Youtube Clients

It looks like the end is near for grayjay, newpipe, and revanced. I'm hoping that they will still be around. I guess they will never be able to stop youtube-dl at least.

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Don't care I don't use that hellpit anyways
    "Youtube clients" is like drinking shitwater in a proper glass instead of picking it up with your hands

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I'm too cool to watch youtube

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'll not turn off my adblock, sponsorblock and Unhook.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >sponsorblock
      stop watching worthless content slop and you won't need this

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'll watch whatever I want the way I want.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          by all means, keep eating shit if you enjoy the taste

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It makes you seethe and mald so even if content is shit, there's some secondary entertaining value in watching you flailing aimlessly.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i get more out of you crying about being made to watch your favourite content creator shilling some random product in his videos

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nah, even quality channels have ads.
        Only way for the makers to make a living creating videos but I'll skip over the ads thanks.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No quality content is made by for profit channels.

          I think I finally got the best way to judge the legitimacy of a channel, view count and the rest of that is all worthless .
          Its by codec, now all mainstream dogshit gets av1, everyone else gets vp9 and only the ones actually worth watching will be stuck on h264.
          I've yet to see a clickbait/sellout/etc video that is only offered in h264.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I wish it were that simple. You aren't safe from any of the youtuber you like to start monetizing his content.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Delusional moron. Not to mention that SB is useful for more than sponsor segments. It also cuts out all the tedious shit like intros, recaps and parts of music videos that aren't music. Youtube is literally unwatchable without it.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >revance my youtube app
    >never think about ads or bullshit ever again

    with the exception of how they gimped dislikes, my youtube experience has hardly changed in something like 12 years

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, my problem with youtube is they never redesigned the search field, add search operators,filtering by languages, search by range of dates, disable thumbnails, blocklist entire channels, face detecting for auto-hide "shocked face",etc. With you premium have the same garbage experience that everybody.

      My hypothesis is: most adult people in the world are childfree and unmarried, There are no reasons for purchase premium if you are the only resident in your household. Cutting video subscriptions are the highest priority in the situation of saving money if you are single. Want to save money starting today? The quick checklist is:
      Youtube, Netflix, Prime, Disney plus.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Blocktube with channel blocking features allowed me to see new goyim channels on israelitetube. Feels nice.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        i think the search function is deliberate, after the ex-CEO commenting
        "we decide what people need to see"

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    /g/rugs think running servers streaming billions of hours of high quality HD video is cheap and easy and they're totally entitled to it without having to help pay for it. I hope YouTube takes these shitters down.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There will be a time where you will have to pay to see less ads.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I get so much value out of YouTube that I'm very much willing to pay for that if they get rid of the adfree premium.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Alright bot/shill

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Youtube uses third-party companies to make bots that automatically strike videos, comments & negative feedback on other sites

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We'll just go back to Tivo. I'll have all my videos prerecorded and ads stripped. Yeah anon, you really need to watch your video *RIGHT* now?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They will do jack fricking shit to completely shut it all down because they are totally aware that Youtube in current shape is absolutely unusable without any third-party tools and people will leave them.
      They already lost short-form videos viewers to Tik-Tok.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They haven't done anything since making this announcement.

        I believe Youtube Shorts is actually raking in big numbers for them.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Cry shill, you barely would get money out of me cause just the power of Durga UI has put me off from using that trash heap of site and would NEVER buy anything from an Internet ad. 90% of them are useless.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Durga UI
        I always assumed it's some meme to shit on jeets or some sort of parody of jeets.
        But holy shit, it's actually unironic and real.
        And this is actually how jeets learn stuff.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      idc i want them to crash and burn

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Irrelevant. They make enough money stealing everyone's content and selling their information. The transaction is already complete.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Your "private company" is getting payed by US gov at very least bootlicker moron
      Even if you do pay you will still get a(i)ds

      idc i want them to crash and burn

      Irrelevant. They make enough money stealing everyone's content and selling their information. The transaction is already complete.

      Also this

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what a good little shabbos goy cuck you are. you do realize youtube is funded in part by the government, right?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      YouTube is so large it is a public entity like a library and should therefore be free.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Google is basically a monopoly at this point they should probably be broken up or given some kind of anti-trust case.Aren't they already in the middle of one?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So your argument is that something that is so commonly used should be free?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes
          >Roads

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >food should be free
            >cars should be free
            >homes should be free
            Ah okay you are a leftist

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Public transport should be free.
            And a UBI should take care of everyone's basic food and housing needs.

            Any questions?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I already said I got it, you are a leftist, you havw no idea how money works

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            NTA
            food and basic (shitty but liveable) homes are already free where I live, maybe you americans are so brain washed that don't really know how money works but act like you do.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Where do you live

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Center Italy.
            I'm specifying even where because south italy isn't any different from third world due to the rampant thievery

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            None of those things are free. Either the individual foots the bill or the collective does via taxes. I'm a leftist too, but quit calling these things "free". The point of leftism is that we can reduce poverty and promote wellbeing by sharing burdens, not that there would be no burdens.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The point of leftism is that we can reduce poverty and promote wellbeing by sharing burdens, not that there would be no burdens.
            One day you'll realize that the people you are trying to help are just using you to be as lazy and worthless as possible and on that day I hope you have a nice day for wasting our potential to reach the stars.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It is free, what are you getting at?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah? and yet Youtube feels entitled to not have to do anything about all the blatant scams and malware in it's ads.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Have the content creators pay for hosting.

      Problem fricking solved.

      Can't believe you tiny brains can't comprehend the simplest of solutions.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It will (also) be done eventually. First you frick the users, but you leave creators "free" to create content in order to bring in more users to frick. After you become a complete 100% monopoly and there is no alternative, you frick the creators too (they can't move elsewhere since you have all the users) and everyone is happy

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      guys…. google can’t afford hosting if we don’t watch ads…

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      guys…. google can’t afford hosting if we don’t watch ads…

      hosting costs like 4 billion dollars and you tube earns at least 29 billion dollars a year right now.

      Frick them.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      By all means go for it homosexual

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I evaluate my own time much higher than whatever anyone earns from me "viewing" ads.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'd genuinely rather youtube gets shut down and all videos get lost forever than me have to watch a single ad.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If youtube or any site is putting in enough intrusive ad's that the end user goes out of their way to figure out how to block ad's then that is on them. No one is born blocking ad's, since all of the most common web browsers (Edge, Chrome, Firefox) show ad's by default. Blocking ad's is a made behavior and when blocking ad's is a significantly better experience by a wide margin who can truly blame them?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this

        [...]
        YouTube can see who is watching ads, you dummy. They can easily check which users aren't seeing ads and throttle the quality, stop sending them videos or block them altogether.

        For NewPipe, Invidious and youtube-dl it's as easy as doing what Twitter and Reddit did: stop users from seeing content unless they sign in to a Google Account™.

        They could also go the Twitch route and embed the ads inside the videos themselves.

        >stop users from seeing content unless they sign in to a Google Account™.
        Congratulations, your website traffic goes down the shitter for a few months at minimum. Twatter and leddit could do it because at the time they didn’t have shareholders who would strangle the board for even considering line go down for a second
        >They could also go the Twitch route and embed the ads inside the videos themselves.
        Congratulations, your hosting cost just went up a gorillion percent. Twitch is not a good example of this strategy working because twitch is bleeding money precisely because holy frick streaming high def video and muxing unique-per-user ads into the stream is expensive

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Dude, YouTube has been bleeding money for over a decade now. It's not profitable at all.

          I highly doubt the shareholders would be mad if Google said "we lost 1 million instead of 2 millions this year."

