Why were Anglos so reluctant to taint their gene pool compared to the rest of the colonial powers of the new world?

Why were Anglos so reluctant to taint their gene pool compared to the rest of the colonial powers of the new world? Even supposedly white countries like Argentina have very few people without a bit of native admixture.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why were Anglos so reluctant to taint their gene pool compared to the rest of the colonial powers of the new world
    They weren't and I'm tired of that myth. How do you think american Black folk got their 20-30% european share of DNA? It just appeared magically?
    The reason is that there weren't many indians to mix with and many of the settlers were families of dissenters and such, as opposed to Iberian settlers who were generally lone, horny men seeking adventures.
    I mean isn't the story of Pocahontas even more famous than Malinche's?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >American Black folk got their 20-30% european share of DNA
      Good job proving your own point wrong. The fact that they are called that despite being quadroons goes to show how much Anglos were concerned with not contaminating their own pool. One drop rule.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Good job proving your own point wrong
        How does it prove anything wrong? And blacks in latin america also get called Blacks in spite of being as if not more mixed

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >How does it prove anything wrong?
          Because it includes extreme cases too.

          These people are lumped in as black, even by themselves, thus segregating them from the gene pool of white Americans. This makes no sense in Mexico where almost everyone is part black.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Please less than 1% of american Black folks look like that, it doesn't change a thing.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Even the fricking President was only 50%. Meanwhile, tons of people with obvious black ancestry are merely called Latino simply by having Spanish origins. Either way, it's not about what they look like, as evidenced by the existence of this town in the first place.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            You seem mistaken. I wasn't arguing that white american had Black blood, I was just saying that the anglos DID racemix as exemplified by the fact that african americans carry a significant share of European DNA.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I was just saying that the anglos DID racemix
            And the OP said they didn't want to taint their gene pool. The solution? Enforce the one drop rule, thus having your cake and eating it too.
            It's the black gene pool being tainted by their racemixing, not the other way around.

            Meanwhile, in Latin America.
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Gaspar_Rodr%C3%ADguez_de_Francia

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            The pic was "lol u racemix" as if the redcoat wasn't capable of such acts
            Anyway that's in the past. USA and the UK along with France are the biggest interracial breeding ground in the world at the moment.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >That's in the past
            Perfect for a IQfy discussion, then.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Not the anon you're replying to, but you're being pedantic. Pointless discussion

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's not pedantic at all if different things are being communicated. There wouldn't be an argument to begin with otherwise.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            This picture is SO fricking funny. I laugh everytim

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >This makes no sense in Mexico where almost everyone is part black.
            That depends on the state.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I mean isn't the story of Pocahontas even more famous than Malinche's?
      In USA obviously, I would guess in their vassal countries and most of the world too because of Hollywood

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, and even the few “white” Americans who have some native admixture are assumed to actually have black ancestry that they’re hiding out of some deep seated shame even though the average White American is slightly disappointed when their DNA results come back as 100% European.

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Mixing with homies was a huge mistake for latinos. Native Americans do not actually carry the genes for severe mental disabilities like SSA.

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    What are you talking about? Americans are extremely mixed race. Outside the south most Americans are Irish-German-Anglo mutts. This is my dna for example.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      literally a master race, but not subject to inbred, unlike pure Euros.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Northern European groups are not distinct races.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      > Why yes, I am mixed race.
      > Really? You don’t look it, what are you? Like 1% black or something? Haha…
      > No, I’m not a filthy Black person. I said mixed race, not mixed species.
      > Wha…
      > Anyways, yeah I’m French, British, Scandinavian, and German. Wish I wasn’t such a disgusting fricking mutt…

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because anglo women are the racist ones
    Anglo men will frick anything including Black folk
    Anglo women are all like "yeah im not racist haha wtf?" but then refuse to get dick that is not white

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Anglo men will frick anything including Black folk
      Based

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Male sexual selection is just irrelevant
        Spanish women got fricked by Black folk and hispanics because they are just loose and have sex more
        White women have always been stuck up b***hes that only want guys they think are super hot
        Spanish women would let an ogre frick them, or a hundred pigs

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Spanish women would let an ogre frick them, or a hundred pigs
          Animals
          Unfortunately, Russian girls are absolutely the same. I'm probably one of the last Russians with pic genetics.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Spanish women would let an ogre frick them, or a hundred pigs
          Animals
          Unfortunately, Russian girls are absolutely the same. I'm probably one of the last Russians with pic genetics.

          For some reason I feel like taking a sabbatical and backpacking through these countries and their rich cultures now.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >backpacking in espain
            make sure you bring lots of lube

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            You'll have far more chance in northern europe trust me.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >A difference of 1-2
            Over a whole lifetime?
            Wow it's nothing, lmao

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            tell that to the other guy who said that anglos women were stuckup virgins
            I don't care personally, european women are moronic and no place is safe.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            He's a fricking moron, have you ever seen an Anglo girl? He clearly hasn't
            >European women
            No you moron, that's just women, your jungle and rice fever doesn't fix that

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            yes but western countries are more affected.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Says who?
            That's really not true mate, have you ever been to a slope or coon country?
            I have, they're absolute prostitutes for white dick

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Ah yes, european admixture in the americas is maternal, this is well known
          what weird cope is that seriously

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Outbreeding depression induced schizophrenia.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          This is the most incellish post I've seen this entire week.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Jefferson was most likely not the father of Hemings children.

        literally a master race, but not subject to inbred, unlike pure Euros.

        Funny how euros will make fun of us for this when their own nobility is just as mixed race as I am

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          They are being made fun of because of the 56% statistic, not because they are generic Europeans.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Is that right? Most of Western Europe is just two generations behind us demographically. I suppose it is all in good fun though.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous
        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          People mock mutts for being a israelite ran shithole that managed to become non-White in a relatively short amount of time.
          Less than 50 years or so for Whites to lose their majority status, as well as voluntarily relinquish control over key governmental, cultural and financial institutions.
          Whites in America being EuroMutts is mock worthy but largely irrelevant at this point.
          All this mockery is just meant to cover the Euros bitterness over being gradually Americanised.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >All this mockery is just meant to cover the Euros bitterness over being gradually Americanised.

            Voluntarily, not gradually. Euros have no culture of their own and haven't since 1900. You all are literally too moronic to innovate these days.

            >Whites in America being Euromutts
            Vast majority aren't, at least South of the Ohio and Potomac Rivers; that being said, most Continental Euros are unironically even more Euromuttified than Americans North of the Ohio and Potomac River who are usually just British-German crosses.

            Brazilians truly are odious creatures.

            What are you talking about? Americans are extremely mixed race. Outside the south most Americans are Irish-German-Anglo mutts. This is my dna for example.

            The South has something like 72 million people or something. We aren't Euromutts, my grandpa took a DNA test and came back as 98% British and Irish.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            That is what I said? Southern whites are often entirely British and Irish. It was actually a common point of criticism towards Yankees in the civil war that they were mutts (like myself)

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Southerners aren't Irish. They're about 10% scotch Irish which actually can mean Anglo but just that they were colonizers of Ireland

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            The term scotch Irish is a relatively recent invention. You are correct that most Irish Protestants were of English or more often still Scottish origin, but when they arrived to America they were Irishman.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >when they arrived to America they were Irishman
            source? there was some discrimination against scotch irish but most of them lived in the bush anyway, they would have enjoyed all the other rights as everybody else

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >It was not until a century later, following the surge in Irish immigration after the Great Irish Famine of the 1840s, that the descendants of the earlier arrivals bega

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            And? Not wanting to be considered an illiterate catholic potato farmer whose politics are defined as a general taste for embezzlement and welfare is probably a good play

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            I never made any value judgements. I myself am a mutt, but all my family were all Protestant.
            >French Huguenots
            >Scottish, English, and Irish Presbyterian
            >Norwegian, Swedish, and German Lutheran
            >English Puritans
            If you hate the Catholic Irish so much move to Belfast. Northern Ireland is about to become demographically Catholic so they need your energy.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >French Huguenots
            Were most meds, by the way.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            And what is your point? George Washington is descended from Huguenots and their diaspora fled across much of Protestant north Europe and her colonies.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            being 1/16th something doesn't mean much

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Well then why do you care that they were Meds? I am less than 1/16 but I still think it is interesting

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            He's moronic, the Huguenots Washington was descended from very distantly were from La Rochelle which are old blood celts like the Irish/Welsh

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            People from there are southern euros. Nothing like the Irish you're being delirious.
            Most huguenots were southwestern french with few normans

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >southern euro immigrants are the original peasants that lived there in the fricking 1500's
            big doubt

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >southern euro immigrants
            schizophrenia, I don't know why amerimutts pretend like everyone in france is the descendant of spanish or italian immigrants. Most of the people depicted there are pure french safe for the few obvious nafris and Blacks

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not the one that proposed the idea that an ancient celtic tribe in western france was a rapefugee enclave

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            celtic don't really mean anything. celts have existed from belgium to southern spain. They were not a homogenous people.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            celtic just means the original inhabitants, the original inhabitants of western france, especially around Brittany, were not nafri van drivers, and probably have a lot in common with other atlantid/gaelic peoples

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            celtic don't really mean anything. celts have existed from belgium to southern spain. They were not a homogenous people.

            And the point was that people from La Rochelle were southern euros because they always have been. the french south is latin

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            South frsnce was heavily colonized by franks after the dissolution of the duchy of aquitanie, similarly during the angevin conquest they settled many anglos there

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            There are like 2 millions french with italian origins, 1-2 millions with spanish origins and around 1 million with portuguese origins. Additionally there should be around 1 millions with polish origins. So a total of around 5 millions french with immigrant background for a total of 50 millions white french (the remaining 15 millions are shitskins)
            American pretending that we're even nearly as mutted as they are is laughable. And the south of france was always mediterranean, the arrival of spanish and italians didn't radically change the place.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Out of the 10 more common surnames in southern france 7 are spanish.
            Modern french are all italo-iberian mutts

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            wouldn't it make sense that there was cultural exchange down there? Also being iberian isn't that bad, they're at least half human rock stackers

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's because every Spaniard is named Garcia or Sanchez so it screw the statistics, we just have a lot more diversity in our patronyms. Also there's a lot of names that are technically both French and Spanish (like Vidal or Camus)

            South frsnce was heavily colonized by franks after the dissolution of the duchy of aquitanie, similarly during the angevin conquest they settled many anglos there

            None of these left a relevant impact

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            germans are honorary americans IMO, their farmers are as good as our farmers

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            The term scotch Irish is a relatively recent invention. You are correct that most Irish Protestants were of English or more often still Scottish origin, but when they arrived to America they were Irishman.

            >when they arrived to America they were Irishman
            source? there was some discrimination against scotch irish but most of them lived in the bush anyway, they would have enjoyed all the other rights as everybody else

            I used to think Scotch Irish were not Irish at all but having moved to a heavy Scots area I'm surprised how similar they look, they act similarly with the same personality 'ticks', and honestly besides religion I would assume a lot of these guys are distant relatives of mine.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Thats because the scots were literally a bunch of irish people that immigrated to what was western scotland and booted the original Picts living there out or fricked them either way, in the end the scots and the irish are far more the same than the other likes to pretend otherwise.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            You know all whites until the mid-later 19th century were majority English, in fact almost all American whites today actually are
            Denying this is a israeli melting pot psyop so Americans think there wasn't a long time where they were an effectual ethnostate

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Americans vastly underestimate their English heritage, but what you wrote is untrue. At the time of independence 60% of white Americans were English, a further 20 were Scottish and (mostly Protestant Irish) while the remaining 20% consisted of mostly Germans, Dutch, Swedes, and (mostly Protestant) French. None of this changes the fact that America is an Anglo country.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            This is only in new york city mind you

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            which was laughably small until the 1800's

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            What are you talking about? The Dutch were almost entirely within New York, but much of Pennsylvania was German and much of the frontier was Scottish and Irish. This number refers to all the colonies.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >much of Pennsylvania was German
            okay that's one state that was relatively empty at the time of independence so your numbers definitely are asspulled

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >okay that's one state that was relatively empty at the time of independence so your numbers definitely are asspulled
            NTA but Pennsylvania apparently had a population of nearly 300,000 at the time of independence, which is pretty small by modern standards but I wouldn't call it a trivial amount.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            At one point about 30% of pennsylvania's population was German, this does not mean the entire US was "60% anglo".

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Try Sam Huntington you homosexual

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            horse shit

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            You know Huntington was from new york city and oddly enough the ethnic breakdown you're describing is that of new york city and not anywhere else, right?

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Sam Huntington was one of the most respected academics in Poly Sci (to the eternal rage of lefties). I will take his numbers for us demographics over your claims.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Okay but you're misattributing things he said about new york city and are applying it to the whole of the US, which is a common thing ellis islanders do

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Did you read the text I screenshotted? He is clearly referring to the whole US

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >calls the second most populous state empty
            Why on earth are you so determined to die on this hill? The fact that 20% of white Americans came from other similar North Euro Protestant nations does not contradict our “Anglo” status

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >30% of Pennsylvania at one point was german
            >this was 20% of the US population
            it was actually probably around like 7-8%
            couple that with many of them assimilating and marrying anglos after this...

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Here I found a source so you wont get mad at me even though I came up with that number myself
            >1790 - By this date as many as 100,000 Germans may have immigrated to America; they and their descendants made up an estimated 8.6 percent of the population of the United States; in Pennsylvania they accounted for 33 percent of the population; in Maryland for 12 percent.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Try Sam Huntington you homosexual

            Not him, but what actually is this sourced of off

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            my source is library of congress . gov

            He's misquoting Huntington talking about new york and claiming it's the whole of the US probably because he's mentally ill

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah but where is this info being gleaned from, whos this Sam fella, what's he contemporary to and where is the actual source and not what I guess is tertiary evidence
            Census data or something?

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Samuel Huntington is a deceased Political Scientist and former director of Harvards school of international affairs. The quote I screenshotted is from page 44 of his book who are we

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Fricking pietists.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Scottish
            Is almost the exact same makeup as English, in fact lowland Scots and northern English are without any shadow of a doubt closer related than northern English than most English areas are related to one another

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Having preferences isn't racist.

      Male sexual selection is just irrelevant
      Spanish women got fricked by Black folk and hispanics because they are just loose and have sex more
      White women have always been stuck up b***hes that only want guys they think are super hot
      Spanish women would let an ogre frick them, or a hundred pigs

      Take a good look, anons. This is what genuine heartbreak looks like.

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    I remember reading that when Mexico wanted to send their blacks back to Africa, Spain was supposed to take them from the Caribbean to morroco but they just took the money and left all the black people in the Caribbean. lol

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    IQfy has fricking broken me. I can't go a single day without thinking of a noble West Eurasian man finding love and family prospects in the exotic depths of the world. White women have lost all appeal to me as a result.

    I really need to take a break from this place.

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Conquistadors were religious conquerors looking for gold, not colonists. The English were colonists

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because countries like the USA, Australia, Canada and NZ for all their faults have been nothing but huge successes
    Every shitskin beaner colony is a depressing, face cutting shithole full of subhumans
    It's so obviously true, now put down the keyboard pedro

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    And they weren't German, lol

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      woops

      >okay that's one state that was relatively empty at the time of independence so your numbers definitely are asspulled
      NTA but Pennsylvania apparently had a population of nearly 300,000 at the time of independence, which is pretty small by modern standards but I wouldn't call it a trivial amount.

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because moorberians are already mixed race goblins duh

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Top 10 most common surnames in occitanie:
    Basically all modern france has is a plauge of moors, italian armenoids and pied noir moors or their mutt offspring larping as french

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ah yes the moors, who instantly bleached themselves with spanish pussy to the point that within just a few generations all the muslim kings were actually spanish

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Spaniards are moorish mixed race brown mongrels with nafri dna. Do not compare with the noble franks

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >moorish mixed race brown mongrels
          yes the islamites didn't last too long

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      yes, martin, vidal, durand, fabre, marty, blanc, robert, roux sound really not french

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >garcia
        spic
        >vidal
        spic
        >martin
        neutral
        >martinez
        spic
        >perez
        spic
        >sanchez
        spic
        >lopez
        spic
        >rodriguez
        spic

        literally mexico lmao

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          if you think spaniards/southern frenchies are as dumb and dysgenic as mexicans you're mistaken

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >spaniards
            yes, they are as dumb and dysgenic as mexicans.

            originally franks without Hispanic contamination aren't

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            factually incorrect

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          vidal is french u tard

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            martin neutral? its the biggest french name u can hear with dupont

            Vidal is quite common in both France and Spain but slightly more in France. Martin exist in virtually every european country, it all come down to the way you pronounce it.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            https://nameberry.com/list/1357/french-last-names

            The most popular last name in France is Martin, which ultimately is Latin rather than French. Durand is the most common surname with French origins in France. The most common French last name in the US is Lambert, which is not that common at all — sitting outside of the Top 300 most popular surnames.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >French origins in france
            You are being a bit obtuse by pretending only Franks are French.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think you are overestimating how different the original occitans were from Catalans, to be honest. They spoke sister languages, for god's sake.
      They weren't all fricking picards and calaisens until guido genocided them.

  12. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    There are 40m African Americans and god-knows-how-many Caribbean blacks of European ancestry, as well as around 1m Anglo-Indians in India of partial white descent

  13. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    aren't maoris half anglo in average? As well as abos ranging from 10 to 80% likely averaging arround 25%

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >aren't maoris half anglo in average
      surely not?
      I've never heard any figure for maoris actually
      for some reason I always assumed most of them were quite pure

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        apparently they are halfbloods

  14. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    didn't south and central america have way more people in it?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes. Also, a lot of modern natives in the US and Canada have European admixture.

  15. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    being french
    u have to read Jason O'Kallaghan del Guerreiro Jackson calling the french meds
    whereas La Rochelle is in the the centre-west of france

  16. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    martin neutral? its the biggest french name u can hear with dupont

  17. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    North america was barely inhabited but angloids still managed to bleach the natives into extinction. There are zero pure native americans left, the larpers from the reserves probably have 80% white ancestry

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Inuit though.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *