Listen you stupid frick. From a quality perspective it is both inhibitive and impractical, but the problem of refining anything to perfection is the element of time. Time is money, and if pushing workable software to market is the goal then time must be managed and optimized fully, thus agile development and project management methods exist. This is compounded by the time-to-market needs of software in order to get the most out of any generated product. Quit pretending your autistic desire to do programming outweighs the business needs of any given organization, because it's the later that gets you paid and you sure as frick don't work for free or you wouldn't be complaining about agile in the first place.
>It's a legitimate concept but abused by managers.
This can be said about anything related to any element of business ranging from products, utilities, or even company policy.
When it’s done right, it’s comfy and empowering for developers. You can raise issues in a safe environment and have your voice heard. Largely dependent on the PM managing business needs and dev needs so you don’t go full autist and burn time on useless features and the business doesn’t over promise to customers.
When it is done wrong, it’s just a soul-draining experience. You end up never getting anything done because everyone either thinks you’re superman/rockstar/slave dev who cranks out work on demand or you’re a fricking idiot one step above a CSR phone slave.
ironically the most agile teams I worked are those who never implemented "agile methodology" like scrum/daily meetings/etc
"le agile"/"le scrum" is just a way to make management feel something is being done instead of actually fixing the fundamental problems. "hey I will have meeting every day, that way I will figure out what is going on in my company".
Yes
>irrelevant time wasting question
dicky is good for you, yes
But not her. Too much hair.
low test
Explain
Listen you stupid frick. From a quality perspective it is both inhibitive and impractical, but the problem of refining anything to perfection is the element of time. Time is money, and if pushing workable software to market is the goal then time must be managed and optimized fully, thus agile development and project management methods exist. This is compounded by the time-to-market needs of software in order to get the most out of any generated product. Quit pretending your autistic desire to do programming outweighs the business needs of any given organization, because it's the later that gets you paid and you sure as frick don't work for free or you wouldn't be complaining about agile in the first place.
>good on-topic post actually seriously discussing the midwit fast-fire shitpost by OP
>no anime avatargayging
Many such cases.
it's more of a vocabulary than an actual practice
It's a legitimate concept but abused by managers.
It's always sprint time!
>It's a legitimate concept but abused by managers.
This can be said about anything related to any element of business ranging from products, utilities, or even company policy.
Yes
agile by roasties is bad. agile by devs is good
>anime
cringe
>(you)
homosexual
When it’s done right, it’s comfy and empowering for developers. You can raise issues in a safe environment and have your voice heard. Largely dependent on the PM managing business needs and dev needs so you don’t go full autist and burn time on useless features and the business doesn’t over promise to customers.
When it is done wrong, it’s just a soul-draining experience. You end up never getting anything done because everyone either thinks you’re superman/rockstar/slave dev who cranks out work on demand or you’re a fricking idiot one step above a CSR phone slave.
Employed dev anons, what is the ratio of devs to project managers on your teams?
>3 Devs on my main App
>10 in our ecosystem.
>1 Project manager
>3 Business analysts
>le agile scum
ironically the most agile teams I worked are those who never implemented "agile methodology" like scrum/daily meetings/etc
"le agile"/"le scrum" is just a way to make management feel something is being done instead of actually fixing the fundamental problems. "hey I will have meeting every day, that way I will figure out what is going on in my company".
I keep seeing this chart but it's never backed by any source
Search your feelings. You know it to be true.
Is that a parody of that picture Marina Nagasawa took with Hayden on Instagram where he completely ignored her?
no clue who the guy is but based for not hovering the e-girl
>do you have a le heckin source for that?
have a nice day.
Also, death to PMs.
There's another variant, which cites a source. But the chart is not in the source, and there's no data in the source that supports it.
I am the source. those are my preferences
Ok guys, pick your project management poison:
-Scrum
-DevOps/DevSecOps
-Lean/Six-Sigma
-Kanban
-Extreme Programming
-Prince2
-Hybrid (explain)
You will be judged on your choice.