>writer uses the term "bodies"

>writer uses the term "bodies"

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    LET THE BODIES HIT THE FLOOR
    LET THE BODIES HIT THE FLOOR
    LET THE BODIES HIT THE...
    FLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOR

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      without ORGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANS

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    “Black bodies” is worse

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's like they degrade themselves

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Exactly

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >he doesnt center the lived experience of black bodies

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Assemblages
    DROPPED INTO THE FRICKING DEEPEST PIT OF HELL

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not into paleontology?

      Bodies?

      STAYVUN, what are you doing on IQfy?!

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        intersection of cybernetics and postmo
        you know this kidna stuff
        >This chapter extends the cybernetic perspective to machinic philosophy, evident in Deleuze and Guattari’s concept of the assemblage and its intersections with nonlinear dynamical systems (i.e., “chaos”) theory. It develops more fully the concept of the computational assemblage, specifically in relation to Robert Shaw’s “dripping faucet as a model chaotic system” and Jim Crutchfield’s ∈-machine (re)construction.

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >sodomies and queer medieval bodies

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Black queer folx

  6. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bodies?

  7. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Almost everytime that word is used in a phrase I get so hard
    I have to lay down on my bed and imagine sexual fantasies (I refuse to watch porn) until I ejaculate to be able to read again.

  8. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    OF bodies changed to other forms I tell;
    You Gods, who have yourselves wrought every change,
    Inspire my enterprise and lead my lay
    In one continuous song from nature’s first
    Remote beginnings to our modern times.

  9. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Does anyone know what the rationale for 'bodies' actually is? No speculation, please; just the facts from someone who read the secondary lit I skipped at uni.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's more democratic when you fill up space or whatever. I don't know. I read that shit and still don't remember. I think in the literature I was reading, this term was preferred because the authors were defending illegal squatting, protests, etc. Space and presence seem to be attributed huge significance in woke lit. Probably because they're very concerned with "visibility" and it's hard to avert your eyes from what's in front of you, and also because it's the lowest common denominator, really, you can't get more inclusive than "has a body". No "elitism" there. Even braindead vegetables have bodies.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      The tl;dr is that it's a way of emphasizing that people are physical beings, and are often physically harmed for not complying with state/corporate/parental/authoritarian demands.

      More generally, it's a reaction against:
      >cartesian dualism and other divisions between the "self" and the body
      >the notion of disinterested, logical economic or government decisions
      >idealism and other trends towards abstraction in political thought
      >nonviolence, or the notion that a state can be nonviolent
      There are probably other ideas I'm missing, but at its core the term is about rejecting a lot of assumptions in old school political philosophy.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >other divisions between the "self" and the body
        I know that "libs are moronic/hypocrites", although true, is a useless argument that doesn't lead anywhere, but how do they not see the obvious contradiction with transgenderism? If trannies can have the wrong body and need to change bodies to be themselves, there is division between self and body.
        They embrace trash materialism for its subversive potential but don't mind violating it the rare times anti-materialism is more useful for subversion.

  10. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >writer has nowhere to go
    >writer gets married
    >writer not published because their life is boring

  11. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's so fricking dehumanizing and it's always the most obnoxious wokescold jack offs who do it.

  12. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >seething at years old academic jargon already on its way out

  13. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Horwendil the Jute
    that one is a bit too advanced teach

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *