Why was there never an Egyptian Caliphate? >highly populous. >very wealthy. >large cities

Why was there never an Egyptian Caliphate?
>highly populous
>very wealthy
>large cities
yet all the islamic caliphates are arab/kurdish/circassian/turk/etc...
Why was there never an Egyptian headed one?

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Fatimid caliphate...

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the fatimids existed.

      They were literally arabs though
      >The Fatimids, a dynasty of Arab origin,[5] trace their ancestry to Muhammad's daughter Fatima and her husband ‘Ali b. Abi Talib, the first Shi‘ite imam.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        your question was
        >Why was there never an Egyptian headed one?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yes Egyptian headed, that is headed by an Egyptian, i didnt mean headed IN egypt else the mamluks would also count

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >the mamluks would also count
            they weren't a caliphate

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            caliphate sultanate it doesnt matter, medieval state

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The Fatimid were Berbers.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I actually believe you. The moment some historical figure starts screeching he's a descendant of Ali doubt creeps in

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the fatimids existed.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    "Egyptian" identity would mean Coptic Christian identity; all Muslim Egyptians were Arabized.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Egyptian" identity would mean Coptic Christian identity
      Yikes why are christcucks like this. The ones who destroyed ancient Egyptian culture were Greeks, Romans, and finally Christians.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >The ones who destroyed ancient Egyptian culture were Greeks, Romans, and finally Christians.
        I am a pagan and I fully agree with you here. My point is that what the Muslims would consider "Egyptian" (or rather Misriyy) by that point would be the Coptic and otherwise Hellenized & Romanized Christians. Islamization meant Arabization.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >My point is that what the Muslims would consider "Egyptian" (or rather Misriyy) by that point would be the Coptic and otherwise Hellenized & Romanized Christians. Islamization meant Arabization.
          And why should that matter to anyone? Who gives a shit. I have no sympathy for christcucks who b***h and moan about arabs/islams fricking them over but then turning around to ignore/downplay their role in ending ancient cultures only to start larping as these ancient cultures once the modern era rolled around.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >And why should that matter to anyone?
            Because it helps answers the question OP asked.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Islamization meant Arabization
          Why are 90% of Muslims unable to hold a conversation in Arabic?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Because they were not swamped with Arab immigrants in the way Egypt was.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The Egyptian fellahin possesed their own unique identity

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is the real answer. "Arab" culture is peak sovllessness.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Egyptians are a slave race since R1B conquered them and founded the Old Kingdom.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *