->

      What part of "intelligence can be detected but is not found attractive" didn't you understand?

      Being funny is very attractive, so intelligence definitely is attractive in that sense. It's intelligence combined with autism that's not attractive.

      Basedence has shown that sexy people are funny, not the other way around

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The type of intelligence that allowed you to survive in the prehistoric African savannah is an attractive trait

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It is

    They just told you it wasn't while they talked shit about you online

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's complicated.
    Isaac Newton was an autistic incel virgin homosexual.
    Nevertheless, his maids stole his semen and gave it to women who wanted smart children.
    We still see this today in preferences for sperm donors.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Intelligence can be detected
    Only by other intelligent people, and intelligent women typically mate with intelligent men, since we're biologically wired to seek out relationships in which we feel understood. John Cacioppo's book on loneliness explained this from a neuroscientific perspective.

    What's not attractive is autism, and stupid people often conflate autism with high intelligence.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Marilyn vos Savant marrying the inventor of the artificial heart is a good example of intelligent people seeking each other out. They've been married almost four decades.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        how many kids?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          2!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        When did they divorce?

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The biggest advantage, evolutionarily speaking, is getting laid.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Being funny is very attractive, so intelligence definitely is attractive in that sense. It's intelligence combined with autism that's not attractive.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    assortative mating, you need to be in vicinity of each other, it's not that interesting beyond that.

    i don't want a partner who's much smarter or dumber than me

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Intelligence is surprisingly cheap

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    intelligence or even high intelligence without any real life success or nothing to show for, as in carreer or succesful trades on the stock market etc. is useless so thats why its not attractive.

    its not the intelligence itself it is what you made out of it.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why is intelligence not an attractive trait?
    in and of itself, intelligence is not a trait that can be judged as attractive or unattractive. Midwits (110-135 IQ) just tend to use their limited intelligence in ways that make them unattractive.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There are people who put intelligence above looks, but they are a very tiny minority, majority of people (especially women) look for beauty, money, status, power etc
    The intelligence you are saying is useless if you have nothing to show up, like money, awards or others

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Natural selection is not the same as sexual selection.
    Take pic rel for example, and other bird species, being colorful is an explicit disadvantage in nature, but peahens find it attractive, so colorful peawieners are more likely to pass on their genes.

    Humans are prone to the same thing, and unless eugenics is enforced, sexual selection by women will lead to the degradation of our species since they don't select for intelligence, work ethic, etc. but instead physical attractiveness and violent, impulsive behavior.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Birds have no use for camouflage. It might be better for them to be seen, than hidden.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It is, you just don’t have useful intelligence.
    Women want intelligence like how to get ahead in your field, making money, good with finance, make good decisions kind of stuff. It’s unattractive to spend your time on what others perceive as useless or unnecessary.

    You need more social intelligence and better social interaction, which is a much better grasp on intelligence than memorization of information. It’s also a detriment if you can’t use your body as well as your brain, because the two go hand in hand. Read books at the gym.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://mankindquarterly.org/archive/issue/50-3/1
    Effects of Sex, Race, Ethnicity and Marital Status on the Relationship between Intelligence and Fertility
    Gerhard Meisenberg and Anubhav Kaul

    Intelligence is selected for in males but is selected against in females.
    The standardised education system is actively dysgenic against women, all it does it load them with debt and waste their most fertile years, while the dumbest women are actively paid to have children by the welfare system.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Realm of body is related to digestive system, and fitness of body, education of simmulation is just shadow of gut.

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they like insightful persons

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    not enough time for adaptations.

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Women use success as A proxy for intelligence already, they don’t care about intelligence they care about what that intelligence achieves, men don’t care. Probably because women cluster around the mean anyway

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *