How are Germanics and Slavs related historically? Where they ever a single people?
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
How are Germanics and Slavs related historically? Where they ever a single people?
Slavs were never people, let alone a "single" people. They're just roaches that eat up resources that could be used by actual people.
Ok Hans, cope harder
>Slavs were never people, let alone a "single" people. They're just roaches that eat up resources that could be used by actual people.
>t.
Maybe Goths and Rus of Kiev is the only thing i can think of
There was probably a lot of mixing between them in todays central europe
Slavs are created by a pairing of Germanic males with Hunnic or Turkic females.
Quite the opposite, some say that the German nobles during the hunnic times would often have "asian eyes" and happa apperance due to Hunnic men often fricking german and slavic women
Atila himself had a Goth for himself
Nah, their y-DNA haplogroups are literally 100% Scandinavian. He got defeated by Goths/Gepids and then got killed and his sons also got killed. Even if people were noble they still returned favours lolol
Still coping, germanoid
Even nowadays, turks rejoyce the wonders germanic women have to share. Their warmth and their wombs to either MED BVLLS or TVRKISH KARABOGA
Yes, the huns were notorious for sexual slavery of germanic women, but ironically it was a germanic sex slave that poisoned atilla while he was passed out drunk after inseminating her multiple times...
Wrong. Slavs were created by Iranic males taking Germanic females. DNA doesn't lie.
slavs were made after swedish females were taken by subsaarian african males
'Iranic' people were perpetually enslaved by Huns and Turks until the Goths freed them.
Goths "freed" them by getting raped by the huns instead
Fact is 'Iranic' people were a complete non-entity at this time. All the politically relevant empires or states were either Turkic or Hunnic. There were Alans in Europe but they were vassals of the Goths.
This is true...about 2000 years ago lol
But from the roman times until as recently as the 1800s (when turkic institutionalized slave practices of slavs was finally abolished, it still occurs but on a far lower frequency), they were ravaged by hunnic, turkic and mongol males for thousands of years.
In fact the name "slav" itself is a result of their heritage as a slave people - this is where the english word "slave" comes from
No.
Slav means word and glory.
Slav means somebody who speaks the same language as you as opposed to say a Nimetski, such as a German, one who talks like mumbling.
SlavBlack person cope
Its the other way around.
Slavs are turkic or hunnic males + germanic females. In fact, germanic and later slavic female slavery by the turks and huns and mongols was institutionalized for thousands of years.
Germans were originally a central asian people similar to iranians but were pushed west by the huns and turks, germans have an earlier wave of significant hunnic male admixture, it was well documented by the romans that the hunnic males routinely had several germanic female sex slaves each.
The Slavic male haplogroups are all the same as Scandinavians, even the R1a clade is related Northwestern Europe and there is no Hunnic or Turkic y-DNA at all.
Where do you think R1a comes from? Scandinavia?
Like we are talking about history now you are talking about the Ice Age?
Slavs are actually sub-saharan Africans painted white.
Goyims*
did my best but I dont speak israelite
*goyim is plurar, goy is singular
>Yesssssss GOYIMS, believe the pilpul!
https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-plural-of/goy.html
Europe was inhabited by different branches of hunter gatherers who were replaced and mixed with the anatolian farmer groups who migrated into central europe. With the exception of scandinavia. The yamnaya-descended eurasians from the eastern steppe corded ware-culture then migrated into europe as well and replaced and intermixed with the already mixed-hunter gatherer/farmer populations. That formed the southern european ethnic groups, They also migrated into scandinavia but the hunter gatherers there could not be subdued and the two groups instead mixed with each other and formed the scandinavian ethnic groups who would then form the germanic ethnicity by mixing with the western europeans in germania and the baltic archipelago. The corded ware who remained in eastern europe mixed with various steppe peoples and became the slavic group, altough the ones who inhabited the baltic coast intermixed with the germanics through trade and raiding.
Swedish raiders then founded what would become the first russian dynasty so there has been significant mixing and fighting between the two. The mongols fricked everything up and permanently changed the slavs and the russians and set the two groups on different paths. But that was something they did to everyone they conquered.
you picture might imply that those languages aren't all derived of a single root language.
>Russian
>slavic
Lol
Also where is celtic or greek ?
>Russian
>slavic
>lol
yes they are moron. literally the slavest slav along with poles
They are tatar mongolic israelite mutts
Not slavs
>israelite mutts
holy shit look at that fricking beak
Funnily enough, the population with the most israeli noses (Górale or the Podhle Highlanders) was considered to be Aryan by the Nazi Germans.
Also, Yiddish is basically German in denial.
>Yiddish is basically German
Here we have another cuckold mutt thinking LANGUAGE is what matters. It doesn't
>omits the inconvenient main argument
>attacks the sidenote
You, my good sir, are indeed a /misc/ack.
My Ukrainian mother in law is also vehemently against Russians being Slavs, even going as far to say they're really Scandinavians (which they look nothing alike). Meanwhile genetic test includes the obvious, they're Slavs.
See
Indo European connection is the most likely given that genetic testing seems to imply these people were created not during the iron age but during the bronze and before the bronze age. Not that genetics have explained everything, but they're the best reference. I do feel that genetics will be less important in the future because linguists are usually vindicated about population migrations. Luwian seems to have had some sort of reverse linguistic influence on Indo European languages via the black sea rather than the Yamnaya dispersal, which I think will become outdated in the next 10 years as DNA testing gets better.
that is a terrible, horrible, moronic map
Slavs and to a lesser extent are basically the exact opposite of Latinos in Central and South America: male mongol genes + female slav/germanic genes instead of male iberian genes + female native/african genes
I think this is where the stereotype of amwf having better success than wmaf: amwf creates people like the slavs or germans whereas wmaf creates people like the mexicans or brazilians
We can't do anything if asian wymen want to rape is to death
>male mongol genes
ah yes famous mongols with european branch of R1a haplogroup
unironically yes. genghis khan's paternal line had r1a from west to east admixture
Cope
genghis was c2b
R1a aryan rulling over N1a and Q asian cattle
But the Han still won and are mutting them out of existence, like they did the Manchus.
It's because the Chinese have a borg like quality. Steppe bigger Tibet, Manchu, Black Yi, and Mongols would often prey on han but a few generations living in China completely changes them to han Chinese.
>german or slav mentioned in the op
>thread is full of rape fantasies
Please stop using this site as your autistic internet battlefield.
Both are from male Turks differentiating with different females.
>Where they ever a single people?
Yes, about 5000 years ago as shown by linguistic, archaeological and genetic evidence. Germanic and Slavic languages descend from Proto-Indo-European or even a hypothesized Proto-Northwest-Indo-European which was more recent. Their material cultures go back to the Corded Ware Culture (picrel), and their yDNA haplogroups come from R1a-Z645 which is about 5000 years old.
https://www.yfull.com/tree/R-Z645/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corded_Ware_culture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_language
Thank you. I am personally filtering posts that aren't sourced since they're usually from sub 90 IQ chimps