With the amount of damage done getting this stuff declassified is just about the only way to un frick everything.

With the amount of damage done getting this stuff declassified is just about the only way to un frick everything.

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Sage

    >>>/x/

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He sounds like he's talking out of his ass.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You can't realistically declassify it right now because it's closely linked to advanced weapons technology that would upset the relative stability of the post-1945 era.
    If you know, you know.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's completely moronic to keep military technology secret. It's how you get a massive war, because both sides think that their BFG 8001 makes them win in no time.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Let me also say, that this is similar in terms of nukes, but that once you have this godlike power, there is no possibility of someone to counteract your attack, even if they also have the same tech. Currently, right now, the USA has the ability to completely obliterate any nation in the planet in the blink of an eye without any possibility of retaliation of any kind. I think Russia also has this capability, but I'm not certain. The USA has had this capability for decades. They also have the ability to destroy the entire planet if they wanted to. As in, destroy the entire formation, not just everything on it. They could completely evaporate Earth.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The only mechanism they could have to destroy the earth would be some sympathetic earthquake machine and that would definitely stop functioning correctly because Earth acoustics would change when breaking apart. Maybe they could steer an asteroid into the Earth.
          We do not have anything to significantly alter the Earth.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >vaporizing earth
          take meds

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Are you talking about this, anon?
          >Pic related

          [...]
          [...]
          What are you talking about?

          Pretty sure he's talking about Le Dugway Zapper, which ~~*allegedly*~~ uses a polariton driven gamma ray laser to exceed the critical field limit in order to generate a collimated beam of bound state positronium.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Are you talking about this, anon?
            no

            The only mechanism they could have to destroy the earth would be some sympathetic earthquake machine and that would definitely stop functioning correctly because Earth acoustics would change when breaking apart. Maybe they could steer an asteroid into the Earth.
            We do not have anything to significantly alter the Earth.

            >earthquake machine
            Not even close

            [...]
            [...]
            What are you talking about?

            Automod thinks my post is spam (too many keywords at once).

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Invokes muh scalar wave Bearden bullshit
            Miss me with that shit, tard. The only good thing that ever came from Tom Bearden is his diagram of his bullshit "sarcophagus" which in reality is Zel'dovich's experimental methane phase conjugation rig, which was stolen from a presentation at Phillips Lab in Kirtland AFB.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Oh, so you've built a mirror and experimented with the results? Did you detect gravity waves? Do you even know how to detect gravity waves? Please show everyone the data where you performed such experiments and disproven gravity waves

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Based "inertia and effective mass are an emergent phenomena of magnetic vector potential" anon isn't going to argue with muh "scalar wave" Bearden tard.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's what's scalar waves are, dumbass. You create gravitational waves by modifying potentials

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Do you even understand bro?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            zero EM wave vectors and pump potential using higher electrical power. Not hard to understand bro

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Oh, the magnetic loses its transverse component and becomes linear.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Longitudinal, but yes, that's the idea. The longitudinal waves have really strange properties that propagate outward from the center point. These waves can also (somehow) be contained and aimed in waveguides using certain metamaterials or by using fields. They warp spacetime by expanding and contracting spacetime itself in a local area of space, leading to effects such as increasing or decreasing mass. These can be used for an enormous variety of capabilities that confer godlike power such as faster than light travel, teleportation through the formation of an Einstein-Rosenbridge, time reversal, etc.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So, there's compression and rarefactions of the em? Where is the dielectric?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If you mean regular electromagnetic waves, then yes.
            >Muh made up longitudinal waves and made up metamaterials
            Spoiler alert, dipshit...there is already negative refractive index metamaterials and they use good ole' EM and not some made up "longitudinal waves". There are even regular electromagnetic metamaterials that support optical phase conjugation, which is what your dumbass refers to as "time reversal".

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And your moronic "scalar wave" is just the conjugate wave. You would know this if you actually knew what "phase conjugation" was or who actually discovered it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >And your moronic "scalar wave" is just the conjugate wave
            Yeah no fricking shit. Making them at ultra low frequencies produces the effects I described in previous posts. Are you going to sit there and try to "acktuelly" me by continually picking apart every concept I've explained to you and just retort with a different name for it? What good does that do? What is even the fricking point of doing that?
            >I'm driving a car
            >Acktuelly you are conducting an automobile
            what a fricking homosexual holy shit
            build the fricking device and try it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ive been looking at trying some of these for a long time

            https://waveguide.blog/brief-history-tesla-hairpin-circuit-stout-copper-bars/
            https://www.researchgate.net/figure/experimental-setup-used-by-Blondel-See-text_fig1_230941528

            https://patents.google.com/patent/US462418A/en

            https://patents.google.com/patent/US787412A/en

            https://patents.google.com/patent/US1540998A/en

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Let's pretend for one second that all this is real. Would you consider this "national security information"? Have you ever heard of Group 220 in the USPTO?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I think it was up until the recent present, than they dumped 10^109 electron volts of UFO stuff at a planck scale signal to noise ratio and left it up to us to to do the next tech jump

            no i have not, but i have heard stories of cryptographers and the types of job offers they get if they get too good

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.fark.com/comments/1386759/11882728/Behold-The-USAF-Top-Secret-Nuclear-Powered-Flying-Triangle-Thingy-in-all-its-glory-Oh-yes-there-are-pics?sticky_host_f=1#c11882728
            https://m.fark.com/comments/4371964/50903132/Scientists-think-warp-driven-starships-may-be-possible-one-day-at-least-until-some-acting-ensign-pulls-o#c50903132
            https://m.fark.com/comments/1203844/9725308 (this is the best one, but you won't know why)
            >Enjoy

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >It's like people have made an entire career out of phase conjugate non-linear adaptive optics...
            https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert-Hellwarth
            I can point you to an actual, non-bullshit experiment in gain assisted superluminal propagation, if you would like. I'm not trying to give you shit, but Tom Bearden is full of a metric frickton of it. That doesn't mean there isn't a kernel of actual information there, it's just not what you think

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes please

            Its not on z axis in the donut beam is it?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.scribd.com/document/208319/NEC-Time-Travel-Experiment-in-2000
            Replace "rephasing" with phase conjugation. Note, everyone shits on this as "muh phase versus group velocity". The kicker is the that a plasmonic excitation is traveling orders of magnitude faster than light over the same distance as actual photons.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            thanks anon, they did the exact same phase vs group stuff with the patent in the pic i sent

            >lijun wang
            same as the cesium column?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes. A Bose-Einstein condensate has can function as a non-linear metamaterial. There is another interesting actual scientist by the name of Ulf Leonhardt. His big paper is "General Relativity in Electrical Engineering" (or maybe the reverse, search his name and you'll find it)

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Found it
            https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0607418

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Fricking righteous. All the beans are getting spilled in this thread I fricking love it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >No longitudinal waves required lol
            Chang even tried to recruit him in 2011 (?). I believe he wrote this while at the Max Plank Institute of Quantum Optics, which is where LiJun Wang went after Princeton and where Wolfgang Ketterle came from pre-Nobel at MIT. I'll give you another one, albeit for something I mentioned above
            >What happens to the wavelength
            https://groups.seas.harvard.edu/haulab/slow_light_project/slow_light_project.htm

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Here's a fiction for you...
            https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread901726/pg3
            Good thing it's all just tales to entertain, right?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yeah and that's just a cylinder. what if you like, put the supercooled cesium gas into a toroid and then spun it real fast xD you'd have your em shielding around a volume and a pulse compressor

            dude what if instead of using a laser you could just use backround EM haha wouldn't that be crazy

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's the a Kerr Singularity aka Ring Singularity analogue
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_singularity
            Reminder that Roy Kerr didn't believe in point singularities and also just so happened to spend some time at the AFRL at Wright Patterson

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Also, it's the same guy, anon.
            https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread913063/pg5

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            incredible paper so far, thanks anon.

            Yes, I know... that's why I posted it. Conjugate time reversal is the reason the military wants to stick laser on everything. You can largely thank this guy.

            rip philosopher

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Where did you find a full text copy?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            one could find this paper from her majesty the pirate queen if they so desire

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Or you could post it...this is IQfy, and we can PDF post here.

            https://i.imgur.com/ab3mdfd.jpeg

            It's literally the exact same thing as the papers you have posted. The exact same mechanism. The products of what he is creating is the exact same thing as the guys you're posting have created. I don't know why he makes you so angry.

            >Conjugate waves in a non-linear optical medium - Real
            >Made up Longitudinal waves - Not real

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Made up Longitudinal waves - Not real

            https://i.imgur.com/4wzKb9G.jpeg

            Ive been looking at trying some of these for a long time

            https://waveguide.blog/brief-history-tesla-hairpin-circuit-stout-copper-bars/
            https://www.researchgate.net/figure/experimental-setup-used-by-Blondel-See-text_fig1_230941528

            https://patents.google.com/patent/US462418A/en

            https://patents.google.com/patent/US787412A/en

            https://patents.google.com/patent/US1540998A/en

            why this paper will be so interesting to try
            it provides good mathematical description of their definitions of 'scalar' 'longitudinal' , etc

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            this is quite a revelation for me,
            thanks again anon

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            time reversal through phase conjugation

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, I know... that's why I posted it. Conjugate time reversal is the reason the military wants to stick laser on everything. You can largely thank this guy.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001900680014-4.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjF5K7xur6GAxXeQjABHWPoA60QFnoECC0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0rJZ2qztAom6Uunn0046O9

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            God fricking damnit, anon...GTFO out with this Bearden bullshit.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's literally the exact same thing as the papers you have posted. The exact same mechanism. The products of what he is creating is the exact same thing as the guys you're posting have created. I don't know why he makes you so angry.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Matches malone

            Recreate reality from a picture?

            Is not reality ain't it just the look of it if at all

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            holographic universe

          • 3 weeks ago
            Matches malone

            Yeah I know is visual reproduction in the form of thoughts, the impronting

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah I know is visual reproduction in the form of thoughts, the impronting

            How drunk are you on a scale of 1-10?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            There are multiple morons in this thread that are just completely fricking incapable of speaking in clear English. IQfy is worse than almost every other board with that problem. IQfy is fricking terrible at communicating too

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You use gravity as a noun?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What this dipshit is intending to get at is that there is a possibility the photon serves as the mediating force for inertia and therefore effective mass via magnetic vector potential. If that is true, you can use conjugate time reversal to frick with the magnetic vector potential in real time. In Bearden's gay paper about tard scalar waves and the Aharanov Bohn effect, he never once mentions "phase conjugation" nor cites the guy who did literally all the foundational research (Yakov Zel'dovich) because he attempting to pass off things he heard whilst doing actual classified work at Redstone Arsenal as his own tard ideas.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Well, out with it Pollack. I know it's you. The population of coc/k/suckers and /misc/acks that cross post on IQfy is very, very low.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Currently, right now, the USA has the ability to completely obliterate any nation in the planet in the blink of an eye without any possibility of retaliation of any kind
          this is your brain on marvel slop

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If it was using zapping condensates of exciton with critical field limit exceeding laser systems to generate a beam of collimated bound state positronium, I might believe him. Instead is "muh scalar waves" which despite having highly classified, world ending potential, are allowed to have presentations by gay fricks like Tom Bearden and the subsequent PDFs approved for unlimited distribution. This would be like a Sigma at LANL giving a seminar on how to build a nuclear weapon if it were true (it's not).

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >zapping condensates of exciton with critical field limit exceeding laser systems to generate a beam of collimated bound state positronium
            just don't cross the streams bro

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Man, Omni was cool when I was 14.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >closely linked to advanced weapons technology that would upset the relative stability of the post-1945
      So the prison planet meme isn't a meme? We're bound to this planet by our own violent and evil inclinations.

      Let me also say, that this is similar in terms of nukes, but that once you have this godlike power, there is no possibility of someone to counteract your attack, even if they also have the same tech. Currently, right now, the USA has the ability to completely obliterate any nation in the planet in the blink of an eye without any possibility of retaliation of any kind. I think Russia also has this capability, but I'm not certain. The USA has had this capability for decades. They also have the ability to destroy the entire planet if they wanted to. As in, destroy the entire formation, not just everything on it. They could completely evaporate Earth.