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i am entitled to it. I am divine being.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      based

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Linux Penis Tips spams every video with sponsorships, I will continue to use an ad blocker. If I could I would make it so he's literally charged money every time I "watch" one of his videos (I put watch in quotes because I really just skim through it)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Linus Shit Tips will make a video about how to set up an adblocker and then tell people not to use it.
        He will also make videos about how to set up emulation and then say to only play the ROMs you own.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't feel bad for Linus. Frick that homosexual both for being part of the problem, and for being a legitimately worthless "techie bro" who panders to children and tech illiterate fricktards.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I wonder if he gets mad when I skip his sponsored segments (and every other creator's as well)

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I think the issue is that these sites are ran by GREEDY FRICKS who insert way too many ads and make them way too obtrusive. Put ONE ad at the beginning of a video, and I'll be fine with it. Put three ads every five minutes and they can just frick off and die. GREED is the issue. THEIR greed.

        Same with all these streaming companies. And broadcast TV for that matter. It used to be that you'd get 3 mins of ads every 15 mins or so. Now you get 4-5 mins of ads every 12 mins or so.

        Quit being greedy frickers and most people wouldnt block the insanely irritating ads.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      youtube has never been profitable, even with ads

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We know it's not cheap, we just don't care. And I don't mean to sound like a schizo but YouTube taking action is just apart of the process. It all will adjust accordingly. It just keeps happening... You know.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      suck, anon bro!!

      I vil download ze videos and I vil like it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What if Youtube charged people to upload content instead?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        much better business model
        >cloud.google.com/storage/pricing
        this way we get rid of the spam and moronic children and content creators are incentivized to make something worth watching.
        having a big channel with thousands of hours and no viewers should be punished while something that has the same length and generates income should start using a form of subscription instead of pay per gb.
        but should be pay per gb for channels <100k

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They are smart people and I guess all the scenarios they run all end in the same conclusion that charging people to upload is only going to hurt them way more than this ads homosexualry.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Have the content creators pay for hosting.

        Problem fricking solved.

        Can't believe you tiny brains can't comprehend the simplest of solutions.

        >Have the content creators pay for hosting.
        >What if Youtube charged people to upload content instead?
        How do you imagine this? A content creator would have to pay X amount to upload content, but it's not just the storage and the processing that costs money, there's also the bandwith cost depending on how many times the videos are watched.

        Do the content creator pays by how many watch their videos?

        I guess you want this so there are no ads on youtube. But now how do the content creators make money to make the content? Literally nobody would ever upload any content with a site like this.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >there's also the bandwith cost depending on how many times the videos are watched
          Bandwidth sint charged per unit of storage used. Every use a VPN or VPS?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >But now how do the content creators make money to make the content?
          In the past artists would be commissioned by some richgay to make their art. In $CURRENT_YEAR+9 we have the internet and sites like patreon that can fulfill the same purpose. If you can’t make a thing that someone likes enough to pay you to make more of it then you need to find a real job, simple as. youtube-as-a-career is what ruined the site

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      YouTube can cope and seethe since i prefer running my own invidious server at home and idgaf. yt-dl and yt-dlp works fine. Grayjay will work fine SINCE IT DOESN'T FRICKING USE THE "Youtube" API FOR FRICK SAKES. (same goes with invidious)

      Boo womp, idgaf. i want to see it burn and crash

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >demonitizes and removes all good content
      >high quality
      Why should anyone want to help them make money when they could remove all of the content people enjoy without notice?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      YouTube should be an ad free pay only platform
      frick off

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The truth makes the IQfytroony seethe

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >entitled
      I'm just going to watch it for free, ok?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      if youtube deleted 50% of its videos, it would still be 99% garbage

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I am either going to watch youtube with ads blocked or not watch youtube. It's that simple. I was willing to have ads but google pushed it too far and now the ads are every few minutes, constant bombardment of wait 20 seconds before skip 2x, so I simply said enough, stopped watching youtube on my PS4, hooked my tv to my PC and run youtube through there with ads blocked. Google completely lost me. They can eventually "win" over ad wars short-term because chromium has the majority of the browser market, but firefox operates on different principles and cannot be stopped from blocking ads even on web 3.0. This might eventually push for greater adoption of firefox unless google wants to spend billions to fight against people coding in their free time because of their philosophical beliefs.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I would agree before they were bought out by israelitegle.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm entitled to it because no one would exist without me perceiving them

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Do you seriously think, YouTube was still around, if it didn't pay off for Google either way?
      I have had my adblockers specifically disabled on YouTube for years, since YT ads overall seemed sensible (at least on the channels I watch regularly).
      A few more recent changes have made me reconsider, though, and a test-run with an up-to-date adblocker enabled worked flawlessly.
      Google is doing well either way. Who I'm worried about, is the (mid-profile) people, I'm watching, that produce good content and don't exaggerate with ads and product placement.
      That's why I have the blocker disabled so far.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Youtube couldn't care less if you use an adblocker. They don't get their money from you, they get it from whoever is paying for advertisements.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      don't care, still not watching the commercials. let the products sell themselves if they're so good (they're not)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I can't believe you refuse to support content creators. You realize this is how they make their living? How about you give back for once?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They should pay me for allowing them to influence me.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i want youtube to die

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I will never stop blocking ads, they make me stupid. I genuinely feel sad for people that can watch them without cringing.
      When I have the money I'll just pay the creator directly. Watching ads for years can't be worth more than a few dollars anyway.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i WILL watch ze content, and i WILL do it for free

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Youtube algorithm has declined noticeably over the past decade+.

      Youtube could be distributed. We could all be running our own Freenet node, with distributed FOSS Democratized Youtube, with a better algorithm.

      The reason that we don’t is everyone isn’t that this would be difficult. The reason is, people are afraid of getting raided for CP.

      So, Youtube gets a monopoly on streaming video because the state has deliberately created a climate of fear? Well, Youtube can eat shit and accept ad-blocking.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Youtube could be distributed
        Do you have any idea how insanely ridiculous the amount of storage you'd need would be

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Freenet is some schizo shit who tf gonna use that.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Don't all these clients just spoof their user agent

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      idk but they don't use the youtube API, so i don't see how youtube can really stop any of them. they couldnt get rid of youtube-dl despite microsoft removing it from github.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      idk but they don't use the youtube API, so i don't see how youtube can really stop any of them. they couldnt get rid of youtube-dl despite microsoft removing it from github.

      YouTube can see who is watching ads, you dummy. They can easily check which users aren't seeing ads and throttle the quality, stop sending them videos or block them altogether.

      For NewPipe, Invidious and youtube-dl it's as easy as doing what Twitter and Reddit did: stop users from seeing content unless they sign in to a Google Account™.

      They could also go the Twitch route and embed the ads inside the videos themselves.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >embed the ads
        But then you can still block them with platforms like sponsorblock, right?
        It's a cursed problem, people that don't watch ads will never go back as long as ads are this bad.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        kek I hope they do. That will be the day they lose 80% of their invesors and it'll be funny watching them try to back-pedal

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >They could also go the Twitch route and embed the ads inside the videos themselves.
        I remember trying to watch something on Twitch and seeing ads for the first time in decades. it was surreal realizing this is every day for normalgays.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They could find legal means to sue them out of making those 3rd party apps run

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Newpipe just scrapes their website. They can do jack shit for now. (Expect DRM/TPM bullshit in the future)

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Youtube does DRM, but it's shit so every third party youtube client works with it anyways.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    is there a client to upload a video to youtube?

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's the best part of revanced, it pretends being the official app, especially if you have root.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >especially if you have root.
      >run a video player as root
      >nothing shady about this

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Clients like Newpipe that don't gaf about being on google play?

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How? NewPipe doesn't use the israelitetube API. Unless they decide to block browsers, NewPipe will continue to work just fine.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      neither does grayjay, but they might implement some DRM or other forms of countermeasures.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >there's a good android tv youtube app (smarttube)
    >there's a good youtube music app (vimusic)
    >there are NO (0, zero, zilch, null) good youtube video apps for android phones

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      NewPipe

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's shit

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Give one reason why

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            grayjay is just better and easier to use tbqhf

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Answer the question

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Back stack is absolutely moronic.
            Looks like shit.
            Can't sync watch time with other devices.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    mpv yt-link

    Simple as

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How are they even going to block them?

