Why were they so completely worthless?

Why were they so completely worthless?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    crazy how the south korean army, the south vietnamese army, and the afghan national army were so shit
    what would cause people fighting for those governments not to really be invested in it's survival?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >ROK
      They were excellent in Vietnam
      >South Vietnam
      Stemming the Tide by John M. Carland seems to say good things about them atleast in Joint operations with the U.S
      >Afghan
      don't even include them in the same list.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/EwMwXx0.jpg

        The ROK wiped the floor with Kim Il b***h’s dogshit troops

        Do not believe tankie lies, communist troops are typically garbage

        >muh ROK
        They were literal dogshit cucks who could fight against unarmed civilians and had one of the biggest surrender rates in any army
        Literally only moronic SK trannies propaganda make them look good

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          kys moron

          John M Carland is an associate of the US Army with a PHD and a post in the Office of the Historian. You guys are two sliteye midwits. Who do you think i would trust?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        kys moron

    • 4 weeks ago
      Chud Anon

      The ROK wiped the floor with Kim Il b***h’s dogshit troops

      Do not believe tankie lies, communist troops are typically garbage

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Holy, thats an abysmal k/d for south korea given that these numbers are from western sources.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >unironic moronic tankie

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >have free reign to write whatever numbers you want
            >still bump the casualties that high
            Lol nope. Any k/d worse than 2:1 is terrible for western countries since it means performance was so visibly poor they couldn't feasibly fudge the numbers. Enjoy having half a country though, no skin off my neck.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >>have free reign to write whatever numbers you want
            Take your meds schizo

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            US military counts every "military aged male" ("double digits", 10yo or more) as a combatant when they mulch a school bus full of them with a drone

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Source: I made it up

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sorry unlike third world shitholes the west actually prefers the truth over pushing a narrative like you push

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Well shit then the soviet k/d against germany was so low that the nazis actually won. And consideringnthe russians had all that british/americans support, damn it's embarrasing

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            he is kind of right tho

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            See

            Well shit then the soviet k/d against germany was so low that the nazis actually won. And consideringnthe russians had all that british/americans support, damn it's embarrasing

            So tankie, did germany win ww2, or did russia?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i am not him
            and obviously world war 2 was won by USA you homosexual
            both ussr and germs lost, just germs lost more rapidly

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            America won the pacific. USSR did most of the work against the germans. Americans through the lend lease program basically funded the soviets though. Brits hid like b***hes.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Bullshit. The Brits and Russians equally won the Western Front. Britain is the only reason that the entirety of WEstern Europe doesn't speak German today.
            Brits also had a HUGE role in the Pacific. They had a fricking empire running shit. They're basically the Soviets of Asia.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Western front accounted for 20% of German force. I wonder where the rest of the germans were. Not to mention that front only opened after the soviets turned the tide in the East and started winning. But yes, equal win in Europe

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Americans through the lend lease program basically funded the soviets
            Like soviet soldiers had american guns, tanks? Ah yes, the famous american PPSH, Mosin Browing and T-34 Sherman yes

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Mutts cope.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Chud Anon

          he is kind of right tho

          Nope, the norks got some initial kills through the treachery of their surprise attack, but once the ROK regrouped it was column after column of moronic nork insects getting mown down by Maxine gun fire and artillery because they only had bugmen tactics.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It shouldn't be forgotten the norks started with an extreme military advantage with arms given by the USSR

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Complacency. They probably didn't actually understand what would happen if the US pulled out. AKA immediately collapse from their enemy countrymen.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Me in the middle with the gas mask holding the M1 Carbine

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      how short you are? 5'4''?

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Same problem as Afghanistan. US trains an army in its own image. That means a reliance on Air Supremacy and Air Support to break deadlock with an evenly sized equally armed opponent

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And when you pull out US Support, and they can no longer afford to fuel arm and maintain that Airforce they collapse.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This. US military is non-flexible in their conduct and training. Their local allies are always set up to fail because they wage codified warfare against a vicious and geographically advantaged enemy.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Radiochan

        Same problem as Afghanistan. US trains an army in its own image. That means a reliance on Air Supremacy and Air Support to break deadlock with an evenly sized equally armed opponent

        Sometimes good executioners make for poor teachers

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      quite on point.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Vietnamese normies didn't actually support the ARVN, there's a difference between collecting a paycheck (or worse, getting conscripted) and actually wanting that side to win the war

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anything the US touches goes to shit

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they weren't, the north were just much better.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The South Vietnamese government did not inspire their troops to fight for them. The North promised land reform and wealth redistribution which was alluring to the rural peasants who still lived in near feudal conditions while the South offered them a corrupt and ineffective government.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The truth is the weren't and pretty much fought to the end until it was obvious the south was lost. They were and sti are portrayed as useless by both the USA and (North) Vietnam because both sides benefit from doing so. The North wanted to push a myth of a valiant liberation of the south vietnamese citizen from their oppressively government, admitting the soldiers of ARVN fought like hell and sustained massive casualties in the last few months of the war with civilian backing puts a hole in that. The USA doesn't get any benefit out of admitting it abandoned a bunch of people who genuinely didn't want to be part of some communist Vietnamese state

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This, though to be fair to the US the perception was shaped in the early years of the conflict by American military advisors when the ARVN really was in a poor state.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *