Still no evolutionary explanation for this yet
Why?
 Anus Alien Shirt $21.68 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Anus Alien Shirt $21.68 |
Homosexuality
Still no evolutionary explanation for this yet
Why?
Anus Alien Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Anus Alien Shirt $21.68 |
Because evolution is random and defies the categories of rational progression that assume to be the case in nature.
It being genetic is purely an American invention and not common outside of the English speaking media sphere
No reason. I believe it is natural to explore love is many verities to explore ones self. I think everyone, even people who will try it and instantly dislike it, should at least attempt to understand or expeirence same-sex romance. That being said, I despise modern sexual identity because it simplifies sexuality and makes it condenced into mottos and symbols and lifestyles, in a similar way to modern politics. I don't think homosexuality and gayness are part-in-parcel, the Ancient Greeks and many Romans at least from the 2nd Century onwards explored homosexuality as a way to experience actual love. They didn't make it their lifestyle, and they didn't automatically assume they only loved men by having a romantic relationship with a boy, they cultivated many forms of love with boys until they either didn't want to go further or went to erotic and sexual love.
a safety check to systemic simping
it's pretty easy actually:
it's much easier evolutionarily to make a species want to frick every other member of the species than hard-coding heterosexuality into both sex, while both share most of their genome.
How do you get the males to have the horny-for-woman gene but not horny-for-men gene, and vice-versa, while also not making both genes obsolete every time there's a big evolutionary change, or when sexual dimorphism increases or decreases.
No, people and animals are bisexual on average. What preferences you have are the result of environmental influences just like your taste in pumpkin pie, despite having the same taste buds as someone who hates pumpkin pie.
It's a mental disorder, simple as that, but instead of researching for a cure we are now allowing people to cut their dicks off and pretend to be women
>homosexuality
>cut their dicks off
Jumped a rather large stepping stone there, anon. Last time I checked dick was the main element of a homosexual relationship.
I meant to say that we are treating sexual deviancy as normal instead of properly dealing with them
>sexual deviancy
Sexual imorality is one thing, but how is a non-subcultured homosexual relationship a deviancy? It was commonplace in Athens,yes, whilst practicing homosexuals also pro-created with their women, whom they did not have time for.
>mental disorder
>sexual deviancy
Those things don’t exist in the animal kingdom. We have gay people because there was some kind of evolutionary advantage to having gay people. That’s it.
>monkey frick other monkey in ass
>monkey feel good
>Reproduction is the most ancient and most selected for instinct in all life forms.
>Make sex feel very good to stimulate reproduction.
>Variability hypothesis + fisherian runaway.jpg
>You get some people that seek pleasure to a detrimental point.
Not too surprising. Prolly the reason why it exists in many other animals too. Having a tiny fraction of gay animals in your species is not enough to cause extinction and probably is correlated with the propagation of other things that are useful.
You do have to be insanely horny to be willing to die for a woman anyway. This is just the consequence.
Having a few individuals as homosexuals prevents them from reproducing and makes them potential surrogate parents for orphans.
Most gays are younger brothers. The more male children a woman has, the more the likelihood they turn out gay. That’s because the gay ones are supposed to help their non-gay siblings with child raising, help out among the wider family. That’s a huge evolutionary advantage
Nope, doesn't work. I am the eldest son and I am gay. It's all societal conditioning or molestation related
Anecdotes don't disprove data. One of the few consistent findings on the research on homosexuality is the birth order effect.
So, why do you think I'm gay then?
Because the birth order effect is a trend but not an absolute one.
There's two ways to pass on your genes, directly and indirectly. Directly is having offspring, indirectly is by investing in close kin. Homosexuality correlates with religiosity. Religious castes in many societies have higher than normal rates of homosexuality. Religion is evolutionarily adaptive by binding the group, enforcing a moral code and exhorting behaviors like procreation. Not all people who devote their lives to become a religious caste are gay, just as not all tall people are basketballers, but the trait benefits the group by indirectly passing on their genes.
The top has a slightly feminized brain and face(?) so that he's able to love a man and distinct him as a man while still penetrating him and treating him almost like a woman.
The bottom has an extremely feminized brain and face and is therefore a poor imitation of a woman.
There. There you go. Also, bottoms use their left hand, tops strictly use their right hand, and heteros also dominantly use their right hand but also use their left hand at times.
You may be surprised to learn that twinks and trannies more often than not top bulky gym chadgays
what do you mean by "evolutionary explanation"
there are tons of "flaws" in our bodies and minds, that shouldnt be a problem with evolution as you define it. humans aren't the finish line in evolution, we're the result of random mutations, like a maggot is the result of random mutations.
if we agree that being gay is 100% genetic, then it's caused by a random mutation, that will either die out in millions of years, or will find some value in reproduction and survive.
There is absolutely an evolutionary explanation, and humans aren't even the only animals where homosexual behavior is observed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kin_selection
what are you talking about. darwin didn't even know about genes. how can he explain this?