How common was racemixing between male colonists and natives during the time of new imperialism?
How common was racemixing between male colonists and natives during the time of new imperialism?
How common was racemixing between male colonists and natives during the time of new imperialism?
There are almost no full blooded natives left. The remaining tribes have had to repeatedly lower the threshold of native mixture for membership. They have been throughly BLEACHED.
That's in the US, there's millions of unmixed native americans in latin america, and native americans and europeans were always genetically related, so the european "admixture" in some of them might not even be post-colonial
link for this?
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figures?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093314
>and native americans and europeans were always genetically related
WE
perpetually triggered by facts, also /misc/ lives rent free if cramped in your tiny head
What evidence do you have that Native Americans are closely related to Europeans, Mr.west eurasian ANE deal with it?
Not him but Amerindians share a common ancestral population with west Eurasians, this should be common knowledge at this point:
>The fact that the first Americans were already mixed to begin with could answer these controversies, Willerslev said. Any Western Eurasian genetic signatures found in Native Americans today were previously attributed to post-1492 colonial mixing with Europeans.
>But when researchers dig into the genes of some Native American people, unexpected genes, genes with a European heritage, jump out.
>The common assumption is that these genes were picked up, mixed into the gene pool from European colonialists. But new preliminary research, reported on by Science Magazine, tells a different story. Some early Americans came not from Asia, it seems, but by way of Europe.
> It also implies that traces of European ancestry previously detected in modern Native Americans do not come solely from mixing with European colonists, as most scientists had assumed, but have much deeper roots."I'm still processing that Native Americans are one-third European, says geneticist Connie Mulligan of the University of Florida in Gainesville. It's jaw-dropping. "At the very least"
>Uses a Siberian boy born 24,000 years ago to prove this
>Is shocked to find west asian admixture
>moron doesn't know what he's talking about
Should be a bannable offense, Amerindians were always 1/3rd west Eurasian (ANE)
What about the other 2/3 bud
Siberian, and only in your strawmanning mind did I ever say "closely", but both populations are still genetically related
Africans are genetically related to Native Americans too, have fun with your WEism
If you want to move the goalpost like a fallacious moron with no arguments, then yes, all humans are genetically related, but in this case, Europeans and Amerindians are more closely related than previously thought
They are still vastly closer related to east asians.
Ever so slightly, they drifted away from both quite a long time ago and far away genetically.
They actually have practically nothing in common with east Asians, that's a moronic meme that needs to die, they're related to west Asians (eg. Siberians) and have 1/3rd ANE admixture on average
northwest Asians*
>west Eurasian (ANE)
ANE were hapas.
True, but Europeans still have significant ANE admixture
Hey fricking moron a bunch of nations below Mexico are native ameican majority.
He's talking about Black folk nobody cares about pablos
All the time.
There are no "full blooded" anyone anywhere. It's already been mathematically proven at the entire human race shares an ancestor who lived around 500 - 2500 years ago. Literally every person on Earth has ancestors who built the pyramids, tamed horses on the steppes, and cultivated rice on the Yangtze river.
>It's already been mathematically proven at the entire human race shares an ancestor who lived around 500 - 2500 years ago. L
That is just plain impossible dude. It means that no later than 500 BC there was someone who:
>A pygmy in the Congo
>An amazonian native
>A pashtun whose ancestors never left their hill village as far back as known history
>A Saami reindeer herder
>an aboringinal in Australia
>A tibetan
all had a common ancestor. The Mitochondrial Eve is from 200,000 years ago, Y-chromosomal Adam is 237,000 to 581,000 years ago. In that case it is entirely plausible, but there is absolutely no chance that the entire human race has a single common ancestor merely 2500 years ago.
What study you're referring to finds that Europeans have common ancestors. Not a single point, but rather 80% of europeans in 1000 had descendants, and each of those Europeans 1000 years ago are related to every European today.
http://www.stat.yale.edu/~jtc5/papers/Ancestors.pdf
an eskimo who lived at the time of the birth of Christ and has a living descendant is TOTALLY the ancestor of everyone alive guys trust me
He's very probably Asian. Mongolian raiders, Arab traders, et al are good occupations to achieve this outcome. At thirty generations you have over a billion maximum ancestors - obviously some branches double, but there only so many people in the world. That's only about 1000 years ago. Pocahontas lived four hundred years ago and she has over 100,000 descendants today.
big yikes, if you seriously think 2000 year old Tasmanian aborigines are everyone's ancestors just because they happen to have living descendants you need to have your head examined
Wouldn’t be surprising. We’re he to mix with other Siberian’s, their genes would have spread throughout Asia and Europe with the mongol Empire, and throughout Africa due to the Islamic trade. Then it could have gone throughout the Americas as the peoples living in Alaska and the eastern edges of Siberia did have some contact with each other
The spanish and portugese literally fricked entire races and ethnicities into extinction, leaving the mixed hispanics as their only legacy.
Very, very common. especially since most colonists were male and there was a serious shortages of females in the early colonies. The only option to sate that thirst was to get some native pussy.
>The spanish and portugese literally fricked entire races and ethnicities into extinction, leaving the mixed hispanics as their only legacy.
That's not new imperialism (19th Century -1918) though
mb
new imperialism had less "marry natives because only women available" and more "frick native women in (forced) prostitution. F.e. the French recruited indigenous women (algerians/berbers, vietnamese) for their military brothels. In Africa, there probably was some racemixing between colonial admins sent deep into the jungle and local women, but nothing on the scale of the Iberians in the age of exploration. British mixing in India plummeted in the 19th century. Where in the first centuries of the EIC, the companymen often intermarried with Indian women, this disappeared in the early 18th as attitudes changed from "we're here as equals to trade" to "silly Indians pay me moronic amounts of taxes to make me rich so I can go back home to England."
The Dutch had little mixing in Indonesia, having a very hands off colonial administration. There was some mixing, resulting in a modern day hapa diaspora in the Netherlands.
South Africa I'm not so sure about. There was mixing but I don't know how much.
this too
On a whole: still a lot of racemixing but with more domination undertones and no marriage.
I suspect improved communications and transport made it more reasonable and practical to expect even the lower ranks of the military and civil service of the colonial powers to maintain a degree of separation from local people. This wasn't as possible in the early years of imperialism (plus, it was also increasingly practical for European women to come to the colonies which wasn't as much the case in the 16th, 17th and early 18th centuries with exceptions).
You are correct. Changing opinions towards natives also play a part
Didn't paraguay had state sponsored miscegenation so that the population would homogenize? Cant speak about bolivia tho
Yeah its kind of hypocritical. But deep down all ideologies and beliefs are hypocritical about the we-they divide.
>Didn't paraguay had state sponsored miscegenation so that the population would homogenize?
For only a short period in time though. Mid-19th century Paraguay was fun.
The Bolivians and Paraguayans are still quite pure. Same with the Guatamalans. The rest are all from the seed of the Iberian bvll.
>bolivia
Literally the ugliest people in the world
>paraguay
Paraguayans are known just because of their drugs and how easy their girls open their legs for argentinians
T argentinian
Also bolivians are pretty cute to be honest look all native N shit
This.
>and Paraguayans are still quite pure
let me guess, you´ve never visited Paraguay right?
>/misc/ complains about white genocide when the largest instances of actual genocide were done by whites
lmao
I don't see the contradiction. Leftists argue that White genocide isn't happening, or they will say it's a good thing. Leftists will also excuse the Ottoman Empire and that the Turks dindu nuffin while saying the UK "plundered" its colonies. The left is a non-stop psyop and gaslighting movement.
white genocide isn't real but it should be
No genocide is real but it should be be.
>leftists argue that
Nobody cares about your obsession you rightoid homosexual. This is a history board.
>Mongols and Turks and berbers and arabs and savage tribes all did the same thing
But it’s only bad when whites do it, oh wait!!! I guess it’s because we were the best and most efficient at it?
>But it’s only bad when israelites do it, oh wait!!! I guess it’s because they were the best and most efficient at it?
>The spanish and portugese literally fricked entire races and ethnicities into extinction
No they didnt, disease wiped kost of the population out.
>he doesn't know that hundreds of thousands of 99% pure mayans, aimara, guarani and others exist to this day
Iberians fricked anything that breathed and projected a shadow, anglocucks and frenchhomosexuals didn't
Stfu favela monkey
>anglocucks and frenchhomosexuals didn't
what are métis?
Pretty common for the Germans
And this. But the African women didn’t want the untermensch kraut, so he had do it by force.
Talking about African husband and wife is kind of nonsense as most Africans were and still are polygamous. This excerpts of who knows what hardly proves anything. Unless you are /believe experts/ nerd.
What. They literally can't subscribe to racial purity ideologies if they do shit like this. Continental Europeans are really a bunch of rapists.
India does the same, as do the Chinese. Congrats, you learned that dudes are willing to bend the rules for pussy.
The ethnic Chinese (Hoa) in Vietnam were particularly noted for this kind of double-standard.
I'm a White Supremacist who has fricked his share of black women, it really isn't that big a deal unless you make it official with marriage or having children (and acknowledging them as yours). I only ever support White political interests have a White fiancee now.
Also, having sex with the enemy's women has long been a form of demographic warfare. Soldiers mass raping enemies they consider subhuman is so common it's practically universal. It's not strange or unusual whatsoever.
Ew disgustin. Putting your pee pee into the dark smelly hole .
This was before nazism.
>Continental Europeans are really a bunch of rapists.
All of humanity raped through history. It's what we all share, there never was a people that never raped. Through rape unity.
why do I keep reading that as Hetero women?
abos have been thoroughly bleached
when the portuguese where around a lot
spanish too
ans even the women mixing with native men
oh sorry just saw you meant for 19th century
there was still records of lots of important people that were mestizos in that time so it still happened just not as much since Portugal didnt send many people to africa as they did to america or asia
again the other countries didnt partake in this nearly as much as the portuguese
>throwing away your everlasting soul for Indian pussy
Based
> "Brother Aguilar; I am married and have three children, and they look on me as a cacique (lord) here, and captain in time of war. My face is tattooed and my ears are pierced. What would the Spaniards say about me if they saw me like this? Go and God's blessing be with you, for you have seen how handsome these children of mine are. Please give me some of those beads you have brought to give to them and I will tell them that my brothers have sent them from my own country."
Guess
French
The Belgians: are they human?
In Europe they act good enough but away from home they do become monsters.
... the germans mustered a giraffe army? I don't get that one.
It's saying that the Germans were so obsessed with order and militarism that they even taught the Giraffes how to goosestep. It's parodying how various European powers conducted themselves in Africa during colonialism. The English were there to extract gold from the Africans, the French were there to frick everything in sight, the Belgians were there to do crazy fricked-up mutilation and shit like that.
No but it's the most famous one because Anglos were involved
>new imperialism
Huh?
The Italian fascists literally wrote a song about fricking black women.
prolly common
i mean why not
What do Carib women look like
Pure Native Caribs don't exist anymore, they are pretty much extinct
Colombian Amerindians are closely related to pre-columbian Caribs
native women all looked like anime characters
How moronic are you to ask this question. How many full blood natives do you still see? It was obviously very common which is why Hispanics exist and come in many different skin tones