      So once you have unlimited godlike power, you quickly find out your true limits is ethics and morality. Ethics is no longer an abstract or nebulous thing. No more an after thought or something to fight to avoid and get around, but is actually a true binding and limiting force on you. And with unlimited power you can suffer unlimited consequences should you frick it up. So taking the easy out simply saying "frick all this shit I don't wanna deal with it anymore" and ignoring the ethical quandaries you find yourself in doesn't work anymore. So here's a question.... why aren't we heavily invested in ethics and morality? Why don't we have a Lockheed Martin or Skunk Works think tank for solving the ethical, moral and spiritual ramifications of having immense power??

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >solving the ethical, moral and spiritual ramifications of having immense power
        Not really a problem you can solve is it? Only real problem to solve is disallowing unstable ammoral people access to the tech and heavily screening and monitoring everyone that does have access to the tech, which is what the entire global surveillance state it all about. It's about having as much control over the populace as possible and making sure they never find out about this stuff. And if they did, making sure they can never build the stuff. And if they did, making sure they would never be able to use it or tell other people or shatter the illusion. Anyone that does have access is watched so closely that they can't take a shit without being monitored in real time. I'm really starting to think the global surveillance state isn't so bad after all, or at least it wouldn't be so bad if they actually gave a shit to care about us and attempt to make our lives better rather than just using us as a money extraction point and ignoring everything else.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Frick off with that "secret knowledge" bullshit.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Elites going back to the beginning of recorded history and presumably before then have conspired to hoard the most valuable and useful knowledge to themselves while controlling those they rule over. This has happened in literally every single society to ever exist. You're an honest-to-God dumbass if you don't think they're still doing that today

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >solving the ethical, moral and spiritual ramifications of having immense power
            Not really a problem you can solve is it? Only real problem to solve is disallowing unstable ammoral people access to the tech and heavily screening and monitoring everyone that does have access to the tech, which is what the entire global surveillance state it all about. It's about having as much control over the populace as possible and making sure they never find out about this stuff. And if they did, making sure they can never build the stuff. And if they did, making sure they would never be able to use it or tell other people or shatter the illusion. Anyone that does have access is watched so closely that they can't take a shit without being monitored in real time. I'm really starting to think the global surveillance state isn't so bad after all, or at least it wouldn't be so bad if they actually gave a shit to care about us and attempt to make our lives better rather than just using us as a money extraction point and ignoring everything else.

            Infinite regress paradox. Who watches the watchers?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's more likely that there isn't a single head to the leviathan. More likely all of these different groups are sort of playing this game together. If one of them is compromised then they all lose the game. So they all have the same motivations in a decentralized sort of way, making their swarm like behavior self sustaining.

            I mean, I suppose it could be possible that the watchers have watchers and they have watchers and they have watchers potentially infinitely to greater degrees of power and complexity. I don't think that's the case though. It doesn't need to be the case for a self contained decentralized conspiracy to spawn, which has been seen multiple times in human history with various nation states, world powers, cults, secret societies, etc.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I agree with moron here. The game is to be sold not told. Knowledge is power. And power is how they keep you little gremlins in check

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I agree with moron here. The game is to be sold not told. Knowledge is power. And power is how they keep you little gremlins in check

            y point it that "sexret kkowledge" is a schizophrenic concept. There can be no such a thing. Knowledge can't be kept secret for the simple reason that nobody needs to spy on you to also obtain it. In fact your attempts to hide something may only hint others where they should look.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >There can be no such a thing. Knowledge can't be kept secret
            >Knowledge can't be kept secret for the simple reason that nobody needs to spy on you to also obtain it
            >fact your attempts to hide something may only hint others where they should look

            >assuming people even know where to look in order to gain valuable and useful knowledge
            >perform experimentation in secret
            >have unique knowledge
            >keep it a secret
            >therefore nobody knows
            >misdirect others that are on the path to gaining such knowledge
            >knowledge can't be kept a secret lmao
            you're a fricking moron. You legitimately believe all humans are capable of all knowing the same things and are incapable of stopping each other from learning things. That's so mind-numbingly dumb fr fr no cap ong

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Let's say you discover America, but won't tell anybody. It isn't secret knowledge. Others can also sail west, and find it. If you try to prevent ships from sailing west, people will know there is something over there that you don't want them to see. If you try to scare them with monsters, they will sail there to find the monsters. Or they even discover it by sailing east.
            You can't keep it secret.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Using your analogy...

            >requires massive ships to get there (assuming great costs of equipment needed to ascertain certain knowledge, not that you need a giant ship to get across the ocean per se, just assume this is true for this particular metaphor which reflects the massive amount of money and expertise needed to discover certain things)
            >discover the place
            >harvest the wealth of materials there
            >launder it with fake businesses as to not arouse suspicion of great treasure (knowledge)
            >you're so rich and powerful that you can buy or do anything
            >set up a monopoly on ships
            >heavily regulate the ship industry
            >heavily regulate the knowledge of ships
            >set up the ONE ship school in the country or a network of them that tell the peasants what you want them to hear
            >propagandize the people to oblivion
            >illegalize building your own ships without the blessing of the crown or whatever
            >require ship licensing and inspection
            >distract the populace with infinite number of other things unrelated to ships
            >monitor the coast with mercenaries
            >hire mercenaries to spy on each other to keep each other in check
            >they don't know about the land
            >spy on all of them
            >they get out of line you kill them with your personal massive fricking ship
            >in the end, nobody knows that there is a land with infinite wealth. Even if they did know, they wouldn't be able to get there because you control all of the wealth and have such an extensive spy network that if you knew they found out and were trying to build a ship to get there, you could stop them with the wrath of an angry God
            Nobody is going to be able to build a multi billion dollar corporation needed to be able to learn certain things, especially in secret, that would advance their level of knowledge on certain topics. All of those steps are also just surface level tactics that don't even assume modern level of tech, which makes the stranglehold much deeper. I could write tens of thousands or hundreds of thousads more words on this

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Eventually everybody knows that something is being hidden. People start questioning why there is a massive gap on the globe despite supposed desperate attempts to get there. All other countries know what's there. Your own people know by the sole fact that they live and work there. Everybody gets tired of your bullshit, and you die, likely not in a very pleasant manner.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            At least we can dream anon. Idk, heard disclosure will have been complete by 2026. Their method of doing it is supposedly to drip feed us all of the info in as slow and as boring of a manner as possible so there is no big shocking revelation. Like senate hearings and stuff like that. Some of it does seem to be coming out in the mainstream, but it's just surface level shit. Maybe they were referring to disclosure as being, "knowledge that this stuff exists", but not, "this is how deep the rabbit hole goes and how it all works and every detail of everything that ever happened with docs and reports". I know if I had a warp drive I'd gtfo of Earth and go some place I wouldn't be subject to the fricking looney toons that run this godforsaken asylum

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Not really a problem you can solve is it?
          Was that a question?
          Personally I think the problems of ethics and morality are just the same as any other problem. That is to say, answers to the problems do exist.

          I feel like it would have been better if we advanced the science of morality and ethics to a point where we were forced work on physical sciences in order to keep working on ethics. If there is truth to OP, then I'd say the situation is reversed. we're at the point where the physical sciences has advanced so far that it now being held back by the lack of ethical/morality sciences. You literally can't advance any more for fear of destroying yourselves.

          >or shatter the illusion
          pic related
          >I'm really starting to think the global surveillance state isn't so bad
          capitulating to your masters won't curry favor

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >So once you have unlimited godlike power, you quickly find out your true limits is ethics and morality. Ethics is no longer an abstract or nebulous thing. No more an after thought or something to fight to avoid and get around, but is actually a true binding and limiting force on you. And with unlimited power you can suffer unlimited consequences should you frick it up. So taking the easy out simply saying "frick all this shit I don't wanna deal with it anymore" and ignoring the ethical quandaries you find yourself in doesn't work anymore. So here's a question.... why aren't we heavily invested in ethics and morality? Why don't we have a Lockheed Martin or Skunk Works think tank for solving the ethical, moral and spiritual ramifications of having immense power??
        this is pure atheist framework and atheist keep saying morality doesnt exist, same for truth

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >and the F-117 was shot down by a 1960s missile technology
    and that was in the 1990s
    imagine how much less effective the current military regime is now with DEI clowns running the show

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    sounds like boomer rambling

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He never said that, schizo.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah it was my plan

    As brilliant at it sounded required popular support

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    yeah after it flew a predictable course and had it's bomb doors open and one of the missles fired didn't hit at all and he missile that did hit didn't actually hit it was indirect which caused the plane to crash

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >With the amount of damage done getting this stuff declassified is just about the only way to un frick everything.
    ESL

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >that's why the SR-71 leaks fuel so badly
    It DRIPPED fuel, because it had thermal expansion joints that only close when the jet was hot. There wasn't fuel pouring out of it, and it wasn't because it's poorly made.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It
      >dripped
      so much fuel on the runway that it had to be aerially refueled right after takeoff.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If it leaked, and it did, why not put 1/4 tank on runway, take off, get hot, then top it off????