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What I don't understand is why don't they pipe the ads in? Why don't they just mix the actual video streams with the ad streams, and serve unskippable ads that will appear even if you yt-dlp the video?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      do you have any fricking idea how much that costs?
      >just splice the video file every time you need ti change the ad for each user region, country, language, ect ect

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        because in order to sell ads, they make them dynamic. they would have to re-encode the video everytime they wanted to serve a different ad.

        I'm sure they could do some clever hack to append two videos with very little processing if you really wanted to.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          yes, they could do that if the maximum number of ads per video was 2. this is exactly why google makes so much money with youtube, they market their algorithms as serving your ad to your potential client only. so advertisers sign up, expecting that bob (who likes golf, grilling, and tommy bahama shirts) sees ads targeted towards his interest, while alice (who likes Black person dick, makeup, and, hot fry) sees ads targeted towards hers, on the same video. plus the ad campaigns change over time.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        because in order to sell ads, they make them dynamic. they would have to re-encode the video everytime they wanted to serve a different ad.

        >just splice the video
        >re-encoding the video
        Do it on packet transmission, no need for remuxing or reencoding.

        or this

        [...]
        I'm sure they could do some clever hack to append two videos with very little processing if you really wanted to.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Explain how twitch does it then. Their ads don't give a shit about ublock.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          they are also spending piles of money on operating costs because they are muxing unique ads into streams per user.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          twitch already has a lot of expensive custom-made infrastructure to support low-latency streaming. ad splicing probably already fits into their existing pipeline. if you go to a vod you can download it ad-free no problem

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          There are ublock solutions for the ad problem on Twitch. look around

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm no expert on the subject but I believe ads are built into the stream. I have no idea how the few ad blockers that can manage to get past it.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The big boys have ads baked into their streams. Smalltime channels you can watch live in mpv or d/l via yt-dlp and never see an ad

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Isn't their format chunked already?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      because in order to sell ads, they make them dynamic. they would have to re-encode the video everytime they wanted to serve a different ad.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        no? Old videos are already fragmented and you can insert any ad you want between any fragment if you want to

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          right, and then an ad-blocker would identify which fragments are ads and block them. only way to do this would be to encode the ad into the video itself, for it to be blocked would become much more resource intensive.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, splicing muxing isn't hard.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          its hard enough that youtube is not yet doing it as far as I know, thats kind of the point.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I have no doubt that there will be ways around it, there always is.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >"Show ads or get blocked"
    >Youtube threatens after spending months attempting to and failing to defeat uBlock Origin
    Imagine being threatened by pajeets and taking it seriously, what are they gonna do? Nothing that's what, pajeets simply aren't intelligent enough to combat ad-hating autists

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Haha
    I'm just
    Pfffft..
    I'm just never going to pay
    Haha
    Sorry!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You font pay for ads

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      MDE never dies...
      Never pays...
      for youtube premium

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    NewPipe will be fine because it just scrapes

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They can prevent the NewPipe app to execute on Android.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >They can prevent the NewPipe app to execute on Android
        If Google blocked NewPipe then they would have to also block the countless forks and it would just become a game of cat and mouse just to stop a small amount of people from circumventing ads without paying.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >take newpipe source
        >rename the application to nupipe,poopipe,jewpipe,snoopipe,etc
        >compile
        >works
        Ez bypass, there would instantly be dozens of forks

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The people using newpipe aren't using Google Roms anyway it would be irrelevant

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It errors out after 10 seconds
      Its over

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I pay for youtube premium because I use youtube music as a streaming service.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >he doesn't use revanced music or one of the many third-party clients such as innertune
      ngmi

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      just use a different client like one of the ones mentioned in OP to get the same functionality. why would you ever pay some giant megacorp anything?

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    cut it off from india and china cause they waste broadband and space

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if Alphabet stops blocking payments through a VPN I would gladly piss pennies for YouTubeRED.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Haven't they been blocking third party clients?

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    frick them
    the site has been degrading for years
    you can't even properly use it on pc anymore without having to zoom out the entire site because the forced the shitty mobile layout with huge fricking icons and thumbnails

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I have YouTube Premium anyway, but I find advertising so funny. Because I'm a sperg, marketing is literately ineffective on me (according to studies), so any marketer is just wasting their money on me.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      do you know what nordvpn is? If you do. Marketing worked on you g00ber

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Knowing is only half the battle

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A sperg knowing your product is a bad thing. They're the people who get annoyed by aggressive marketing enough to to look into things and go online to drag you through the mud. Next thing you know your company is doing damage control on social media because a handful of e-famous spergs did an exposé on you and convinced thousands of people not to buy your products.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, we all know what it is and we know we should avoid it, pozzed, overpriced service with manipulative marketing.
        Mullvad is half the price of Nord, btw 🙂

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I have YouTube Premium
      >marketing is literately ineffective on me

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they said the same about stopping ublock and failed abysmally
    even if you hate firefox you should at the very least use it as a youtube client because ublock functions on it.

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Youtube doesn't understand how much people hate ads

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The weird part is how much revenue are they actually losing to adblock? Normies don't really use it, so it can't be a lot, I wouldn't be surprised if their anti-adblock homosexualry has actually ended up costing them more than how much revenue they'd lose from adblockers

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Get fricked google I'm taking my business to x videos

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nice try Elon, you're as funny as ever. Xvideos > X videos.

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't even care about this shit platform anymore. Their algorithm got a lot worse in the last couple years and now it only recommends me garbage I don't want to watch. I'm off the hook.

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Does this mean Newpipe is kill

    Also is Revanced exempt from this considering that technically its not a 3rd party app?

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    mpv ffmpeg yt-dlp sponsorblock.lua newsboat

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's simply a service problem, as always
    Custom clients simply offer more features than YT Premium, why should I pay for it then?
    Tbh I would've been paying premium for some time if it didn't mean I'm giving more money to Google

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They will DRM the shit out of it

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'll never see an ad, homosexuals

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Grayjay just came out a few weeks ago. Is it really that popular already?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      its been in development for years the launch of the non-beta version 1 is recent.

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/9554#issuecomment-2027991921
    kind of black magic is YT trying to pull on us now, and why it is happening to Android client APIs specifically is currently a mystery to me.
    >Youtube is using Safetynet's AndroidGuard to validate that the requests are coming from their app; possibly in an effort to block revanced, though they have already implemented a bypass.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kek error 406 attestation failed your device will need a valid drivers licence in order to hit our API

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ads are such a snake-oil bullshit meme

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I would sooner delete my israelitetube account before deleting my ublock. I gave up twitch entirely because of ads, so you can alphaBET I'd do the same to you. Heh

  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Use our Adware
    >20-something dumbasses don't even remember how upset everyone was when YouTube added banner ads
    >and text based ads
    Clearly long term permission escalation, this is not normal for any tech companies. Not even for Meta/FB/Lifelog owned companies

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I remember being in college in the late 00s and my adblocking being so good I didn't even know youtube had video ads at all because a professor played a video and and ad started I was like "Youtube has ads?"

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >IQfy: "WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO, DMCA THE APP?"
    Yes
    >IQfy: "WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO, BAN THE GOOGLE ACCOUNT WATCHING WITHOUT ADS??"
    >IQfy: "WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO, BAN THE IPV6 OF THE PHONE???"
    Yes

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If entire Google Accounts got banned just for using an adblocker I'm positive Google would get reamed by courts across the world. It's why they still haven't fricking done it, despite adblockers only becoming more prevalent. No one sane LIKES to see ads. If millions of normies lost their e-mail/cloud storage/music/etc over blocking YouTube ads, Google offices would see active shooters.

  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just buy a subscription already. It's not that expensive.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm regularly using YouTube logged out, so that wouldn't really help.

  41. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine paying for something that's actively being made worse at every turn....

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      exactly
      I WONT EVER PAY PAJEET

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How so? YT and also now YT music just works for me. Just like it always did.
      What are you refering to? Poor youtubers? LMAO, they can get fricked for all I care. Get a real job.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      "People" who pay for YouTube premium disgust me.

  42. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good luck with that.
    >Oh, boy. Here I go scraping again.

  43. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    God that new brown shiteo really wants to turn everything to poo huh.

  44. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The final solution for adblocking is have it built into the monitor. I wonder what google would do if monitor manufacturers brought out an AI powered adblock feature.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >AI powered adblock
      God that would be shit

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anon, you're a moron.
      Not only would an "AI-powered adblocker" be terrible at it's job, but you're far more likely to see big corpo use AI to try and get around adblockers, not make them.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Required monitor TPM

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        unfortunate fate

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Don't ask for smart monitors, they're going to come locked down and filled with ads like smart tvs.

  45. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Adblocking everything for the last 20 years, it FEELS FRICKING GOOD. Skip demented social media, shorts and tik tok, you will thank me later.

  46. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    make me

  47. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Throttle conzoomers, kill live streaming, make an unblockable single serve ad at the beginning of a video, kill all 24 hour lofi channels to goon to, restrict videos to 1 hour in length, charge creatards who want longer videos hosted, boom, profitable YouTube. Now while we're at it, combine YouTube TV, Music and Premium into one fricking service and charge less than what you're charging for TV.

  48. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Google would really if everybody just paid for Premium
    THEN OFFER FRICKING BETTER INCENTIVES FOR PREMIUM YOU GIGAhomosexualS
    Please we all know they're just gonna start putting ads on premium eventually anyways. I want all these companies to just die already, they are literal cancers on humanity.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This. It's embarrassing. It's both overpriced and doesn't offer anything even remotely substantial, especially considering that adblockers are still undefeated and most if not all of the other features can be achieved through alternative means. It's just a moron tax so far. I'm not against supporting YouTube (at least in principle, since Google is absolutely awful), but this isn't the way to go.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, they won't. They know that's the only real reason anyone uses it. Instead, they'll just keep raising the price.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >They know that's the only real reason anyone uses it.
        The current phrasing is "with less ads", so you can bet your ass on ads coming to "Premium".
        Amazon did the same with "Prime", which made me cancel my subscription over there. Frick ads.

  49. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The day I see youtube ads is the day I stop using youtube.

  50. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That was 2 months ago. What's up now?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Everything is still working. We can't really tell what is going on behind the scenes of any of them. Grayjay via louis rossman has announced that they received several cease and desist letters from youtube. It sounds like they are refusing to obey and might get into a big legal fight over it.

  51. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i don't use youtube and i don't have a google / youtube account

  52. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm fine.

  53. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ads are anti-content and a form of informational terrorism. YT, just like the whole Internet, is unusable without an adblocker and everyone knows it. The solution isn't giving them money at gunpoint ("subscription") which they can and will then make more and more expensive but in totally destroying the ad industry as a whole. In other words using adblockers isn't just okay but a moral imperative.

  54. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are normies using adblockers? Why are they pushing ads so much?
    Even if I have to use a pc without an adblocker I would never click an ad.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That is what puzzles me about it, seems most likely the % of people who use adblockers is negligible
      I don't want to be "muh sheeple" but most people surely just zone out and watch the ads?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >seems most likely the % of people who use adblockers is negligible
        Why would you think that?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          People are morons

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          most of the world operates with their phones and barely anyone goes out of his way to install a third party app given the security concerns
          on pc most normalgays also use the default settings, and that doesnt include a decent adblocker
          if anyone's using an adblocker, generally its because someone who isnt utterly moronic held their hands and told them what to install and how to do it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >barely anyone goes out of his way to install a third party app
            You think 0 people use the appstores on their phone? Literally Everyone does
            >given the security concerns
            Nobody thinks like this

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            talk to 10 normalgays, the kind that doesnt know what a PCI-E port is, and ask them what they use to watch yt

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >normal people don't know what a pcie port is
            WTF? How do they even function?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Its pretty normal. Most people only know about the resolutions shown in the youtube settings (ie 1080p) and dont know it means 1920x1080 either
            UBO has 45M users according to firefox and chrome's extension sites, the world has like 5B people under 40yo. That's less than 1%.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nothing I just said was incorrect

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Not that guy but no one in my last workplaces full of normalgays used an adblocker, specially the fricking women which are advertisers' most beloved target.
          Even the one guy who wasn't an absolute tech idiot just used his iphone's official adblockers which are total shit, nothing on his laptop until I gave him directions on installing ublock.
          They're doing all this cause execs are absolutely paranoid about losing even a tiny amount of profit and having their bonuses in danger, plus the new pajeet in charge of israelitetube literally comes from the googleads division, so he's doubly paranoid and obsessed about adblockers becoming mainstream.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Its really difficult to believe they just put up with that stuff

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nta but they never consider the fact that there might be alternatives. For example, my parents never used ad-block because in their days it was TV advertisements, radio advertisements, adverts everywhere. People just put up with the ad's, do it for long enough and that's "just how it is". For example, I introduced Brave to my father just last year so he could watch videos without ad's (he still prefers safari and only uses brave when he wants to watch Youtube). There is a reason why the younger generation primarily uses them when compared to the older generation, because we grew up in the age of the internet where we could find ways around ad's using adblock. Where the older generation moved into it, bring the old way of dealing with ads along with them (AKA, just dealing with it).

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Young people also just deal with them and don't really see the issue. It's just how they know it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they've been trying to get rid of adblockers as much as possible, hence manifest v3
      they're probably are collecting as much info as possible about what works and doesnt so they can extend it to their other services

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Are normies using adblockers?
      Boomers and GenX without Millennial children are not.
      Neither are zoomers.
      >Why are they pushing ads so much?
      Money, money, money...

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Why are they pushing ads so much?
      Take mentality of "every pirated copy is a lost sale" and make it dumber.

  55. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Ctrl+F Peertube
    >0 results
    also I downloaded many interesting videos from YT already, using yt-dlp, so even if they go full gayMAN, I already have a local copy
    freetards should help normalgays get off Youtube

  56. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How is youtube even free?

    I record all my gameplay when i play games and upload it to YouTube as private videos.
    I have been doing this since 2010 and i have almost 2000 videos and im using probably 10TB+ of storage

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ads and serving as an incentive to many people to create a Google account.
      Back in the day, 1GB of freemail was enough to achieve that.
      Times have changed.

  57. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i dont care that much, i only check youtube once a week. if they find a way to force ads down my throat i will simply just stop using it.

  58. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I only have so many hours in this world. I will not spend any second of it listening to some fricking advert I care nothing for.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I only have so many hours in this world.
      Assuming you are a male US American it's (on average) 643,860 hours.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And that number doesn't go up so I'm not wasting time. I only get one shot.

  59. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I pay for ytp yet I still use newpipe and adblock+sponsorblock. If they do that I will cancel my subscription.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      who pays for youtube poop

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Morshu's customers.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ytp connisseurs

  60. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'll just stop using YouTube. It'd probably be better for me anyhow.

  61. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    These power tripping indians are in for a rude awakening.

  62. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Look, I'm just not going to watch them (the ads)

  63. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just pretend you're Russian, ez adblock

  64. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Frick off, Neal.

  65. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm unironically paying for Youtube Premium because I thought the susanbux/nealbux thing where the videos you watch directly pay the creators was a neat idea, but with all the algorithm shit it's becoming a chore trying to avoid watching videos from people you don't give a shit about while making sure I watch other videos on incognito WITH adblock enabled

  66. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >grayjay, newpipe, and revanced.
    I do not use this homosexualry.
    >guess they will never be able to stop youtube-dl at least.
    I use yt-dlp BTW.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *