Is it here to stay or will we see it on killedbygoogle.com eventually?
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Is it here to stay or will we see it on killedbygoogle.com eventually?
Is it here to stay or will we see it on killedbygoogle.com eventually?
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
It's only getting bigger, and it's already fairly removed from Google already. They probably couldn't if they wanted to by now
Flutter is going on the list any day now though
they've double downed on flutter as its fuschiaOS's applications are built with it
if fuschia becomes successful so will flutter.
Otherwise its got a lot of competition with xamarin, react native etc.
>if fuschia becomes successful
big if
Different use cases.
It will, all Google needs is full compatibility with current Android Linux and done. Nobody except developers will even notice.
Depends will Google do angular again with the impending Go2 which very likely will not be compatible with Go1. That will kill the Go.
it was dead on arrival
>27057
No it will not killed by google. Sorry.
It won't get killed by google. Stop freaking.
Rust will be seen there eventually
What I don't understand is why people choose go over c#
OOP hate I guess
because they're not moronic. what kind of question is this?
>i dont understand why people chose a good language over one of the absolute worst languages
>Oversimplified = good
Ok now write your 10th for loop for shit that every reasonable language has higher order functions for
it'll use exactly like one line more at the end and be ten times easier to read.
>Easier to read
If you are moronic maybe
and also if you have any experience programming at all and aren't afraid of a scary loop. higher order functions don't give you really any more expressiveness over a one line loop doing the same thing and are simply a more contrived way to write an equivalent block of code. go ahead and bury your c# code in functional spaghetti, but don't ask why anyone would want to use a language where you can be certain any project you find will actually have good programing style.
I dont use c#. I use typescript and golang at work and switching from typescript to golang makes me puke
oh, ok, your opinion is fully invalid gotcha
interface{} says otherwise
not an argument
>Abandoning type safety due to shortcomings of a dumbed down language
>Not an argument
Then what is? The logo? I dont care for that moronic mascot as im not a woman or troony
>cant even figure out how to reply to posts on LULZ properly
ok newfriend. and i don't think you know what type safety is. type assertions exist and it is in fact possible to check if they succeed. in any case nobody will use the empty interface for really any reason in a couple months. they already have no real reason to. it usually is an indicator someone is doing something very wrong unless it's on a really low API level
Yea well guess what in typescript i dont need to check anything because i KNOW. Do you know how it feels to KNOW what datastructure you actually got infront of you without even running it? Maybe you should spent less time making dumb gopher memes and try out some other languages that actually do have a good typesystem.
Dont get your hopes up for the upcoming generics either again this language is made for morons so the implementation of these will be as anything in that language massively dumbed down so even the female diversity hire can be somewhat productive. Maybe a great language if your company was all diversity hires to produce shit tier fast food software but to someone who actually knows what he is doing it doesnt feel fulfilling in the slightest
>I KNOW THE TYPES
>wants generics
lmao what's type erasure
Yes i KNOW. And if i ever dont i have the option to use type guards which i barely ever needed despite having written plenty of generic functions.
Yeah alright if you never need generics in what you do you are exactly the target audience for golang anyway since you are a mcdonalds type code monkey except underpaid and overworked. Why not flip burgers for real at this point?
>talks about compile time type checking
>talk about generics and having to add runtime type checking
tiresome
Its not just in runtime. There are plenty things that can already be catched before running it if you dont use any or in golangs case interface{}. Difference is in typescript you can entirely avoid any while in golang you cant
Please dont tell me what is tiresome if you are part of a community that puts a cringy mascot in everything they have including tshirts
this isn't Java.
there's no type erasure in Go.
the generics are already done, we already know what they're like and they're well implemented. but you will still almost never need them.
every library you will use, will switch to generics.
you should be able to debug the libraries you use.
you will need generics for that.
C# is what most languages should strive for
>gays who use the language don't endlessly complain about the syntax/features of the language on brazillian basket weaving boards
>openly set out to copy another language but just became better
>isn't trying to become the new <insert popular language here> just wants people to get shit done
C# is like a magnitude more complex than Go and breaks backwards-compatibility all the time.
C# is mostly used by blub programmers since everyone else avoided proprietary MS.
Blub programmers do not talk about their boring job in public.
C#'s concurrency primitives are still universally hated:
https://github.com/davidfowl/AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios/blob/master/AsyncGuidance.md
Hope so. I use it at work and i feel dumb everytime because it was made for the lowest common denominator(non whites)