Why Rome Never Conquered Persia

Why Rome Never Conquered Persia

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Mountians

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    skill diff

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why Persia Never Conquered Rome

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    > same thread by same fartsi diaspoopoo over and over and over and over again
    >>""Why R*me Never Conquer My Dump??"
    When your people sacked Babylon, there was nothing worth stealing from there anymore. Your people, the Turks, and the Arabs shat up everything that made the region valuable.

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why would they?

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because israelites killed Caeser

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why couldn't these autists realise after 100-200 years of wars that neither of them can conquer the other one and that they should just leave some buffer states between them?

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Parthian
    >Persian
    lmao

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      That’s something that never sits well with Persians. They are less Parthian than even Georgians. They dont even use parthian words in their language.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      That’s something that never sits well with Persians. They are less Parthian than even Georgians. They dont even use parthian words in their language.

      The Parthians spoke an Iranian language, they are Persians.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Iranian doesn't mean Persian otherwise the Sarmatians would be

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Middle Persian and Parthian weren't exactly mutually intelligible, in spite of what some pan-Iranic diaspoopoo nationalists like to imply. Parthians balkanized Iran itself during their invasion of the region. Sharing a language superfamily doesn't mean that you're related.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Parthians balkanized Iran itself during their invasion of the region
          The frick? The Parni entered the region of the Parthia and merged with the population then broke away from the seleucid empire.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Stop larping. When the Persiams overthrew the Parthians they erased Parthian history

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          This. The entire Parthian period is briefly mentioned and then skipped in the Persian National Epic. Lmao at these larpers

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        The Anglo-Saxons spoke a germanic language, they are Goths.

  9. 4 months ago
    Chud Anon

    TOTAL ESL DEATH

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    If the Romans (at their peak) were able to devote their entire military to a war of conquest against the Parthians then they would have been able to crush them but that's a magical fairy world where all of Rome's other borders are peaceful for generations.
    Then there's also the fun idea of having to garrison Parthia, though the more likely scenario is Rome breaks them into a large number of smaller client kingdoms to keep Parthia divided and incapable of threatening Roman interests

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    They took their main region and capital 5 or 6 times

  12. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Rome sucked when the logistics and communications train went far from the Mediterranea

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is a good point. Romans grew used to ship transport everywhere even Caesar's invasion route in Gaul up to Lugdunum had direct access to the mediterranean. In their far eastern campaigns there was little choice but to use the rivers for shipping. Most notorious example was Julian's very stupid moves: giving up a siege, burning the fleet to march further inland without supplies.

  13. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because Carthage aside, when did Rome ever take on a competent and organized state?
    All their conquests were of mud hut tribesmen

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Because Carthage aside, when did Rome ever take on a competent and organized state?
      Greece, Egypt and Judea

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Greece,
        Not competent or organized
        >Egypt
        Organized but not competent
        >and Judea
        Neither competent or organized

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Judea
        Didn't exist at the time.
        And Palestine was hardly ever an organised state.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >The Kingdom of Judea didn't exist

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Correct, the israelite kangdom never existed, no evidence for it ever existing.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Except for all of the historical and archeological evidence.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            What historical and archeological evidence, Avi.
            Please show me a single primary and contemporary source attesting to the kangdom.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Kek!
            Historical Judea is as well attested to as the holocaust myth.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Kek!
            Historical Judea is as well attested to as the holocaust myth.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Um the hellenistic kingdoms?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >... Carthage ...
      You answered your own question.
      > All their conquests were of mud hut tribesmen
      That's a great way to describe Iranian civilizations before they assimilated among Kassite gypsies and Mesopotamians, it's only due to them stealing from the Assyrians that they ever managed to escape total pajeetdom. It's very reminiscent to how the Chinese steal everything from the West.

      >Greece,
      Not competent or organized
      >Egypt
      Organized but not competent
      >and Judea
      Neither competent or organized

      "Competent" is subjective. But Greeks were pretty competent. All it took from the Greeks to destabilize Iran and burn Ctesiphon to nothingness was a roving band of mercenaries lead by a homosexual.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >But Greeks were pretty competent
        No they weren't. You have no idea about the state of the late hellenistic kingdoms and it shows. There's a reason why Rome's eastern vonquests were so easy

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, it's because a horde of worthless bums invaded the region and destroyed something beautiful. It's no different from what Medians/Persians did to Kassites and Mesopotamians. You are two sides of the same gypsy marauder coin, but fortunately, your side isn't face-up anymore. Have fun dying for Palestine.

  14. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Total Roman Death

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *