Of course, following the moron is the actual schizo moron. Just another day in IQfy
2 years ago
Anonymous
>le schizo buzzword
Maybe it's been changed but you have to be an idiot to not have known that this is a real thing.
https://petri.com/windows-10-ignoring-hosts-file-specific-name-resolution/
>literally anything closed source must be a NSABOTNET
Could be true but imagine using 100% FOSS, the freetard life fricking sucks shit for many needs. Also I work in areas where all installed software needs to go passed like possibly-glowing auditors or whatever and they let it in so idk.
Anyway it's pretty obvious why it would be shilled here. It's extremely useful and simple and fast and light.
find -name "file"
t. never used Everything, imagine walking the entire fs every time you search. Everything is more like mlocate for winblows.
So tell me why Windows hasn't incorporated this search? Or why Windows hasn't bought out the guy and hired him?
imagine scanning your fs tree every time you want to perform find operation instead of make a quick lookup into index database.
the best you can get on your moronic OS is to get fs tree from cache stored in RAM, but still your cpu have to process every entry in moronic-like tape stream unironically called "pipe"
>hm... looks interesting >find everything wikipedia page >freeware >developed by david carpenter >search david carpenter on google images >first result is serial killer
kek.
they tried to use a builtin db for the windows version that was going to come out after xp but management kept fricking with the requeriments so much it was extremely late and slow, so they had to quickly make vista to have something to sell and the project was completely discarded
they also wanted C# to be the unified programming lang for windows but it was slow compared to what people was using at the time (C++) so they fricked that up too
apple got this part right with swift
Windows search, as it is, is completely intentional. Microsoft needs to force people to prop up the Bing numbers and serve more ads. If you got the content you wanted quickly on the first search try they wouldn't be able do that.
There are already fully open-source implementations of search that work as good or even better than *shilled software in this thread* in Linux that come as defaults. See for example in KDE with baloo, which is integrated in the file explorer, start menu and krunner. You have also full control over the index files/db and also indexes the contents of files (you can specify even more extensions than the defaults for content-indexing). This is one of the many reasons why I switched to Linux for work purposes.
>closed source
>constantly shilled here
yeah indeed, it really illuminates my path with how much it glows
SIR PLEASE REDEEM
Yeah and if you decide you don't want it anymore, you have to delete everything to get rid of it.
and?
>technology board
>morons never know how to use a fricking firewall
Every time
>he thinks a firewall will stop the baked in whitelists for telemetry domains
Of course, following the moron is the actual schizo moron. Just another day in IQfy
>le schizo buzzword
Maybe it's been changed but you have to be an idiot to not have known that this is a real thing.
https://petri.com/windows-10-ignoring-hosts-file-specific-name-resolution/
>literally anything closed source must be a NSABOTNET
Could be true but imagine using 100% FOSS, the freetard life fricking sucks shit for many needs. Also I work in areas where all installed software needs to go passed like possibly-glowing auditors or whatever and they let it in so idk.
Anyway it's pretty obvious why it would be shilled here. It's extremely useful and simple and fast and light.
t. never used Everything, imagine walking the entire fs every time you search. Everything is more like mlocate for winblows.
Incompetence, mostly?
find -name "file"
imagine scanning your fs tree every time you want to perform find operation instead of make a quick lookup into index database.
the best you can get on your moronic OS is to get fs tree from cache stored in RAM, but still your cpu have to process every entry in moronic-like tape stream unironically called "pipe"
>hm... looks interesting
>find everything wikipedia page
>freeware
>developed by david carpenter
>search david carpenter on google images
>first result is serial killer
kek.
So tell me why Windows hasn't incorporated this search? Or why Windows hasn't bought out the guy and hired him?
Anyone not using this software is missing out.
Microsoft didn't break their search by accident
They are probably just using code from XP and never bothered to improve it since they are constantly redesigning and breaking other stuff
they tried to use a builtin db for the windows version that was going to come out after xp but management kept fricking with the requeriments so much it was extremely late and slow, so they had to quickly make vista to have something to sell and the project was completely discarded
they also wanted C# to be the unified programming lang for windows but it was slow compared to what people was using at the time (C++) so they fricked that up too
apple got this part right with swift
Windows search, as it is, is completely intentional. Microsoft needs to force people to prop up the Bing numbers and serve more ads. If you got the content you wanted quickly on the first search try they wouldn't be able do that.
There are already fully open-source implementations of search that work as good or even better than *shilled software in this thread* in Linux that come as defaults. See for example in KDE with baloo, which is integrated in the file explorer, start menu and krunner. You have also full control over the index files/db and also indexes the contents of files (you can specify even more extensions than the defaults for content-indexing). This is one of the many reasons why I switched to Linux for work purposes.
OpenSUSE