It makes no difference. Sure it “looks” smoother, but the window is still blurry when moving. It still leaves a “trail” while moving. It’s a meme. The only thing that is worth it is 4k IMO. Granted I’ve never had 240hz, just 144hz.
In all honesty, going from a galaxy s21 ultra to the new iPhone SE 2022, I didn't notice at all. I mean I thought I would. The 60hz on the s21 seemed choppy. 60hz is fine and you don't need 144hz.
That does not mean that a 120hz refresh rate does not look different from 60hz to the human eye though. I grew up poor and didn't experience 120hz on a screen until I bought my first decent TV at 18 or so - watched Breaking Bad in 120hz and thought something was wrong at first, like they had accidentally uploaded unprocessed footage for that episode, it looked too fast/uncanny somehow. So yeah nah there is a difference, I felt that way before I had any idea what was causing it.
It's most likely because your TV created new frames and interpolated them there instead of multiplying them and slightly speeding up.
24x5=120 basically there would be no need to speed it up at all, just multiply the frames and it will look smooth af.
You might not be able to control this process from the TV's menu but you can plug it to your computer and use MPV or a player that allows you granular control and has various ways of dealing with frames.
Almost all early 120Hz TV's did so through interpolation, anon.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>create 5x the frames >its better somehow
Why don't they just make movies 120 fps then. Even if they only record at 24 I'm sure their interpolation technology could do better than your old tv
I don't really notice the difference in regular tasks between my 144hz 1440p home monitor and the 1080p 60hz monitor at work, besides the work one being smaller.
Only reason to get a 144hz monitor is gaming and maybe animation(?). Anyone claiming otherwise is just a moron trying to cope with his buyers remorse by getting others to spend money on shit they don't need.
>Only reason to get a 144hz monitor is gaming and maybe animation(?).
Yes for movies or animation or the fact that some animations in video games are created at 120 fps.
But 72fps is enough for movies, it's 3x24 and it makes the playback seem smooth af.
I didn't notice either. It's because some people have really slow cursors speeds so they notice it.
Mine's just set to fastest i can get away with so its always snapping to places in both screens.
Makes absolutely no difference whatsoever unless you play vidya games. I cope with the feeling by being a fricking adult who doesn't play children's games. You could give that a shot.
It's an immediately noticeable difference when you just move the mouse across the screen.
>children's games
Most video games are not made for children and I'm tired of zoomers constantly trying to virtue signal and talk themselves up by posting this shit.
>loonixtroon sour grapes, s31e2^19937-1
There is nothing remotely adult about every single one of your posts on this pit of your board featuring blistering seethe that people do shit that you can't.
On CRTs anything below 75hz would make my eyes hurt after a while but I don't notice it at all on flat panels. Nowadays it really just seems to be a way to get something useful out of games running above 60fps.
same. i have a 75hz v
capae one, i use x config to swtich it back to 59.0hz like a true sigma. our eyes cant se emore then 60 fps anyway, i use fps max 59 in games too. thats how big of a chad i am
what feeling?
Everything looking and feeling objectively worse from your eyes to input lag when you go from high Hz back down to 60.
It makes no difference. Sure it “looks” smoother, but the window is still blurry when moving. It still leaves a “trail” while moving. It’s a meme. The only thing that is worth it is 4k IMO. Granted I’ve never had 240hz, just 144hz.
Didn't notice
by not going back down to 60hz obviously
It's noticeable but doesn't really matter after 1 minute of switching
In all honesty, going from a galaxy s21 ultra to the new iPhone SE 2022, I didn't notice at all. I mean I thought I would. The 60hz on the s21 seemed choppy. 60hz is fine and you don't need 144hz.
I honestly don't see any difference between my gf's 1440p 144Hz monitor and my 15 year-old Dell 1600x1200@60 display.
gf male or gf female
I don't have autism i can adapt easily
I feel the change instantly and I don't care about it. 60 fps is not a problem.
I just don't care. ooh the mouse cursor is ghosting, big deal.
Humans can only see 30fps per eyeball
finally some actual science.
That does not mean that a 120hz refresh rate does not look different from 60hz to the human eye though. I grew up poor and didn't experience 120hz on a screen until I bought my first decent TV at 18 or so - watched Breaking Bad in 120hz and thought something was wrong at first, like they had accidentally uploaded unprocessed footage for that episode, it looked too fast/uncanny somehow. So yeah nah there is a difference, I felt that way before I had any idea what was causing it.
It's most likely because your TV created new frames and interpolated them there instead of multiplying them and slightly speeding up.
24x5=120 basically there would be no need to speed it up at all, just multiply the frames and it will look smooth af.
You might not be able to control this process from the TV's menu but you can plug it to your computer and use MPV or a player that allows you granular control and has various ways of dealing with frames.
Almost all TV and Movies are shot at 24fps anon
Almost all early 120Hz TV's did so through interpolation, anon.
>create 5x the frames
>its better somehow
Why don't they just make movies 120 fps then. Even if they only record at 24 I'm sure their interpolation technology could do better than your old tv
I don't really notice the difference in regular tasks between my 144hz 1440p home monitor and the 1080p 60hz monitor at work, besides the work one being smaller.
Only reason to get a 144hz monitor is gaming and maybe animation(?). Anyone claiming otherwise is just a moron trying to cope with his buyers remorse by getting others to spend money on shit they don't need.
>Only reason to get a 144hz monitor is gaming and maybe animation(?).
Yes for movies or animation or the fact that some animations in video games are created at 120 fps.
But 72fps is enough for movies, it's 3x24 and it makes the playback seem smooth af.
I didn't notice either. It's because some people have really slow cursors speeds so they notice it.
Mine's just set to fastest i can get away with so its always snapping to places in both screens.
You get used to it after a day or two.
Makes absolutely no difference whatsoever unless you play vidya games. I cope with the feeling by being a fricking adult who doesn't play children's games. You could give that a shot.
oooooh im so mature i spend my free time on 4chink
this
spend your free time doing extra unpaid hours for Schlomo, that's Maturity
It's an immediately noticeable difference when you just move the mouse across the screen.
>children's games
Most video games are not made for children and I'm tired of zoomers constantly trying to virtue signal and talk themselves up by posting this shit.
There's nothing wrong with video games being made for children.
Stop being a schizophrenic millennial.
>loonixtroon sour grapes, s31e2^19937-1
There is nothing remotely adult about every single one of your posts on this pit of your board featuring blistering seethe that people do shit that you can't.
when you move your cursor, the difference is very noticeable. don't worry, though. it doesn't get any better. stop using your mouse and stop gaming
On CRTs anything below 75hz would make my eyes hurt after a while but I don't notice it at all on flat panels. Nowadays it really just seems to be a way to get something useful out of games running above 60fps.
just adapt to it Black person, what else are you going to do?
120hz is a meme
I WILL STAY AT 60HZ FOREVER
same. i have a 75hz v
capae one, i use x config to swtich it back to 59.0hz like a true sigma. our eyes cant se emore then 60 fps anyway, i use fps max 59 in games too. thats how big of a chad i am
60Hz looks smooth with black frame insertion if you can handle the flickering.
you'll get used to it in a couple of weeks
I see no difference
t. have both
I even notice 144 to 120... I have a 240hz TV for gayming and I also notice it... where is the limit?