>why yes, my politics is FOSS.

>why yes, my politics is FOSS. how could you tell?

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Eleutheromania is to politics what Five Nights at Freddy's lore is to computer science.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      based

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I've never used cocaine, freebase or otherwise.
        Oh, you mean "based" in that inane sense of "vaguely good," right? Much like using "cool" to refer to anything not involving temperature?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >vaguely good
          they both mean easy-going/laid-back, what's vague about that?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >what's vague about that?
            The fact I've seen both used to describe more than what's simply "easy-going/laid-back." It seems either one can be used to describe whatever the speaker personally finds favorable, in which case, neither one means anything at all, unless you actually intended to call me a drug addict or say that I have a below-average body temperature.

            both anarchists and socialists lie about their beliefs for political expedience so there's no reason to care what they have to say
            they're just authoritarians selling fables
            you're just a useful idiot doing propaganda for them, for free

            >you're just a useful idiot
            All "libertarians" ("anarchists" included) are useful---no, useLESS idiots, because their idiocy is only useful in establishing some reset point from which order can emerge, as it naturally does in every human society. "Limited Government" ideologies are just mass-scale coping, because Authority will emerge in the gaps it would leave behind.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's so easy to spot them these days, it's not even worth the effort

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I know. They don't even need the cringe "A" insignia for you to point them out in a crowd.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >If you come in my yard, I will shoot you
    >I do this because I'm libertarian

    Why we posting nonsense teenage political memes? The person who wrote that is still supported by their parents.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Why we posting nonsense teenage political memes?
      I don't know, why did you?

      Self-identifying anarchist are globohomosexual statist bootlickers.

      True, because the "globohomo" state is built on the fallacies of eleutheromania.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Self-identifying anarchist are globohomosexual statist bootlickers.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why...?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because self-identifying anarchists are sponsored by the state to function as useful idiots for globohomosexual ideology. It's a mutually beneficial relationship. Though this is changing with the CURRENT THING track record breaking down over Gaza.

        Hopefully the state will discard their anarchist wind up toys now they've bitten the hand that feeds.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >anarchists are sponsored by the state to function as useful idiots for globohomosexual ideology
          See

          >Why we posting nonsense teenage political memes?
          I don't know, why did you?
          [...]
          True, because the "globohomo" state is built on the fallacies of eleutheromania.

          .

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wait so if everyone is allowed to do whatever they wanted and a bunch of people decided to form a government and told you that if you don't listen to them they'll throw you in jail and they made that happen, isn't that already anarchy? isn't everything already anarchy by default? is anarchism just sour grapes that they didn't come up with the idea of government first?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Eleutheromaniacs rarely, if ever, think that hard, if at all.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >form a government
      >anarchy

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        where's the rule that says I can't? and who's going to enforce it?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Eleutheromaniacs rarely, if ever, think that hard, if at all.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You can if you want but it wouldn't be anarchy anymore by definition.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Depends, if individual free form actions result in a government being created, and nobody disagrees or changes their behavior as a result, it would still be anarchy.

            A real edge case, granted tho

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, you can't have governments under anarchy because "anarchy" only exists as the negation of government. If everyone wanted feudalism or something then it would just be feudalism and no longer anarchy.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Begone Satan.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >pic
    this doesn't happen in low trust societies.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bump

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >this doesn't happen in [eleutheromaniac] societies
      Of course it doesn't. Never tell its supporters that, though, they just won't listen.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Frick off glowBlack person

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Who are you taking to? I need to know, in case I'm the one being told to frick off.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If the shoe fits...

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What shoe? I don't know which posts you're responding to with

          Frick off glowBlack person

          . I already assumed you had the temperament of a teenager, now you're just further proving it by being a vague little twat spouting vague little clichés.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So if a bunch of people dress like Roman legionnaires and go around hanging people up on crosses just because that's anarchy, but if too many people do it it's not?

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    can't spell "anarchist" without "arch"

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This person doesnt know the definition of anarchy.
    If you are thirsty, i will put sand in your mouth. If you are hungry ill eat a hamburger in front of you. If you are cold, I will set you on fire. If you are in need I'll chew gum and go visit your mom.
    I am an anarchist

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Black personest of the glowies

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >bro if there weren't laws n shiet id totally start setting people on fire and crucify-ACK
    Until you come face-to-face with an antifa supersoldier that is.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >antifa soldier
      I'll make sure i put clown makeup on him before he gets hanged as a warning to others. It will be hilarious

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That guy weighs less than most women, I'd eat him alive.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Of corse you would, fatso

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Governing over people is needed but it should be so that it can't be corrupted from either within or outside of it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Governing over people is needed but
      >but
      Discarded.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That but doesn't negate the fact. It's a necessary limitation I placed on it. Learn to read. That but is not making it redundant.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >necessary limitation
          And you are qualified to determine what is necessary in Government how, exactly?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      through what mechanism do you prevent all "corruption" from within or outside? can you even define corruption in a self-consistent way? you might as well be saying "the sun should really be green. yellow is a stupid color."

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Your example misses the point. If you think corruption is like a color that I don't like then consider yourself filtered by what I was stating.

        >necessary limitation
        And you are qualified to determine what is necessary in Government how, exactly?

        I just gave you my stance on this matter. I agree with that one anon that suggested that our state right now isn't any different to anarchy. Only it's controlled anarchy.

        The absence of the governance. That is true anarchism.

        I think governments should be transparent. It should be built in a way that no one can obfuscate:
        Intention, Connections, Numbers, internal procedures, communication between departments and actually distribution of information and any good they give out or take in.

        If that's not viable, government as a way of structured living isn't.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I just gave you my stance on this matter
          Then you have no experience in Governance, hence

          >Governing over people is needed but
          >but
          Discarded.

          .

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The house wins. Never play a rigged game

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >says my point for me
            >thinks it's a refutation of itself

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What are you even arguing? You are just mad at me for having an opinion. Go leave

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >What are you even arguing?
            That unless you have a background working in Government, your views on how it ought to function are as worthwhile as a 6-year-old Minecraft player's view on particle physics.
            >You are just mad
            I've been laughing with every word I type.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You are either a sad boomer or under 18. Just gtfo.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >sad boomer
            Still laughing.
            >under 18
            I'm not an eleutheromaniac ("anarchist"/"libertarian"), so no.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I think governments should be transparent.
          I might concede that a government which informs you immediately of its misbehavior is better than reality, but that's a low fricking bar.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Anarchism isn't a serious political philosophy. Its teenage angst.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I agree on that. It's not what we need.

            >sad boomer
            Still laughing.
            >under 18
            I'm not an eleutheromaniac ("anarchist"/"libertarian"), so no.

            >eleutheromaniac
            I get it know. Should have known. Please continue to spam this shit.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's fully relevant, so it's not "spamming" to call a spade a spade.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            One day it works, surely...

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What do you mean by "works"?

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When did anarchists turned into communists?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's the other way around, the commies are anarchists until they hold office then they go giga-statist

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They forgot that everything is their property.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Im horny
    Will you suck my dick?

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm a Marxist

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anarchism isn't compatible with FOSS because FOSS requires work, and anarchists are luddites, druggies, and bandits who don't work and should be shot

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >X isn't a serious political philosophy. Its teenage angst.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Those are typically the people who bankroll anarchists, yeah
      Rich bourgeois parents

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who else wears anarchy t shirts except from privileged kids of wealthy parents?

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Most homosexuals who call themselves FOSSgays are nothing like that though. They blindly follow their cult leader and practice doublethink to make themselves and others believe less free software is more free software, and seethe at the very idea of others using their code for things they don't personally like.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's the point of being an anarchist when they won't even let you say Black person or talk shit about the israelites
    They're just the thought police and they just recreate statism mentally

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >What's the point of being an anarchist
      I'll stop you there and say: none. As you point out yourself, they always end up reinventing the proverbial wheel of Government while denying it at every step. This is true for all eleutheromaniacs, not just the ones who claim to oppose Government as a concept.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      IQfy's design of letting people say what they want is closer to anarchy than any other political ideology.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Political ideologies require Order to be successful. "Anarchists" (eleutheromaniacs) know this, but they refuse to acknowledge it for the sake of their "principles."

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Political ideologies require Order to be successful
          Anarchists just have to wait for the current thing to collapse.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And then they watch as Order forms naturally with or without their involvement, refuting the mass delusion they were taught to call an "ideology."

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            keep hoping

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, they will; even after their eleutheromania is shown for the nonsense that it is before their very eyes, they'll continue to hope (although with a "C" being a better fit for it than the "H") that it'll all work out in their favor.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous
          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's funny that you use a symbol of benevolent moronation to personify your dream world. I'll give you a chance to figure out why that's funny, but if you're stuck, don't worry, I'll spell it out for you.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you are an antichrist?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he's literally following in christ's footsteps, unlike all the fake christians of our satanist society

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >open source = anarchy and communism
    this is just so hilariously bad, holy shit

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they complement each other

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >an eleutheromaniac concept originates from eleutheromaniacs
      What's hard to believe about that?

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Cool software bro, what is it called?

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You are just a consumer who only wants the .exe and once all the contributors quit due to lack of funds/help it will all die.

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nowhere near as repugnant as being a neo-con (populist) that thinks having your wages slashed and being taxed for israelitesrael sake is le based based based. Politics are shit and anyone who thinks following a political ideology will somehow save their lives is extremely delusional.

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Technology?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >he uses proprietary politics

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    a lot of anons confusing anarchism with libertarianism ITT
    anarchists are one of the two camps of socialists, the one which believes the social revolution should attempt to destructure power imbalances instead of using them for establishing a 'dictatorship of the proletariat' a la marx
    but as socialists they're very much not against rules and regulations, they just believe they should be enforced cooperatively between equal actors instead of deferring responsibilities to centralized bodies
    the more you know

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      both anarchists and socialists lie about their beliefs for political expedience so there's no reason to care what they have to say
      they're just authoritarians selling fables
      you're just a useful idiot doing propaganda for them, for free

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *