And it's hilarious how it backfired because it inadvertently elevated "Christian" time keeping to the standard worldwide time keeping system that everyone uses.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I mean, I don't think they care so much about what the date marked, just what Anno Domini implies, its like if a muslim had to right "muhammad wasn't a real prophet" every time they wanted to keep track of a year. Christian calendar keeping was bound to take hold more due to the industrial revolution's global standardization rather then what a few israeli dudes were writing in their small little intellectual groups,
2 years ago
Anonymous
Oh I know that, I know that the BCE/CE categories are also Christian in origin, I just find it funny that israeli and secular academics, in order to make time-keeping more "secular and and objective" ended up making Christian time keeping the base standard and made it inescapable.
If you REALLY wanted to get rid of the Christian system completely you'd have to get rid of the Before/After categories altogether and start over counting from another point in time.
2 years ago
Anonymous
We could call it year zero maybe..? Oh wait…
2 years ago
Anonymous
I've only ever seen people online get angry about it, that's because people in the real world don't get to be autistic spergs like that.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nobody in the real world uses BCE or CE so why would they get mad?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Backfired
If it did, why does it trigger you though?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Because morons like you still posture as if you're le dunking on le heckin Christians?
One of my teachers in college warned us that he would deduct one point from your grade if we wrote papers using the BC/AD categories.
2 years ago
Anonymous
2 years ago
Anonymous
"in god we trust"
i'm sure you'd have a decent case in supreme court about killing that guy for national security.
2 years ago
Anonymous
He sounds like a royal c**t, I would have used BC and AD just out of pure spite and accept my point deduction gladly.
2 years ago
Anonymous
this is the gayest thing a college professor has ever done in recorded history
2 years ago
Anonymous
>In the year of our Lord, Protector and Saviour Jesus Christ, 1337, began the hundred years war >Don't lose a point as no 'AD' written, so you win on technicality
2 years ago
Anonymous
>anecdotal evidence
Ignored
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I've never seen X >I have >it doesn't count
Dumbass.
Which is funny because they still use the Jesus dating. It's literal semantic seething from israelites kvetching over the terms "Before Christ" and "Anno Domini" being blasphemous to their beliefs.
>after/before the year of our lawd jesus christus third of the trinity and son of virgin maria (pbuh) (saw) (ra) >*yeshua ben pantera was born in this year btw
VS >common ere/before common era
keep seething. all academic publications use common era
it's irrelevant. the point of common era is that this is the commonly used date system. if we kept using AUC then it also would have been common era.
the point of using CE instead of AD is to not praise some dead rabbi every time dates are mentioned
>the point of using CE instead of AD is to not praise some dead rabbi every time dates are mentioned
Which is entirely irrelevant if we're still counting years by the amount of time since that rabbi's birth.
2 years ago
Anonymous
yeshu wasn't born on 1/1/1. even if he was, i am not calling him a lord
2 years ago
Anonymous
What do you call someone whose name is Domini
2 years ago
Anonymous
his name is Yeshua ben Yosef. only chriscucks call him lord
daily reminder this is being actively pushed by Asian & South Asian academia. It's going to be commonplace soon and there's nothing you can do about it.
>malding over 1 letter
The whole change is started over atheists malding about the calendar starting with the birth of Jesus.
Actually, I believe it was israeli Historians who started to use it first(for obvious reasons) and then seeped into secular and atheist academics.
And it's hilarious how it backfired because it inadvertently elevated "Christian" time keeping to the standard worldwide time keeping system that everyone uses.
I mean, I don't think they care so much about what the date marked, just what Anno Domini implies, its like if a muslim had to right "muhammad wasn't a real prophet" every time they wanted to keep track of a year. Christian calendar keeping was bound to take hold more due to the industrial revolution's global standardization rather then what a few israeli dudes were writing in their small little intellectual groups,
Oh I know that, I know that the BCE/CE categories are also Christian in origin, I just find it funny that israeli and secular academics, in order to make time-keeping more "secular and and objective" ended up making Christian time keeping the base standard and made it inescapable.
If you REALLY wanted to get rid of the Christian system completely you'd have to get rid of the Before/After categories altogether and start over counting from another point in time.
We could call it year zero maybe..? Oh wait…
I've only ever seen people online get angry about it, that's because people in the real world don't get to be autistic spergs like that.
Nobody in the real world uses BCE or CE so why would they get mad?
>Backfired
If it did, why does it trigger you though?
Because morons like you still posture as if you're le dunking on le heckin Christians?
I’ve never seen a non Christian get mad at the use of AD and BC, but I can’t say the same for Christians
One of my teachers in college warned us that he would deduct one point from your grade if we wrote papers using the BC/AD categories.
"in god we trust"
i'm sure you'd have a decent case in supreme court about killing that guy for national security.
He sounds like a royal c**t, I would have used BC and AD just out of pure spite and accept my point deduction gladly.
this is the gayest thing a college professor has ever done in recorded history
>In the year of our Lord, Protector and Saviour Jesus Christ, 1337, began the hundred years war
>Don't lose a point as no 'AD' written, so you win on technicality
>anecdotal evidence
Ignored
>I've never seen X
>I have
>it doesn't count
Dumbass.
Which is funny because they still use the Jesus dating. It's literal semantic seething from israelites kvetching over the terms "Before Christ" and "Anno Domini" being blasphemous to their beliefs.
>Big wiener Era
>BCE
Before Christ's Era
>CE
Christ's Era
Seethe, fedoras.
>after/before the year of our lawd jesus christus third of the trinity and son of virgin maria (pbuh) (saw) (ra)
>*yeshua ben pantera was born in this year btw
VS
>common ere/before common era
keep seething. all academic publications use common era
what does that even mean bro
Appeal to Authority
That's cool. What was the event that separates the common era from the pre-common era?
Birth of John the Baptist
trump lost
No idea. it's not the birth of yeshua ben pantera
it's irrelevant. the point of common era is that this is the commonly used date system. if we kept using AUC then it also would have been common era.
the point of using CE instead of AD is to not praise some dead rabbi every time dates are mentioned
>the point of using CE instead of AD is to not praise some dead rabbi every time dates are mentioned
Which is entirely irrelevant if we're still counting years by the amount of time since that rabbi's birth.
yeshu wasn't born on 1/1/1. even if he was, i am not calling him a lord
What do you call someone whose name is Domini
his name is Yeshua ben Yosef. only chriscucks call him lord
for me, it's AB URBE CONDITA
>Before Chud Era
>Chud Era
BBC
daily reminder this is being actively pushed by Asian & South Asian academia. It's going to be commonplace soon and there's nothing you can do about it.
Before Christ's Era
Christ's Era
The only solution is to adopt the French Republican calendar, making this year 223.
The Juche calendar must be adopted. It is currently Juche 111
>Before the Christian Era
>Christian Era
What's the problem again?