Hey all you atheists. Despite all your wrong doings, God still loves you and will welcome you with open arms if you come to him.
 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
|
Hey all you atheists. Despite all your wrong doings, God still loves you and will welcome you with open arms if you come to him.
Cool. Your consciousness will cease to exist when you die.
I hear your pain. Jesus heals.
I disagree with this notion, because atheists don't actually commune with the divine so they're probably not going to be saved.
The passage of the prodigal son debunks this.
Everyone is welcomed at his table. Even those who leave it, as long as they come back asking for forgiveness.
How do I come to God, when I deny the truth and righteous?
The idea of God can be overwhelming. Even deadly if approached incorrectly. the men who entered the tabernacle in an improper manner died and Remember that the people of Israel were scared by God’s presence at mountain sinai.
It’s because God is the ‘summum bonum’. The ultimate good. So the closer you get to him the more evident your inadequacies become. But Jesus has a way to help you come closer to god’s grace by teaching you little by little how to become worthy of being in heaven.
You have to be humble enough to see the true potential in you. How much more you can do to make the world a better place.
I want to challenge God to a fist fight for shit's and giggles though
>God loves you
>Those bad things happening to you? They’re actually good things in disguise! You’ll understand in the future! This is totally not a cope!
You have no proof otherwise.
>What punishments of God are not gifts?
well he has to love somebody when all of his worshippers are pedophilic self-mutilators
The atheist worldview isnt free from this either.
>atheism is a rejection of a claim
And with that rejection you indirectly claim everything opposite to it, and other things such as subjective morality and no good or bad.
At. the very least, christianity condemns those things even if some of its worshippers do them. So tell me what's worse? Atheistic morality where they wont even acknowledge that it's good or bad, or christianity where even if they do it, they atleast acknowledge the evil.
The atheistic worldview is the psychopathic one.
oh yes please talk down to me about your morality of hypocrisy, you mutilated pedophile. its so nice having a moral system you can use to judge everyone else, but when you disobey it, hey at least you have the moral system!
>The atheistic worldview is the psychopathic one.
no, the israelite homosexual pedo slave worldview is the psychopathic one, because every single one of you animals is constantly amazed by the atheist ability to maintain morality without the fear of god over their head - if you ever accepted there was no god, you psychopaths would rape and pillage and cannibalize and rampage all around you, because you never developed a real sense of morality, just a fear of a magical sky fairy
>oh yes please talk down to me about your morality of hypocrisy, you mutilated pedophile
Imagine being made so angry by being told that someone loves you that you write and post something this vile
Imagine being called out as a follower of a religion of mutilated pedophiles, responding with "w-well at least we have morality!", and then in response to getting BTFO AGAIN saying "a-all i did was say god loves you, im a good guy, you're a meanie head :("
I think it's pretty psychopathic when the judeo-christian god murders Job's entire family and christcucks try to defend it by saying Job got twice as many family members afterwards
No, it's because Job gets to experience infinite pleasure in heaven alongside kids with cancer.
I shoved a frog up the anus of Christ, will God forgive this transgression?
But which god? What is the One True Religion™
The one with the strongest case. Christianity.
>The public told everyone what they saw
If the public being individuals who were already disciples of Christ then sure.
I always found real interesting that the Romans have ZERO(0) reports or records of zombies in Jerusalem or Peter and Paul going all around Rome and Greece performing exorcisms and miraculously healing people
I'm not sure how many of them were Christians but that's pretty irrelevant if you think about it. Jesus appeared to 5000 people, and they all described the exact same thing with no contradictions. To write it off as a mass hallucination or lie is impractical.
>I'm not sure how many of them were Christians but that's pretty irrelevant if you think about it. Jesus appeared to 5000 people, and they all described the exact same thing with no contradictions.
Where are their accounts?
>oh we don't have them silly atheist, don't you know not everyone back then could read and write?
What primary accounts do we have of writers who interacted with them?
>Oh, the bible of course, written by followers of Jesus, and they would of course have no reason to misrepresent anything!
Any other accounts?
>Well... no. But it's still real, we have 5000 accounts with no contradictions!
Do christians really?
We do have other accounts though. The canonical books where the accounts of the apostles just get the most attention.
>We do have other accounts though.
Besides Josephus relating the beliefs of early christians in the resurrection, you have zero other accounts - which is why you will not name a single one, but will say "w-we have dozens of accounts, no really, we do, believe me!!!"
Gnostics? Even though what they believed is heretical they acknowledge everything else about christ. They also wrote down their accounts.
>they were later in 1st century.
They could still very well be alive when jesus was.
Go ahead and name them.
>Christ rose from a public tomb publicly.
No, he didn't. All of the canonical Gospels record the tomb being found already empty.
>Christ publicly showed himself to the public.
According to Paul. There is no reason to believe this happened unless you think Paul was inspired.
>How other religions started
Tons of religious texts record public miracles and visions. Historians take them just as seriously as they take things like the Resurrection and the appearance to the 500.
Do you have anything to back up your claims? Verses perhaps?
The demigod achilles publicly, in front of two armies of thousands of soldiers each, showed off his invulnerability before the gods struck him down with an arrow to the heel.
Greek paganism is the one true religion.
Based real Christian.
>no buttsex!
If this post exists, then your God is not real/weaker than me
You cultists are so annoying, ffs.
If the sight of the cross annoys you then that's something to be concerned about. One can look at a lunatic and be entertained and be on their way, but to look at it and feel anger is not a rational response in most cases.
I'm not saying you're possibly being influenced by something demonic but...
>If the sight of the cross annoys you
Read the post again more carefully this time. This moronicness typical of you people is also why you're annoying.
>Read the post again more carefully this time
You are made irrationally angry by any discussion of Christianity in a positive light. Seems pretty cut and dry to me
>You are made irrationally angry by any discussion of Christianity in a positive light.
Wrong again, moron.
Look at what you're doing right now. The OP was a post made in good faith because he wants to help you and people like you, and here you are responding like this
>Look at what you're doing right now.
Expressing how annoying you people are?
>The OP was a post made in good faith
I didn't say it wasn't. I said you're annoying. Illiteracy is a b***h.
>I said you're annoying
So you're irrationally annoyed by Christianity
>You are annoyed when we spam christcuck apologetics on a history and humanities board?
>Clearly, you are the irrational one for not believing in bearded men in the sky. Also, you're probably the devil.
Where are the apologetics? I only said Jesus loves you. The anger is coming from you, friend, and I'm only responding with the truth. Religion falls under humanities as well.
I read your post, and you claim we "cultists" annoy you. Cultists isnt the proper term, cultism needs the factor of a small group of people. But I digress, you claim we annoy you, and if our faith annoys you then the metaphor of "the sight of the cross" is valid, it's a euphemism for our faith. It isnt rational to be angry at someone's beliefs unless you've had a traumatic experience. Normal people simply keep walking, but you engaged with anger.
>and if our faith annoys you then the metaphor of "the sight of the cross" is valid, it's a euphemism for our faith. It isnt rational to be angry at someone's beliefs unless you've had a traumatic experience.
Wrong, frickwad, and part of what annoys the frick out of me about you people is getting basic shit wrong like this.
That still isnt a proper justification. It doesn't make sense to start going haywire when someone tells you that someone loves you. You can simply say, "I dknt believe in that," but no you responded with viscous anger.
>It doesn't make sense to start going haywire when someone tells you that someone loves you.
Too bad that's not all that's happening disingenuous anon-kun. Endless proselytizing gets annoying after a while just like being told repeatedly God doesn't exist would get annoying for you.
DId I mention Christianity? I said YOU PEOPLE are annoying. And the fact that you people are thickheaded and can't read like you're demonstrating is part of it.
Well I'm not telling you am I? It's a post that you chose to engage with.
You write all this and you claim we're the psychopaths. Really, it's not helping your point. Atheists dont have objective morals, and they're human just like Christians so they commit the same sins they do - But Christian's recognize what they do is evil so they're arguably better people.
It doesnt have a fraction of evidence and historical validity that christ has though
>It doesnt have a fraction of evidence and historical validity that christ has though
It has one primary written account - which gives it the exact same amount of evidence as the resurrection of christ.
One primary account while christianity has many accounts, from both primary sources and secondary sources who claimed they saw these people going around talking about what they saw.
But even ignoring that, one doesnt need accounts to have evidence for Jesus christ. There is also archaelogical evidence. Tell me is there archaelogical evidence for Achilles too?
>You cannot prove the existence of god and that's the point. This is why you must have faith.
>god totally exists! Look at all the primary accounts!
Why are christoids like this?
>christianity has tons of accounts, trust me bro!
Islam has an entire dedicated set of secondary accounts for the life and sayings of Muhammad - therefore, Islam is obviously the true religion. Christianity, meanwhile, has nothing.
And besides "muh fraud of turin" there is exactly zero archaeological evidence of Jesus, not even records of an execution where he would have been killed. You have nothing.
The Quran is self defeating (look up quranic dilemena) and Muhammed's miracmes are questionable since they were written hundreds of years after his death by people who didn't know him.
Theres lots of archalepgical evidence for christ besides the shroud of turin.
We have his tomb and the pilate stone.
Wow, so the quran was written about a hundred years after muhammad's death, just like the bible? More proof Islam must be true!
>his tomb
no, we don't.
>pilate stone
it will never cease to amaze me that christians think the ability of the bible to get the name of a governor right is proof of jesus. it's absolutely baffling how desperate you are for even the slightest hint of evidence.
This is a humanities post:
>To what extent is christianity responsible for the fall of the Roman Empire?
This is christcuck apologetics, i.e not humanities:
>jesus loves you
Learn the difference and then frick off to your board
>>>/x/
No, that falls under the history part of this board. Humanities falls under the realm of philosophy, religion, arts, distinguished from the natural sciences so this post is valid. And either way, the name is loose considering the amount of unrelated topics that stay up.
Discussion of the paranormal and occultisim has nothing to do with this post, but it has everything to do with jesus aka christianity.
Nevertheless, there is a difference between humanities discussion and christcuck apologetics, and you are a christcuck apologist.
>jesus and his purported 'miracles'
>the judeo-christian god's "mysterious ways"
>not beyond the scope of scientific understanding, aka "paranormal"
OH NO NO NO
Not him but I gained a visceral aversion to Christian symbols and memes by growing up in Alabama. It wasn't trauma, just years of being tired of being around rednecks.
Wrong