Is this the most embarrassing Soviet defeat ever?

Is this the most embarrassing Soviet defeat ever?

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >today: Russia
    everything you need to know

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >controls 20% of the second most militarized country in Europe after France
      2 more weeks until Ukroid take Moscow

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Second most militarized? I thought it was a homosexual nation that would surrender seconds after Russia invaded? Must be the Ebola pigeons.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Strength has nothing to do with capitulation speed. France was equal to Germany and folded in six weeks. Finland was outnumbered 7 to 1 and held out for three months.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Nope.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Damn. Forgot the image.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Does this count?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >162 soldiers killed
      Who honestly believes this crap?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        afaik, American casualties in war are the only remotely trustworthy numbers. all the rest is just guessing. i digress, the only important part is the result: ukrainian victory.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Didn't realize winning meant giving up Mariupol and Severodonetsk.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Well it certainly doesn't mean having to constantly walk back your victory conditions.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Stop being israeli.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            What do Mariupol and Severodonetsk have to do with the battle for Kiev, moron?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >ukrainian victory
          AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, Ukraine won the Battle of Kiev.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Russia's objective was never to capture/annex Kiev. The "battle" there was a red herring meant to distract the Ukrainiana and tie up their resources and troops near the capital while the Russians gained ground in Donetsk and Luhansk, blow up some weapons depots and other infrastructure while there, then beat a tactical retreat. Their plan worked like a charm.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Russia's objective was never to capture/annex Kiev.
            This is Slava intel tier cope. Russia tried a decapitation strike and failed miserably.
            >The "battle" there was a red herring meant to distract the Ukrainiana and tie up their resources and troops near the capital while the Russians gained ground in Donetsk and Luhansk
            The Russians only seriously began to gain land in the donbass once all of the surviving soldiers from Kiev were redeployed.
            >blow up some weapons depots and other infrastructure while there, then beat a tactical retreat. Their plan worked like a charm.
            Do you consider the vdv getting btfo'd at Hostomel a "charm"?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Russia's objective was never to capture/annex Kiev.
            This is truly a even more moronic recreation of winter war, let me guess, denazification of illegal Ukrainian junta was just a feint?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Their plan worked like a charm.
            is that why they are taking 4x longer than the US against sandBlack folk half a world away with 3x the numbers?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Battle of the Ghost

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    And yet in the decades after the war the finns bent over backwards to appease the Soviet Union to make sure they never invaded them again.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Cope.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        t. burger who thinks America won the Vietnam War.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          you’re using the same type of logic Amerimutts use when they talk about Vietnam.
          >yeah we pissed away 50,000 men and South Vietnam doesn’t exist but there’s a McDonalds in Hanoi so who REALLY won?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            finland had to cede land to the ussr moron

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >eventually a continent-spanning empire was able to defeat its tiny sparsely populated neighbour with barely any history as a nation
      Wow. Still embarrassing.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Izbushensky was pretty embarassing. 2,000 reds defeated by a bunch of wops on horses.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >foreign participation
      surely the Germans should also be included in this? I don't think any of them were Tsaritsyn natives

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >they lost a battle
      >to ITALY
      >the mentally moronic little brother of the axis
      s-soviet bros i'm not feeling so good

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >he doesn't know that the Soviets were against the Khmer Rouge
        >he doesn't know that Misc Pot was a blatant CIA plant

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >North Vietnam spends years training up and supplying Khmer Rouge, despite every indication Misc Pot was a xenophobic nutjob that thought the Vietnamese were innately capitalist
          >Khmer Rouge comes to power, chimps out on newly-unified Vietnam over land Cambodia lost centuries ago
          >...

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Vietnam was training and supplying three separate commie groups in Cambodia. Misc Pot just happened to become the strongest one. The remnants of the other two remained loyal to Vietnam and got purged just before the war.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        whiter and blonder than you mutt

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There were tremendous battles which Soviets lost, have hidden in their archives, are sealed from German sources and, as the UK and US go along with whatever israelites want, none of the other allies mention.

    Not until Germany's restoration may we have some accurate idea of how badly israelite's forces were stomped in the East.

    From what records we do have, Germany's k:d was 1.5:1 minimum against the US, even in battles they retreated from, and 2:1 minimum against the USSR.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No, that would be 1991

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *