How is racism a modern construct when it existed well throughout the ancient world?
Hippocrates:
> Those who live in a region which is mountainous, rough, high, and well-watered, where the changes of the seasons show marked differences, are likely to be tall, well suited for endurance and courage, and such natures are likely to possess quite a lot of wildness and ferocity. Those who inhabit low-lying regions, that are grassy, marshy, and have more hot than cool winds, and where there is hot water, those will be neither tall nor well-shaped, but tend to be stocky, fleshy, and dark-haired; they themselves are dark rather than blonde, more susceptible to phlegm than to bile. Similarly, courage and endurance are not by nature part of their character, but the imposition of law may produce them artificially.
No you're wrong.
Your example would be people calling Mixed Martial Arts UFC and saying it didn't exist until Dana white started his company. Completely ignoring other forms of mixed marital art because it didn't apply to specific contexts within the modern day and ignoring how companies like UFC are formed from people evolving things from ancient times. Claiming they're entirely separate is moronic.
Racism is blasphemy against the anti-white faith. It doesn't mean anything objective.
>if you don't oppress non-whites, then you hate whites
Classic.
This is true, though. If you aren't willing to kill everyone who's different, you are a traitor.
You have a loyalty to your ingroups by affiliation. And the end goal is to make your deepest group have power over all other groups.
I don't believe in that
It's more like to defend you group at all costs
Left-wing people are anti-white because they want unfair anti-white discrimination; demographic change and parrot anti-white historical narratives to justify it all.
>more susceptible to phlegm than to bile
racetards this is your mindset
This is hippocrates, this is ancient philosophy. Welcome to history.
Simply because racism is one of the most ill defined ideas in common use, nobody has an idea what it entails and when it started
It's not ill defined any more than colours are. It's simply become deeply unpopular due to the elites enforcing conformity on post-colonial nations.
>le European master race was concieved through racemixing between ooga booga farmers and steppeBlack folk
>"le racemixing is bad because...it just is ok?!?!?!?!"
Yes, because you're having children that are not of your own, thus, losing your phenotype/genotype.
>your children
>not of your own
>your
>not of your
Smartest /misc/Black person right here.
Yes, not of your own, or more accurately, not of our own.
Which means you have non-white children.
You literally can't have children that "aren't your own". That's an oxymoron. Why are you so moronic? Are you just falseflagging to make people who hold these opinions look stupid?
Then whose children is it then?
What i said was that they are not white so they don't belong to the tribe.
You don't have any children.
The only ooga boogas were the WHGroids
Except the point doesn't stand. You didn't even understand my post.
>RACISM IN ANCIENT TIME DIDN'T EXIST BECAUSE , WELL WE CHANGED THE WORD !
Based moron. OP is calling you out, you just replied with the same shit.
>you just turned a specific concept
Ok explain racism, as it is a specific concept it shouldn't be hard. Of course I am asking for modern day racism, so you must explain how it's completely unrelated to what OP said.
Because ask yourself this question: do you agree with what Hippocrates said? Does it still apply and make sense today? Are all people who live in rough or flat terrain the same physically and psychologically or did he base this on a few observations?
> has specific connotation
Ok list them moron. We both know you can't because you're full of shit. You keep saying specific but you can't point to any thing specifically.
>demonstrable by the fact that greeks didnt even have the term "racism",
Now you've been clearly exposed as a moron, you don't get any more (you)
The term racism only came about recently and was never used by race typlogists.
Aristotle:
> The peoples of cold countries generally, and particularly those of Europe, are full of spirit, but deficient in skill and intelligence; and this is why they continue to remain comparatively free, but attain no political development and show no capacity for governing others. The peoples of Asia are endowed with skill and intelligence, but are deficient in spirit; and this is why they continue to be peoples of subjects and slaves. The Greek stock,64 intermediate in geographical position,65 unites the qualities of both sets of peoples. It possesses both spirit and intelligence: the one quality makes it continue free; the other enables it to attain the highest political development, and to show a capacity for governing every other people—if only it could once achieve political unity.
All children you have will carry roughly 50% of your alleles. Assuming you avoid close cousin marriage and worse incest, even a mildly inbred child won't carry more than 60% of a parent's alleles.
Ibn khaldun on race:
> The first and second climates are characterized by heat and the black color of their inhabitants; the sixth and seventh by cold and the white skin-color .... The names given to the inhabitants of the first and second climates do not owe their origin to a black man, Ham or any other. For we have seen that the Black folks, normally inhabitants of the south, have established themselves in the temperate fourth climate, and even in the cold seventh climate, but they leave descendants who acquire a white coloring in the course of time. On the other hand, when men from the north or fourth climate dwell in the south, their skins become black in the fullness of time
>How is racism a modern construct when it existed well throughout the ancient world?
It's called historical revisionism. It's the primary tool of the left, they're the modern nazis who think if they lie loud enough and hard enough they can change truth.
They can't.
Nazism is good
Leftism is nothing like nazism
Ethnocentrism existed but they didn’t categorize races into the same groups we do.
It didn't exist in modern forms like with genetics and IQ tests or whatever it actually entails, because racism as a term is nebulous, but on the other hand it existed in its own different form. It boils down to tribalism and xenophobia, but those are also nebulous terms. It's just how it is.