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Because it required special tankers with high flow fueling booms and used a different fuel than the normal fleet of airframes. Not to mention the triethylborane fuel used to jumpstart the turbines.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            *triethylborane
            Pretty sure diborane might have been used as well.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It dripped very little fuel, pic related is the allowable drips per minute. The popular conception would have gallons of fuel pouring out of the plane rapidly draining the tanks, but that just isn't true.

        It was refueled after takeoff because if you go through all the trouble to make such an expensive high performance jet as that, it only makes sense to put as much fuel into it as you possibly can. Replacing the fuel burned during take-off is common sense.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/nNf3Ffr.jpeg

        It dripped very little fuel, pic related is the allowable drips per minute. The popular conception would have gallons of fuel pouring out of the plane rapidly draining the tanks, but that just isn't true.

        It was refueled after takeoff because if you go through all the trouble to make such an expensive high performance jet as that, it only makes sense to put as much fuel into it as you possibly can. Replacing the fuel burned during take-off is common sense.

        for comparison, the plane held 12,000 gallons of fuel, nearly 50,000 liters. The drips were an inconsequential drain on the tanks.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Let me also say, that this is similar in terms of nukes, but that once you have this godlike power, there is no possibility of someone to counteract your attack, even if they also have the same tech. Currently, right now, the USA has the ability to completely obliterate any nation in the planet in the blink of an eye without any possibility of retaliation of any kind. I think Russia also has this capability, but I'm not certain. The USA has had this capability for decades. They also have the ability to destroy the entire planet if they wanted to. As in, destroy the entire formation, not just everything on it. They could completely evaporate Earth.

    What are you talking about?

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    homosexual

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He may not be such a homosexual after all, if he's talking about what I think he is. I don't know if you could scale it up to be a planet destroyer, but it does put nuclear MAD doctrine on it's head. If it is indeed real, there would be
      >Zero fallout, only short lived gamma activation
      >Zero launch signature
      >Scalable destructive capability
      >Exceptionally hard to detect as it essentially would appear to be a huge fricking lightning strike to a gamma detection satellite
      I definitely think he's wrong about the Russians, because IF we are talking about the same thing, they never would have let Zel'dovich publish anything. And the Russians are known morons in this particular aspect. See Victor Vesalago, Anatoliy Koroteyev, and Pietor Ulmestev (and of course of friend Yakov Zel'dovich). I think the average person grossly underestimates how much of our defense technology magic started life as Russian research that they were just too moronic to understand the implications of.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Military industrial complex bad
    Duh.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this thread has alot of fairy tales papers posted, soientists are really pathetic, atleast i can use your white papers to wipe my ass sometime

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    >NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    >NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    >NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    >NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    >NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    >NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    >NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    >NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION
    >NUCLEAR PULSE PROPULSION

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    (you)

    He may not be such a homosexual after all, if he's talking about what I think he is. I don't know if you could scale it up to be a planet destroyer, but it does put nuclear MAD doctrine on it's head. If it is indeed real, there would be
    >Zero fallout, only short lived gamma activation
    >Zero launch signature
    >Scalable destructive capability
    >Exceptionally hard to detect as it essentially would appear to be a huge fricking lightning strike to a gamma detection satellite
    I definitely think he's wrong about the Russians, because IF we are talking about the same thing, they never would have let Zel'dovich publish anything. And the Russians are known morons in this particular aspect. See Victor Vesalago, Anatoliy Koroteyev, and Pietor Ulmestev (and of course of friend Yakov Zel'dovich). I think the average person grossly underestimates how much of our defense technology magic started life as Russian research that they were just too moronic to understand the implications of.

    >If it is indeed real, there would be
    That's the thing: It isn't. He's just some schizo homosexual who things he has the right of passing judgement because he didn't take his meds and has read too much science fiction.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I was talking about something different than that tard.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *