Do NetBSD devs feel butthurt that a man they banished from their project succeeded more? Does it mean he was right and they were wrong?
Graph is relevant, but "success" is also about the wide adoption of CopeBSD packages like OpenSSH.
Do NetBSD devs feel butthurt that a man they banished from their project succeeded more?
I will call it a success when I can run FreeBSD on raspbery pi without ethernet cable
right now I'm stuck with arch linux
What an astonishing waste of quads.
Just remember kids, you're arguing about which flavor of BSD is the most popular with the 0.0000000001% of computer users who install a *BSD.
>I'm stuck with arch
>you're arguing about which flavor of BSD
?
>posts in a thread with a graph of *BSD users
>WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I CAN'T INSTALL THIS HOBBYIST OS WITH NO DRIVERS TO MY RASPBERRY PI! WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!
>what do you mean this thread is about BSD?
Now we know the severe level of brain damage the average BSD user must experience to subject themselves to this idiocy.
I CAN'T INSTALL THIS HOBBYIST OS WITH NO DRIVERS TO MY RASPBERRY PI!
What does Linux have to do with NetBSD?
BSD is a meme for trannies who want to feel more special than Linux users
It has no actual advantages
nice digits
Which one is CopeBSD? Free?
Open as in "open as a beer".
What the frick does "open beer" mean?
OpenBSD is free software, and thr project is staunchly anti-open source.
buy a bottle of beer, open it and leave it outside in the sun for a week, come back and taste it, that's open beer
>free software
I don't feel free, when I can't install FreeBSD on my old laptop.
now that I think about it, I have same issue with "free" phone ROMS which I can't install on my phone...
Just like with linux you are free to do it, but it won't work
works on my machine
Holy cope.
>קָדוֹשׁ
But I installed Linux successfully after FleeBSD failed.
>OpenBSD is free software
Other than the license, sure.
OpenBSD is released without license, zoom zoom, it only has a free software copyright statement.
freeBSD always seemed nice
kys troon
BSD devs give exactly zero shits about how many people use their OS. Hell, the more exclusive the better. Go use Leenux. We don't want you.
FreeBSD devs seem to care a whole lot judging by their screeds
Probably not a coincidence that it's the most popular one
the graph is from 2005 btw
NetBSD has kernel-level lua scripting, bluetooth support, a sound server, amazing portability (clear distinction between MD code and MI code), rump kernels, journaled filesystem with TRIM support, kernel built-in mixer (goodbye sndio, pulseaudio and all this crap) and much more
What useful feature does openbsd has ?
>bluetooth support
explains why noone uses it
>What useful feature does openbsd has ?
I don't care, I'm asking about "success"?
oh ok then. windows is much more successful than openbsd. qed.
Yeah, they have their "banisment" case with Valve, which will soon beat Windows with its Arch-based OS.
By that metric: Windows 7.
The same amount of butthurt the freebsd Black folk feel for macos I presume
Don't care, I use Haiku
Don't care about hipsters, suffer.