Why the FRICK are there no good programming languages?

Why the FRICK are there no good programming languages?

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    c go perl

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      C was an acceptable attempt in the 60. The other two are crap.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >creators of C used 35 years of experience writing C to write a better C in Go
        >Go bad
        >???

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is all you need tho. It's hacker's trio

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >you don't need good tools to get crappy software done
        The eternal mantra of the programmoid.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Those are good tools you idiot.
          I bet you are a webshitter and haven't ever touched anything else besides muh javascript

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Wrong on every single count. I'm not webshit. I did most of my professional work in C++ and Java, most of my hobby in C and I have a good familiarity with something like a dozen programming languages at this point. It just dawned on me today that not a single one of them is actually good.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            make your own homosexual

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >perl
      lmao do zoomies really?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that's the opposite. zoomies think bash and awk is all you need

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it is

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >bash
          batch, linux sux, powershell also sucks

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >perl is zoomie
        Are you moronic?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Inshallah we will meet in Vahalla

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You mean c++, go, python

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Wrong, pytoddler.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Name one thing wrong with Python
          >inb4 speed
          Use pypy you fricking moron.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            shitty syntax

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >no scopes
            javascript tier jeetness

            Sounds like skill issues.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >no scopes
            javascript tier jeetness

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why would you use perl over python? Are you fricking stupid?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why would you use python over perl? Are you fricking stupid?

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You quite literally do not need more than this

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's not a language that's a cute picture!

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because you haven't made it yet.
    Go for it, OP!

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why the FRICK are there no good programming languages?
    Python is good language saar, come join with us in durgasoft for python course bhai mainne tum sabakee maan chod dee

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yah sahee hai bhaee, ajagar sabase achchhee bhaasha hai, mujhe ajagar aur naagoor baaboo bahut pasand hain

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Your average project is probably ~800 LoC, though.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >all software should be ~800 LoC
    If only that was possible.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I can just tell you have 20-30% African ancestry.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Strange cope

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      deformed amerimutt but still 100% euro ancestry

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because the deeper you go into this shit, the harder and perplexed the shit becomes.

    Also the only thing that realllly changed since C is metaprogramming, any code is still a bunch of if, else, loop statements.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Because the deeper you go into this shit, the harder and perplexed the shit becomes.
      No, it doesn't. Making a good programming language is laughably easy and yet no one has ever done it. What gives?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >laughably easy
        then do it
        >yet no one has ever done it
        likely it isn't so easy then
        >What gives?
        DO IT

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >then do it
          I could but what's the point? No one would use it because it wouldn't have 20-30 years worth of libraries, tools, programming tutorials and bug-testing behind it and it wouldn't mesh well with code written in bad programming languages.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Kek you’re listing bug testing as if it weren’t part of actually making the language you fricking moronic waste of air

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            GCC has been around for how long? It has bugs to this day.

            [...]

            >I expect a good programming language to have all of those things
            I know. That's because you're moronic.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >gcc has a few bugs
            >my language would have more bugs than features
            >my language is just like gcc
            literal troony reasoning

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You sound mentally ill. Get well soon.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ok troon

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Things did change after C in ways that I don't think are metaprogramming. Garbage collection, strong type systems, dynamic type systems, generators, imutable variables, exceptions. Also C dropped stuff that existed before it

      >Because the deeper you go into this shit, the harder and perplexed the shit becomes.
      No, it doesn't. Making a good programming language is laughably easy and yet no one has ever done it. What gives?

      >Making a good programming language is laughably easy and yet no one has ever done it
      What would a good language look like?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >What would a good language look like?
        It would have two components: one would be a modernized C, with static typing, static compilation, manual memory management and low abstraction, the other would be a lightweight, GC'd, dynamic scripting language with optional typing. Both would have similar syntax and there would be a shared core standard library. You would choose one or the other per module. The compiler would handle bindings automatically and allow seamless interop between the two. There, I solved 95% of muh language trade-offs.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You're describing exactly what Mojo aims to be.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Garbage collection
        for low iq Black folk who cant code

        > strong type systems
        kind of metaprogramming

        > dynamic type systems
        trash for Black folk who cant code, also useless trash

        > generators, imutable variables, exceptions.
        runtime stuff that is not even related to programming languages

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          NTA but your IQ is clearly in the low 80s.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So none of it is metaprogramming. Also the last things are not runtime stuff. Runtime stuff would be the stack, heap, etc that are not exposed in the language

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You can do some metaprogramming with a sufficiently advanced type system but you're talking to a dumb Black person ape who doesn't really understand what it's spouting.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Things did change after C in ways that I don't think are metaprogramming. Garbage collection, strong type systems, dynamic type systems, generators, imutable variables, exceptions.
        All of those are older than C.
        >Garbage collection, dynamic type systems,
        Lisp
        >strong type systems, imutable variables,
        Algol 68
        >generators,
        Simula 67
        https://staff.um.edu.mt/jskl1/talk.html
        >exceptions.
        PL/I

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >All of those are older than C.
          So?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >So?
            >Things did change after C in ways that I don't think are metaprogramming.
            Can you read the quote? They are not things that changed after C. They are older than C. Just because C doesn't have something doesn't mean it didn't exist.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >generators didn't become not generators after C
            Show me who said they did.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Things did change after C in ways that I don't think are metaprogramming. Garbage collection, strong type systems, dynamic type systems, generators, imutable variables, exceptions.
            All of those are older than C.
            >Garbage collection, dynamic type systems,
            Lisp
            >strong type systems, imutable variables,
            Algol 68
            >generators,
            Simula 67
            https://staff.um.edu.mt/jskl1/talk.html
            >exceptions.
            PL/I

            You’re one serious moron

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    God demonstrated His love to us by sending His Son Jesus Christ, who died and rose from the dead to Give us eternal life. He also promised to heal your body. If you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead. He'll give you eternal life.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There are no good and bad programming languages, only good and bad developers who know how to make the most of the tools they have.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Rhombus prototype

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Scala was an attempt at making a good language and see how that turned out.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Common Lisp

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this Its simple elegant,syntax follows rules no #$#$**/#(%) c perl gibberish.

      I cant stand anything else Its so simple and nice .

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    ok troon

    Legit losing your mind with rage.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're a Black person if you don't use punched cards.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Black person, you are actually delusional and so low-T that you're one step away from trooning out yourself. Your incoherent posts sound like projection more than anything.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you know its only half serious right? It's called "chumming the waters". If you call everyone a troon, you're bound to end up insulting a real troon eventually. It's a kind of meta-joke.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You know that guy is definitely about to troon out, right? Learn to recognize early signs (e.g. extreme agitation and paranoid delusions about everyone else being a troony). This information may help save you or others.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    C#

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There are a bunch of fun ones that are pretty good, but people won't use them for business reasons, and I also suspect the average programmer can only learn one or two kinds of syntax, and also only knows how to think about problems in one or two ways. I read a comment about programmers preferring hierarchical file systems, but normal uses preferring tags. I have not been able to find any real information to validate it, but I also have not spend much time doing so. It seems interesting to look into, so that's why I brought it up.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I also suspect the average programmer can only learn one or two kinds of syntax, and also only knows how to think about problems in one or two ways.
      All the more important to get rid of the dozens of moronic programming languages and only have one that is actually good. :^)

      >I read a comment about programmers preferring hierarchical file systems, but normal uses preferring tags.
      Well, tags are useless from a programmer's perspective. You can't organize a project using tags because tags don't identify any file uniquely.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Haskell

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    HolyC.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Go and Kotlin are nice

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I wrote a nice filepicker in rust and the memes are a lie, it's actually a good language

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I'm one of the three designated troon shills who spam every thread with Rust
      Oh.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    But anon, Go and Java exist

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why the FRICK are there no good programming languages?
    Use rockwell ladder logic, it'll change you're life

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >rockwell ladder logic
      qrd? people rising to their level of incompetence?

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Python, Go, C++

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think a single existing language (except those that are less than 15-20 years old) was designed to be a powertool. Old language were simple because it was the beginning. OOP kind of languages tried but failed to make powerful languages. The entire ML family is academic masturbation. Scripting languages were all made to make it easy to write toy programs. Java and C# might has well have been created by managers.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > entire ML family is academic masturbation.
      You shut your mouth

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There are almost on useful software written in these languages. Programming languages are tools, if a PL isn't use to make good software with it then it's a shitty tool. simple as

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    *no

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >c++
    >c++
    >c++
    >python
    >python
    >java
    >java
    >program

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    jai

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    jai chié

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    LEARN PERL YA SWARTHY BASTARD

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's wrong with c++ and c# ???

    Python is the only acceptable high level language, but not for large complex apps.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing imo, they just make it easy to turn the code into a pajeet rat's nest

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The one I wrote and use for myself is perfect. I know the second you homosexuals touch it though it'll be ruined like all the others

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's likely impossible to create a programming language that doesn't suck. Otherwise we would have at least one good language by now.

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I decided the 3 languages I want to try to get good at are go, c# and kotlin. any thoughts?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There's C if you need speed.
      There's Python if speed is irrelevant.
      And JS for webshit frontend.
      SQL for DB.

      You don't need anything else.
      Are they perfect? No nothing is, but they are good and work without issues.

      What's wrong with c++ and c# ???

      Python is the only acceptable high level language, but not for large complex apps.

      > Python is the only acceptable high level language, but not for large complex apps.
      There's plenty of large, complex apps where language speed is irrelevant. Biggest bottlenecks are web speed and database queries. What's the point if your language is super fast, if it's querying a huge db, its speed is irrelevant?
      And most python libraries are written in C anyway.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        c strings are archaic.
        you can't convince me that a 15k line python project is easy to maintain and add new features to.
        and js is js. it's shit but we're stuck with it.

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    python excellent for prototyping and interactive work, C++ is great when you want to write fast OO programs. Javascript is actually great for webdev. Putting aside the memes Rust is already a pretty good language, too bad it's still not standardized. C is good enough when the embedded system doesn't have a C++ compiler. Bash is great when you need do is call awk/sed.

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    C/C++
    PHP
    OCaml
    every use case covered by those three/four

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    c/c++ with your handwritten codebase, extremely minimal amount of dependecies

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the Lu(oh)a programming language

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Is that Bjarne Stroustrup in front of her? This must be a clever reference to Lua being utilized in C++ programs.

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hey I might be moronic but why is getting a solid source of information regarding coding hard? Every time I've tried to learn I can't seem to get anything beyond the very basic functions. Looking up more formal guides online gets me the same results and Youtube videos are either 36 hours long where they take 30 minutes to explain what the language is and another 30 minutes to explain what Print does or they just go willy nilly and don't explain what half of the shit they're typing does.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      programmoids are elitists and are afraid that if they share knowledge they'll lose jobs or smth idk
      moronic mentality at its best

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A lot of people don't understand what is going on, so of course they can't teach it.
      On the other hand, some of those rabbit holes are very deep; diving in will be overwhelming if you don't need to. Printing some numbers gets complicated to do well. Please put up with just swimming on the surface for some things; you can go back later once you've levelled up your skills. (Printing the shortest representation of a floating point number is surprisingly hard. Everything to do with the implementation of floating point numbers is difficult, typically serious-expert-tier stuff.)
      After you master basic coding, your next real step up is tackling data structures and algorithms; that will give you the basic tools to write code that is good. It's not the whole story, but it's stuff you need to understand to not end up writing disgustingly slow and stupid code. Once you can pick good representations for data and how to manipulate it, you can code most things (but might need to study quite a bit to understand what the right solution must be).

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      because there is nothing to teach
      all you need to understand is variables, ifs and loops
      that's all there is to it
      the rest is just practicing and reading documentation
      anything but the documentation is a double edged sword, you will do things faster but you won't learn as much and they might not be optimal
      also just ask ChatGPT for a course in a language of your choice if you want someone to hold your hand

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Anything advanced
      Learn math and algorithms. Read the language/library/API documentation and ask chatGPT/Copilot/StackOverflow for your options.
      And the most advanced stuff has nothing to do with writing lines of code: physics, marketing, psychology, accountability, chemistry, and so on. Remember that programming is a tool mainly made to solve problems, if you don't know jack shit about problems that need a solution you will never attempt to write code to solve it.

  41. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Don't blaspheme Dennis Ritchie's and Ken Thompson's beautiful creation

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      C is an abomination.

  42. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ruby is good.

  43. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I just use python for everything

    Nothing I do requires speed or anything much complex, I just use it in my spare time for fun.

  44. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    C++

  45. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm thinking of learning Solidity, any thoughts?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      solidity is just javascript in disguise

  46. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >no good programming languages
    Define what you mean by a "good programming language" precisely.
    Maybe there are good PLs but you just haven't tried them. Or maybe they don't exist because you've not put on your programming socks and written one.

  47. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I use Python, Go, C, and Javascript. I've never needed anything else.

  48. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    For me, it's bipes.br

  49. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you ignore all of the company hate boners, and look at purely features and syntax: which is better
    Kotlin or Swift?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Swift is a ridiculously good language. Way better than kotlin. It’s a shame how it’s locked behind the apple ecosystem

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        apple does offer compilers for windows and linux. I just assume that you can't make anything useful on those platforms

  50. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Man even the crap languages are very good these days.

  51. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They're all good. Just fricking learn one.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *