You know that’s not what I meant, too. These structures are more impressive than any European church
2 years ago
Anonymous
Kek nice joke
2 years ago
Anonymous
Those structures are basic b***h
Accumulation lakes spaning dosens of kilometers and navigable channels connecting them over hundrends of kilometers are fricking impressive
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Those structures are basic b***h
Take that back
Picrel is 9th century
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yes they stacked some stones
Seriously tho
You can see the sorrounding infrastructure from satelite
It was a major civilised human culture, milions of people, frickhuge systems, citties the likes of which earth hasnt seen till the industrial revolution, bare the ones the mongols burned in central asia
People like you always focus on the pissing contest
I bet if you walked arround giza you wouldnt even notice obvious signs of machine worked stone youd just go - uuuu loook big rock pile bigger than catedral take that whitemang
2 years ago
Anonymous
.
Machine worked stone.
You should be machine worked.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Those structures are basic b***h
Take that back
Picrel is 9th century
this is what you get when you want to talk to racists lol
2 years ago
Anonymous
rent free
2 years ago
Anonymous
that image gives me an immense sense of sadness
2 years ago
Anonymous
rent free
>going back to communal worship >bad
This is literally how it was in the early days
2 years ago
Anonymous
>blacks haven’t progressed in thousands of years
2 years ago
Anonymous
This is only 200-300 years younger and its infinitely more complex and larger.
2 years ago
Anonymous
better you say? i know how to deal with that...
2 years ago
Anonymous
say oy vey to my little friend!
2 years ago
Anonymous
>infinitely more complex and larger.
*BTFOs your pathetic church 100 years earlier*
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm not saying its not impressive, but architecturally its no where near as advanced.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Angkor Wat isn't that big. It only keeps being cited as the largest religious structure in the world by including the entire area surrounded by the moat (pic related) as part of the temple. The actual central temple structure in your picture would easily fit in St. Peters square.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The moat is part of the structure because it's lined with carved stone. It's a pretty integral reason. And constantly clearing jungle is no small feat itself. It's extremely impressive it was able to last so long even in long term neglect.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Not part of the building though, is it? If you count monastic complexes up to their outer walls, then places like Cluny Abbey mogged Angkor hard in the same time period.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It's integral as the building's skin, protecting it from the jungle, and all of it was produced together in a single lifetime. Cluny's walls were expanded to house 1,000 until 10,000 two centuries later.
The temple is about twice the size of St. Peter's Square.
Why are you making it a competition though? I'm not the disrespectful anon.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Why are you making it a competition though?
I'm making it a competition? I replied to "*BTFOs your pathetic church 100 years earlier*"
2 years ago
Anonymous
Lurking, I didn't think anyone would rise to such 80 IQ bait. Everyone here knows European architecture is on a pedestal.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>European architecture is on a pedestal.
It really isn't.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It is. Europe has the most tourism of any region. Everyone realizes this implicitly, and attempts to smear it are still obviously contrarian. Forty years from now when swarthoids burned down a good chunk of Europe, I would definitely understand rushing into baits from slimy lizard people trying to spoil Europe.
2 years ago
Anonymous
That's not because they have superior architecture lmao More like safer, more prosperous, and tourist friendly. moron..
2 years ago
Anonymous
no moron europes architecture is photographed more than any other
wanna change the situation you ugly untermensch? stop being a shithead and help your shithole gain prosperity and building projects
2 years ago
Anonymous
There are so many factors that go into that besides quality lmao
2 years ago
Anonymous
but europe is quality you ugly moron. they didnt learn from euclid for nothing. can you explain why even east asian and sea diaspora vacation to and photograph western architecture more than their own?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Larger media coverage and economic relevancy.
2 years ago
Anonymous
so why do you keep beating around the bush ignoring that european architecture is generally better? vaults disperse heat and are more generally useful than domes or the strained chambers of sea architecture. european architecture has good decoration that isnt the empty busyness of hindu art. do you have good points on what makes non-european architecture better? im the angkor wat defender btw, it well earned its logically sound reputation as the world's most massive religious building.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You haven't provided any evidence other than "its more popular". I'm not even saying European architecture is inferior, just that it isn't necessarily superior
2 years ago
Anonymous
i literally did, and medieval european architecture is generally superior. read the post you quoted. you suffer from great denial.
vaults are a superior medieval technology, not just for reasons i already said, but because they also disperse respiration/humidity and light more effectively.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The most impressive European structure is the colosseum. Most of the churches aren't even a thousand years old. Look at how fragile Notre Dame is
2 years ago
Anonymous
Was it like that at the time? For all you know it was improved over the centuries.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Was it like that at the time?
Obviously not. That's why it's a shitty comparison
Another amazing thing about Angkor wat is that it was built over the span of like 60 years while churches like the Lincoln cathedral took 3 centuries
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nice bait
2 years ago
Anonymous
They are tho
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You know that’s not what I meant, too. These structures are more impressive than any European church
European churches were constructed using many blocks of stone, which were carved, moved into place, and finished, creating very large, very high, domes and walls, which defy the strength of the material for the size.
The Indian structures, and mostly heavily carved stone structures, made from stone such as granite, which is significantly harder than the stone types used in Europe, but which is also structurally way stronger and more resilient.
In some cases the Indian temples were carved out of the “living rock” rather than constructed of multiple blocks.
It’s sort of a toss up which is more impressive.
Engineering wise, I would say the European buildings.
Workmanship wise, the granite is more impressive.
2 years ago
Anonymous
yeah but hindu architecture has evil themes. they represent chaotic gods and degenerate tier sex which is the mindset that led to india being such a shithole in the first place. i think you have a point in the energy and workmanship required for them, but aesthetically the victor is europe.
These civilizations would figure out how to clear jungle for farmland and it could be very productive per acre leading to a very dense population, due to trade influence from China and India they would quickly figure out exquisite architecture like this.
However eventually the gravy train would run out. The jungle root system traps a lot of water while the countless millions of trees help water evaporate, it effectively creates its own rainfall, but only on this huge scale, as the jungles recede so does this water recycling, if there is a drought the entire area just dries out. To make matters worse most of their crops require ample water, rice or in the case of the Maya who suffered a similar fate, maize.
Just like that it is over, the famine becomes apocalyptic and agriculture does not recover until the jungles do, leaving behind majestic ruins.
>The jungle root system traps a lot of water while the countless millions of trees help water evaporate, it effectively creates its own rainfall, but only on this huge scale, as the jungles recede so does this water recycling, if there is a drought the entire area just dries out. To make matters worse most of their crops require ample water, rice or in the case of the Maya who suffered a similar fate, maize.
They had to have cut tens of thousands of acres if not one hundred thousand to have that kind of effect. They managed to do that with stone tools? I think you're overestimating how much land they cleared.
>They managed to do that with stone tools?
They burnt the forest, anon... The quickest way to profit yourself with fertile fields from ashes, but also the quickest way to demise
https://www.historymuseum.ca/cmc/exhibitions/civil/maya/mmc12eng.html#:~:text=The%20Maya%20created%20arable%20land,beans,%20squash,%20and%20tobacco.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Why should we assume that's what happened though? There are shitloads of other reasons for collapse or abandonment.
not the person you replied to, but none of these were created by blacks/bantoids
2 years ago
Anonymous
>blacks haven’t progressed in thousands of years
[...]
Cool, now show us africa in the 700s
Mental health and neuropsychological assessment of the typical politically incorrect poster.
Pepe Frog, MD, MPH, PhD, Wojak Feel Guy,MD, PhD
University of Meme,Kek State
Every three or four threads created on the board you will find one discussing blacks and even threads having nothing to do with them will oftentimes have some anon/anons who have them on the brain.Behind all the hate, behind all the monkey and KANGZ memes,Tyrone sheeit comics,gifs,demotivational pictures, and webms - /misc/ users secretly admire the Black.The raw brass confident masculinity that they possess which they are quick to compare to a feral animal,and yet at the same time acknowledge is what women truly desire at their core and what is lacking in many white heterosexual unions.Their intrinsic ruggedness that enables them to stamp their mark on any field of physical activity that they enter.The amazing sense of rhythm that they naturally seem to possess that they liken to ape gesticulations and yet are oh so majestic to witness.Then there is the stereotype of the black man's sexuality,particularly his phallus.It has become a bodily protuberance of myth and legend.There is a reason that r/AsianMasculinity trolls are laughed off while BBC and Blacked generates anger and solemn disdain.For where the asian man's masculinity is considered a joke the black man's is a threat to be taken with utmost seriousness,for there may be a kernel of truth to it.Is it a coincidence that of all the races of men it is the black man whose masculinity has become a meme? Based on our assessment,Dr. Wojak and I have thus concluded that /misc/ is a board populated with manic depressive autistic schizoid individuals afflicted with a sort of Jungian-Pavlovian psychopathological Black-complex.
2 years ago
Anonymous
American culture is centered around Black folk. They have holidays for Black folk. They killed hundreds of thousands of white men to free Black folk. They listen to Black person music. They elect a Black person as their president. They dress and act like Black folk. They draw the entirety of their modern culture from Black folk. They post sassy gifs about Black folk. They watch sportsball in worship of Black folk. Their biggest event of the year involves throwing parties in honor of Black folk playing sports. They use Black person slang like "bruh" and "thot". When you say "Martin Luther" they're not thinking of the father of protestantism. They're thinking of the Black person. Their cities are completely overrun with Black folk. They worship their ZOGbot police force disproportionately filled with Black folk and their global police force of soldiers filled with Black folk. Their men sit around watching Black person ball while their women sit around watching Black person talk shows. They worship Black folk like Muhammad Ali and Michael Jordan and Michael Jackson and the late Mike Tyson while attacking the whites who actually built their country before Black folk took over. Their movies are filled with Black folk and their music charts are topped by Black folk. They send Black folk to the Olympics and celebrate when the Black folk win because those Black folk are true red blooded american Black folk. They watch Black person porn to a point where "BBC" does not make them think of an international media company but about Black person penises instead. They will tell you how much they hate Black folk and how the mutt's law meme is a stale joke and they are just pretending to love Black folk but the evidence speaks for itself in that America has always been and will be a nation of Black person loving Black folk.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Meds
2 years ago
Anonymous
cope.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>late mike tyson
typical out of the loop homosexual. If whites are such bawds for black culture, then can you really call them the superior race? Don't even start with blaming israelites, considering whites are supposed to be better than them too.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>"american..." >m-muh whites!
you will never move the goalpost.
2 years ago
Anonymous
American culture is centered around Black folk. They have holidays for Black folk. They killed hundreds of thousands of white men to free Black folk. They listen to Black person music. They elect a Black person as their president. They dress and act like Black folk. They draw the entirety of their modern culture from Black folk. They post sassy gifs about Black folk. They watch sportsball in worship of Black folk. Their biggest event of the year involves throwing parties in honor of Black folk playing sports. They use Black person slang like "bruh" and "thot". When you say "Martin Luther" they're not thinking of the father of protestantism. They're thinking of the Black person. Their cities are completely overrun with Black folk. They worship their ZOGbot police force disproportionately filled with Black folk and their global police force of soldiers filled with Black folk. Their men sit around watching Black person ball while their women sit around watching Black person talk shows. They worship Black folk like Muhammad Ali and Michael Jordan and Michael Jackson and the late Mike Tyson while attacking the whites who actually built their country before Black folk took over. Their movies are filled with Black folk and their music charts are topped by Black folk. They send Black folk to the Olympics and celebrate when the Black folk win because those Black folk are true red blooded american Black folk. They watch Black person porn to a point where "BBC" does not make them think of an international media company but about Black person penises instead. They will tell you how much they hate Black folk and how the mutt's law meme is a stale joke and they are just pretending to love Black folk but the evidence speaks for itself in that America has always been and will be a nation of Black person loving Black folk.
im not reading your essays
just want to call you guys perma virgin homosexuals
2 years ago
Anonymous
>literally called black by neighbors
>bantoid
Literally pseudo science
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nubians aren't black? Do you know what Sudan means?
>build useless megastructures >Economic black hole >civilizational collapse >Megastructures assimilated by nature >rinse and repeat
Wow you sure showed us
>Megastructures assimilated by nature
Roman remains were still occupied by people. Nice try though
2 years ago
Anonymous
Rome was practically a ghost city from the 5th Century to the 19th. It had a population of 50,000 from the 5th Century to the 16th, then only modestly growing to 150k by Italy's unification... which was only 15% of its peak.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I can imagine the weed growth... What magnificent ruins though...
Maybe they had a large, populous and sophisticated civilised culture with things like infrastructure and division of labor?
You know, the way humans do?
You know those creatures with prefrontal cortexes and posable thumbs
Humans, right?
Those bipedal creatures that tend to build things and manufacture tools and have organised societies and fight wars and such
It used to be a biochemical spaceship. The natives found its carcass and decided to eat its meat, so they covered it in stones in order to keep it refrigerated. The stone structure imitates the spines of the dead alien ship.
Java has been the most densely populated region of the world for a long, long time.
And historically one of the richest.
Spices, until the 17th Century were more portable and valuable than gold.
It's less impressive when you've been there and realize those aren't actual domes topping some impressive, tall-ceiling interior, but just rounded rocks on top of other rocks. It's a big pile of nicely decorated rocks with a small niche of an interior with a pretty low ceiling. If you were to look at a floor plan of the interior the vast majority of it would be taken up by the wall thickness.
It's impressive logistically and in terms of decorative craftsmanship, not so much in terms of architecture or engineering.
There must have been a ruling caste that was at least party-white.
Only whites construct epic architecture, if you ever see epic architecture anywhere, especially anything that contains or requires STRAIGHT LINES, that means it was constructed with native workers working under white overseers and project managers. From the Pyramids on down.
If you see a straight line in architecture, that's the tell-tale sign that white people designed it and ordered it to be built.
A lot of monkey-peoples across the world trace their culture to a time when whites ruled over their ancestors.
Japan, China, Korea, all of these "Asian" cultures have ancient white origins. The white people either left, were killed off, or simply outbred themselves, and the ruling castes of these cultures now are maybe only 1-2% white.
>thread about thailand >turns to be another africa hate thread
I genuinely understand that but could you guys stop remembering me Africa is a thing? I come to this site trying to forget it
>*BTFOs your pathetic church 100 years earlier*
IDK what race typed this but they're moronic. Could be SEA, could be white looking for a stick to beat others with. Christianity has been the more consistent inspirer of holy architecture in history, and the religious spirit of either civilization would frown on such barbaric behavior.
The Southeast Asian Islands aren't like smoll pacific Islands like Hawaii or some shiet. They're bigass places that allow for a big population to expand.
And Indonesia's Java & Sumatra Islands are home to enough fricking floodplains to feed a huge population of ricefarming Austronesians building discount Pajeet maritime empires.
Prior to the 1960s, history, anthropology, and archaelogy were fields led by white men who put forward the common sense
IF a people were capable of creating a level of civilization they would maintain or exceed this degree of civility in modernity.
IF a people were savages squatting on a past civilization's lands then there must have been a different people living there prior to them.
It's a very recent, kosher nonsense to consider civilization some spontaneously emergent property completely divorced from the people manifesting it.
>were fields led by white men who put forward the common sense
Alright then motherfricker >One of these temples, a rival to that of Solomon, and erected by some ancient Michelangelo, might take an honorable place beside our most beautiful buildings. It is grander than anything left to us by Greece or Rome
This was written by a white, western famous archeologist from the 19th century.
youre moronic. malaysians built petronas towers. youre a stupid Black person if you dont think its an awesome monument
2 years ago
Anonymous
The architect was a italian Argentine.
2 years ago
Anonymous
lmao so moron? and pelli got his concepts from a muslim, fazlur khan. pelli also consulted with the malaysian government for ideas which is why its islamic in design.
the blue mosque is one of the world's treasures
also modern islamic architecture has some wonderful pieces. i leave muslims to post pics and back that.
why is there so much shit like this in that general area of the world
You could ask the same about Europe and churches lmao, literally the same thing
yeah europe is a bunch of remote jungle islands
You know this is not what I meant
You know that’s not what I meant, too. These structures are more impressive than any European church
Kek nice joke
Those structures are basic b***h
Accumulation lakes spaning dosens of kilometers and navigable channels connecting them over hundrends of kilometers are fricking impressive
>Those structures are basic b***h
Take that back
Picrel is 9th century
Yes they stacked some stones
Seriously tho
You can see the sorrounding infrastructure from satelite
It was a major civilised human culture, milions of people, frickhuge systems, citties the likes of which earth hasnt seen till the industrial revolution, bare the ones the mongols burned in central asia
People like you always focus on the pissing contest
I bet if you walked arround giza you wouldnt even notice obvious signs of machine worked stone youd just go - uuuu loook big rock pile bigger than catedral take that whitemang
.
Machine worked stone.
You should be machine worked.
this is what you get when you want to talk to racists lol
rent free
that image gives me an immense sense of sadness
>going back to communal worship
>bad
This is literally how it was in the early days
>blacks haven’t progressed in thousands of years
This is only 200-300 years younger and its infinitely more complex and larger.
better you say? i know how to deal with that...
say oy vey to my little friend!
>infinitely more complex and larger.
*BTFOs your pathetic church 100 years earlier*
I'm not saying its not impressive, but architecturally its no where near as advanced.
Angkor Wat isn't that big. It only keeps being cited as the largest religious structure in the world by including the entire area surrounded by the moat (pic related) as part of the temple. The actual central temple structure in your picture would easily fit in St. Peters square.
The moat is part of the structure because it's lined with carved stone. It's a pretty integral reason. And constantly clearing jungle is no small feat itself. It's extremely impressive it was able to last so long even in long term neglect.
Not part of the building though, is it? If you count monastic complexes up to their outer walls, then places like Cluny Abbey mogged Angkor hard in the same time period.
It's integral as the building's skin, protecting it from the jungle, and all of it was produced together in a single lifetime. Cluny's walls were expanded to house 1,000 until 10,000 two centuries later.
The temple is about twice the size of St. Peter's Square.
Why are you making it a competition though? I'm not the disrespectful anon.
>Why are you making it a competition though?
I'm making it a competition? I replied to "*BTFOs your pathetic church 100 years earlier*"
Lurking, I didn't think anyone would rise to such 80 IQ bait. Everyone here knows European architecture is on a pedestal.
>European architecture is on a pedestal.
It really isn't.
It is. Europe has the most tourism of any region. Everyone realizes this implicitly, and attempts to smear it are still obviously contrarian. Forty years from now when swarthoids burned down a good chunk of Europe, I would definitely understand rushing into baits from slimy lizard people trying to spoil Europe.
That's not because they have superior architecture lmao More like safer, more prosperous, and tourist friendly. moron..
no moron europes architecture is photographed more than any other
wanna change the situation you ugly untermensch? stop being a shithead and help your shithole gain prosperity and building projects
There are so many factors that go into that besides quality lmao
but europe is quality you ugly moron. they didnt learn from euclid for nothing. can you explain why even east asian and sea diaspora vacation to and photograph western architecture more than their own?
Larger media coverage and economic relevancy.
so why do you keep beating around the bush ignoring that european architecture is generally better? vaults disperse heat and are more generally useful than domes or the strained chambers of sea architecture. european architecture has good decoration that isnt the empty busyness of hindu art. do you have good points on what makes non-european architecture better? im the angkor wat defender btw, it well earned its logically sound reputation as the world's most massive religious building.
You haven't provided any evidence other than "its more popular". I'm not even saying European architecture is inferior, just that it isn't necessarily superior
i literally did, and medieval european architecture is generally superior. read the post you quoted. you suffer from great denial.
vaults are a superior medieval technology, not just for reasons i already said, but because they also disperse respiration/humidity and light more effectively.
The most impressive European structure is the colosseum. Most of the churches aren't even a thousand years old. Look at how fragile Notre Dame is
Was it like that at the time? For all you know it was improved over the centuries.
>Was it like that at the time?
Obviously not. That's why it's a shitty comparison
Another amazing thing about Angkor wat is that it was built over the span of like 60 years while churches like the Lincoln cathedral took 3 centuries
Nice bait
They are tho
>You know that’s not what I meant, too. These structures are more impressive than any European church
European churches were constructed using many blocks of stone, which were carved, moved into place, and finished, creating very large, very high, domes and walls, which defy the strength of the material for the size.
The Indian structures, and mostly heavily carved stone structures, made from stone such as granite, which is significantly harder than the stone types used in Europe, but which is also structurally way stronger and more resilient.
In some cases the Indian temples were carved out of the “living rock” rather than constructed of multiple blocks.
It’s sort of a toss up which is more impressive.
Engineering wise, I would say the European buildings.
Workmanship wise, the granite is more impressive.
yeah but hindu architecture has evil themes. they represent chaotic gods and degenerate tier sex which is the mindset that led to india being such a shithole in the first place. i think you have a point in the energy and workmanship required for them, but aesthetically the victor is europe.
It's a jungle when it isn't settled, moron. Any area will grow into forest unless it's too cold or dry unless it's actively kept otherwise.
>What's a Kulturbund
For whatever reason they survived better over there.
These civilizations would figure out how to clear jungle for farmland and it could be very productive per acre leading to a very dense population, due to trade influence from China and India they would quickly figure out exquisite architecture like this.
However eventually the gravy train would run out. The jungle root system traps a lot of water while the countless millions of trees help water evaporate, it effectively creates its own rainfall, but only on this huge scale, as the jungles recede so does this water recycling, if there is a drought the entire area just dries out. To make matters worse most of their crops require ample water, rice or in the case of the Maya who suffered a similar fate, maize.
Just like that it is over, the famine becomes apocalyptic and agriculture does not recover until the jungles do, leaving behind majestic ruins.
This happened to the Nazcas.
Those guys lived in a desert and got fricked by el nino, nothing to do with jungle
Thank you if true.
>The jungle root system traps a lot of water while the countless millions of trees help water evaporate, it effectively creates its own rainfall, but only on this huge scale, as the jungles recede so does this water recycling, if there is a drought the entire area just dries out. To make matters worse most of their crops require ample water, rice or in the case of the Maya who suffered a similar fate, maize.
They had to have cut tens of thousands of acres if not one hundred thousand to have that kind of effect. They managed to do that with stone tools? I think you're overestimating how much land they cleared.
>They managed to do that with stone tools?
They burnt the forest, anon... The quickest way to profit yourself with fertile fields from ashes, but also the quickest way to demise
https://www.historymuseum.ca/cmc/exhibitions/civil/maya/mmc12eng.html#:~:text=The%20Maya%20created%20arable%20land,beans,%20squash,%20and%20tobacco.
Why should we assume that's what happened though? There are shitloads of other reasons for collapse or abandonment.
But aren't rainforests some of the most infertile biomes ever?
>so much
There's not
>a fricking jungle island
those jungles were long became paddy fields.
this destroys whitoid headcanon about muh backward nonwhites
Cool, now show us africa in the 700s
not the person you replied to, but none of these were created by blacks/bantoids
Mental health and neuropsychological assessment of the typical politically incorrect poster.
Pepe Frog, MD, MPH, PhD, Wojak Feel Guy,MD, PhD
University of Meme,Kek State
Every three or four threads created on the board you will find one discussing blacks and even threads having nothing to do with them will oftentimes have some anon/anons who have them on the brain.Behind all the hate, behind all the monkey and KANGZ memes,Tyrone sheeit comics,gifs,demotivational pictures, and webms - /misc/ users secretly admire the Black.The raw brass confident masculinity that they possess which they are quick to compare to a feral animal,and yet at the same time acknowledge is what women truly desire at their core and what is lacking in many white heterosexual unions.Their intrinsic ruggedness that enables them to stamp their mark on any field of physical activity that they enter.The amazing sense of rhythm that they naturally seem to possess that they liken to ape gesticulations and yet are oh so majestic to witness.Then there is the stereotype of the black man's sexuality,particularly his phallus.It has become a bodily protuberance of myth and legend.There is a reason that r/AsianMasculinity trolls are laughed off while BBC and Blacked generates anger and solemn disdain.For where the asian man's masculinity is considered a joke the black man's is a threat to be taken with utmost seriousness,for there may be a kernel of truth to it.Is it a coincidence that of all the races of men it is the black man whose masculinity has become a meme? Based on our assessment,Dr. Wojak and I have thus concluded that /misc/ is a board populated with manic depressive autistic schizoid individuals afflicted with a sort of Jungian-Pavlovian psychopathological Black-complex.
American culture is centered around Black folk. They have holidays for Black folk. They killed hundreds of thousands of white men to free Black folk. They listen to Black person music. They elect a Black person as their president. They dress and act like Black folk. They draw the entirety of their modern culture from Black folk. They post sassy gifs about Black folk. They watch sportsball in worship of Black folk. Their biggest event of the year involves throwing parties in honor of Black folk playing sports. They use Black person slang like "bruh" and "thot". When you say "Martin Luther" they're not thinking of the father of protestantism. They're thinking of the Black person. Their cities are completely overrun with Black folk. They worship their ZOGbot police force disproportionately filled with Black folk and their global police force of soldiers filled with Black folk. Their men sit around watching Black person ball while their women sit around watching Black person talk shows. They worship Black folk like Muhammad Ali and Michael Jordan and Michael Jackson and the late Mike Tyson while attacking the whites who actually built their country before Black folk took over. Their movies are filled with Black folk and their music charts are topped by Black folk. They send Black folk to the Olympics and celebrate when the Black folk win because those Black folk are true red blooded american Black folk. They watch Black person porn to a point where "BBC" does not make them think of an international media company but about Black person penises instead. They will tell you how much they hate Black folk and how the mutt's law meme is a stale joke and they are just pretending to love Black folk but the evidence speaks for itself in that America has always been and will be a nation of Black person loving Black folk.
Meds
cope.
>late mike tyson
typical out of the loop homosexual. If whites are such bawds for black culture, then can you really call them the superior race? Don't even start with blaming israelites, considering whites are supposed to be better than them too.
>"american..."
>m-muh whites!
you will never move the goalpost.
im not reading your essays
just want to call you guys perma virgin homosexuals
>literally called black by neighbors
>bantoid
Literally pseudo science
Nubians aren't black? Do you know what Sudan means?
Lmao cope
yes and? they are in africa and are from the 700s
>build useless megastructures
>Economic black hole
>civilizational collapse
>Megastructures assimilated by nature
>rinse and repeat
Wow you sure showed us
>build useless megastructures
>Economic black hole
>civilizational collapse
>Megastructures assimilated by nature
literally yurop
>Megastructures assimilated by nature
Roman remains were still occupied by people. Nice try though
Rome was practically a ghost city from the 5th Century to the 19th. It had a population of 50,000 from the 5th Century to the 16th, then only modestly growing to 150k by Italy's unification... which was only 15% of its peak.
I can imagine the weed growth... What magnificent ruins though...
That wasn’t useless. A temple basically no one gets to use is pretty useless you’re bringing in lots of pilgrims.
I only think that Black folk are backward for your information.
>Asians are advanced too
We have known this since Japan humiliated Russia in 1905
>How the frick did they do it?
Indian influence brought knowledge
Maybe they had a large, populous and sophisticated civilised culture with things like infrastructure and division of labor?
You know, the way humans do?
You know those creatures with prefrontal cortexes and posable thumbs
Humans, right?
Those bipedal creatures that tend to build things and manufacture tools and have organised societies and fight wars and such
Do you anons even know how many years a day lasts?
It used to be a biochemical spaceship. The natives found its carcass and decided to eat its meat, so they covered it in stones in order to keep it refrigerated. The stone structure imitates the spines of the dead alien ship.
I actually unironically believe you.
All ancient starter civs were r1b aryans
>bigger = better
materialists are just shills for americanism
Java has been the most densely populated region of the world for a long, long time.
And historically one of the richest.
Spices, until the 17th Century were more portable and valuable than gold.
It's less impressive when you've been there and realize those aren't actual domes topping some impressive, tall-ceiling interior, but just rounded rocks on top of other rocks. It's a big pile of nicely decorated rocks with a small niche of an interior with a pretty low ceiling. If you were to look at a floor plan of the interior the vast majority of it would be taken up by the wall thickness.
It's impressive logistically and in terms of decorative craftsmanship, not so much in terms of architecture or engineering.
There must have been a ruling caste that was at least party-white.
Only whites construct epic architecture, if you ever see epic architecture anywhere, especially anything that contains or requires STRAIGHT LINES, that means it was constructed with native workers working under white overseers and project managers. From the Pyramids on down.
If you see a straight line in architecture, that's the tell-tale sign that white people designed it and ordered it to be built.
ok moron
A lot of monkey-peoples across the world trace their culture to a time when whites ruled over their ancestors.
Japan, China, Korea, all of these "Asian" cultures have ancient white origins. The white people either left, were killed off, or simply outbred themselves, and the ruling castes of these cultures now are maybe only 1-2% white.
Let's indulge ourselves a little in your moronation. How do you explain mesoamerican and andean civilizations then?
How do YOU explain the fact that their Creation Myths agree with what I said and not with what you are arguing?
What did they do when bearded white men with steel armor and weapons came walking up to them?
"Oh wow, look who's back! It's the Gods our ancient ancestors worshiped, the ones who gave us our way of life and everything we know."
>thread about thailand
>turns to be another africa hate thread
I genuinely understand that but could you guys stop remembering me Africa is a thing? I come to this site trying to forget it
>*BTFOs your pathetic church 100 years earlier*
IDK what race typed this but they're moronic. Could be SEA, could be white looking for a stick to beat others with. Christianity has been the more consistent inspirer of holy architecture in history, and the religious spirit of either civilization would frown on such barbaric behavior.
The Southeast Asian Islands aren't like smoll pacific Islands like Hawaii or some shiet. They're bigass places that allow for a big population to expand.
And Indonesia's Java & Sumatra Islands are home to enough fricking floodplains to feed a huge population of ricefarming Austronesians building discount Pajeet maritime empires.
they actually washed themselves unlike poos. either india nor indos built real maritime empires
Define real my beloved nobody.
They didn't.
Prior to the 1960s, history, anthropology, and archaelogy were fields led by white men who put forward the common sense
IF a people were capable of creating a level of civilization they would maintain or exceed this degree of civility in modernity.
IF a people were savages squatting on a past civilization's lands then there must have been a different people living there prior to them.
It's a very recent, kosher nonsense to consider civilization some spontaneously emergent property completely divorced from the people manifesting it.
Who did then, smartass. Aliens?
>were fields led by white men who put forward the common sense
Alright then motherfricker
>One of these temples, a rival to that of Solomon, and erected by some ancient Michelangelo, might take an honorable place beside our most beautiful buildings. It is grander than anything left to us by Greece or Rome
This was written by a white, western famous archeologist from the 19th century.
i feel like this is a "pretending to be moronic" bait to spark discussion
indonesians and cambodians are genetically the same people as the people who built those monuments
>we could totally still make awesome monuments
>we just choose not to
youre moronic. malaysians built petronas towers. youre a stupid Black person if you dont think its an awesome monument
The architect was a italian Argentine.
lmao so moron? and pelli got his concepts from a muslim, fazlur khan. pelli also consulted with the malaysian government for ideas which is why its islamic in design.
Aliens.
>thread about indonesian civilization
>gets twisted into racebaiting and some obsessed moron somehow brings "muh Black folk" into it
Sigh
they were barbaric savages in mud huts before the big brahmin wiener came from india and gave them civilization.
>produce incredible works of architecture
>become Islamic
>culture becomes completely sterile
Many such cases.
the blue mosque is one of the world's treasures
also modern islamic architecture has some wonderful pieces. i leave muslims to post pics and back that.