Chance of a battery burning my house down

I own dozens of old android devices that I sometimes tinker with by writing custom ROM software, when I feel like it.
What is the risk of an old battery catching fire by itself? Can I manage the risk? Again, I do this just for fun, I'll give all of this up if that means one day I don't wake up in hellfire.

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why do white girls turn into men and men turn into white girls

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's a white thing, you can't understand.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's an american.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hitler lost the war.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Jews aren't white

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's a mixed up, muddled up, shook up world

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is that really the same girl?

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's just bad photo, her face is deformed because she is too close to the edge. Bottom picture looks more modern than top one.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Top: wouldn't.
    Bottom: would.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why is IQfy suddenly full of paedophiles?
      Just a thread ago I saw other dude making completely unappropriated remarks about little kids as well

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this is chomosexual central, normy
        frick off, homy
        https://decider.com/2024/05/18/mike-tyson-says-he-had-an-erection-from-watching-16-year-old-jake-paul-dancing-online/

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >suddenly

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >IQfy - teche-girlgy
        >suddenly

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Frick me, that jaw.

          [...]
          >suddenly

          >suddenly

          this is chomosexual central, normy
          frick off, homy
          https://decider.com/2024/05/18/mike-tyson-says-he-had-an-erection-from-watching-16-year-old-jake-paul-dancing-online/

          its literally bait you morons
          only paedophiles say "paedo"

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't. I just nail children.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >t.paedo

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I was just pretending for attention
            No. You're moronic.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            huh?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I said you're moronic.
            Which is the case no matter the context.
            If you wrote the original post, sincerely or just for attention, you're moronic.
            If you made an assumption on someone else's behalf, you're extra moronic and naive.
            It's no surprise you're confused.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sorry anon but can you explain it a little bit better?
            I don't understand what you're trying to say

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, that's the limit of my clarification with you unless you specify something in particular.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            uhhh, then what about, uhhhh.....
            Dinosaurs

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What about them? I don't see the relevance they have to any of this.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            can you be more specific?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Specific in regard to what?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            let's say dinosaurs, thats a good topic to be specific about

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I have no desire to talk about dinosaurs in general, especially since they have no relevance to the topic at hand.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            well then what do you want to talk about?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't want to talk with you at all.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            uhh, care to elaborate on that?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sure. I don't like the way you choose to communicate, so it's not worthwhile to engage with you except for the purpose of keeping the thread bumped.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I didn't quite catch what you just said, can you say it a bit louder?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's not how text works. But what I'm saying is that I'm using you as bump bait to keep the thread alive.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            what? what does that even have to do with dinosaurs?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It has nothing to do with dinosaurs.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            sorry I don't really get it can you explain that again?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No. If you want you can re-read the posts in the thread and see if it makes sense on a second pass.
            If there's something specific you don't understand, you can quote it and ask me to clarify it.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            then can you clarify on the dinosaur question?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know which dinosaur question you're referring to.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            what dinosaur?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not sure what you meant by that, so I can't answer it. In regards to what are you asking about "dinosaur"?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            you know, dinosaurs, dinosaurs are cool aren't they

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I know about them, I don't know what you're asking. Regardless, I don't want to talk about them. If you have questions about something relevant, you can ask me about that.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            well if not dinos, what is relevant then?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The meta of this thread. I.e. this reply chain.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            huh?
            and where did the dinosaur topic came from then?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >where did the dinosaur topic came from then
            This post

            uhhh, then what about, uhhhh.....
            Dinosaurs

            (which is not mine) brought it up.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            can you explain about that then?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, can't.
            I can only make assumptions on it. If you're the author of that post, only you can explain your rationale for bringing it up.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            well you can't deny they're cool then

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's a topic I don't wish to argue, one way or the other.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            what topic?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Your tangent topic.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            what the one you mentioned about a string and whatnot?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't recall mentioning such a thing, you'll have to find and quote what you're referring to.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            well what do you have to say about the string post then

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't have anything to say about it because I have no recollection of what you're referring to. Are you talking about the reply-chain, as in a string of posts or something else?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yeah yeah that, is that a dinosaur?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I guess it depends on your interpretation. I wouldn't call it that.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i don't get it, explain it to me please

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Consider the term "sealioning", it refers to both a kind of animal and a form of posting on the internet. Uncommon, and maybe unconventional but arguably valid.
            In this case, you could be referring to the string of posts in the same manner, and I am not. I wouldn't be able to tell what your vocabulary is since I do not know you.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            uhhh, and what does that have to do with dinosaurs again?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nothing. You're the one bringing that into the reply chain. You'd have to tell me, I can't tell you.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You're the one
            Haha got you gay how do you know it's me who posted it
            Now, as this

            I said you're moronic.
            Which is the case no matter the context.
            If you wrote the original post, sincerely or just for attention, you're moronic.
            If you made an assumption on someone else's behalf, you're extra moronic and naive.
            It's no surprise you're confused.

            post describes, you're "extra moronic and naive"

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            This post

            Nothing. You're the one bringing that into the reply chain. You'd have to tell me, I can't tell you.

            is a direct reply in the chain, to this post

            uhhh, and what does that have to do with dinosaurs again?

            which brings the topic into the discussion. Either in sequence or independently.
            I.e. "You" is referring to the author of said post, whether it is the same as previous ones or not.
            I'm not sure what exactly you mean or what you're referring to now. Got what?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No mods.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >suddenly

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Suddenly
        Just take a look at deleted OP posts in the archive... Why would someone bother with privacy technologies if not for CP ?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >suddenly

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous
  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    and people say the wall aint real... s m h

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It's miss bean now, chud

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's what "no makeup" actually looks like. You wanted that.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Makeup wouldn't have hidden that jaw.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    fugly

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Frick me, that jaw.

      Why is IQfy suddenly full of paedophiles?
      Just a thread ago I saw other dude making completely unappropriated remarks about little kids as well

      >suddenly

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >batteries randomly exploding into fire
    the israelite oil industry is a worm in your brain

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    50/50

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's a biological grill, just a very ugly one

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if lithium batteries then it's quite high

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If lithium batteries then it's extremely low

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Low but not zero. You can mitigate the risks by storing them in metal containers (don't have to be sealed) away from easily burnable items.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Any old metal box will do?
      >(don't have to be sealed)
      Why not?

      I used to work for a cellphone maker. People in such a company have at least 5-10 older device flying around in their desks. Back when those had replaceable batteries, at least a dozen of those too. And that was >1000 workers in the building.
      There never was a single fire. We never even worried about that. And that's with prototype devices in the mix too. The battery charging logic and protection circuit is always low level hardware unaffected by firmware.

      >The battery charging logic and protection circuit is always low level hardware unaffected by firmware.
      I sort of knew that. I wasn't so much worried about my OS tinkering causing a fire, more so a battery I didn't notice is degraded igniting randomly.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        My understanding is that there will be some swelling first.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >What is the risk of an old battery catching fire by itself?
          Moderate in the medium term, pretty high in the long term when you're talking about a range of old mobile devices with thin Li-Ion cells constrained by the case of the battery. One of those swells up enough, gets punctured by the casing, and cooks off... almost inevitable eventually.

          >Can I manage the risk? Again, I do this just for fun, I'll give all of this up if that means one day I don't wake up in hellfire.
          Yes. Some of the phones have removable batteries and will run on a cord without the battery inserted - Get rid of the batteries for those and use them without. For the rest, you have a range of options. You could get rid of the oldest ones to mitigate the highest risks. You could keep them in a place with a smoke alarm overhead so if they do cook off, you are alerted quickly to the situation and can either escape or fight the fire. Speaking of which, regular extinguishers aren't effective, but some specialized ones are available. If you have a suitable place, you could also store them outside your living area e.g. in a shed or garage so that if they do cook off, the damage is limited. Gotta be a bit careful with that last option though, since temperature and humidity swings can speed up the battery degredation and increase the odds of a fire.

          >My understanding is that there will be some swelling first.
          There will but this is where the problem lies - When a battery swells inside a phone it doesn't have anywhere to go and the casing presses against it. If this leads to the battery wrap being pierced, you get an oxygen reaction with the lithium in the cell and now you have a fire. Storing the batteries outside the phones can be a good way to both observe for any swelling and prevent the phone shell from piercing the batteries, but this only works if the battery is removable.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't have time to talk to the looser of this internet debate
    I simply won it, stay mad about it

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    One of the things to worry about is puncturing them and causing a fire.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I used to work for a cellphone maker. People in such a company have at least 5-10 older device flying around in their desks. Back when those had replaceable batteries, at least a dozen of those too. And that was >1000 workers in the building.
    There never was a single fire. We never even worried about that. And that's with prototype devices in the mix too. The battery charging logic and protection circuit is always low level hardware unaffected by firmware.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    She hit the wall hard

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >anon replies to bot posts then makes himself mad
    top kek

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >damn, CWC is almost passing these days.
    Phone batteries are relatively safe. Keep them in metal or pottery boxes if you're worried. They'll die and leak before they catch fire.

    I've had a faulty vacuum cleaner battery catch fire at my parents' last year. I just had used the vacuum and the battery started melting and spouting flames.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lol

      can you believe we live in a world where (s)he raped his own mother? just absurd, the entire thing

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *